WEBVTT

00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:08.920
we told you we would test the most popular HDMI cables and we're doing it

00:00:06.080 --> 00:00:16.199
but it turned out to be a lot more work than we bargained

00:00:10.840 --> 00:00:19.520
for the good news is it was all worth it

00:00:16.199 --> 00:00:24.080
53 cables from 17 different

00:00:19.520 --> 00:00:27.400
manufacturers totaling ,000 dollars

00:00:24.080 --> 00:00:29.800
$1,000 and after painstakingly labeling

00:00:27.400 --> 00:00:34.640
testing and logging all of them we've got the juicy details for you which ones

00:00:32.680 --> 00:00:38.360
are topnotch which ones aren't even worthy of being used as a skipping rope

00:00:36.640 --> 00:00:41.840
we're going to tell you and also give you some guidelines that you can follow

00:00:39.879 --> 00:00:45.000
to make sure that you are not getting ripped off on

00:00:52.199 --> 00:00:59.199
cables ask a cable vender and naturally they'll claim that their product does

00:00:56.760 --> 00:01:04.960
everything from dissipating noise to reducing Emi interference to Turning

00:01:01.559 --> 00:01:06.479
water into wine but you an intellectual

00:01:04.960 --> 00:01:11.720
you're too smart for that you should just buy the cheapest cable every time

00:01:08.240 --> 00:01:14.720
right well not quite the truth as usual

00:01:11.720 --> 00:01:17.479
lies somewhere in between you see on the

00:01:14.720 --> 00:01:22.520
surface an HDMI cable is basic you've got your plugs on the ends 19 conductors

00:01:20.479 --> 00:01:26.479
in between and some kind of plastic sheath covering the whole thing they're

00:01:24.320 --> 00:01:30.920
basically a commodity item but as we learned on this journey there is a lot

00:01:28.720 --> 00:01:37.280
that can happen in between the two ends and some of the Bold performance claims

00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:39.960
actually can change the user experience

00:01:37.280 --> 00:01:44.960
also well over 10% of the cables that we bought and tested failed to meet their

00:01:42.720 --> 00:01:51.840
claims let's start then with a handful of things that don't matter one while it

00:01:48.719 --> 00:01:54.399
looks nice and feels premium this right

00:01:51.840 --> 00:01:58.240
here is not a signal carrying component of the cable and as long as it isn't so

00:01:56.320 --> 00:02:02.640
corroded that it literally cannot fit in the slot the inclusion of gold plating

00:02:00.320 --> 00:02:06.759
on the HDMI connector housing doesn't matter two and this is going to blow

00:02:05.159 --> 00:02:10.479
your mind but I give you my personal Linus Tech tips guarantee that anyone

00:02:08.679 --> 00:02:16.599
selling you a cable based on the conductors inside is probably bsing you

00:02:13.760 --> 00:02:21.160
to be clear better conductors or better construction can improve signal

00:02:18.720 --> 00:02:25.360
Integrity which will increase the chance that a cable will meet spec and we will

00:02:23.239 --> 00:02:31.280
talk about that more in a bit but that is the manufacturer's problem not yours

00:02:28.599 --> 00:02:35.040
for digital signals like HDMI all that matters is that the signal arrives

00:02:32.959 --> 00:02:39.200
reasonably on time and at a high enough amplitude that it can be read what that

00:02:37.080 --> 00:02:44.280
means is that whatever materials are used if the cable meets the spec there

00:02:42.000 --> 00:02:48.200
will be no loss of ones or zeros and therefore there cannot be any

00:02:46.280 --> 00:02:52.920
discernable difference in quality if you say you believe otherwise you are a

00:02:49.800 --> 00:02:55.440
sucker or you are a liar but here's the

00:02:52.920 --> 00:02:59.879
thing that doesn't mean that all of the marketing is snake oil in order to meet

00:02:57.800 --> 00:03:04.159
the spec or to improve the user experience there can be numerous

