1
00:00:00,299 --> 00:00:07,740
he paid over thirty thousand dollars to get every version of Apple's new M1 Pro

2
00:00:05,220 --> 00:00:11,519
and M1 Max MacBooks and now that we've finally got our grubby paws on them we

3
00:00:09,960 --> 00:00:16,800
can really put them through their Paces we're focusing on the 14-inch M1 Pro

4
00:00:13,920 --> 00:00:21,060
Macbook today both the 814 core and the 1016 core models not only are we going

5
00:00:19,020 --> 00:00:24,900
to review and Benchmark the all-new redesign from Notch to bottom we're

6
00:00:23,100 --> 00:00:29,340
going to answer all the questions Apple wouldn't and the question of who our

7
00:00:27,060 --> 00:00:33,300
sponsor is it's crucial thanks to crucial for sponsoring this video get

8
00:00:31,140 --> 00:00:38,579
more done with crucial's P5 plus NVMe SSD with up to 6600 megabytes per second

9
00:00:36,300 --> 00:00:44,000
sequential reads and a 5 year warranty crucial makes Tech to last get yours

10
00:00:41,100 --> 00:00:44,000
today at the link below

11
00:00:51,239 --> 00:00:56,820
as soon as you lay eyes on the new MacBooks the flattened edges strike you

12
00:00:55,559 --> 00:01:01,800
in the same way older generation MacBooks did this is in stark contrast

13
00:00:59,579 --> 00:01:05,220
to the 2016 pedigree of MacBooks that did everything in their power to hide

14
00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:08,700
their Dimension by adding curves wherever possible looking kind of like

15
00:01:07,140 --> 00:01:12,900
an envelope with something bulging out from it this refreshed flattened design

16
00:01:10,920 --> 00:01:17,340
philosophy just so happens to allow Apple to stuff more functionality into

17
00:01:14,580 --> 00:01:22,320
the new machines it's almost like fan at any cost held them back imagine that

18
00:01:20,460 --> 00:01:27,119
while the changes keep rolling back we're looking at a new touch barless

19
00:01:24,780 --> 00:01:31,860
keyboard with basically zero deck flex and thankfully they brought back the

20
00:01:29,220 --> 00:01:36,060
function keys personally I'd still like to have the touch bar maybe stick with

21
00:01:34,320 --> 00:01:40,680
half height function keys and sneak it in there just so long as I get function

22
00:01:38,340 --> 00:01:45,900
keys like look how much faster it is to mute a Mac with function keys than with

23
00:01:42,840 --> 00:01:47,759
the touch bar it's not even a contest

24
00:01:45,900 --> 00:01:52,079
and there's no contest that magsafe always has been and always will be the

25
00:01:50,460 --> 00:01:56,159
best charging method for an expensive laptop like a Macbook Pro not only is

26
00:01:54,240 --> 00:01:59,700
the new implementation much shallower and thus less likely to hook your laptop

27
00:01:58,560 --> 00:02:03,960
off the desk but it's capable of fast charging it up

28
00:02:01,979 --> 00:02:08,459
to 96 Watts depending on which charger you end up with what's more the number

29
00:02:06,540 --> 00:02:13,739
one complaint people had about magsafe that the cable frayed over time I've had

30
00:02:11,340 --> 00:02:18,660
it happen that's been largely addressed here thanks not only to a much more

31
00:02:15,720 --> 00:02:23,879
Supple braided cable but also the fact that it's a detachable type c connector

32
00:02:20,700 --> 00:02:25,980
on the other end mind you apple is still

33
00:02:23,879 --> 00:02:31,080
charging 50 for a mere six foot replacement but that's still cheaper and

34
00:02:28,620 --> 00:02:34,620
less wasteful than a new power adapter besides you can always charge via type c

35
00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:40,379
if you want you just won't get fast training but

36
00:02:37,080 --> 00:02:42,599
um there's one thing here that has never

37
00:02:40,379 --> 00:02:47,459
been on any Apple notebook or to my knowledge any previous notebook

38
00:02:45,840 --> 00:02:53,280
the notch it looks a smidge larger than the notch

39
00:02:49,860 --> 00:02:56,420
on my iPhone 11 Pro Max and inside is a

40
00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:59,040
single 1080p webcam

41
00:02:56,420 --> 00:03:04,080
Apple's justification for The Notches size on iPhones is that they need the

42
00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:10,080
extra space to house face ID sensors and these laptops don't have face ID maybe

