1
00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:06,879
When Apple walked up to me and said, "Hello, the new AirPods Pro 3 is fit

2
00:00:05,040 --> 00:00:11,519
better, sound better, last for 2 hours longer with active noise cancellation."

3
00:00:08,400 --> 00:00:13,280
I said, "You had me at fit better, sound

4
00:00:11,519 --> 00:00:16,400
better, last 2 hours longer, and have better noise cancellation." I didn't

5
00:00:14,880 --> 00:00:20,400
really care about the Hello. But what I did care about was getting my hands on

6
00:00:18,080 --> 00:00:25,359
the AirPods Pro 3s immediately because if these are anywhere near as good as

7
00:00:22,800 --> 00:00:30,240
Apple claims they are, I am so excited to replace my daily driver AirPods Pro

8
00:00:27,359 --> 00:00:35,920
2s with these. Where the hell's the charging cable?

9
00:00:33,920 --> 00:00:41,280
Seriously, they don't ship it with a charging cable anymore.

10
00:00:38,239 --> 00:00:43,120
Not even a charging C. I mean, first

11
00:00:41,280 --> 00:00:48,800
they took my wall wart, then they took my stickers. Now I don't even get a

12
00:00:45,120 --> 00:00:51,680
cable. Damn it, Apple. Oh, shoot. There

13
00:00:48,800 --> 00:00:56,399
was one accessory I just got rid of. That's what you get. They now have five

14
00:00:54,160 --> 00:01:00,160
sizes of ear tips, including a new double extra small, which is going to be

15
00:00:58,320 --> 00:01:04,879
perfect for kids. Now, these are one thing that I am both excited about and

16
00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:09,600
apprehensive of because Apple claims that their new sort of hybrid material

17
00:01:07,280 --> 00:01:15,200
design with a combination of silicone flanges like you have in the old ones

18
00:01:11,840 --> 00:01:17,040
and included foam makes these better for

19
00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:20,240
passive noise isolation, which is probably a big part of where their

20
00:01:18,479 --> 00:01:25,040
better active noise cancellation comes from. The problem is that my experience

21
00:01:22,960 --> 00:01:28,880
with foam based ear tips has been that they are extremely low durability. And

22
00:01:27,040 --> 00:01:32,880
that has already been an ongoing problem for me. I've had to buy a couple of

23
00:01:30,320 --> 00:01:37,119
packs of these for my AirPods Pro 2os. And I've been informed by the Labs team

24
00:01:34,880 --> 00:01:40,479
that one of ours already broke during our testing. One of the large ones. It

25
00:01:38,720 --> 00:01:44,799
doesn't look very broken. Maybe you can Oh, it's broken.

26
00:01:42,640 --> 00:01:49,920
That was quick. With that said, according to the lab's team, the foam

27
00:01:46,479 --> 00:01:51,680
does work and they do seal way better.

28
00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:55,040
Let's take a look at the case. My understanding is that it hasn't really

29
00:01:53,119 --> 00:02:00,960
changed much in terms of features, but oh my god, is it ever bigger? Did they

30
00:01:58,159 --> 00:02:05,520
Did they talk about this? I wouldn't say it's huge, but like what the heck. For

31
00:02:04,000 --> 00:02:10,959
those wondering, by the way, I was painting with some very aggressive

32
00:02:07,439 --> 00:02:13,680
solvent based paints and um my AirPods

33
00:02:10,959 --> 00:02:18,319
Pro 2 case fused to the liner of my pants. They claim 24 hours of total

34
00:02:16,720 --> 00:02:22,080
active noise cancellation listening using the battery that's included in the

35
00:02:19,920 --> 00:02:27,599
case, but I didn't want it to be bigger at that cost. Dude, I'm so disappointed

36
00:02:25,280 --> 00:02:31,440
with the size. Now I've got to check. Is it going to fit in my my AirPods pocket?

37
00:02:29,760 --> 00:02:35,200
Okay, it still fits really easily. I'm probably just being a little whiner.

