WEBVTT

00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:05.759
i don't think i can remember the last time i had a wish granted this quickly

00:00:03.679 --> 00:00:10.559
so in our recent video collab with gav from the slow-mo guys we investigated

00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:14.880
the real-world benefits of high refresh rate monitors for gamers and we found

00:00:13.040 --> 00:00:20.000
ourselves at the time wishing that we had even higher refresh rate displays to

00:00:18.160 --> 00:00:22.800
further improve the accuracy of our results

00:00:21.199 --> 00:00:27.920
and ASUS must have been watching or something because they reached out to

00:00:24.800 --> 00:00:31.039
sponsor a video about their prototype

00:00:27.920 --> 00:00:32.000
rog zephyrus laptop with the world's

00:00:31.039 --> 00:00:37.680
first 300 hertz display

00:00:35.520 --> 00:00:42.680
300 refreshes per second

00:00:49.680 --> 00:00:56.559
all right look at him run around this is only running at like 100 150 frames per

00:00:54.559 --> 00:01:00.480
second right now it's pretty good i guess but basically peasant stuff as far

00:00:58.480 --> 00:01:03.760
as this laptop is concerned anyway

00:01:01.520 --> 00:01:07.520
ASUS has long been a believer when it comes to the benefit of high refresh

00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:13.040
rate gaming laptops they were first to 120 hertz in 2016 first to 144hz the

00:01:10.479 --> 00:01:16.720
following year they showed 240 hertz earlier this year and now they're

00:01:15.119 --> 00:01:21.520
ratcheting it up again but as soos sponsor talking points aside

00:01:19.680 --> 00:01:27.200
this product raised a lot of questions for me that

00:01:24.240 --> 00:01:31.680
need to be answered how did they do it are there any trade-offs who can benefit

00:01:29.600 --> 00:01:36.560
from this how much is this going to cost me and where did Linus get that super

00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:41.600
cool hard drive shirt that he's wearing ltdstore.com

00:01:38.799 --> 00:01:45.920
anyway let's start with how they did it thanks to the existing embedded

00:01:43.600 --> 00:01:52.000
displayport 1.4 interface between the GPU and the panel in the gx701 there was

00:01:49.920 --> 00:01:58.799
already enough bandwidth available to make a 300hz display basically a drop-in

00:01:56.079 --> 00:02:03.119
replacement from ASUS's side but the engineering on the display itself wasn't

00:02:01.200 --> 00:02:08.160
quite as simple now unfortunately auo the makers of this

00:02:05.759 --> 00:02:12.239
particular unit right here wouldn't share the exact details of the jump to

00:02:10.720 --> 00:02:17.360
300 hertz something something proprietary blah

00:02:14.160 --> 00:02:19.280
blah trade secrets etc but to give you

00:02:17.360 --> 00:02:23.120
some idea of what they've probably been up to i can tell you about some of the

00:02:21.280 --> 00:02:28.959
technological challenges that had to be solved to go from 120 to 144 hertz a

00:02:27.200 --> 00:02:33.680
couple of years back so it was a collaborative effort that

00:02:30.959 --> 00:02:38.959
went outside of the tech industry as you'd think of it and included not only

00:02:35.760 --> 00:02:39.920
ASUS and auo but even chemical giant

00:02:38.959 --> 00:02:44.879
merck here's the thing you can drive any

00:02:42.319 --> 00:02:49.920
crappy lcd panel at whatever refresh rate you want but unless the true

00:02:47.840 --> 00:02:54.720
gray-to-gray response times of the pixels themselves are fast enough to

00:02:52.720 --> 00:02:58.720
display a clear image that many times per second you're just going to end up

00:02:56.560 --> 00:03:03.840
with a smeary mess like we did when we were playing around with our diy monitor

00:03:00.640 --> 00:03:05.519
at 480 hertz so then at a microscopic

00:03:03.840 --> 00:03:10.000
level the old structure of the crystals themselves had branches that were broad

00:03:08.080 --> 00:03:14.640
kind of like a tree while the new structure brought them in much closer

00:03:12.879 --> 00:03:21.200
that made the crystals more difficult to grow then in order to let them switch faster

00:03:18.400 --> 00:03:26.000
the viscosity or the the gooeyness of the liquid that they were immersed in

00:03:23.120 --> 00:03:30.400
had to be lowered for less resistance to their switching but then you can't go

00:03:28.159 --> 00:03:34.640
too low because then you lose the control that you need to achieve optimal

00:03:32.319 --> 00:03:38.560
uniformity and brightness on the panel so a ton of tuning went on there the

00:03:36.879 --> 00:03:44.319
structure of the gaps that they leave for the crystals needed tuning too so

00:03:41.440 --> 00:03:48.640
more room is good for their mobility but if you leave too much that ends up

00:03:46.640 --> 00:03:54.000
affecting your color gamut and your contrast so you don't want to let too

00:03:51.440 --> 00:03:57.840
much light through they even used a new anode and cathode material so that's the

00:03:56.319 --> 00:04:01.760
part of the display that actually changes the liquid crystal structure and

00:04:00.000 --> 00:04:06.480
that was to reduce resistance and crosstalk and all of that work was for a