43
00:03:08,099 --> 00:03:13,800
the true depth sensors are too thick for the housing maybe smaller sensors were

44
00:03:12,120 --> 00:03:20,159
expected to be available but the Silicon shorter to laid them why then did Apple

45
00:03:16,500 --> 00:03:22,319
not wait for the next Generation it just

46
00:03:20,159 --> 00:03:27,239
feels like they planned for it realistic last minute crap we can't make it work

47
00:03:24,480 --> 00:03:34,319
and then thought it ship it as it is mind you the webcam in that Notch is

48
00:03:30,599 --> 00:03:36,060
quite good albeit marred with a skin

49
00:03:34,319 --> 00:03:41,400
smoothing algorithm that I can't find a way to turn off it takes effect both in

50
00:03:38,519 --> 00:03:46,440
photo booth and QuickTime still the image is otherwise quite sharp around

51
00:03:43,560 --> 00:03:49,860
the edges with a little tweaking I think it could actually be one of the better

52
00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:55,440
webcams integrated into a laptop it's certainly far better even now than Dells

53
00:03:52,500 --> 00:04:00,659
and how about that microphone away not too shabby if you ask me the speakers

54
00:03:57,959 --> 00:04:05,879
though Apple says they've got four counter firing woofers and two tweeters

55
00:04:02,659 --> 00:04:07,980
and quite frankly it sounds so much

56
00:04:05,879 --> 00:04:23,209
better than anything else I've heard in a laptop that it's not even close

57
00:04:28,580 --> 00:04:35,100
sorry XPS 15 you sound like trash by

58
00:04:32,400 --> 00:04:38,940
comparison Apple's definitely tuned to these speakers with a sweet spot in mind

59
00:04:36,780 --> 00:04:43,380
and that sweet spot seems to be sitting at a desk when you're in that sweet spot

60
00:04:41,280 --> 00:04:47,699
the frequency response is at its best and stereo Imaging is almost like you've

61
00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:52,820
got widely separated speakers I almost wish we had a binaural

62
00:04:49,440 --> 00:04:52,820
recording rig so I could show you

63
00:05:09,000 --> 00:05:15,600
I can show you the display though this

64
00:05:12,960 --> 00:05:20,220
this is beautiful it reminds me of a TV at home with its 2000 local dimming

65
00:05:17,580 --> 00:05:23,940
zones and 1600 nits Peak brightness just crammed into a much smaller form factor

66
00:05:22,199 --> 00:05:27,840
thanks to the mini LED backlight array that Apple calls xdr

67
00:05:25,740 --> 00:05:32,160
the other big feature is the new 120 hertz adaptive refresh rate promotion

68
00:05:30,000 --> 00:05:34,560
support that can go as low as 24 Hertz to save on battery life during an

69
00:05:33,720 --> 00:05:41,220
activity Apple's way out ahead of Windows on this one way out thanks to having first baked

70
00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:45,660
this into the iPad line several years ago

71
00:05:42,300 --> 00:05:47,039
it's not quite 4K but apple has a

72
00:05:45,660 --> 00:05:51,180
history of not targeting specific resolutions but rather specific pixel

73
00:05:49,320 --> 00:05:55,800
densities and in that regard it's close to 4K and definitely retina from any

74
00:05:53,639 --> 00:05:58,919
reasonable distance which is really all that matters day to day for

75
00:05:57,180 --> 00:06:03,180
professionals a separate pixel matched external display for critical viewing is

76
00:06:00,900 --> 00:06:07,080
common and can be hooked up via any one of the three DisplayPort enabled

77
00:06:04,500 --> 00:06:13,500
Thunderbolt 4 ports or the full-size HDMI 2.0 Port which can handle up to 4K

78
00:06:09,660 --> 00:06:14,759
60 with HDR HDMI 2.1 support for 120

79
00:06:13,500 --> 00:06:18,960
hertz would have been nice on a top-of-the-line laptop like this but

80
00:06:16,620 --> 00:06:23,100
honestly this wouldn't be too useful for non-gamers right now anyway unless

81
00:06:20,699 --> 00:06:27,960
you're working with 8K for some reason 4K 60 is the most you're going to get

82
00:06:25,440 --> 00:06:31,800
out of a typical projector or TV so it's just not a huge limiter now we don't

83
00:06:29,759 --> 00:06:36,479
have the M1 Max Max in for testing yet but we can put the M1 Pro through its

