1
00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:06,319
yeah I'm into Tech news telling every cool human nothing except what's

2
00:00:04,640 --> 00:00:13,920
slapping that's why we're changing the name of the show to slap

3
00:00:08,920 --> 00:00:15,440
link AMD teased the ryzen 9800 x3d today

4
00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:20,600
what that means in practice is that they said the name mentioned a launch date of

5
00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:25,599
November 7th and said absolutely nothing else all right but it's okay that's what

6
00:00:23,080 --> 00:00:31,359
leaks are for while AMD hasn't stated a price the 9800 x3d has already been

7
00:00:28,400 --> 00:00:36,480
spotted at some us retailers for around 500 bucks on top of that leaked

8
00:00:33,840 --> 00:00:41,440
cinebench R23 results from the nonch forums show the upcoming chip getting

9
00:00:38,600 --> 00:00:47,120
over 25,000 points in multi-core and just over 2200 in single core the tested

10
00:00:44,239 --> 00:00:51,600
CPU was overclocked but the results are fairly close to separate cinebench

11
00:00:49,440 --> 00:00:56,160
results leaked by code Commando on Twitter big day for

12
00:00:53,239 --> 00:01:00,359
cinebench C bench heads rise up do you think code Commando only ever tweets

13
00:00:57,960 --> 00:01:06,640
without his underpants on I hope so code Commando also tweeted cinebench results

14
00:01:02,519 --> 00:01:09,400
for the 9950 x3d leaked scores for an

15
00:01:06,640 --> 00:01:13,720
unannounced chip making these numbers especially

16
00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:21,640
naughty ooh according to those scores the 9950 x3d will be over 18% faster

17
00:01:17,479 --> 00:01:24,880
than the 7950 x3d a massive shock to the

18
00:01:21,640 --> 00:01:26,960
five people that bought a 7950 x3d but

19
00:01:24,880 --> 00:01:35,720
even more shocking AMD is reportedly making even more ryzen 5000 CPUs ryzen 5

20
00:01:31,560 --> 00:01:38,720
5600t and 5600 XT their existence has

21
00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:41,600
been corroborated by leaker momomo us on

22
00:01:38,720 --> 00:01:46,600
Twitter geekbench results and ASUS's official CPU support list for their

23
00:01:43,840 --> 00:01:52,560
motherboards so there are now seven different chips in the ryzen 5600 series

24
00:01:50,560 --> 00:01:58,759
I think we can stop now Intel said themselves that their upcoming Flagship

25
00:01:54,560 --> 00:02:00,920
core Ultra 9 285k was just okay at

26
00:01:58,759 --> 00:02:08,920
gaming compared to its predecessor the core I9 14900 K but it may be over 10%

27
00:02:05,799 --> 00:02:11,400
faster in cinebench cine bench's big day

28
00:02:08,920 --> 00:02:16,160
continues leaked cinebench scores for the upcoming chip were posted by a

29
00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:20,440
Vietnamese leaker whose name I will not try to pronounce out of respect since

30
00:02:18,239 --> 00:02:27,040
AOL Lake's whole identity has been efficiency it's worth noting that the

31
00:02:22,480 --> 00:02:29,480
285k had to match the 14900 K's 250 wat

32
00:02:27,040 --> 00:02:35,120
power draw to get those results but there were also leaked geekbench scores

33
00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:36,959
for the locked core Ultra 285 nonk which

34
00:02:35,120 --> 00:02:42,519
show the chip achieving comparable performance to the 14900 K despite the

35
00:02:39,560 --> 00:02:48,360
285s maximum power draw being about 60 watts lower efficiency is what we're

36
00:02:45,400 --> 00:02:53,640
into now get on get on board even the multicore score was on par despite the

37
00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:57,040
285 Having Eight fewer threads due to the lack of hyperthreading see it's not

38
00:02:55,800 --> 00:03:01,640
that the chips are bad they're just holding back their full power they're

39
00:02:58,840 --> 00:03:09,680
like Shaggy with ankle weights compared to the 14900 nonk the 285 nonk beats it

40
00:03:06,480 --> 00:03:11,879
by 12% in single core and 133% in

41
00:03:09,680 --> 00:03:16,400
multi-core that's great news for power conscious users or Gamers who maybe want