00:04:05.519 --> 00:04:10.720
similar 20 increase

00:04:09.200 --> 00:04:15.120
woof let's talk trade-offs now my biggest

00:04:13.040 --> 00:04:18.799
concern here was that we'd be giving up something in terms of visual fidelity

00:04:17.199 --> 00:04:26.160
like it used to be that you had to choose between a fast tn type panel for

00:04:22.400 --> 00:04:29.520
gaming or a slow ips type panel for

00:04:26.160 --> 00:04:32.000
creative work but ASUS says that both in

00:04:29.520 --> 00:04:36.960
terms of color fidelity and brightness we can expect the new 300hz three

00:04:34.320 --> 00:04:42.800
milliseconds displays to be just as good as their outgoing 240hz ones with the

00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:47.199
same pantone validation great news indeed

00:04:44.400 --> 00:04:52.880
now it's time to talk about who this benefits now it's no secret that running

00:04:50.880 --> 00:04:58.400
games at 300 frames per second consistently

00:04:54.160 --> 00:05:01.199
is no easy feat and to do it in a laptop

00:04:58.400 --> 00:05:06.479
is even more difficult not only are NVIDIA's top model gpus not available

00:05:04.080 --> 00:05:11.039
for laptops due to thermal constraints mobile cpus also can't reach quite the

00:05:09.039 --> 00:05:15.840
same clock speeds as their desktop counterparts now

00:05:12.720 --> 00:05:19.039
ASUS was quick to point out that their

00:05:15.840 --> 00:05:20.400
rog boost closes the gap a little bit

00:05:19.039 --> 00:05:24.639
but little is quite honestly the key word

00:05:23.840 --> 00:05:30.960
here in a game like doom the complex shading

00:05:28.160 --> 00:05:34.400
and detailed character models mean that you can

00:05:32.160 --> 00:05:40.720
rog boost all you want but you're not going from the 200 or so FPS that we're

00:05:37.120 --> 00:05:43.280
running right now all the way to 300 FPS

00:05:40.720 --> 00:05:47.440
and this game doesn't even support demanding features like NVIDIA's

00:05:45.199 --> 00:05:51.199
real-time ray tracing so

00:05:48.639 --> 00:05:54.800
anyone shopping for a high refresh rate display actually i kind of want to

00:05:53.039 --> 00:06:01.600
rephrase that i'm going to define anything beyond 1080p 240hz the limit of

00:05:58.080 --> 00:06:04.000
displayport 1.2 as an extreme refresh

00:06:01.600 --> 00:06:07.280
rate display anyone shopping for one of these

00:06:04.880 --> 00:06:11.600
has to understand that only certain types of games are going to fully

00:06:09.360 --> 00:06:14.560
benefit from it so uh yeah i was gonna fire up rocket league sorry i got

00:06:12.800 --> 00:06:18.720
distracted playing video games it's really smooth

00:06:16.240 --> 00:06:23.039
now this is more like it so rocket league is running at depending on who

00:06:20.639 --> 00:06:28.720
you believe the in-game or the NVIDIA control panel anywhere from around 240

00:06:25.360 --> 00:06:30.800
to 320 frames per second and

00:06:28.720 --> 00:06:34.360
men is that ever smooth that looks freaking fantastic

00:06:35.680 --> 00:06:40.120
here's the trick this

00:06:38.880 --> 00:06:44.720
is a 240hz display

00:06:42.240 --> 00:06:50.960
and also looks pretty darn fine and really smooth and

00:06:48.080 --> 00:06:56.960
basically freaking fantastic like i've got to go all the way down to

00:06:53.680 --> 00:06:59.599
a 120 hertz model over here before i

00:06:56.960 --> 00:07:03.840
start to really go oh yeah i can easily and noticeably feel the

00:07:01.840 --> 00:07:07.199
difference here it's also quite a bit more smeary especially you know when

00:07:05.599 --> 00:07:11.360
we're panning around from the crowd and stuff 300 there it is

00:07:10.000 --> 00:07:16.160
boom man that is incredibly smooth

00:07:13.840 --> 00:07:18.639
if i die here i have no one to blame but myself

00:07:18.800 --> 00:07:26.400
okay i don't know how to kill okay so in overwatch it's not bad although we did

00:07:23.440 --> 00:07:29.520
see some dips below 300 FPS in spite of the fact that this is a game that we

00:07:27.919 --> 00:07:35.280
were able to run fairly well on the upgraded 69 gaming pc

00:07:33.440 --> 00:07:40.479
so that makes matters even more complicated for extreme frame rate

00:07:37.759 --> 00:07:43.840
gamers because it's not uncommon for games that are

00:07:41.680 --> 00:07:49.599
pretty easy to run and look great on entry-level hardware to have engine or

00:07:46.960 --> 00:07:54.400
API bottlenecks or even built-in frame rate limiters that make them impossible

00:07:51.840 --> 00:07:58.080
to run at extreme frame rates even if you're willing to crank down your

00:07:55.759 --> 00:08:01.520
details and your view distance or even upgrade to faster hardware it's just