00:03:01.959 --> 00:03:08.080
physical differences from one cable to the next many of which wouldn't be

00:03:05.959 --> 00:03:13.080
obvious to the eye at least not without cutting them open category 1 and

00:03:10.200 --> 00:03:18.400
Category 2 cables for example both have four Twisted pairs to carry color sink

00:03:15.480 --> 00:03:22.440
and clock signals but the with Ethernet versions took some of the extra

00:03:20.080 --> 00:03:27.519
conductors and added a fifth twisted pair to carry Ethernet the Category 3

00:03:25.159 --> 00:03:34.080
spec by contrast includes this fifth Twisted Paris standard so then

00:03:30.319 --> 00:03:38.400
are all HDMI cables with Ethernet the

00:03:34.080 --> 00:03:42.720
same no not even close remember how I

00:03:38.400 --> 00:03:44.920
said materials don't matter well they do

00:03:42.720 --> 00:03:49.400
in theory because we're still using the same conductor count and connector from

00:03:47.120 --> 00:03:57.920
nearly 20 years ago a cable that was made in 2001 could conceivably carry a

00:03:52.560 --> 00:04:00.079
modern 8K 60 HZ signal just not very far

00:03:57.920 --> 00:04:04.319
the thing is each new generation of the HDMI spec has approximately doubled the

00:04:02.319 --> 00:04:09.959
maximum data rate putting much greater demands on cable quality that is why

00:04:07.200 --> 00:04:14.079
certification is so important everything from the gauge of the wires to the

00:04:11.680 --> 00:04:19.840
tightness and consistency of the Twisted pairs to the yes the materials including

00:04:17.479 --> 00:04:24.919
both the conductors and the shielding will impact the Integrity of the signal

00:04:22.000 --> 00:04:29.840
over a given distance so a manufacturer who cracks the code so to speak might be

00:04:27.520 --> 00:04:35.680
able to stay in Spec over a longer distance or create a a lighter more

00:04:32.560 --> 00:04:37.759
flexible cable using thinner conductors

00:04:35.680 --> 00:04:43.000
but from a performance standpoint if you are comparing two compliant cables at

00:04:40.320 --> 00:04:47.280
the same length you don't need to care what's inside them with that in mind we

00:04:45.360 --> 00:04:52.160
set off and purchased a whack load of cables from The Usual Suspects Amazon

00:04:49.800 --> 00:04:57.160
Best Buy mono price and a few others for good measure for the majority of these

00:04:54.199 --> 00:05:03.880
we bought three or more of each cable why well because one failure could be a

00:04:59.720 --> 00:05:06.039
Luke two is a coincidence but three

00:05:03.880 --> 00:05:10.360
that's a pattern before we get to the results though one really important note

00:05:08.360 --> 00:05:15.800
here is we were initially aiming to test only HDMI 2.1 cables cuz that's the

00:05:13.639 --> 00:05:21.160
latest and greatest but because neither Amazon Basics nor Best Buy Insignia

00:05:18.280 --> 00:05:27.080
brand offer HDMI 2.1 cables we decided to test those 2.0 rated cables as well I

00:05:24.280 --> 00:05:33.560
mean they're both Category 3 right maybe it'll work wow Colin that's a lot of

00:05:30.520 --> 00:05:36.360
tests yeah it was it was a

00:05:33.560 --> 00:05:40.639
lot there uh something is there's more than 53 here yeah uh I also went around

00:05:39.160 --> 00:05:46.440
the office and grabbed some interesting cables just to see what would happen they're down at the bottom as bonus got

00:05:43.960 --> 00:05:52.120
it okay let's start with the normies though of the 53 cable tests nine failed

00:05:50.440 --> 00:05:57.240
these failing cables were made by four different manufacturers belcon mono

00:05:54.280 --> 00:06:02.800
price Amazon Basics and cable Decon doing the math here that is a 16.9 nice

