WEBVTT

00:00:01.460 --> 00:00:10.640
Few things strike fear, or perhaps loathing, into the hearts of PC enthusiasts more than

00:00:10.640 --> 00:00:15.930
the words Windows Vista.

00:00:15.930 --> 00:00:26.370
That operating system's notoriety as a buggy, slow, bloated mess reaches far and wide, even

00:00:26.370 --> 00:00:31.390
to the land of the Apple faithful Vista was aboard.

00:00:31.390 --> 00:00:34.930
Its successor, Windows 7, adored.

00:00:34.930 --> 00:00:40.310
But was Vista's heart truly evil, or simply misunderstood?

00:00:40.310 --> 00:00:46.140
Pushed out into a world that wasn't ready, one can say.

00:00:46.140 --> 00:00:54.410
It is a terrible tale, but perhaps its telling may reveal new secrets.

00:00:54.410 --> 00:00:58.290
After this word from our sponsor.

00:00:58.290 --> 00:01:02.450
Memory Express is the go-to place for your electronic needs and services in Canada, and

00:01:02.450 --> 00:01:03.450
they're opening a new store in Victoria, Canada.

00:01:03.450 --> 00:01:03.490
And they're opening a new store in Victoria, Canada.

00:01:03.890 --> 00:01:04.890
And they're opening a new store in Victoria, Canada.

00:01:04.890 --> 00:01:18.120
They're hiring for all positions, so check them out at the link in the video description.

00:01:18.120 --> 00:01:22.600
So I was reading a post written by Glassbomb on our forum, and it inspired a fairly lively

00:01:22.600 --> 00:01:25.240
debate in our weekly writers' meeting.

00:01:25.240 --> 00:01:28.280
Was Windows Vista really that bad?

00:01:28.280 --> 00:01:30.940
You ask a dozen people, you'll get a dozen different answers.

00:01:30.940 --> 00:01:35.740
The one thing we all agreed on, though, was that to answer the question fairly, we would

00:01:35.740 --> 00:01:40.820
have to get our hands on an ISO and actually install it on a system.

00:01:40.820 --> 00:01:41.740
And we chose the 145.

00:01:41.740 --> 00:01:46.680
Usesonerongo is a $450 gaming PC, that Riley and I put together.

00:01:46.680 --> 00:01:48.120
Mostly because it's from 2007.

00:01:48.120 --> 00:01:50.340
The year that Windows Vista launched.

00:01:50.340 --> 00:01:52.410
And, how is it?

00:01:52.410 --> 00:01:59.120
Well, surprisingly, it works pretty well.

00:01:59.120 --> 00:02:08.820
There's some GPV mobilised programming, but it tasks for jail i assume.

00:02:08.820 --> 00:02:09.860
The fixing process is not as high end.

00:02:09.860 --> 00:02:10.860
The software doesn't work that well either.

00:02:10.860 --> 00:02:11.860
Both systems are a sticky bit.

00:02:11.900 --> 00:02:14.060
exactly like Windows 7.

00:02:14.060 --> 00:02:18.380
So how is it different then from Windows 7?

00:02:18.380 --> 00:02:20.120
And what's so bad about it?

00:02:20.120 --> 00:02:22.580
Well, the answer requires some history.

00:02:22.580 --> 00:02:24.920
Development of Windows Longhorn,

00:02:24.920 --> 00:02:27.460
actually named after the Longhorn Saloon and Grill

00:02:27.460 --> 00:02:29.500
in Whistler, BC, represent,

00:02:29.500 --> 00:02:33.540
began in 2001, the year that Windows XP was launched.

00:02:33.540 --> 00:02:37.640
Longhorn was supposed to launch in 2003,

00:02:37.640 --> 00:02:39.440
but a number of issues during development

00:02:39.440 --> 00:02:41.540
left Microsoft conflicted

00:02:41.540 --> 00:02:43.400
about which features to include

00:02:43.400 --> 00:02:44.920
in the new operating system

00:02:44.920 --> 00:02:48.780
and which ones to add to Windows XP and Windows Server.

00:02:48.780 --> 00:02:51.800
Things got so complicated that in 2004,

00:02:51.800 --> 00:02:54.660
development was effectively reset

00:02:54.660 --> 00:02:56.180
as team leaders changed

00:02:56.180 --> 00:02:59.780
and much of the code was scrapped and repurposed.

00:02:59.780 --> 00:03:01.880
This was also when Longhorn's product name

00:03:01.880 --> 00:03:03.760
was finalized to Vista

00:03:03.760 --> 00:03:08.340
with a tagline of clear, confident, and connected,

00:03:08.340 --> 00:03:11.380
none of which had described Vista's development so far.

