1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:03,560 So back at Computex, when Intel did that weird demo 2 00:00:03,560 --> 00:00:05,760 on stage where they had this like, 3 00:00:05,760 --> 00:00:09,280 this like chilled liquid cooled 28 core 4 00:00:09,280 --> 00:00:11,660 overclocked processor, 5 00:00:11,660 --> 00:00:13,880 I don't think anyone could figure out 6 00:00:13,880 --> 00:00:17,760 what exactly it was they were trying to accomplish. 7 00:00:17,760 --> 00:00:21,080 Even Intel themselves didn't seem to know what was going on 8 00:00:21,080 --> 00:00:25,480 because that same CPU, although not cooled by chilled liquid 9 00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:28,980 was actually on display the next day 10 00:00:28,980 --> 00:00:31,820 with their board partners like ASUS, 11 00:00:31,820 --> 00:00:34,260 only to be quickly yanked away 12 00:00:34,260 --> 00:00:37,340 and then we haven't heard anything about it since then, 13 00:00:37,340 --> 00:00:41,740 except for a leaked roadmap that seems to suggest 14 00:00:41,740 --> 00:00:44,960 that Intel is planning what appears to be 15 00:00:44,960 --> 00:00:49,960 a knee jerk reaction to AMD's 32 core Threadripper 2, 16 00:00:50,980 --> 00:00:55,080 a 28 core based on as far as we can tell, 17 00:00:55,080 --> 00:00:58,840 a similar platform to their existing Xeon Platinum. 18 00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:01,180 Now, I don't know what segment they're gonna target 19 00:01:01,180 --> 00:01:04,060 with this, a workstation, enthusiast, 20 00:01:04,060 --> 00:01:06,100 people with more money than brains, 21 00:01:06,100 --> 00:01:09,220 but whatever it is, I realized something. 22 00:01:09,220 --> 00:01:12,040 We actually have in our hands, 23 00:01:12,040 --> 00:01:15,340 both the 32 core Threadripper 2 24 00:01:15,340 --> 00:01:19,540 and Intel Xeon Platinum 8180, 25 00:01:19,540 --> 00:01:23,000 which rumor has it will be very similar 26 00:01:23,000 --> 00:01:24,840 to the upcoming enthusiast chip, 27 00:01:24,840 --> 00:01:26,700 albeit without overclocking. 28 00:01:26,700 --> 00:01:28,840 So today we are gonna put them 29 00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:31,160 head to head as a preview 30 00:01:31,160 --> 00:01:35,020 of the ultimate heavyweight showdown of CPUs 31 00:01:35,020 --> 00:01:37,920 we're not sure who is going to buy. 32 00:01:37,920 --> 00:01:40,820 And the whole thing is brought to you by Videoblocks. 33 00:01:40,820 --> 00:01:43,380 Videoblocks is a great subscription-based resource 34 00:01:43,380 --> 00:01:46,260 for downloading stock footage, video, and more. 35 00:01:46,260 --> 00:01:57,790 Check it out at the link in the video description. 36 00:01:57,790 --> 00:01:59,730 So while Ivan puts the finishing touch 37 00:01:59,730 --> 00:02:02,870 on our LGA 3647 bench over there, 38 00:02:02,870 --> 00:02:05,390 I'm gonna walk you through what are otherwise 39 00:02:05,390 --> 00:02:06,890 as identical as we can get them to be. 40 00:02:06,890 --> 00:02:08,590 We can get them test rigs. 41 00:02:08,590 --> 00:02:12,130 So in here, we've got a Threadripper 32 core. 42 00:02:12,130 --> 00:02:15,250 We've got a Noctua 120 millimeter tower cooler. 43 00:02:15,250 --> 00:02:17,050 We've got a Zenith Xtreme motherboard 44 00:02:17,050 --> 00:02:21,050 with what I believe is 32 gigs of RAM, 32 gigs, right? 45 00:02:21,050 --> 00:02:21,890 Yeah, it should be. 46 00:02:21,890 --> 00:02:26,550 And then we've got a GTX 1080, Samsung 840 Pro SSD, 47 00:02:26,550 --> 00:02:29,510 and an RM850i power supply. 