00:06:00.800 --> 00:06:07.720
perc failure rate that means that the odds of buying an out ofpc HDMI 2.1

00:06:05.319 --> 00:06:14.400
cable even if you shop with reputable Brands is nearly one in five wow two of

00:06:12.440 --> 00:06:18.280
them passed the signal Integrity test meaning you'd probably never know

00:06:16.160 --> 00:06:23.000
something was wrong where they failed was on continuity that means that some

00:06:20.520 --> 00:06:28.000
of the wires were outright not connected where they were supposed to be pretty

00:06:25.280 --> 00:06:32.440
lame the other seven failed on either signal Integrity alone or or a

00:06:30.039 --> 00:06:37.080
combination of the two at HDMI 2.1 speeds none of our cables failed on the

00:06:34.560 --> 00:06:41.120
third category DC resistance which means that any of them would comfortably power

00:06:38.720 --> 00:06:45.400
a low power device like say an early generation chomecast this kind of makes

00:06:43.240 --> 00:06:51.080
sense because DC resistance increases with length and most HDMI 2.1 cables are

00:06:48.759 --> 00:06:55.280
quite short we found that this is a much bigger concern with passive cables at

00:06:52.759 --> 00:07:00.039
lengths of 25 ft or more let's start with the most surprising of our failures

00:06:57.319 --> 00:07:05.280
Amazon Basics was doing really well until they had one that failed number 28

00:07:03.160 --> 00:07:10.039
here now because this is the only one that didn't make it out of our batch of

00:07:06.759 --> 00:07:11.720
three it looks more like a one-off and

00:07:10.039 --> 00:07:17.639
considering that it's also one of the 10-ft cables it's not that surprising

00:07:15.599 --> 00:07:24.599
what is surprising though is that these three numbers 25 26 and 27 all of which

00:07:21.319 --> 00:07:27.520
are 6-t cables not only passed the HDMI

00:07:24.599 --> 00:07:33.319
2.0 spec but they also passed the HDMI 2.1 spec at 48 G gbit per second that's

00:07:31.240 --> 00:07:38.000
pretty good that makes Amazon basic six-footers one of the best bang for the

00:07:35.199 --> 00:07:42.479
buck cables on the market but not quite the best that Throne is reserved for

00:07:40.479 --> 00:07:47.280
infinite cables who not only guarantee their cables for HDMI 2.1 instead of

00:07:45.080 --> 00:07:53.000
just maybe it'll happen but they even charge about 17% less per foot our next

00:07:50.960 --> 00:07:56.960
runner up in the fail Olympics then is mono price which hands down had the

00:07:55.680 --> 00:08:01.639
worst showing out of all the manufacturers we tested only 11 of their

00:07:59.479 --> 00:08:05.560
15 cables passed our tests and we're also starting to see a trend with the

00:08:03.240 --> 00:08:10.280
only failures coming from either 10 or 15t lengths due to Signal Integrity that

00:08:08.479 --> 00:08:14.440
makes sense if you remember from our previous video the longer a cable gets

00:08:12.639 --> 00:08:18.319
the more voltage drop is experienced across its length and the more

00:08:15.919 --> 00:08:22.440
opportunity there is for interference something else interesting is that the

00:08:20.120 --> 00:08:27.360
fails all occurred on the same pair of signal wires number four and number six

00:08:25.479 --> 00:08:33.760
now consistency in manufacturing is usually a good thing but consist

00:08:30.080 --> 00:08:35.839
failing well that's a bad thing looking

00:08:33.760 --> 00:08:40.279
at these fail reports we also find something very interesting you know how

00:08:38.120 --> 00:08:45.480
the best lies have a grain of Truth at their core well much of the marketing

00:08:43.039 --> 00:08:51.399
particularly around audio file HDMI cables centers around Jitter and Jitter

00:08:48.120 --> 00:08:53.200
is bad really bad High Jitter means that

00:08:51.399 --> 00:08:58.360
even though your signals are being sent at regular intervals they might not be

