1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,799
480 super more like 480 wow super paint

2
00:00:03,360 --> 00:00:08,679
job in 4k gaming we found next to no

3
00:00:06,799 --> 00:00:13,880
difference across our entire Suite of games between our two top end cards in

4
00:00:10,840 --> 00:00:16,560
fact our super card performed a bit

5
00:00:13,880 --> 00:00:21,960
worse in cyber Punk compared to our nons super despite having more cores and

6
00:00:19,359 --> 00:00:26,519
higher onp paper clock speeds now that doesn't mean that the super is a worse

7
00:00:24,119 --> 00:00:30,359
card overall we just released a video demonstrating that modern processors can

8
00:00:28,439 --> 00:00:35,600
have measurable difference from one to the next all it means is power limits

9
00:00:33,280 --> 00:00:40,079
are a bit and this whole launch Shenanigans could have been an email so

10
00:00:38,160 --> 00:00:45,760
rather than waste your time trickling out LTT review videos every couple of

11
00:00:42,600 --> 00:00:49,160
weeks with o one more line on the graph

12
00:00:45,760 --> 00:00:51,520
we combined everything into one super

13
00:00:49,160 --> 00:00:57,160
video between the price cuts and the new cards though the GPU Market has

14
00:00:53,480 --> 00:00:59,760
officially been shaken up a lot here do4

15
00:00:57,160 --> 00:01:06,360
frame the 4080 super presents virtually the the same value as the Beloved 3080

16
00:01:03,399 --> 00:01:10,799
at its original MSRP and while the other super refresh cards don't get lower

17
00:01:08,360 --> 00:01:17,479
prices they're at least more Winter Soldier super than Nick Fury super

18
00:01:14,520 --> 00:01:23,479
finally the 470 gets a price cut down to $550 which makes it actually still kind

19
00:01:20,720 --> 00:01:27,880
of a bad value uh we're not going to spend too much time on 1080p gaming

20
00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:32,799
because even the weakest card in this kind of price tier delivers an excellent

21
00:01:29,920 --> 00:01:38,479
1080p Ultra experience it is impressive to see the 3080 sinking so low on our

22
00:01:35,320 --> 00:01:40,720
charts though and the 4070 super is

23
00:01:38,479 --> 00:01:46,159
really impressive beating out even the 3090 despite retailing for less than the

24
00:01:43,640 --> 00:01:50,119
historically low pricing on that card if you're an Esports player the good news

25
00:01:48,159 --> 00:01:55,840
is any card on this chart will do you well but the bad news is the word super

26
00:01:53,360 --> 00:02:02,759
can mean basically anything from a sizable performance increase

27
00:01:57,920 --> 00:02:05,200
to me so what exactly did they change

28
00:02:02,759 --> 00:02:10,920
with these cards let's go through it after this message from our sponsor

29
00:02:06,960 --> 00:02:13,319
build Redux hey do you like gaming the

30
00:02:10,920 --> 00:02:16,879
folks over at build Redux do as well and their mission is to help you build the

31
00:02:14,879 --> 00:02:20,720
gaming rig of your dreams Pick Your Parts and let them take care of the rest

32
00:02:18,959 --> 00:02:25,720
check out build Redux at the link below to learn more the 470 super uses the

33
00:02:23,519 --> 00:02:32,599
same 8104 silicon that's found on its nons super and TI cousins man these

34
00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:36,120
names a but it comes with 20% increases

35
00:02:32,599 --> 00:02:37,599
in its functional units or Fus for short

36
00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:42,400
just about across the board and it got an especially big bump in level two

37
00:02:39,360 --> 00:02:45,519
cache it however got no increase to its

38
00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:48,159
memory interface width or its 12 GB of

39
00:02:45,519 --> 00:02:53,360
vram a move that seems entirely designed to ensure that this otherwise actually

40
00:02:50,360 --> 00:02:54,920
pretty solid value card won't last for

41
00:02:53,360 --> 00:03:00,440
the rest of this generation of console games many of which already perform best

42
00:02:57,680 --> 00:03:05,799
with 16 gigs of vram or more so if that's a concern you'll have to

43
00:03:02,120 --> 00:03:09,440
look to the 470 TI super it now shares

44
00:03:05,799 --> 00:03:11,120
the same 8103 silicon as the 480 family

45
00:03:09,440 --> 00:03:15,840
but it's clear that this move is less about providing more value and more

46
00:03:13,239 --> 00:03:21,599
about NVIDIA offloading some 8103 chips that weren't up to Snuff as for the 480

47
00:03:18,680 --> 00:03:27,040
super the modest increase in Fus seems to offer a small benefit sometimes but