84
00:06:33,960 --> 00:06:42,780
Paces with some PC competition a surface laptop Studio an ASUS zephyrus G14 and

85
00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:46,979
if those fail we've got our trusty GPU bench to show it what for starting with

86
00:06:45,120 --> 00:06:52,080
good old cinemench we've got our first impressive showing our 10 core MacBook

87
00:06:49,620 --> 00:06:56,280
Pro matches the zephyrus's top end ryzen 9 and the 8 core Stomps the surface

88
00:06:54,419 --> 00:07:00,600
laptop Studio and the MacBook Pro 13-inch as well geekbench brings more

89
00:06:59,039 --> 00:07:04,680
pain for Microsoft than even the zephyrus takes a beating from the 8 core

90
00:07:02,400 --> 00:07:08,759
M1 Pro this time around handbrake and software encoding brings more good news

91
00:07:06,539 --> 00:07:13,380
for apple with only our ryzen desktop outperforming the 10 core and h.264 and

92
00:07:11,460 --> 00:07:19,919
the zevaris pulling a lead in the more complex and thread hungry h.265 encoder

93
00:07:16,979 --> 00:07:26,400
when we turn on Hardware encoding why is this Macbook so slow

94
00:07:22,740 --> 00:07:28,319
okay it looks like Apple's video toolbox

95
00:07:26,400 --> 00:07:34,440
has some issues with the New Media engine right now so unfortunately these

96
00:07:31,560 --> 00:07:38,220
results are unusable but I'm including them here because this is something you

97
00:07:36,960 --> 00:07:41,580
might run into if you pick one of these puppies up compressor gives us a better

98
00:07:40,259 --> 00:07:45,180
look at what the hardware encoding performance looks like and strangely it

99
00:07:43,440 --> 00:07:49,560
seems like whatever Apple did with the media engine to add prores support

100
00:07:46,819 --> 00:07:54,180
negatively affected h.265 in preference to h.264 which is a strange balance to

101
00:07:52,319 --> 00:07:58,380
make but it's not a big difference either way it's just weird in Final Cut

102
00:07:56,639 --> 00:08:02,160
both the new MacBooks put up numbers roughly double what the original M1

103
00:08:00,240 --> 00:08:06,840
MacBook could which is largely down to the additional GPU cores and prores and

104
00:08:04,560 --> 00:08:10,199
coding is almost three times faster than M1 thanks to that new media engine that

105
00:08:08,940 --> 00:08:14,520
turned Apple's two thousand dollar afterburner card into Retro Tech videos

106
00:08:12,900 --> 00:08:18,120
not everything people do with their Macs though so let's come back around to 3D

107
00:08:16,080 --> 00:08:22,379
modeling with blender as of right now Apple silicon isn't natively supported

108
00:08:19,979 --> 00:08:26,039
by blender but Apple has joined the blender Development Fund and provided

109
00:08:24,180 --> 00:08:30,479
patches to enable metal going forward so stay tuned for that for now CPU random

110
00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:34,800
performance isn't too shabby the 10 core M1 Pro beating out the zephyrus in both

111
00:08:32,520 --> 00:08:39,479
the shorter BMW render and the sustained classroom render which is ridiculously

112
00:08:36,959 --> 00:08:44,279
good Adobe Creative Cloud mostly runs in Rosetta as well and unfortunately that

113
00:08:42,060 --> 00:08:47,220
means that either Puget bench will often crash or in the case of the few

114
00:08:45,779 --> 00:08:52,560
available Apple silicon versions of these apps simply not work we do have

115
00:08:49,860 --> 00:08:56,459
Photoshop numbers though and these shell very similar performance to the M1

116
00:08:54,240 --> 00:08:59,940
perhaps because of Rosetta but also perhaps because of the lightly threaded

117
00:08:58,019 --> 00:09:04,380
nature of the work what isn't lightly threaded is code compilation it's here

118
00:09:01,800 --> 00:09:09,300
that M1 Pro comes back to dominance even the 8 core M1 Pro outperforms the best

119
00:09:06,660 --> 00:09:13,620
mobile ryzen chip on the market and the 10 core is second only to the desktop

120
00:09:11,220 --> 00:09:16,620
ryzen 9 5950x it's ridiculously impressive when

121
00:09:15,360 --> 00:09:20,399
something like this happens kind of like our new water bottles at lttstore.com

122
00:09:18,540 --> 00:09:25,140
you've got to see the new lids and colors and we can get 50 off a lid if