00:03:11.380 --> 00:03:13.240
Perhaps they were trying to ask the universe

00:03:13.240 --> 00:03:15.480
to throw them a freaking bone.

00:03:15.480 --> 00:03:17.200
There's actually a lot more I could say

00:03:17.200 --> 00:03:19.180
about the development, but frankly,

00:03:19.180 --> 00:03:20.760
we could make a whole video about that.

00:03:20.760 --> 00:03:23.940
So let's just leave it at the launch was delayed

00:03:23.940 --> 00:03:26.620
a few more times, bones were not thrown.

00:03:26.620 --> 00:03:29.880
And then finally, on January 30th, 2007,

00:03:29.880 --> 00:03:32.360
Vista made its public debut.

00:03:32.360 --> 00:03:34.040
And that's really when the excrement

00:03:34.040 --> 00:03:36.520
hit the air circulation unit, so to speak.

00:03:36.520 --> 00:03:40.640
You see, Vista had a ton of new tricks up its sleeve,

00:03:40.640 --> 00:03:43.860
including the graphics intensive arrow UI

00:03:43.860 --> 00:03:46.060
with translucency effects

00:03:46.060 --> 00:03:48.500
and elements of the Windows backend

00:03:48.500 --> 00:03:51.400
that had been completely redone.

00:03:51.400 --> 00:03:53.900
So the hardware requirements were higher

00:03:53.900 --> 00:03:56.040
than probably anyone expected,

00:03:56.040 --> 00:03:57.440
which meant that at launch,

00:03:57.440 --> 00:04:02.440
Vista was slower than its predecessor on equivalent hardware.

00:04:02.900 --> 00:04:07.900
So users accused Microsoft of packing the OS full of bloat

00:04:08.020 --> 00:04:10.520
as part of a conspiracy to force them

00:04:10.520 --> 00:04:12.580
to upgrade their computers.

00:04:12.580 --> 00:04:14.240
Not that that would necessarily lead

00:04:14.240 --> 00:04:16.080
to a better experience anyway.

00:04:16.080 --> 00:04:20.080
Making its own foot more full of bullet holes than necessary,

00:04:20.080 --> 00:04:24.500
Microsoft allowed many prebuilt PCs, brand new ones mind you,

00:04:24.500 --> 00:04:27.280
to be sold with Vista capable branding

00:04:27.280 --> 00:04:29.520
on the front that they created.

00:04:29.520 --> 00:04:32.440
But these PCs only met the requirements

00:04:32.440 --> 00:04:37.440
for Vista Home Basic, the second of these six different

00:04:38.200 --> 00:04:40.140
and very confusing editions

00:04:40.140 --> 00:04:41.960
of this software that existed.

00:04:41.960 --> 00:04:44.640
And because of this particular misstep,

00:04:44.640 --> 00:04:48.120
Microsoft actually got served a class action lawsuit

00:04:48.120 --> 00:04:50.120
for misleading marketing.

00:04:50.120 --> 00:04:51.980
On top of everything so far,

00:04:51.980 --> 00:04:54.760
many component and peripheral vendors

00:04:54.760 --> 00:04:58.020
didn't release updated drivers for Vista

00:04:58.020 --> 00:05:00.360
for their older, or in some cases,

00:05:00.360 --> 00:05:02.680
even their existing products.

00:05:02.680 --> 00:05:04.800
So many users having experienced

00:05:04.800 --> 00:05:06.960
the relatively seamless migrations

00:05:06.960 --> 00:05:09.420
between various versions of Windows 9X

00:05:09.420 --> 00:05:13.420
or 2000 to XP, where drivers could in many cases

00:05:13.420 --> 00:05:15.960
be used interchangeably were outraged

00:05:15.960 --> 00:05:18.460
when particularly their wireless cards

00:05:18.460 --> 00:05:22.180
and printers just didn't work anymore.

00:05:22.180 --> 00:05:24.720
As for the hardware components that did work,

00:05:24.720 --> 00:05:28.700
well, because the drivers were so fundamentally different

00:05:28.700 --> 00:05:31.920
from the XP versions requiring extensive rewrites

00:05:31.920 --> 00:05:35.200
in many cases, even key system components

00:05:35.200 --> 00:05:38.860
from reputable vendors like graphics cards from NVIDIA

00:05:38.860 --> 00:05:42.100
were prone to causing whole system crashes.

00:05:42.100 --> 00:05:44.120
Even when it was running normally,

00:05:44.120 --> 00:05:46.500
Vista managed to generate user ire too.