38
00:02:33,680 --> 00:02:39,200
They're not that much bigger. And at least they are contoured so they slide

39
00:02:37,280 --> 00:02:42,319
in and out nicely. In terms of features, we're not really giving up anything else

40
00:02:40,560 --> 00:02:45,040
either, though. They still have Mag Safe charging just like the old one. They

41
00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:48,720
still have a speaker just like the old one, making it much easier to find these

42
00:02:46,879 --> 00:02:54,239
things when they're missing. They've got USBC charging, and they've actually got

43
00:02:51,680 --> 00:02:58,959
upgraded UWB connectivity, so you can track them down using the Find My app

44
00:02:56,080 --> 00:03:04,160
with more granularity from farther away. Oh, they significantly changed the

45
00:03:01,840 --> 00:03:05,840
ergonomics of them.

46
00:03:05,840 --> 00:03:13,040
I loved the AirPods Pro 2. They were perfect for me.

47
00:03:10,800 --> 00:03:17,760
They are different,

48
00:03:14,720 --> 00:03:19,280
but probably not worse. Oh, wow. The top

49
00:03:17,760 --> 00:03:25,120
down, you can really see the difference in profile. See that? That is a very,

50
00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:27,840
very different orientation. In terms of physical features on the earbuds

51
00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:31,360
themselves, we've still got these squeezable stems that now, in addition

52
00:03:29,840 --> 00:03:36,000
to all the other things they can do like activate Siri or pause and play or skip

53
00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:41,599
tracks, um, can be used to take a picture or start video recording. And

54
00:03:38,560 --> 00:03:43,200
apparently the mics on these are badass.

55
00:03:41,599 --> 00:03:48,720
Not only do they offer great performance in challenging environments thanks to

56
00:03:44,720 --> 00:03:50,879
beam forming, but they also can record

57
00:03:48,720 --> 00:03:54,480
audio separately from the Bluetooth connection to the phone. So if you're

58
00:03:52,239 --> 00:03:58,319
like shooting something on your iPhone or whatever, anecdotally, some folks

59
00:03:56,799 --> 00:04:01,680
have been saying that they just don't worry too much about it if they forget

60
00:03:59,840 --> 00:04:05,040
their like standalone microphone. They sound that good. Haven't tried them yet

61
00:04:03,280 --> 00:04:09,040
myself, but lots of other great features from the AirPods Pro 2os make their way

62
00:04:06,799 --> 00:04:12,720
into the AirPods Pro 3s, but better. And I got to say, the fact that so many of

63
00:04:10,959 --> 00:04:17,280
these features do overlap between the two is a testament to how well Apple

64
00:04:14,640 --> 00:04:20,000
sometimes supports their older products. Since this product launched, they've

65
00:04:18,639 --> 00:04:24,960
added hearing aid functionality. They've added their hearing protection functionality. In addition to being able

66
00:04:22,800 --> 00:04:29,440
to create a customized sound profile for you based on using your iPhone camera to

67
00:04:27,440 --> 00:04:33,600
get the shape of your head, they have microphones inside them that are

68
00:04:31,280 --> 00:04:37,840
continuously tracking how well they're sealed in your ears so that they can

69
00:04:35,759 --> 00:04:42,639
fine-tune the sound to make sure that you get a consistent listening

70
00:04:39,840 --> 00:04:45,639
experience. All right, how do they fit though?

71
00:04:47,280 --> 00:04:55,440
Very, very well. But the big test for me is always how well can I sleep in them

72
00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:59,759
because I do sleep using my AirPods Pro Twos almost every night. Can I get a

73
00:04:58,000 --> 00:05:04,639
pillow while he's fetching a pillow? Very first impressions.

74
00:05:01,919 --> 00:05:10,639
A and C. Very little of the displeasing pressure.

75
00:05:08,560 --> 00:05:14,240
Although I got to say it does seem like a little

76
00:05:12,320 --> 00:05:16,080
more than the twos. No, I might just have a headache today.

77
00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:24,039
>> Okay. >> Yeah, I think that's okay. Oh, perfect.

78
00:05:19,919 --> 00:05:24,039
Okay, lying down test.