42
00:03:14,159 --> 00:03:20,599
to save a bit of money by getting a nonk chip but if that's the case you'll have

43
00:03:18,519 --> 00:03:27,000
to be a bit patient Intel is launching the unlocked K chips this week but won't

44
00:03:23,159 --> 00:03:30,159
release the nonk variants until CES 2025

45
00:03:27,000 --> 00:03:32,159
just hold on I Believe In You valve said

46
00:03:30,159 --> 00:03:36,000
they won't have yearly steam deck refreshes because they don't think it's

47
00:03:34,120 --> 00:03:40,840
fair to customers at least that's according to deck designers Lawrence

48
00:03:37,799 --> 00:03:43,360
Yang and yazan alhayat who gave an

49
00:03:40,840 --> 00:03:47,720
interview to Aussie Outlet reviews.org last week specifically Yang feels that

50
00:03:45,680 --> 00:03:52,360
it is unfair to your customers to release new versions of a product every

51
00:03:49,840 --> 00:03:57,720
year that are only incrementally better a subtle jab at smartphone manufacturers

52
00:03:55,079 --> 00:04:02,360
and also every other company ever now Yang has previous ly stated in

53
00:04:00,519 --> 00:04:06,560
interviews that valve won't release a steam deck 2 until there's a

54
00:04:04,239 --> 00:04:11,519
generational Improvement in performance but he's now after a more ambitious goal

55
00:04:09,079 --> 00:04:16,680
of getting a generational leap in compute without sacrificing battery life

56
00:04:14,760 --> 00:04:21,079
that's something both Yang and alah Hyatt think we'll be waiting at least a

57
00:04:18,400 --> 00:04:24,840
couple of years for and that means we'll also probably be waiting a while for a

58
00:04:22,840 --> 00:04:28,720
steam deck that finally has a variable refresh rate display the designers

59
00:04:26,880 --> 00:04:34,880
actually told reviews.org that they intended VR r r for the steam deck OLED

60
00:04:31,560 --> 00:04:36,759
but couldn't get it done on time but you

61
00:04:34,880 --> 00:04:41,400
had to get that one out that one would that one was a rush job that people were

62
00:04:39,080 --> 00:04:45,240
waiting you don't understand I told my mom and my vision board and I promised I

63
00:04:43,560 --> 00:04:49,360
would tell you about this video sponsor can viid it makes screen recording

64
00:04:47,360 --> 00:04:53,000
easier and just better in general with its built-in features it makes it easy

65
00:04:51,240 --> 00:04:57,680
to add video and audio of yourself to recording with AI powered tools to make

66
00:04:55,320 --> 00:05:02,039
your audio clearer or removing your webcam background of course the very

67
00:04:59,919 --> 00:05:05,960
editing features are all optional you don't have to you can just skip to

68
00:05:03,840 --> 00:05:11,440
exporting your recording as an mp4 or even a gif that's right I said JF and

69
00:05:08,840 --> 00:05:14,400
they don't judge you for that check them out at canid

70
00:05:14,960 --> 00:05:21,360
docomo TechLink for an exclusive 50% off

71
00:05:18,479 --> 00:05:26,000
a canid lifetime plan where are the quick

72
00:05:22,600 --> 00:05:28,919
bits they're all around you the world is

73
00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:31,960
quick bits but if I choose one place it would be

74
00:05:30,400 --> 00:05:36,840
right here we don't usually get too excited

75
00:05:34,479 --> 00:05:42,319
about phone processors but qualcom just announced new flagship the Snapdragon 8

76
00:05:39,759 --> 00:05:45,960
Elite sounds so cool I'm getting a little flustered just thinking about it

77
00:05:43,919 --> 00:05:51,759
the chip is called the 8 Elite instead of the 8 Gen 4 because it uses Orion

78
00:05:48,800 --> 00:05:58,440
cores just like qualcomm's X Elite and X+ laptop CPUs that means this guy can

79
00:05:55,560 --> 00:06:03,680
be up to 45% faster than the Snapdragon 8 gen 3 while using using 27% less power

80
00:06:01,720 --> 00:06:08,280
there's also this n22 Benchmark courtesy of on leaks showing the eight Elite

81
00:06:05,560 --> 00:06:12,560
scoring nearly twice as high as an iPhone 16 Pro Max this puts the