48 00:02:29,510 --> 00:02:31,570 Now, bear in mind that any results 49 00:02:31,570 --> 00:02:33,870 that we show you guys for this guy 50 00:02:33,870 --> 00:02:36,770 have to be taken with a significant grain 51 00:02:36,770 --> 00:02:39,710 of salt because Intel will have at least, I think, 52 00:02:39,710 --> 00:02:43,010 a couple of months to tune the consumer version of this 53 00:02:43,010 --> 00:02:45,310 before you would ever be able to buy one. 54 00:02:45,310 --> 00:02:47,670 Not that most people would ever be able to buy one. 55 00:02:47,670 --> 00:02:49,270 Like, this is 10 grand. 56 00:02:49,270 --> 00:02:51,610 So we don't know how much or how little they're planning 57 00:02:51,610 --> 00:02:53,370 to slash the price compared to the Pro one, 58 00:02:53,370 --> 00:02:55,790 but like, it ain't gonna be cheap. 59 00:02:55,790 --> 00:03:00,090 So this guy right here has got same power supply, 60 00:03:00,090 --> 00:03:03,530 same cooler, sort of, except it's like a modified version 61 00:03:03,530 --> 00:03:05,890 that works with LGA 3647. 62 00:03:05,890 --> 00:03:06,570 Thank you, Noctua, for that. 63 00:03:06,570 --> 00:03:07,750 Thank you, Noctua, for sending that over. 64 00:03:07,750 --> 00:03:10,150 We've got them both hooked up to power meters, 65 00:03:10,150 --> 00:03:14,690 and then it's running an ASUS Z11PA-U12. 66 00:03:14,690 --> 00:03:18,210 It's got the same GeForce GTX 1080 Founder's Edition, 67 00:03:18,210 --> 00:03:21,050 and then it is, of course, running a Xeon Platinum 8180. 68 00:03:21,050 --> 00:03:24,310 Now, the RAM, this is something that could affect our results, 69 00:03:24,310 --> 00:03:27,090 but we had to use what's compatible with our CPU. 70 00:03:27,090 --> 00:03:31,210 So this is DDR4-2666 ECC memory, 71 00:03:31,210 --> 00:03:36,730 the same stuff from our six workstations, one CPU project. 72 00:03:36,730 --> 00:03:38,300 Hey, it's done. 73 00:03:38,300 --> 00:03:41,730 Here we go. 74 00:03:41,730 --> 00:03:43,320 Is this broken? 75 00:03:43,320 --> 00:03:45,780 This CPU, what, what, what, what, what, what, what? 76 00:03:45,780 --> 00:03:48,820 Okay, adding another boulder-sized grain of salt 77 00:03:48,820 --> 00:03:53,020 to this whole experience is that this latest BIOS 78 00:03:53,020 --> 00:03:57,780 we just flashed no longer supports the 8180 CPU, 79 00:03:57,780 --> 00:03:59,260 probably, if I had to guess, 80 00:03:59,260 --> 00:04:03,960 because of its massive 205-watt TDP. 81 00:04:03,960 --> 00:04:08,000 So we're gonna have to go back in time to another BIOS 82 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:10,000 in order to run our comparison. 83 00:04:11,960 --> 00:04:16,200 And four hours later, we finally have the solution. 84 00:04:16,200 --> 00:04:17,020 You know what? 85 00:04:17,020 --> 00:04:17,940 Screw it. 86 00:04:17,940 --> 00:04:19,180 We're just gonna run our... 87 00:04:22,050 --> 00:04:25,050 We're just gonna run the light of a thousand suns 88 00:04:25,050 --> 00:04:27,150 directly into Ivan's eyes. 89 00:04:27,150 --> 00:04:28,950 Spawning into my soul. 90 00:04:28,950 --> 00:04:29,790 Sorry about that. 91 00:04:29,790 --> 00:04:32,770 Anyway, none of the BIOSes we tried worked, 92 00:04:32,770 --> 00:04:34,970 and we downloaded, like, one of the earliest ones 93 00:04:34,970 --> 00:04:36,390 that should have been the same as what we had, 94 00:04:36,390 --> 00:04:38,510 and it was corrupt right off AC system. 95 00:04:38,510 --> 00:04:39,790 Whatever, it doesn't matter. 96 00:04:39,790 --> 00:04:41,870 Point is, we're just using our dual-socket board, 97 00:04:41,870 --> 00:04:43,670 with a single CPU, 98 00:04:43,670 --> 00:04:46,550 where the only real consideration performance-wise 99 00:04:46,550 --> 00:04:48,770 is we have to make sure we use a PCI Express slot 100 00:04:48,770 --> 00:04:50,530 that is connected to that socket. 