79
00:05:25,759 --> 00:05:32,080
They're still pretty darn good, but if they had just done them in the same body

80
00:05:29,600 --> 00:05:35,280
as last time, I probably would be a little bit happier. Are the other

81
00:05:33,759 --> 00:05:40,800
upgrades worth it, though? Because I'm not even done yet. Apple is offering IP

82
00:05:37,759 --> 00:05:42,400
water resistance certification, IP57 to

83
00:05:40,800 --> 00:05:46,880
be precise, meaning they should be extremely water and sweat resistant. And

84
00:05:44,639 --> 00:05:50,880
for the first time ever, these AirPods Pro 3's feature a heart rate sensor,

85
00:05:48,880 --> 00:05:55,600
making them a great workout companion for folks who don't like wearing a watch

86
00:05:52,880 --> 00:06:00,960
or can't wear a watch during their workouts. I think they support cycling,

87
00:05:57,360 --> 00:06:02,479
jogging, and hit. Let's pair them. As

88
00:06:00,960 --> 00:06:06,840
always, it should be as simple as opening up your AirPods near your iPhone.

89
00:06:09,680 --> 00:06:16,319
Place both AirPods in your ears. gently adjust the angle and rotation of each

90
00:06:14,560 --> 00:06:20,880
AirPod to get the best comfort. According to the lab, these have

91
00:06:18,400 --> 00:06:26,720
excellent consistency from insertion to insertion. So, that's something, but um

92
00:06:24,479 --> 00:06:30,960
their positivity kind of ended there with respect to the measurements. We'll

93
00:06:29,039 --> 00:06:35,520
get to those later. The transparency mode is supposed to be more natural

94
00:06:32,880 --> 00:06:38,880
sounding than ever before. Oh, I would say my voice sounds significantly more

95
00:06:37,440 --> 00:06:43,680
natural. I can still definitely tell I'm in transparency mode, but you guys want to hit me with some talking.

96
00:06:41,759 --> 00:06:46,639
>> Can you tell us about our sponsor? >> Oh, right, our sponsor.

97
00:06:45,039 --> 00:06:50,000
>> Thanks to Corsair for sponsoring this video. Do you sometimes wish you just

98
00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:53,440
had more screens to look at, but not enough desk space to add a whole other

99
00:06:51,680 --> 00:06:57,520
monitor? Well, the new Xenon Edge from Corsera might be up your alley. It's a

100
00:06:55,440 --> 00:07:01,599
14.5 in touchscreen display that you can magnetically mount, have sitting on your

101
00:06:59,199 --> 00:07:05,599
desk, or even install inside of your PC case. Get instant access to system

102
00:07:03,520 --> 00:07:09,680
metrics, chat channels, and more. Plus, if you want to throw a meme on there,

103
00:07:06,800 --> 00:07:14,319
it'll look deliciously crispy at a 2560 by 720 resolution and a 60 Hz refresh

104
00:07:12,400 --> 00:07:18,880
rate. Check it out today using our link in the description. >> Huh, that's actually pretty good. It's

105
00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:24,080
still a little off. It's still a little like uncanny valley, but it's um

106
00:07:22,639 --> 00:07:29,680
it's better. >> Oh my god, the A&C is freaking nuts.

107
00:07:28,240 --> 00:07:33,199
>> They hadn't actually talked when I had the&C on yet. Okay, conversation boost

108
00:07:31,680 --> 00:07:39,880
apparently doesn't work like that. So, so there's that. But holy balls.

109
00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:49,199
I've talked about this on WAN Show, but never in a video before. One of the

110
00:07:45,599 --> 00:07:52,400
things that I use my AirPods Pros for is

111
00:07:49,199 --> 00:07:55,120
to just kind of tone things down a

112
00:07:52,400 --> 00:07:59,599
little bit. Whether that's at like a way too loud performance or whether that's

113
00:07:57,039 --> 00:08:05,599
in an extremely overwhelming social environment. Um, this is the first time

114
00:08:02,879 --> 00:08:10,960
that I've ever felt like, you know what, Apple, I need to be able to fine-tune

115
00:08:07,840 --> 00:08:14,560
this because I've gone from not being

116
00:08:10,960 --> 00:08:16,319
overwhelmed to lonely.