00:05:46.500 --> 00:05:48.820
While the new user account control feature,

00:05:48.820 --> 00:05:52.360
which prompted users for permissions to run programs

00:05:52.360 --> 00:05:54.940
and change settings was a great step forward

00:05:54.940 --> 00:05:58.620
for system security, it appeared far too often

00:05:58.620 --> 00:06:01.220
and took control of the entire Windows interface

00:06:01.220 --> 00:06:02.760
until it could be dismissed.

00:06:02.760 --> 00:06:05.720
Annoying and confusing regular end users

00:06:05.720 --> 00:06:08.640
who just wanted the annoying pop-ups to stop,

00:06:08.860 --> 00:06:10.860
they could get their work done.

00:06:10.860 --> 00:06:12.760
And this is only a fraction of the complaints.

00:06:12.760 --> 00:06:15.140
It truly was a horrible launch.

00:06:15.140 --> 00:06:17.520
And you could argue that it directly resulted

00:06:17.520 --> 00:06:20.020
in Apple increasing their OS 10 market share

00:06:20.020 --> 00:06:24.200
thanks to their wildly successful Mac versus PC commercials.

00:06:24.200 --> 00:06:26.080
Now, some of the issues were addressed

00:06:26.080 --> 00:06:27.880
in Service Pack 1 for Vista,

00:06:27.880 --> 00:06:30.320
which launched a year later in 2008.

00:06:30.320 --> 00:06:32.980
But you know what else launched in 2008?

00:06:32.980 --> 00:06:35.560
Service Pack 3 for Windows XP,

00:06:35.560 --> 00:06:38.680
which understandably left users confused

00:06:38.680 --> 00:06:43.120
about whether they should upgrade or just stick with XP.

00:06:43.120 --> 00:06:47.160
April 2009 then saw the release of Service Pack 2 for Vista,

00:06:47.160 --> 00:06:49.120
which addressed even more issues.

00:06:49.120 --> 00:06:51.620
But by then, we were five months away

00:06:51.620 --> 00:06:54.560
from everyone's favorite OS, Windows 7,

00:06:54.560 --> 00:06:57.160
which whether you want to admit it or not,

00:06:57.160 --> 00:07:00.440
is very similar to Windows Vista.

00:07:00.440 --> 00:07:02.720
With many of the improvements in performance

00:07:02.720 --> 00:07:04.960
and driver compatibility coming about

00:07:04.960 --> 00:07:07.500
simply because hardware in 2009 was better,

00:07:07.500 --> 00:07:08.440
and the software was better.

00:07:08.440 --> 00:07:12.000
And driver developers had gained a lot of experience

00:07:12.000 --> 00:07:13.800
working with Windows Vista.

00:07:13.800 --> 00:07:16.840
And 7, which were far more similar under the hood

00:07:16.840 --> 00:07:19.080
than XP and Vista were.

00:07:19.080 --> 00:07:21.440
Because like it or not, in some cases,

00:07:21.440 --> 00:07:25.940
Vista wasn't bad as much as it was misunderstood,

00:07:25.940 --> 00:07:27.700
and maybe a little ahead of its time.

00:07:27.700 --> 00:07:30.260
It was the beginning of a lot of really good stuff

00:07:30.260 --> 00:07:31.940
that we take for granted today.

00:07:31.940 --> 00:07:34.740
For example, its all new memory management model

00:07:34.740 --> 00:07:36.920
used free RAM to load frequently used programs and files,

00:07:36.920 --> 00:07:38.100
and it was the beginning of a lot of really good stuff

00:07:38.100 --> 00:07:41.620
and files in the background to smooth out operation.

00:07:41.620 --> 00:07:43.340
Users didn't understand this.

00:07:43.340 --> 00:07:45.880
They just thought that Windows was hogging up

00:07:45.880 --> 00:07:48.260
all of their RAM for no apparent reason.

00:07:48.260 --> 00:07:51.260
And arguably, Microsoft could have done a better job

00:07:51.260 --> 00:07:52.660
of representing this.

00:07:52.660 --> 00:07:55.980
As for Windows Aero with its cool translucency effects,

00:07:55.980 --> 00:07:58.380
well, it ran on the system's GPU.

00:07:58.380 --> 00:08:01.040
So if you had a discrete graphics card,

00:08:01.040 --> 00:08:02.860
and you weren't experiencing crashes,

00:08:02.860 --> 00:08:05.480
which not everyone did, by the way, I didn't,

00:08:05.480 --> 00:08:07.460
it ran very smoothly and looked so good.

00:08:07.460 --> 00:08:11.940
That going back to the old way with Windows XP

00:08:11.940 --> 00:08:13.840
felt like caveman stuff.