101 00:04:50,530 --> 00:04:51,630 So everything's hunky-dory. 102 00:04:51,630 --> 00:04:54,230 This is effectively the same 103 00:04:54,230 --> 00:04:56,510 apples-ish to apples-ish comparison, 104 00:04:56,510 --> 00:04:58,490 and we are ready to go. 105 00:04:58,490 --> 00:05:01,350 So naturally, I'm sure the first thing you guys 106 00:05:01,350 --> 00:05:04,870 are gonna wanna see after the task manager porn, 107 00:05:04,870 --> 00:05:09,330 56 threads on this one, 64 threads on this one, 108 00:05:09,330 --> 00:05:10,670 is probably gonna be Cinebench, right? 109 00:05:10,670 --> 00:05:13,030 It's gotta be Cinebench. 110 00:05:13,030 --> 00:05:15,170 Boom! 111 00:05:15,170 --> 00:05:18,670 Who will finish first? 112 00:05:18,670 --> 00:05:20,610 Wow, those are both super fast, 113 00:05:20,610 --> 00:05:24,310 but one of them looks a little faster. 114 00:05:24,310 --> 00:05:26,370 One of them looks a fair bit faster. 115 00:05:26,370 --> 00:05:27,210 Whoa! 116 00:05:28,700 --> 00:05:32,720 AMD is a good 20% ahead, which makes sense, 117 00:05:32,720 --> 00:05:37,720 because even though Threadripper 2's performance per clock 118 00:05:37,860 --> 00:05:41,520 is lower than Intel's Skylake architecture, 119 00:05:41,520 --> 00:05:43,480 they do have a core advantage, 120 00:05:43,480 --> 00:05:46,860 so they have four more cores, and watch this. 121 00:05:46,860 --> 00:05:49,140 We're gonna go ahead, we're gonna run the test again, 122 00:05:49,140 --> 00:05:51,000 and we're gonna have a look at what our clock speeds are 123 00:05:51,000 --> 00:05:52,040 while they're going. 124 00:05:52,040 --> 00:05:55,940 So you can see here, AMD is turboing up higher 125 00:05:55,940 --> 00:05:59,590 when you're hitting all the cores compared to Intel. 126 00:05:59,590 --> 00:06:05,100 So round one goes to the Threadripper 2990WX. 127 00:06:05,100 --> 00:06:10,390 Test number two, the V-Ray benchmark from Chaos Group. 128 00:06:10,390 --> 00:06:14,400 So we're running the CPU benchmark here. 129 00:06:14,400 --> 00:06:16,760 Here we go, our AMD processor is pinned, 130 00:06:16,760 --> 00:06:19,120 our Intel processor is pinned. 131 00:06:19,120 --> 00:06:23,040 AMD's looking pretty good here too, wow. 132 00:06:23,040 --> 00:06:26,290 And done. 133 00:06:26,290 --> 00:06:29,410 Okay, no matter which one of these things you buy, 134 00:06:29,410 --> 00:06:33,140 you're gonna be like going super fast, 135 00:06:33,140 --> 00:06:37,040 and three seconds doesn't seem like a lot of difference, 136 00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:42,040 but three seconds out of 30 is 10% faster for Threadripper 2. 137 00:06:43,410 --> 00:06:44,810 This is great. 138 00:06:44,810 --> 00:06:46,150 Tell us more about your gear. 139 00:06:46,150 --> 00:06:47,070 Are you overclocking? 140 00:06:47,070 --> 00:06:48,730 Is it liquid cooling or anything else ingenious 141 00:06:48,730 --> 00:06:51,260 for getting a performance boost? 142 00:06:51,260 --> 00:06:53,540 Does it show that every time? 143 00:06:53,540 --> 00:06:56,340 Or is it just when you're like bananas? 144 00:06:56,340 --> 00:07:01,410 Hey Anthony, you ever seen this in the V-Ray benchmark? 145 00:07:01,610 --> 00:07:02,890 It did it on both of these. 146 00:07:02,890 --> 00:07:04,910 I wonder if there's some kind of a threshold. 147 00:07:04,910 --> 00:07:07,330 Clearly that's a tailored message. 148 00:07:07,330 --> 00:07:09,160 Yeah. 149 00:07:09,160 --> 00:07:10,620 No, we're not doing anything ingenious, 150 00:07:10,620 --> 00:07:13,120 just spending lots of money. 151 00:07:13,120 --> 00:07:14,720 So for our blender test, 152 00:07:14,720 --> 00:07:17,760 we're going to be rendering the classroom scene. 153 00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:21,180 And this one will probably actually take a couple minutes. 