117
00:08:14,560 --> 00:08:22,160
I feel like I'm the only person in the universe right now. It's so

118
00:08:20,400 --> 00:08:25,919
isolated and quiet. It's like putting these on and turning on the ANC is kind

119
00:08:24,400 --> 00:08:29,599
of like the moment in a film when they cut between, you know, the astronauts on

120
00:08:28,080 --> 00:08:36,399
the space station who are having a lively conversation and there's background music to like the guy who's

121
00:08:34,159 --> 00:08:39,839
outside in the vacuum of space pounding on the window to let him in and no one

122
00:08:38,399 --> 00:08:46,880
can hear him because no sound transmission or whatever and they like intentionally just cut to nothing. It's

123
00:08:43,120 --> 00:08:49,360
like gone. Camera remote.

124
00:08:46,880 --> 00:08:52,880
Yeah. Okay. I want to try this. Hold on. Hold on. I'm getting distracted. Okay.

125
00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:56,800
So, can I just hold it? Cuz that would be way better if I could just hold it.

126
00:08:54,240 --> 00:08:59,680
Did that take a picture? No. Like, can I just Can I just trick it and make it

127
00:08:58,240 --> 00:09:04,800
think it's in my ear? >> Oh, it's a timer.

128
00:09:01,760 --> 00:09:06,640
Okay, Apple. Just friendly suggestion.

129
00:09:04,800 --> 00:09:10,880
If I could just not bother with the timer and then if I didn't have to trick

130
00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:15,200
it by covering the sensors, like if I could just hold it like this and just

131
00:09:12,880 --> 00:09:19,279
press it, that would be super cool. But, as you can see, now I have to hold it

132
00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:24,080
like this so that it thinks it's in my ears. then I can do it. Very cool

133
00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:28,480
feature though. I used the remote functionality of my S Pen on my Note 9

134
00:09:26,399 --> 00:09:32,560
tons. You could just hold it and then just click the button and then

135
00:09:31,120 --> 00:09:37,440
or you could put it somewhere and then you could go get into the picture and and trigger it. Very cool. Since I'm in

136
00:09:36,160 --> 00:09:41,160
here, this will be a perfect opportunity to try out the microphones.

137
00:09:46,640 --> 00:09:55,480
Okay. Okay. I figured it out. It's This is heinous. You're going to hate this.

138
00:09:51,279 --> 00:09:55,480
>> Okay, so go to camera app.

139
00:09:56,000 --> 00:10:03,519
Switch to video and then open control center by swiping

140
00:10:00,560 --> 00:10:09,839
down from the upper right. Tap camera controls at the top. Then under audio

141
00:10:06,399 --> 00:10:11,360
and video, tap input and select.

142
00:10:09,839 --> 00:10:17,600
Okay, this is great because every single time

143
00:10:15,040 --> 00:10:22,240
from now on that someone tells me Apple software is so intuitive, I am going to

144
00:10:20,079 --> 00:10:29,120
show them this. That is how you change the microphone in

145
00:10:26,240 --> 00:10:34,360
the camera app from the onboard bike to the one you're wearing in your ears.

146
00:10:31,360 --> 00:10:34,360
Unreal.

147
00:10:35,360 --> 00:10:42,480
Unreal. Cuz why would it be here, you know, in a

148
00:10:39,519 --> 00:10:47,680
settings menu? Why would it be here in this settings menu? No, no, no, no, no,

149
00:10:45,600 --> 00:10:52,399
no. That is

150
00:10:49,680 --> 00:10:57,279
That is actually insane. It's a special menu that only shows up when you have

151
00:10:54,480 --> 00:11:02,160
the camera open and you open the control center.

152
00:10:59,040 --> 00:11:04,160
Completely unhinged, Apple.

153
00:11:02,160 --> 00:11:07,160
Unbelievable. Unbelievable.

154
00:11:07,279 --> 00:11:13,680
Never tell me that Apple's software is

155
00:11:10,959 --> 00:11:17,839
intuitive. Their complete unwillingness to do something obvious just because

156
00:11:15,360 --> 00:11:22,800
it's how everybody else does it is mindblowing sometimes.

157
00:11:20,880 --> 00:11:29,279
Anyway, let's try out this microphone.

158
00:11:26,560 --> 00:11:33,600
Hey there, how you doing? I'm just trying out my new AirPods. I wear

159
00:11:31,360 --> 00:11:37,040
AirPods because I don't want people to have to look at my wrist or feel around

160
00:11:35,440 --> 00:11:43,320
in my pockets to know how much I love Apple. I want it to be the first thing

161
00:11:39,600 --> 00:11:43,320
they see about me.