00:08:13.840 --> 00:08:17.400
Fun fact, today, elements of Aero's translucent effects

00:08:17.400 --> 00:08:19.280
can be seen in all sorts of other UIs

00:08:19.280 --> 00:08:22.060
from Windows 10 to macOS to iOS.

00:08:22.060 --> 00:08:24.920
And as for the sidebar with its gadgets,

00:08:24.920 --> 00:08:27.120
well, that looks pretty laughable

00:08:27.120 --> 00:08:29.180
with our modern design sensibilities,

00:08:29.180 --> 00:08:31.400
but it was pretty trendy at the time.

00:08:31.400 --> 00:08:34.940
Apple's OS 10 Tiger also had widget mini apps,

00:08:34.940 --> 00:08:37.080
although they were kept on the dashboard, not the desktop,

00:08:37.080 --> 00:08:41.540
and live updating UI elements are now ubiquitous

00:08:41.540 --> 00:08:43.900
in modern OSs, including the live tiles

00:08:43.900 --> 00:08:45.280
in the Windows start menu.

00:08:45.280 --> 00:08:47.140
So those were kind of cool,

00:08:47.140 --> 00:08:49.360
until a critical vulnerability was discovered

00:08:49.360 --> 00:08:52.340
that could leave your PC open to hackers, oops.

00:08:52.340 --> 00:08:53.960
And guess what else Vista added?

00:08:53.960 --> 00:08:55.880
Instant search from the taskbar,

00:08:55.880 --> 00:08:58.760
built-in Windows Defender, built-in Windows Update,

00:08:58.760 --> 00:09:02.040
user-friendly data backup, BitLocker drive encryption,

00:09:02.040 --> 00:09:04.660
user account control, which in its modern,

00:09:04.660 --> 00:09:06.760
more refined form, is an essential part of Windows 10.

00:09:07.080 --> 00:09:07.920
It also added Windows security,

00:09:07.920 --> 00:09:10.480
and what's funny is that OS 10 these days,

00:09:10.480 --> 00:09:13.480
or macOS, excuse me, has something pretty similar.

00:09:13.480 --> 00:09:16.500
It also added DirectX 10 and games for Windows Live,

00:09:16.500 --> 00:09:19.840
which for all its faults, was one of the first ways

00:09:19.840 --> 00:09:23.360
to enable gameplay between a console and a PC.

00:09:23.360 --> 00:09:27.300
Not to mention the completely redesigned print, display,

00:09:27.300 --> 00:09:29.860
peer-to-peer networking, and audio subsystems

00:09:29.860 --> 00:09:33.840
that laid the foundation for Windows 7 and its successors.

00:09:33.840 --> 00:09:35.240
Though I do have some issues

00:09:35.240 --> 00:09:36.560
with the changes they made to audio

00:09:36.560 --> 00:09:39.140
that effectively killed hardware-accelerated sound.

00:09:39.140 --> 00:09:41.520
That's kind of a separate note, though.

00:09:41.520 --> 00:09:47.340
So, was Vista that bad?

00:09:47.340 --> 00:09:52.700
Yes, and also no, which together makes yo,

00:09:52.720 --> 00:09:55.620
because yo, man, for real.

00:09:55.620 --> 00:09:58.160
For all its faults, and there were many,

00:09:58.160 --> 00:10:01.420
Windows Vista was a huge, if wobbly step,

00:10:01.420 --> 00:10:02.700
in the right direction.

00:10:02.700 --> 00:10:06.000
And once it had settled in and received proper support,

00:10:06.000 --> 00:10:07.800
users seemed to appreciate it.

00:10:08.000 --> 00:10:10.120
In fact, in 2008, a few months

00:10:10.120 --> 00:10:12.300
after releasing Vista Service Pack 1,

00:10:12.300 --> 00:10:16.100
Microsoft ran an ad campaign called the Mojave Experiment,

00:10:16.100 --> 00:10:18.060
in which they invited users to vent

00:10:18.060 --> 00:10:19.980
about how much they hated Vista,

00:10:19.980 --> 00:10:22.160
and then try out Windows Mojave,

00:10:22.160 --> 00:10:23.820
the next version of Windows.

00:10:23.820 --> 00:10:26.180
And surprise, surprise, people actually loved it.

00:10:26.180 --> 00:10:30.020
And then cue the reveal, Mojave isn't Mojave, it's Vista.

00:10:30.020 --> 00:10:31.510
Really?

00:10:31.510 --> 00:10:32.970
Are you serious?

00:10:34.590 --> 00:10:36.150
This is Windows Vista.