154 00:07:21,180 --> 00:07:22,640 So we'll come back in just a moment here. 155 00:07:22,640 --> 00:07:24,000 Man, that's a lot of cores. 156 00:07:24,000 --> 00:07:27,240 It's beautiful. 157 00:07:27,240 --> 00:07:30,300 You can even just feel the heat coming off these things. 158 00:07:30,300 --> 00:07:32,120 This does seem like a good opportunity 159 00:07:32,120 --> 00:07:33,600 to remind you guys though, 160 00:07:33,600 --> 00:07:36,440 that this is not the actual product. 161 00:07:36,440 --> 00:07:39,840 This is just the closest thing that we have to it now. 162 00:07:39,840 --> 00:07:40,860 This is cool though, 163 00:07:40,860 --> 00:07:43,400 compared to that burn test we were running before, 164 00:07:43,400 --> 00:07:46,380 it's turboing much higher in real world applications, 165 00:07:46,380 --> 00:07:48,420 even though the usage is a hundred percent. 166 00:07:48,420 --> 00:07:51,000 So it looks like they might be detecting 167 00:07:51,000 --> 00:07:53,380 stress testing applications and throttling down. 168 00:07:53,380 --> 00:07:56,500 Anyway, so that's interesting to know. 169 00:07:56,500 --> 00:07:57,860 In terms of power consumption, 170 00:07:57,860 --> 00:08:00,800 this is one area where Intel's looking a little bit better. 171 00:08:00,800 --> 00:08:04,100 Our Threadripper 2 machine is pulling 380 watts 172 00:08:04,100 --> 00:08:04,940 from the wall. 173 00:08:04,940 --> 00:08:07,320 Remember, this is before we've even touched the GPU, 174 00:08:07,320 --> 00:08:09,620 and this is with no overclocking on either of them, 175 00:08:09,620 --> 00:08:11,020 because our Xeon won't overclock, 176 00:08:11,020 --> 00:08:13,280 whereas we don't know what Intel's planning to do 177 00:08:13,280 --> 00:08:15,020 with the real chip that's coming. 178 00:08:15,020 --> 00:08:18,380 And then Intel's pulling about 265 watts. 179 00:08:18,620 --> 00:08:19,460 It's crazy. 180 00:08:19,460 --> 00:08:22,080 They both feel like space heaters, you know? 181 00:08:22,080 --> 00:08:25,590 With the fans, even with these fans running at full speed, 182 00:08:25,590 --> 00:08:27,050 and these are nice fans. 183 00:08:27,050 --> 00:08:32,440 Oh boy, this is not looking amazing for Intel right now. 184 00:08:33,900 --> 00:08:37,340 Threadripper 2 already chewed through 185 00:08:37,340 --> 00:08:42,420 the first segment of the test, and I think it's done. 186 00:08:42,420 --> 00:08:45,970 Wow. 187 00:08:45,970 --> 00:08:49,840 Just under five minutes for Classroom, 188 00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:51,700 whereas Intel, 189 00:08:51,700 --> 00:08:54,210 we're at 515, 190 00:08:54,210 --> 00:08:57,810 and it hasn't even finished the initial render. 191 00:08:57,810 --> 00:09:03,090 545. 192 00:09:03,090 --> 00:09:07,650 I don't think I ever thought I would see it again. 193 00:09:07,650 --> 00:09:12,330 AMD's top of the line versus Intel's top of the line, 194 00:09:12,330 --> 00:09:17,480 and it just being a blowout. 195 00:09:17,480 --> 00:09:20,120 So that concludes the productivity segment of our testing, 196 00:09:20,120 --> 00:09:25,080 and now we're gonna do what neither Intel nor AMD 197 00:09:25,080 --> 00:09:27,420 is gonna be particularly stoked on. 198 00:09:27,680 --> 00:09:29,080 We're gonna fire up some games. 199 00:09:29,080 --> 00:09:31,900 So starting with CSGO. 200 00:09:31,900 --> 00:09:34,940 Well, if CSGO is anything to go by, 201 00:09:34,940 --> 00:09:37,560 Intel looks like they're gonna have a bit better of a time 202 00:09:37,560 --> 00:09:38,660 when it comes to gaming. 203 00:09:38,660 --> 00:09:41,960 With that said, CSGO is known to heavily favor 204 00:09:41,960 --> 00:09:46,920 Intel's current chips versus AMD's Zen-based chips. 