162
00:11:45,040 --> 00:11:50,480
They don't sound that great, but I'm actually kind of wondering if that's

163
00:11:48,320 --> 00:11:54,480
that the AirPods don't sound that great. I shouldn't have peaked at the frequency

164
00:11:52,000 --> 00:12:00,160
response graphs. >> I'm just trying out my new AirPods.

165
00:11:57,680 --> 00:12:05,600
The mic's really good. That makes me deeply worried about these because my

166
00:12:02,240 --> 00:12:08,130
voice sounded so freaking bassy.

167
00:12:05,600 --> 00:12:09,279
I do not have a bassy voice.

168
00:12:09,279 --> 00:12:18,559
Oh no, I can't put this off anymore. It's time to listen to them.

169
00:12:18,880 --> 00:12:26,160
They sound like why

170
00:12:23,680 --> 00:12:29,680
the AirPods Pro 2Os were already V-shaped,

171
00:12:27,680 --> 00:12:35,440
which is to say that they were boosted in the high-end and boosted in the low

172
00:12:32,079 --> 00:12:38,800
end. I don't even mind a bit of overdone

173
00:12:35,440 --> 00:12:41,440
bass as long as it's reasonably tight.

174
00:12:38,800 --> 00:12:48,639
The Beats acquisition was for the brand name, not the sound signature.

175
00:12:44,959 --> 00:12:50,240
You did not adequately warn me, DMS.

176
00:12:48,639 --> 00:12:55,200
>> Every day I wake up and this is my nightmare. >> You told me they were a bit worse. You

177
00:12:53,680 --> 00:12:59,200
didn't tell me they were that much worse.

178
00:12:57,440 --> 00:13:04,000
We're going to try the personalized audio profile thing. Maybe

179
00:13:00,959 --> 00:13:06,560
it'll sound like less crap.

180
00:13:04,000 --> 00:13:11,200
Come on, Apple. You got You guys seriously have some of the most talented

181
00:13:09,279 --> 00:13:15,120
audio engineers in the entire bloody world. Like the fact that the iPhone

182
00:13:13,040 --> 00:13:20,480
speakers and the fact that MacBook speakers sound as good as they do is a

183
00:13:17,360 --> 00:13:23,839
modern marvel. Okay, why did you do

184
00:13:20,480 --> 00:13:25,760
this? It had to be on purpose. Like, it

185
00:13:23,839 --> 00:13:33,080
can't be a skill issue. They took the one product of theirs that I

186
00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:34,240
legitimately don't just like that I love

187
00:13:34,240 --> 00:13:42,399
it. I shouldn't need a funky workaround to get EQ. Where the hell is the AirPods

188
00:13:39,440 --> 00:13:42,399
menu?

189
00:13:44,000 --> 00:13:51,440
Where the This had a link to the menu like 10 seconds ago, didn't it? What is

190
00:13:49,120 --> 00:13:56,639
going on right now? >> I'm trying to get to the AirPods menu.

191
00:13:54,240 --> 00:14:03,440
>> There it is. >> Holy Apple, because I can't start

192
00:14:00,480 --> 00:14:07,680
the tuning while I have them in my ears. So, I thought maybe I'd start it with

193
00:14:04,880 --> 00:14:11,120
them not in my ears. Yeah. Okay. I'm working on it.

194
00:14:14,240 --> 00:14:22,199
Holy. So, they have to be not in my ears, but

195
00:14:18,560 --> 00:14:22,199
not in the case.

196
00:14:24,079 --> 00:14:30,560
You're better than this, Apple. I know that you don't like what I have to say.

197
00:14:28,560 --> 00:14:35,360
But I do think that it probably wouldn't kill you to listen to media that are not

198
00:14:33,360 --> 00:14:40,399
all all the time. That's bad. That's just

199
00:14:38,399 --> 00:14:45,680
objectively bad. What just happened there? Fix it. Like, just fix it now.

200
00:14:43,839 --> 00:14:51,519
Don't put it off. Just fix it immediately. Dude, I'm so upset that

201
00:14:48,399 --> 00:14:54,160
they sound so bad. I was really looking

202
00:14:51,519 --> 00:14:57,800
forward to these. I could have gotten over how they feel.