123
00:09:23,100 --> 00:09:29,339
you bought one of the old ones now we need to talk games I I know I

124
00:09:28,620 --> 00:09:35,279
know games aren't a Mac thing

125
00:09:31,980 --> 00:09:37,200
I disagree but more importantly they're

126
00:09:35,279 --> 00:09:41,220
a great way to visualize relative GPU horsepower unfortunately for us I'm not

127
00:09:39,540 --> 00:09:45,480
aware of any game that takes advantage of Apple silicon that the ones that I

128
00:09:43,080 --> 00:09:49,680
thought did merely run in a rosetta as a result turn times in Civilization 6 for

129
00:09:47,519 --> 00:09:53,760
example are ludicrously long a good three times longer than the surface

130
00:09:51,180 --> 00:09:57,600
laptop Studio and zephyrus this trend continues at CS go where it seems that

131
00:09:55,680 --> 00:10:00,660
despite having double the GPU cores running in Rosetta is seriously

132
00:09:59,100 --> 00:10:05,519
hampering the M1 Pro's performance potential although there is a market improvement over the standard M1 shadow

133
00:10:04,019 --> 00:10:10,380
of the Tomb Raider meanwhile does come close to the RTX 3050 TI and our surface

134
00:10:07,920 --> 00:10:14,339
laptop Studio and scales pretty linearly compared to the original M1 temperature

135
00:10:12,420 --> 00:10:18,600
readings on the cores can get alarmingly high under sustained load although Those

136
00:10:16,320 --> 00:10:23,279
sensors are buried inside the soc if we look at the integrated GPU clusters on

137
00:10:20,339 --> 00:10:26,820
the same SOC we see far more manageable temperatures so these core temps are not

138
00:10:25,380 --> 00:10:31,920
likely to be a major cause of concern strangely the fans never even got to Max

139
00:10:30,120 --> 00:10:35,820
Speed I suppose I need to hit it with a bind CPU and GPU load to really get it

140
00:10:34,080 --> 00:10:39,839
to scream get subscribed by the way because we'll be comparing every chassis

141
00:10:37,860 --> 00:10:43,740
and soc's full thermal characteristics throughout the rest of the series and

142
00:10:41,940 --> 00:10:47,040
you don't want to miss that this is just scratching the surface the main hotspot

143
00:10:45,779 --> 00:10:52,500
is in the middle of the keyboard where we read somewhere from 46 to 48 degrees

144
00:10:49,980 --> 00:10:56,700
on both models while the Palm rest area stays relatively cool in the low 30s

145
00:10:54,480 --> 00:11:01,079
that's pretty similar across all the laptops we tested if a bit warmer on the

146
00:10:58,440 --> 00:11:03,720
hotspot curiously ample has designed the cooling system so that hot air is

147
00:11:02,459 --> 00:11:07,980
exhausting directly onto the lower corners of the screen where it's getting

148
00:11:05,760 --> 00:11:11,820
as hot as 50 degrees or more which may be cause for concern over time my

149
00:11:10,260 --> 00:11:15,000
recommendation to combat this is to manually set the fans to maximum if

150
00:11:13,380 --> 00:11:19,200
you're doing a sustained all-core load by using TG Pro or another utility that

151
00:11:17,760 --> 00:11:23,040
can manage the fan speeds that should keep air flowing and prevent heat from

152
00:11:21,180 --> 00:11:26,640
concentrating in one small spot now we need to talk battery and to do this we

153
00:11:24,720 --> 00:11:29,760
turn the 13-inch MacBooks display down to about a third brightness and matched

154
00:11:28,260 --> 00:11:34,140
all the laptops up as best we could fired up this YouTube countdown clock

155
00:11:31,800 --> 00:11:38,880
and cut the power not only did the zephyrus die hilariously quickly at just

156
00:11:36,600 --> 00:11:42,839
under seven hours but the surface laptop Studio also ended up dying a little

157
00:11:40,500 --> 00:11:47,700
early due to the GPU resetting part way in next to fall was the M1 MacBook Pro

158
00:11:45,300 --> 00:11:53,399
at just under 22 and a half hours and the lower end M1 Pro shortly after that

159
00:11:51,240 --> 00:11:58,140
and the 1016 well it kept going past the 24 hour mark

160
00:11:56,040 --> 00:12:01,680
honestly the only reason I can think of that the lower end M1 Pro didn't hit the