00:10:36.150 --> 00:10:38.090
Now, were people's reactions cherry-picked,

00:10:38.090 --> 00:10:40.440
to only include the good ones?

00:10:40.440 --> 00:10:42.200
Duh, of course.

00:10:42.200 --> 00:10:45.620
But based on my experience running Vista from day one,

00:10:45.620 --> 00:10:47.980
on what was at the time a high-end system,

00:10:47.980 --> 00:10:50.000
I don't find it hard to believe at all

00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:52.460
that some people genuinely liked it,

00:10:52.460 --> 00:10:54.140
or even really liked it.

00:10:54.140 --> 00:10:56.380
Its main issue, I think, is that by the time

00:10:56.380 --> 00:10:58.780
it had really gotten to the point where it was usable,

00:10:58.780 --> 00:11:00.700
Windows 7 was right around the corner,

00:11:00.700 --> 00:11:03.780
and Vista's reputation had been irreparably damaged.

00:11:03.780 --> 00:11:06.100
So despite the tech and feature advancements,

00:11:06.100 --> 00:11:08.300
Vista will, and should,

00:11:08.380 --> 00:11:10.520
continue to go down in history

00:11:10.520 --> 00:11:13.240
as the worst Windows launch ever,

00:11:13.240 --> 00:11:14.400
other than Windows ME.

00:11:15.820 --> 00:11:18.820
Just get colder in here.

00:11:18.820 --> 00:11:22.080
By the way, guys, just in case this story has convinced you

00:11:22.080 --> 00:11:24.580
to try to install Vista and use it,

00:11:24.580 --> 00:11:26.600
perhaps out of pity, please don't.

00:11:26.600 --> 00:11:29.640
Microsoft's support for the OS ended last year,

00:11:29.640 --> 00:11:31.420
and while we were using it,

00:11:31.420 --> 00:11:34.580
like pretty much everything was covered in these like,

00:11:34.580 --> 00:11:37.540
scary, gigantic, end of support messages.

00:11:37.540 --> 00:11:40.500
So it's not a secure thing to do.

00:11:40.500 --> 00:11:42.560
If you're a small business owner or a freelancer,

00:11:42.560 --> 00:11:46.060
FreshBooks is the accounting solution for you.

00:11:46.060 --> 00:11:48.380
It's a simple way to be more productive,

00:11:48.380 --> 00:11:51.100
more organized, and to get paid faster.

00:11:51.100 --> 00:11:53.760
So you're spending less of your time fussing over

00:11:53.760 --> 00:11:57.780
your expenses and your accounts receivable,

00:11:57.780 --> 00:12:00.380
and more time actually doing your work.

00:12:00.380 --> 00:12:02.660
You can create and send professional looking invoices

00:12:02.660 --> 00:12:03.980
in less than 30 seconds.

00:12:03.980 --> 00:12:06.340
You can set up online payments in just a couple of clicks

00:12:06.340 --> 00:12:07.480
to get paid up to four days,

00:12:07.480 --> 00:12:08.320
faster.

00:12:08.320 --> 00:12:10.080
You can see when your client has seen your invoice

00:12:10.080 --> 00:12:11.480
to put an end to the guessing games,

00:12:11.480 --> 00:12:13.760
and you can take the whole experience with you on the go

00:12:13.760 --> 00:12:16.640
with their fully featured iOS and Android apps.

00:12:16.640 --> 00:12:18.540
For an unrestricted 30-day free trial,

00:12:18.540 --> 00:12:22.440
go to www.freshbooks.com forward slash tech tips.

00:12:22.440 --> 00:12:23.900
We're gonna have that linked below,

00:12:23.900 --> 00:12:25.400
and enter Linus Tech Tips

00:12:25.400 --> 00:12:27.260
in the how did you hear about us section.

00:12:27.260 --> 00:12:28.560
So thanks for watching, guys.

00:12:28.560 --> 00:12:30.900
If you disliked this video, you can hit that button.

00:12:30.900 --> 00:12:34.790
But if you liked it because you love Windows Vista,

00:12:34.790 --> 00:12:36.150
hit the like button, get subscribed,

00:12:36.150 --> 00:12:37.770
or maybe consider checking out where to buy the stuff

00:12:37.770 --> 00:12:40.590
we featured at the link in the video description.

00:12:40.590 --> 00:12:41.850
Also down there is our merch store,

00:12:41.850 --> 00:12:43.390
which has cool shirts like this one,

00:12:43.390 --> 00:12:48.050
and our community forum, which you should totally join.

00:12:48.050 --> 00:12:50.930
Maybe it was a little bit of fondness.