203
00:15:01,519 --> 00:15:07,600
Let's make sure that my fit is good while we're at it. Even just from their

204
00:15:05,920 --> 00:15:11,639
little test audio track, I can already tell they still sound like trash.

205
00:15:14,880 --> 00:15:19,199
>> How's the transparency, though? >> Good. We're speaking.

206
00:15:18,880 --> 00:15:25,440
>> Yay. >> Can you hear me? >> Yeah, I can actually make you guys out pretty good. I don't even think I have

207
00:15:23,199 --> 00:15:29,760
the automatic conversation thing on, so the transparency is really good, which

208
00:15:28,000 --> 00:15:33,519
honestly just makes me more upset right now because

209
00:15:31,920 --> 00:15:37,680
I I don't want to listen to music on these. Oh yeah, we can try the live

210
00:15:35,600 --> 00:15:40,000
translation feature. That's pretty cool. Uh, do we have someone who speaks

211
00:15:39,040 --> 00:15:44,160
another language handy? >> Speak some French. >> You speak what? >> Some French.

212
00:15:42,079 --> 00:15:50,240
>> You speak some French? No, you don't. Hello, cheese eater.

213
00:15:47,199 --> 00:15:53,320
>> Oh, bonjour.

214
00:15:50,240 --> 00:15:53,320
Come on.

215
00:15:56,959 --> 00:15:59,959
>> Uh,

216
00:16:00,880 --> 00:16:05,079
bonjour. Jake

217
00:16:11,440 --> 00:16:20,560
said cheater. I said cheese eater. Um

218
00:16:17,360 --> 00:16:22,000
I don't hear anything if that's Well, my

219
00:16:20,560 --> 00:16:26,639
intention was to do a full review of these on the LT channel anyway. So I

220
00:16:24,399 --> 00:16:31,480
guess for the unboxing we don't need to figure out how this works. But like

221
00:16:31,680 --> 00:16:37,279
intuitive means easy to figure out.

222
00:16:35,600 --> 00:16:42,560
This is not intuitive. Any option that I

223
00:16:40,240 --> 00:16:47,360
might wish to change that is grayed out is not intuitive. I'm sure there's

224
00:16:44,800 --> 00:16:50,560
another place to change that, but intuitive would allow me to change it

225
00:16:49,040 --> 00:16:54,880
here, too, because I obviously came looking for it here, which you

226
00:16:52,240 --> 00:17:00,000
acknowledge I might do by putting this here in the settings menu for

227
00:16:57,600 --> 00:17:03,839
conversation. >> How are you?

228
00:17:02,399 --> 00:17:07,839
>> What time is it? >> Apparently, they're supposed to sound

229
00:17:05,520 --> 00:17:12,160
better for you over time, though, with AI or some,

230
00:17:10,319 --> 00:17:16,240
right? Yeah, I know. I know that's the look DMS has g me. Another thing that's

231
00:17:14,880 --> 00:17:20,000
supposed to make them sound better is if you listen at a much higher volume so

232
00:17:18,319 --> 00:17:24,400
the frequency response gets better above about 80%. Although that would be deeply

233
00:17:22,640 --> 00:17:27,760
uncomfortable for me to listen to them at. That's that's way too loud.

234
00:17:26,079 --> 00:17:30,960
Subscribe to ShortCircuit and also subscribe to Linus Tech Tips because

235
00:17:29,360 --> 00:17:34,559
I'll be daily driving these for better or for worse over the next little bit and I'll definitely have some more

236
00:17:33,440 --> 00:17:39,120
thoughts. Maybe I'll get used to the difference in audio quality. Maybe the heart rate sensor will win me over. If

237
00:17:37,919 --> 00:17:43,760
you're watching this a little bit later, by the way, we're going to have a pinned comment down below with the full Labs

238
00:17:41,919 --> 00:17:48,240
report on these as well, so you can get all of the empirical data down there.

239
00:17:46,000 --> 00:17:52,799
It's so hard to have energy to outro the video in a fun, enthusiastic way after

240
00:17:50,320 --> 00:17:52,799
listening to these.