00:08:00.160 --> 00:08:06.160
part of the nature of how game development works you target a given

00:08:03.520 --> 00:08:10.720
performance and or visual fidelity level and then you fine tune until you're

00:08:08.400 --> 00:08:15.120
satisfied that playstation 4 gamers are gonna have a great experience on their

00:08:12.479 --> 00:08:19.680
hardware and everyone else can just live with exactly the same thing even if they

00:08:16.960 --> 00:08:23.520
have way more horses under the hood sorry that's sort of a separate

00:08:21.120 --> 00:08:27.120
conversation the point is that no one is looking at their game and

00:08:26.240 --> 00:08:33.200
going well on modern hardware it looks amazing and

00:08:30.639 --> 00:08:36.240
runs at 200 frames per second you know we should do

00:08:34.240 --> 00:08:40.000
we should delay this puppy another six months so we can spend another couple

00:08:37.839 --> 00:08:45.920
million dollars tuning the code to get it to 300 frames per second for all

00:08:42.320 --> 00:08:49.200
those future space age displays that may

00:08:45.920 --> 00:08:51.279
or may not ever even go mainstream

00:08:49.200 --> 00:08:57.200
there is some good news though while the average player realistically doesn't

00:08:54.560 --> 00:09:03.760
need 300 hertz there is a point of diminishing returns and

00:08:59.600 --> 00:09:03.760
it was actually a little ways back

00:09:04.959 --> 00:09:09.839
in the rear view mirror but

00:09:10.080 --> 00:09:17.040
ASUS works with professional gamers who obviously want any competitive edge that

00:09:14.560 --> 00:09:22.959
they can get which means the highest refresh rates possible so because of

00:09:19.680 --> 00:09:25.040
this pressure from both sides developers

00:09:22.959 --> 00:09:29.839
are starting to pay attention to this demand so then in the games that do

00:09:28.320 --> 00:09:33.040
support it today is it worth it then

00:09:31.839 --> 00:09:41.040
well like i said i had a hard time making out

00:09:37.040 --> 00:09:43.680
the difference between 240 and 300 hertz

00:09:41.040 --> 00:09:48.720
in fact if i'm being completely honest i couldn't tell the difference

00:09:45.760 --> 00:09:53.360
but the thing is ASUS seems to have a pretty realistic view

00:09:50.480 --> 00:09:58.720
of what 300hz displays mean to the market so if you just ran out and bought

00:09:55.920 --> 00:10:03.279
a 240hz laptop from them they're not going to send jeff over here to your

00:10:00.800 --> 00:10:06.880
door to no no go ahead rip it out of your hands

00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:12.399
and you know expect you to run out and buy a 300hz panel

00:10:09.760 --> 00:10:18.000
but that's fine because the best thing about 300hz is that it is not expected

00:10:15.519 --> 00:10:25.440
to be a significant cost adder compared to existing 240hz models so if you had a

00:10:22.160 --> 00:10:27.760
120 or a 144hz machine and were looking

00:10:25.440 --> 00:10:33.360
for an upgrade there'd be no reason to go out in search of a 240hz display if

00:10:31.440 --> 00:10:38.320
you can get a 300 hertz one for the same price and something to keep in mind is that if

00:10:36.560 --> 00:10:44.399
you're upgrading from an older laptop you're getting more than just a higher refresh rate back in the 120 and 144

00:10:42.160 --> 00:10:50.160
hertz for fresh rate days it was typical to see anywhere from 7 milliseconds on

00:10:46.240 --> 00:10:53.279
ASUS's older 144s all the way up to 25

00:10:50.160 --> 00:10:55.839
milliseconds on some of the worst 120

00:10:53.279 --> 00:10:58.720
hertz panels in terms of pixel response time

00:10:56.640 --> 00:11:03.440
by comparison we're looking at three milliseconds here which means that even

00:11:01.120 --> 00:11:07.360
at lower frame rates you can expect better clarity on objects that are

00:11:05.519 --> 00:11:13.440
moving around on the screen and there's even some other small upsides so here's a cool thing even if

00:11:11.040 --> 00:11:17.120
you can't run a given game at 300 frames per second

00:11:14.399 --> 00:11:22.959
technologies like v-sync which eliminate tearing in game animations have a lag

00:11:20.000 --> 00:11:28.560
period that's measured in display frames so the shorter those frames are the less

00:11:25.680 --> 00:11:33.440
floatiness or lag you're going to feel while you're using features like vsync

00:11:30.720 --> 00:11:37.680
now the final units of this particular model

00:11:34.800 --> 00:11:40.959
will have g-sync anyway but the strix ones that ASUS will be showing at the

00:11:39.040 --> 00:11:45.279
same time with this tech won't have g-sync so you could see a benefit there

00:11:43.920 --> 00:11:51.279
so thanks for watching guys if you're interested in learning more about high refresh rate gaming check out the collab

00:11:48.880 --> 00:11:54.800
video we did with gav and make sure you're subscribed because we've

00:11:52.560 --> 00:12:01.440
partnered up with NVIDIA to do a follow up to that piece with some pro gamers

00:11:56.800 --> 00:12:01.440
and some other cool stuff don't miss it