00:08:55.399 --> 00:09:05.360
arriving at those same intervals it's terrible for any application but in

00:09:02.120 --> 00:09:07.880
really different ways Professor Riley in

00:09:05.360 --> 00:09:13.440
analog signaling even a small amount of Jitter can manifest as an obvious loss

00:09:10.120 --> 00:09:16.519
in audio quality with pops crackles and

00:09:13.440 --> 00:09:18.200
other unpleasant anomalies maybe snaps

00:09:16.519 --> 00:09:22.720
this appears to be the grain of Truth upon which modern audio file marketing

00:09:20.320 --> 00:09:28.279
is built but where it turns to horse plop is when these same principles are

00:09:25.120 --> 00:09:31.839
applied to digital signaling digital

00:09:28.279 --> 00:09:34.000
signals are made up of discrete

00:09:31.839 --> 00:09:38.920
zeros and ones Jitter can't change the order of

00:09:36.680 --> 00:09:47.040
the data but it can change when it arrives which can lead to it being read

00:09:44.000 --> 00:09:49.440
incorrectly let me show you this is an

00:09:47.040 --> 00:09:56.040
eye diagram from our tester and at its Center is a single data sampling point

00:09:52.240 --> 00:09:58.440
right where the ey is a one or a zero is

00:09:56.040 --> 00:10:03.200
measured at this point as Jitter increases the the variance between our

00:10:00.440 --> 00:10:10.800
samples also increases thickening these lines causing the eye to narrow like

00:10:08.040 --> 00:10:15.920
this lots of Jitter takes what used to be a good signal like this and makes the

00:10:13.360 --> 00:10:20.560
signal not come in on time meaning the sampling Point could be at a point where

00:10:17.800 --> 00:10:28.320
the signal is still rising or falling to a one or a zero respectively once you

00:10:23.800 --> 00:10:31.000
can't get a clean reading your data is

00:10:28.320 --> 00:10:36.800
garbage and you will experience a very obvious failure either sparkly or more

00:10:33.959 --> 00:10:41.800
likely a complete loss of signal so there you have it either

00:10:39.079 --> 00:10:47.200
everything arrives in order and on time or nothing does that's why I Mark all

00:10:44.399 --> 00:10:51.639
late assignments with a zero back to you lonus oh nice hoodie by the way LTT

00:10:51.720 --> 00:10:58.959
store.com you better believe it Wan hoodie V2 is awesome and it's finally in

00:10:56.240 --> 00:11:04.480
stock get yours today let's move on to the most expensive cable we tested this

00:11:01.320 --> 00:11:06.920
braided HDMI 2.1 cable from belon it

00:11:04.480 --> 00:11:14.000
cost me a tiar inducing $841 cents per foot and it failed

00:11:11.279 --> 00:11:18.800
miserably on its continuity checks we did only get one of them and the signal

00:11:16.240 --> 00:11:23.720
Integrity technically passed but at this price frankly one failure is enough for

00:11:21.040 --> 00:11:28.399
me don't take a risk on this we also tested an Rog cable that we had lying

00:11:25.880 --> 00:11:33.240
around the office and to our surprise even though it was in included with a

00:11:30.399 --> 00:11:38.000
monitor it also failed though it was just on continuity so it probably will

00:11:35.800 --> 00:11:40.920
work for most applications it just goes to show that we should be checking the

00:11:39.519 --> 00:11:45.760
cables that come with products going forward to see what kinds of Trends we

00:11:43.040 --> 00:11:50.680
discover our last cable that failed was this short little cute one from cable

00:11:47.680 --> 00:11:52.680
Decon we're assuming that the LED

00:11:50.680 --> 00:11:58.000
feature that's in the cable here caused it to fail on the continuity test but it

00:11:55.680 --> 00:12:02.800
also failed on Signal Integrity so best just to skip over this particular cable

00:12:00.079 --> 00:12:07.639
so that's some pretty surprising results now if we step back for a sec and take a