205 00:09:46,920 --> 00:09:47,900 Oh boy. 206 00:09:47,900 --> 00:09:53,750 Average frame rate, 310.21 207 00:09:53,750 --> 00:09:56,330 versus 297.85. 208 00:09:56,330 --> 00:09:58,460 That doesn't seem right. 209 00:09:58,460 --> 00:09:59,300 Because in game- 210 00:09:59,300 --> 00:10:02,060 This was so much higher. 211 00:10:02,060 --> 00:10:03,800 Hex? 212 00:10:03,800 --> 00:10:04,760 I have an alibi. 213 00:10:04,760 --> 00:10:06,720 Yeah, I don't know what just happened there. 214 00:10:06,720 --> 00:10:08,280 There's like, there's no way. 215 00:10:08,280 --> 00:10:11,620 Okay, well take those results with even more salt 216 00:10:11,620 --> 00:10:13,260 than the rest of this video, 217 00:10:13,260 --> 00:10:14,920 because there's no way that's right. 218 00:10:14,920 --> 00:10:16,970 That doesn't make any sense. 219 00:10:16,970 --> 00:10:18,330 All right. 220 00:10:18,330 --> 00:10:21,500 Our test is done. 221 00:10:21,500 --> 00:10:24,180 We can go ahead and quit the game. 222 00:10:24,180 --> 00:10:25,020 Okay. 223 00:10:25,020 --> 00:10:26,260 So these are more like the numbers 224 00:10:26,260 --> 00:10:28,780 we were expecting to see in CSGO. 225 00:10:28,780 --> 00:10:29,880 That brings us to our- 226 00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:31,260 Our final game. 227 00:10:31,260 --> 00:10:32,820 Shadow of the Tomb Raider. 228 00:10:32,820 --> 00:10:34,700 How to benchmark on the same account 229 00:10:34,700 --> 00:10:37,530 with two PCs at once. 230 00:10:37,530 --> 00:10:40,530 You gotta do the Ethernet cable shuffle. 231 00:10:40,530 --> 00:10:41,510 It goes like this. 232 00:10:45,260 --> 00:10:48,780 Play game. 233 00:10:48,780 --> 00:10:52,360 Here we go. 234 00:10:52,360 --> 00:10:54,340 Now this is closer. 235 00:10:54,340 --> 00:10:56,020 This is really close. 236 00:10:56,020 --> 00:10:58,120 With all these character models, 237 00:10:58,120 --> 00:11:02,620 Intel is actually enjoying a pretty significant advantage. 238 00:11:02,620 --> 00:11:04,200 Average FPS, 100. 239 00:11:04,200 --> 00:11:06,000 Average FPS, 87. 240 00:11:06,000 --> 00:11:07,080 So, a significant advantage. 241 00:11:07,080 --> 00:11:12,500 But it should be noted that a gaming advantage 242 00:11:14,620 --> 00:11:16,280 from one of these CPUs to the other 243 00:11:16,280 --> 00:11:18,200 is not particularly meaningful. 244 00:11:18,200 --> 00:11:19,880 If you wanted to game, 245 00:11:19,880 --> 00:11:24,320 you would run out and you would buy a secondhand 7700K 246 00:11:24,320 --> 00:11:26,220 and overclock the snot out of it. 247 00:11:26,220 --> 00:11:28,380 Oh right, thermals. 248 00:11:28,380 --> 00:11:29,840 We're not done yet. 249 00:11:29,840 --> 00:11:31,320 So we already have a pretty good idea 250 00:11:31,320 --> 00:11:32,400 of what we're gonna see here, 251 00:11:32,400 --> 00:11:35,200 simply because the power consumption 252 00:11:35,200 --> 00:11:37,500 on Intel's platform was so much lower. 253 00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:40,040 Yeah, so this is consistent with what we saw before 254 00:11:40,040 --> 00:11:43,680 with Intel's cores coming in about five degrees lower. 255 00:11:43,680 --> 00:11:46,340 So there you have it, guys. 256 00:11:46,340 --> 00:11:48,220 I said it before, but it bears repeating. 257 00:11:48,220 --> 00:11:50,820 Take everything you saw here with a grain of salt 258 00:11:50,820 --> 00:11:52,860 because we don't know what, if anything, 259 00:11:52,860 --> 00:11:55,300 Intel will change about the real product 260 00:11:55,300 --> 00:11:57,280 that they're supposedly coming out with. 261 00:11:57,280 --> 00:11:59,160 I mean, something like an increase 262 00:11:59,160 --> 00:12:01,580 to the all-core boost frequencies 263 00:12:01,580 --> 00:12:03,980 could make a significant difference 264 00:12:03,980 --> 00:12:05,980 to the results that we got today. 