48
00:03:25,159 --> 00:03:31,920
other times it's clear that NVIDIA's power limit for this card is doing

49
00:03:28,920 --> 00:03:34,840
exactly what it intended to do limit its

50
00:03:31,920 --> 00:03:39,239
power you'll see what I mean at 1440p the 470 TI super is another major

51
00:03:37,159 --> 00:03:43,480
disappointment here despite the shift to the bigger die we don't really see a

52
00:03:41,239 --> 00:03:49,319
major increase in performance at least not like we saw on the 470 super and

53
00:03:46,599 --> 00:03:55,760
even at its new lower price the 4080 super doesn't seem to offer a great

54
00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:58,280
value proposition over AMD's 7900 XT or

55
00:03:55,760 --> 00:04:03,920
NVIDIA's own 47 ETI super which now retail for 750 and $800 respectively it

56
00:04:02,120 --> 00:04:08,680
offers only a singled digigit performance uplift for what are in both

57
00:04:05,959 --> 00:04:12,840
cases double- digigit price pumps a couple of bright spots for NVIDIA though

58
00:04:10,200 --> 00:04:18,000
are they took the lead in f123 a game series that has heavily favored AMD in

59
00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:20,040
the past and the 4070 super just kind of

60
00:04:18,000 --> 00:04:24,440
in general that is an offer that is kind of hard to refuse at least in the

61
00:04:22,320 --> 00:04:29,720
context of NVIDIA's other 40 series cards say it with me guys this is the

62
00:04:27,520 --> 00:04:34,120
card NVIDIA should have released a year year ago looking at games like cyberpunk

63
00:04:32,360 --> 00:04:40,960
the Step Up from the nons super is pretty darn big and yeah it's $100 more

64
00:04:37,680 --> 00:04:44,320
than the 7800 XT but the 4070 super

65
00:04:40,960 --> 00:04:46,240
outperforms it consistently by about 5%

66
00:04:44,320 --> 00:04:51,199
and is compatible with NVIDIA Fancy Pants AI features like their new

67
00:04:48,440 --> 00:04:55,560
automatic SDR to HDR video playback Tom Foolery and dlss with frame gen we're

68
00:04:53,960 --> 00:05:01,320
going to get to frame gen in a bit but first let's move on to 4K raster gaming

69
00:04:58,360 --> 00:05:05,360
in Dota 2 at 4K every single super GPU will be able to produce as many frames

70
00:05:03,479 --> 00:05:11,720
as you can possibly output with DisplayPort 1.4a AMD's dp2 clad gpus on the

71
00:05:09,280 --> 00:05:15,840
other hand may end up being the go-to for high refresh rate 4K e athletes even

72
00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:21,360
if it comes at the cost of some performance in other games the 480 super

73
00:05:18,560 --> 00:05:26,160
pulls pretty far ahead of the 7900 XT in Red Dead Redemption 2 and atomic heart

74
00:05:23,680 --> 00:05:32,960
as for the 470 TI super it has fully caught up to the 7900 XT and extends its

75
00:05:28,960 --> 00:05:35,400
lead over the 470 super to about 20% a

76
00:05:32,960 --> 00:05:39,759
point where its $800 price tag could almost be

77
00:05:36,840 --> 00:05:44,680
justifiable and the 470 super begins falling behind the 3090 it appears to be

78
00:05:42,560 --> 00:05:48,400
being held back by that 12 gigs of video memory that we complained about before

79
00:05:46,960 --> 00:05:53,080
if you were hoping that this refresh then would push the prospect of 4K Ultra

80
00:05:50,720 --> 00:05:57,759
gaming to a lower price bracket I'm sorry but that just isn't the case and

81
00:05:55,520 --> 00:06:01,319
it appears to be by Design so with NVIDIA's cards having names that are too

82
00:05:59,400 --> 00:06:06,080
long and traditional raster gaming performance that is at best competitive

83
00:06:03,840 --> 00:06:10,639
with AMD the question becomes are NVIDIA's other features worth the price

84
00:06:08,639 --> 00:06:15,039
premium let's take a quick detour into productivity and find out now featuring

85
00:06:13,560 --> 00:06:19,960
I'm so sorry you must be so tired of hearing about it AI benchmarks The proon

86
00:06:18,199 --> 00:06:25,280
Benchmark is testing the speed of inference of various AI models on this

87
00:06:22,639 --> 00:06:29,800
Hardware things like upscaling and object recognition or generating images

88
00:06:27,919 --> 00:06:35,080
like with stable diffusion like it'll see pixels and infer that those pixels