00:12:05.160 --> 00:12:14.320
more macro view we start to see some Trends first is cost paying more than

00:12:11.639 --> 00:12:18.920
say about a dollar a foot for an HDMI cable appears to be a complete and utter

00:12:16.600 --> 00:12:22.600
waste of money at least from a signaling perspective with that said there are

00:12:21.000 --> 00:12:26.399
other attributes that might be important for your application properly rated

00:12:24.560 --> 00:12:30.880
sheathing for example is probably required for an in-wall installation in

00:12:28.560 --> 00:12:35.199
your area UV resistant cables can be useful for outdoor installations flat or

00:12:33.120 --> 00:12:39.639
flexible cables might look nicer in your theater room and active cables are great

00:12:37.639 --> 00:12:43.720
for hitting longer distances or in the case of optical active cables running in

00:12:41.680 --> 00:12:48.639
environments with a lot of interference we can also say that if you're going

00:12:45.360 --> 00:12:52.120
anywhere over 10 ft with HDMI 2.1 you're

00:12:48.639 --> 00:12:54.680
asking for trouble only 50% of our 15t

00:12:52.120 --> 00:12:58.639
cables passed and it seems like the high bandwidth signal just doesn't have the

00:12:56.680 --> 00:13:01.720
beans to transmit over lengths like that without the voltage dropping to

00:12:59.920 --> 00:13:05.880
unreadable levels so for those situations you're going to want to

00:13:03.079 --> 00:13:10.160
consider going active or even Optical active I think this testing is pretty

00:13:08.480 --> 00:13:14.440
definitive at this point and answers the most important questions about the HDMI

00:13:12.360 --> 00:13:18.040
cables that y'all are actually shopping for and turbo nerds can check out the

00:13:16.240 --> 00:13:24.480
full data dump on our Forum at the link down below but if you guys disagree and

00:13:22.560 --> 00:13:29.440
you think that we should blow hundreds or even thousands of dollars testing

00:13:26.839 --> 00:13:33.839
extra snake oily audio file gear tell us in the comments who we should be secret

00:13:31.560 --> 00:13:37.920
shopping and maybe we'll take another stab at in a future video there's still

00:13:36.519 --> 00:13:41.240
tons of stuff we want to get into with our cable tester here and we sure hope

00:13:39.760 --> 00:13:44.399
you guys have enjoyed this deeper dive into HDMI cable quality which leaves

00:13:43.240 --> 00:13:48.000
only one question what am I going to do with all

00:13:46.440 --> 00:13:51.839
these HDMI cables actually I know I'm going to

00:13:50.199 --> 00:13:56.639
replace all the bad ones that have been causing intermittent problems for us

00:13:53.399 --> 00:13:59.639
here at the office for the last seven

00:13:56.639 --> 00:14:00.800
years I'm actually super stoked

00:13:59.639 --> 00:14:05.040
and I'm stoked to tell you about our sponsor manscaped provides an all-in-one

00:14:03.320 --> 00:14:09.920
grooming kit that has you covered from head to toe their performance package

00:14:07.360 --> 00:14:13.639
4.0 features their lawnmower 4.0 waterproof body trimmer their weed

00:14:11.600 --> 00:14:17.759
whacker ear and nose trimmer plus a whole lot of other goodies for a limited

00:14:15.560 --> 00:14:23.160
time you get all of this plus two free gifts the shed travel bag and a pair of

00:14:20.519 --> 00:14:29.160
manscaped anti-chafing boxer briefs just visit manscape.com or click the link

00:14:25.800 --> 00:14:30.920
down below for 20% off and free shipping

00:14:29.160 --> 00:14:35.759
if you guys enjoyed this video go check out our original cable tester video

00:14:33.199 --> 00:14:40.600
because it's got a lot more detail about how you guys can interpret some of the

00:14:37.079 --> 00:14:40.600
visuals that you just saw