265 00:12:05,980 --> 00:12:07,480 But what it looks like? 266 00:12:07,480 --> 00:12:08,360 But what it looks like? 267 00:12:08,360 --> 00:12:13,360 For now, is that for the first time in over a decade, 268 00:12:14,180 --> 00:12:18,900 in a pure who's got the biggest wheelie competition, 269 00:12:18,900 --> 00:12:20,880 because I don't know that we would necessarily 270 00:12:20,880 --> 00:12:24,660 put a two-thumbs-up recommendation behind either of these, 271 00:12:24,660 --> 00:12:26,990 depending on pricing, 272 00:12:26,990 --> 00:12:32,680 AMD might have the bigger wheelie. 273 00:12:32,680 --> 00:12:35,340 Who'da thunk it? 274 00:12:35,340 --> 00:12:36,960 And this wheelie measuring contest 275 00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:39,960 was brought to you, of course, by Videoblocks. 276 00:12:39,960 --> 00:12:41,080 Videoblocks is the place 277 00:12:41,080 --> 00:12:44,440 to get studio-quality footage for a fraction of the cost, 278 00:12:44,440 --> 00:12:45,900 and we use it all the time, 279 00:12:45,900 --> 00:12:48,020 particularly on our Techquickie channel. 280 00:12:48,020 --> 00:12:49,400 With Videoblocks, you can download 281 00:12:49,400 --> 00:12:51,160 all the stock video your heart desires 282 00:12:51,160 --> 00:12:52,260 from their member library, 283 00:12:52,260 --> 00:12:54,740 including HD and 4K footage, 284 00:12:54,740 --> 00:12:57,500 After Effects templates, motion backgrounds, and more. 285 00:12:57,500 --> 00:12:59,780 Plus, you can get exclusive discounts 286 00:12:59,780 --> 00:13:02,400 on millions of additional Marketplace clips 287 00:13:02,400 --> 00:13:05,700 where you save 40% on every purchase compared to non-members, 288 00:13:05,700 --> 00:13:08,400 and the original artists take home a commission 289 00:13:08,400 --> 00:13:10,100 of the sale price. 290 00:13:10,100 --> 00:13:10,900 All the content is royalty free, so if you're interested, 291 00:13:10,900 --> 00:13:14,020 you can use it for commercial and personal projects, 292 00:13:14,020 --> 00:13:15,260 such as YouTube videos, 293 00:13:15,260 --> 00:13:17,120 and new clips get added regularly, 294 00:13:17,120 --> 00:13:19,140 so there's always something new to check out. 295 00:13:19,140 --> 00:13:22,760 So head to the link in the video description to learn more. 296 00:13:22,760 --> 00:13:23,700 So thanks for watching, guys. 297 00:13:23,700 --> 00:13:24,960 If you disliked this video, 298 00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:27,540 then clearly you're not into, like, 299 00:13:27,540 --> 00:13:29,560 you know, heavyweight title fights, 300 00:13:29,560 --> 00:13:31,660 because that's basically what we saw today. 301 00:13:31,660 --> 00:13:33,520 But if you did like it, hit that like button, 302 00:13:33,520 --> 00:13:35,200 get subscribed, maybe consider checking out 303 00:13:35,200 --> 00:13:37,520 where to buy the stuff we featured 304 00:13:37,520 --> 00:13:39,380 at the link in the video description. 305 00:13:39,380 --> 00:13:40,740 Just like, you know, 306 00:13:40,740 --> 00:13:42,620 you open up your wallet, 307 00:13:42,620 --> 00:13:45,020 you start, you know, pulling out the cash, 308 00:13:45,020 --> 00:13:47,000 and then the credit cards, you know what? 309 00:13:47,000 --> 00:13:49,860 Forget it, just take the whole thing, right? 310 00:13:49,860 --> 00:13:51,860 So what else was I gonna say? 311 00:13:51,860 --> 00:13:52,940 Right, our merch store. 312 00:13:52,940 --> 00:13:53,980 You can check that out at the link 313 00:13:53,980 --> 00:13:54,820 in the video description. 314 00:13:54,820 --> 00:13:56,560 Also, we have our community forum down there, 315 00:13:56,560 --> 00:13:57,960 which you should totally join.