89
00:06:32,319 --> 00:06:41,840
form a stop sign and naturally we see NVIDIA dominate here but this isn't just

90
00:06:38,800 --> 00:06:44,599
some architectural failure on AMD's part

91
00:06:41,840 --> 00:06:49,919
a big part of it is software Cuda has been around for a long time now and

92
00:06:47,800 --> 00:06:55,400
basically every AI program is accelerated by NVIDIA's Cuda course

93
00:06:52,479 --> 00:06:59,039
whereas AMD is stuck in direct ml hell in this test and just can't keep up so

94
00:06:57,879 --> 00:07:04,319
we're going to be working to build out an AI Suite that is more representative

95
00:07:01,680 --> 00:07:08,520
as time goes on of note this is the first instance where we see an actual

96
00:07:06,319 --> 00:07:14,240
increase in performance from the 4080 refres excuse me 4080 super if AI is a

97
00:07:12,639 --> 00:07:18,560
major part of your workflow then you can be thankful that you're now getting even

98
00:07:16,240 --> 00:07:23,280
better AI performance for less money at the very high end similarly in blender

99
00:07:21,080 --> 00:07:27,759
AMD is hamstrung by lacking software support and we see NVIDIA dominate the

100
00:07:25,440 --> 00:07:32,360
rendering race even without taking advantage of their Optics rendering in

101
00:07:30,440 --> 00:07:37,759
however that uplift that we saw in AI workloads on the 4080 redu sorry sorry

102
00:07:34,840 --> 00:07:41,879
480 super has all but evaporated let's talk about how NVIDIA's

103
00:07:39,960 --> 00:07:47,960
AI horsepower affects gaming now then with DSS and frame gen as we've seen in

104
00:07:44,479 --> 00:07:50,440
the past an increase in AI cores doesn't

105
00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:55,199
correlate to improved performance from dlss and frame gen you turn them on and

106
00:07:53,479 --> 00:08:00,400
they work or you don't turn them on and they don't work you get roughly a 60%

107
00:07:57,919 --> 00:08:04,440
increase in FPS from aing dlss with frame gen regardless of which card

108
00:08:02,159 --> 00:08:09,639
you're using that is assuming it's green which dramatically increases performance

109
00:08:06,800 --> 00:08:14,440
with what has become a pretty small difference in visual Fidelity the

110
00:08:12,080 --> 00:08:19,199
increase in latency is measurable but outside of professional Gamers and

111
00:08:17,120 --> 00:08:23,599
enthusiasts I think it's kind of reached the point where it's like well why

112
00:08:20,800 --> 00:08:27,639
wouldn't I turn this on as for AMD you might have noticed that even though they

113
00:08:25,800 --> 00:08:33,279
finally launched their driver level frame generation we didn't included in

114
00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:35,399
our results we wanted to be as Apples to

115
00:08:33,279 --> 00:08:39,120
Apples as possible and in theory it's really cool you just turn it on in the

116
00:08:37,120 --> 00:08:44,240
adrenaline control panel and it boosts your FPS in any directx11 or directx12

117
00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:47,279
game though like with NVIDIA they do say you need decent performance already for

118
00:08:45,920 --> 00:08:53,080
it to work its best with AMD recommending 60 FPS the problem is that

119
00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:57,480
we were not able to get consistent outputs such that we would be confident

120
00:08:55,160 --> 00:09:02,120
putting them on our graphs so we've got some screen capture here for you guys to

121
00:08:59,160 --> 00:09:05,640
give you you some idea of what you might expect in terms of a performance uplift

122
00:09:04,440 --> 00:09:09,880
but I think it's going to have to wait for a future video to see how their

123
00:09:07,519 --> 00:09:14,360
fluid motion frames compared to NVIDIA when it comes to image quality and

124
00:09:12,120 --> 00:09:19,760
latency another place speaking of latency where AMD has legged behind

125
00:09:16,720 --> 00:09:21,640
NVIDIA has been Ray tracing which

126
00:09:19,760 --> 00:09:26,959
doesn't change at all the introduction of these performance bumps and the new

127
00:09:23,480 --> 00:09:28,680
SKS will all but Force AMD to Discount

128
00:09:26,959 --> 00:09:33,000
pretty much their entire current gen lineup at at least if they want to

129
00:09:30,120 --> 00:09:38,360
appeal to Ray tracing Enthusiast Gamers post price cut the 4080 now competes

130
00:09:35,480 --> 00:09:42,560
directly with the 7900 XTX with slightly better raster and much better rage

131
00:09:40,360 --> 00:09:47,040
racing performance alongside other NVIDIA waloff features and the story is

132
00:09:45,640 --> 00:09:51,399
the same when it comes to power consumption even with the bump to Total