82
00:06:10,840 --> 00:06:17,440
disappointing launch of the X Elite laptops into much clearer context I mean

83
00:06:15,599 --> 00:06:22,639
Michael Jordan was just pretty good at baseball too Apple might finally fix the

84
00:06:20,120 --> 00:06:28,639
iPad mini's jelly scrolling issue with the upcoming iPad Mini 7 according to

85
00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:31,000
Jason Snell of the six colors podcast

86
00:06:28,639 --> 00:06:34,280
jelly scrolling may sound delightful but it's actually a form of screen tearing

87
00:06:32,759 --> 00:06:38,680
where the left and right half of the screen refresh out of sync resulting in

88
00:06:36,800 --> 00:06:44,160
a wave effect and everyone learned about this when the last iPad Mini launched it

89
00:06:41,520 --> 00:06:48,599
was great for some reason Apple decided that the iPad Mini screen would refresh

90
00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:53,360
from left to right rather than top to bottom causing it to wobble like a bowl

91
00:06:51,080 --> 00:06:58,840
of jelly or Santa's belly though it feels hurtful to point that

92
00:06:56,240 --> 00:07:04,039
out Santa's working really hard sorry Santa he's on Atkins the internet

93
00:07:01,520 --> 00:07:09,120
archive is slowly coming back online after the momentus hack recently but it

94
00:07:06,840 --> 00:07:13,759
has been revealed that someone still has control of the site's internal emailing

95
00:07:11,400 --> 00:07:18,319
tools users sending emails to the site report all getting the same response

96
00:07:15,800 --> 00:07:23,080
clearly written by someone who isn't the internet archive the hacker has access

97
00:07:20,840 --> 00:07:27,120
to the site's support tickets including anyone who emailed asking for their

98
00:07:24,639 --> 00:07:30,479
information to be removed from the site the archive was at least able to send

99
00:07:28,680 --> 00:07:35,319
one legitimate email email last week asking users for donations which we'll

100
00:07:32,520 --> 00:07:41,199
be happy to do as soon as there's a way to do that safely please figure it out

101
00:07:38,840 --> 00:07:46,120
in response to widespread rumors bite dance has confirmed that an intern was

102
00:07:44,000 --> 00:07:50,479
fired in August apparently for intentionally sabotaging or at least

103
00:07:48,520 --> 00:07:54,520
trying to sabotage the company's internal AI

104
00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:59,720
training thing some of the Wilder speculation online claimed that the

105
00:07:56,360 --> 00:08:01,639
sabotage involved over 8,000 gpus and

106
00:07:59,720 --> 00:08:06,919
that bite dance had lost tens of millions of dollars presumably due to

107
00:08:04,440 --> 00:08:11,319
the interns interference claims that bite Dan has called seriously

108
00:08:09,199 --> 00:08:15,919
exaggerated the company has notably lagged behind its rivals in terms of AI

109
00:08:13,759 --> 00:08:19,919
development and lost a high number of key AI Talent earlier this year but I

110
00:08:18,639 --> 00:08:24,360
guess now it seems like they found at least one employee who gets results and

111
00:08:22,639 --> 00:08:29,120
Microsoft has announced that businesses can now start making their own

112
00:08:26,039 --> 00:08:31,240
autonomous AI agents starting next month

113
00:08:29,120 --> 00:08:36,599
the company is also releasing 10 pre-made Bots that can carry out tasks

114
00:08:34,159 --> 00:08:42,640
in multiple categories there are sales Bots that can prioritize sales leads and

115
00:08:39,560 --> 00:08:44,440
automate order intake operations Bots

116
00:08:42,640 --> 00:08:49,880
that can manage your supply chain and financial processes and of course Bots

117
00:08:46,839 --> 00:08:52,200
for customer service the ones everyone

118
00:08:49,880 --> 00:08:56,040
loves don't worry though Microsoft says these aren't meant to replace jobs

119
00:08:54,120 --> 00:09:01,279
they're meant to free up time for more valuable tasks tasks like firing all the

120
00:08:58,640 --> 00:09:07,160
people you just replace placed with AI I shouldn't laugh I'm sorry but we'd

121
00:09:05,079 --> 00:09:10,320
never replace you as long as you come back on Wednesday for more Tech

122
00:09:10,800 --> 00:09:15,279
news it's not a threat