133
00:09:49,360 --> 00:09:55,040
power consumption NVIDIA's new cards handily outclass AMD in overall

134
00:09:53,160 --> 00:09:58,920
efficiency and if you were worried that the power bump would result in thermal

135
00:09:56,720 --> 00:10:03,240
problems maybe on the 480 super for example you can rest easy knowing that

136
00:10:01,079 --> 00:10:08,040
thermals on all of these cards were very much in check so you can rest easy and

137
00:10:05,880 --> 00:10:13,279
comfortably in our new collection of pajamas we have onesies and lounge pants

138
00:10:10,560 --> 00:10:17,839
now available at LTD store.com now is anyone else getting a sense of deja vu

139
00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:24,040
by now if you are it's probably cuz you're pretty smart and observing NVIDIA

140
00:10:20,880 --> 00:10:27,560
is pulling from the exact same Playbook

141
00:10:24,040 --> 00:10:29,440
as they did with the 20 series seriously

142
00:10:27,560 --> 00:10:34,640
stop me if this sounds familiar you release a generation of cards that is

143
00:10:31,920 --> 00:10:38,360
perceived as not offering a very good value and in fact not offering much in

144
00:10:36,839 --> 00:10:45,040
the way of a performance improvement over the last gen then you do a midcycle

145
00:10:41,720 --> 00:10:46,639
super refresh so that you can say yeah

146
00:10:45,040 --> 00:10:52,560
we know this one was kind of a downer but we're listening well that may have

147
00:10:49,480 --> 00:10:54,920
been a very long 4 and 1/2 years ago but

148
00:10:52,560 --> 00:10:59,600
I haven't forgotten NVIDIA and how is it that you thought that this was worth

149
00:10:57,120 --> 00:11:04,440
dragging out over a month plus long series of launch events did anyone else

150
00:11:01,920 --> 00:11:09,639
notice that they gave nothing to The Gamers who already had the least this

151
00:11:07,360 --> 00:11:15,839
generation what about people who have less than

152
00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:17,880
$500 to spend on a gaming accessory

153
00:11:15,839 --> 00:11:23,440
NVIDIA is basically yielding that customer to Sony or Microsoft so I hate

154
00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:29,600
to say it but unless Intel Arc battle mage swoops in to save us

155
00:11:26,959 --> 00:11:34,480
apus might be the future that we have to look forward to for Budget PC gaming as

156
00:11:32,320 --> 00:11:39,800
for the future of this video it's the segue to our sponsor ground news no one

157
00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:43,760
likes to admit it but we all kind of live in our own bubbles thanks in no

158
00:11:42,040 --> 00:11:48,560
small part to internet platforms that feed us more and more stuff that they

159
00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:52,040
think we'll like including news but ground news wants to change how we

160
00:11:50,399 --> 00:11:56,839
engage with news by helping us break free from algorithms see through media

161
00:11:54,360 --> 00:12:01,920
bias and better understand where we get our information from to do this their

162
00:11:59,000 --> 00:12:07,240
team team processes nearly 60,000 news articles from over 50,000 different news

163
00:12:04,480 --> 00:12:11,279
sources each day merging coverage of the same events to give you a clearer

164
00:12:09,320 --> 00:12:14,959
picture of just what the heck is going on out there every story comes with this

165
00:12:13,360 --> 00:12:19,120
little bar that breaks down the political leanings of the outlets that

166
00:12:16,600 --> 00:12:23,600
are reporting on it for example here's a recent story about open AI no longer

167
00:12:21,440 --> 00:12:27,120
Banning the use of chat GPT for military purposes Outlets from one side of the

168
00:12:25,440 --> 00:12:30,720
spectrum reported on it while it looks like the other side didn't really find

169
00:12:28,639 --> 00:12:35,480
it that news Y and if you wonder why ground news can help you dig more into

170
00:12:32,800 --> 00:12:39,839
those Outlets to uh have a look at what topics they cover which ones they don't

171
00:12:37,680 --> 00:12:44,199
and why that might be it's time we had a smarter way to read the news so go to

172
00:12:41,560 --> 00:12:49,160
ground. news/ Linus or click the link below and you'll get 40% off their

173
00:12:46,240 --> 00:12:52,160
unlimited access Vantage plan today if you guys enjoyed this video why don't

174
00:12:50,720 --> 00:12:57,199
you check out the one I alluded to earlier where we analyzed the difference

175
00:12:54,240 --> 00:13:02,880
between a dozen different identical AMD CPUs and showed how they don't always

176
00:12:59,560 --> 00:13:02,880
perform quite the same