161
00:12:00,000 --> 00:12:06,660
same Milestone was horse was probably still logged in and I didn't notice ah

162
00:12:04,320 --> 00:12:10,860
the joys of having to share still to say this is luminary battery

163
00:12:09,060 --> 00:12:15,180
life would be underselling it especially in light of the machine's capabilities

164
00:12:12,260 --> 00:12:19,380
like the most comparable overall performer is the zephyrus and it got

165
00:12:16,980 --> 00:12:22,860
less than a third of that I need to see this thing's battery for myself pulling

166
00:12:21,300 --> 00:12:27,720
it apart is the same process as with other recent Macs but now just two screw

167
00:12:25,260 --> 00:12:30,899
types like my 2011 MacBook long in the back and short in the front now with

168
00:12:29,339 --> 00:12:36,540
collars to prevent them from going too far pop two clips on the left and right the

169
00:12:33,600 --> 00:12:39,839
panel slides right off now that is a pretty interior and it shows more of

170
00:12:38,760 --> 00:12:43,800
what Apple's doing with that extra internal volume not only is there more

171
00:12:42,120 --> 00:12:47,459
battery capacity along with pull tabs for safer user servicing but there's a

172
00:12:45,480 --> 00:12:52,079
reasonably robust cooling solution and that battery no longer overlaps the

173
00:12:49,620 --> 00:12:55,860
logic board either amazing what you can do with a little more volume huh while

174
00:12:54,600 --> 00:13:01,740
we're under the hood I should mention that Wi-Fi is limited to two spatial

175
00:12:57,839 --> 00:13:04,440
streams so Wireless AC AKA y55 will Top

176
00:13:01,740 --> 00:13:08,040
out at 866 megabits per second this has been standard for MacBooks since 2019

177
00:13:06,360 --> 00:13:12,540
and is one of the few design elements that Apple hasn't changed for the better

178
00:13:10,139 --> 00:13:16,920
if I had to guess why not these Macs use broadcom Wi-Fi adapters while the ones

179
00:13:14,700 --> 00:13:20,880
with 3x3 support were running on Morata chips that apple co-designed and branded

180
00:13:18,899 --> 00:13:25,680
as universal scientific Industrial evidently those proved to either be too

181
00:13:23,160 --> 00:13:29,940
costly too unreliable too power hungry or all of the above

182
00:13:27,180 --> 00:13:33,959
if cost was a factor though Apple sure hasn't spared any for the Thunderbolt

183
00:13:31,800 --> 00:13:37,500
because each of the USB type-c ports has its own Thunderbolt 4 controller Apple's

184
00:13:35,880 --> 00:13:41,880
doing a lot right here there's the return to an SD card slot albeit without

185
00:13:39,420 --> 00:13:46,139
SD Express support and we've got a high impedance headphone jack that while it

186
00:13:43,980 --> 00:13:50,639
doesn't sound amazing is better able to drive higher end headphones than

187
00:13:47,639 --> 00:13:52,620
previous gen Max what Apple hasn't

188
00:13:50,639 --> 00:13:56,339
gotten right is the handling of the notch the mouse cursor going behind the

189
00:13:54,779 --> 00:13:59,639
Notch and getting lost seems like such a colossal oversight next to the way that

190
00:13:58,260 --> 00:14:03,420
the rounded Corners are handled on the display and this behavior isn't even

191
00:14:01,680 --> 00:14:07,680
consistent if you've got menus open what's more the Notch's whole reason for

192
00:14:06,000 --> 00:14:13,139
being that is to provide a menu bar above the regular 16x10 display area

193
00:14:09,899 --> 00:14:15,240
that would otherwise just be bezel is by

194
00:14:13,139 --> 00:14:17,660
default entirely removed if you use full screen mode

195
00:14:16,320 --> 00:14:22,260
Apple why thankfully both of these issues can

196
00:14:20,940 --> 00:14:27,660
be worked around by either turning off this setting or by choosing get info on

197
00:14:25,200 --> 00:14:32,639
the app and checking scale to fit the letter option nobody should ever

198
00:14:30,300 --> 00:14:36,060
want to use this the final issue I have is price starting at two thousand

199
00:14:34,440 --> 00:14:39,300
dollars US for the 14 inch model it's not going to be for everybody and as

200
00:14:37,560 --> 00:14:43,860
we've seen the base model falls behind in a few fundamental ways and of course

201
00:14:41,699 --> 00:14:46,380
because the memory is part of the soc and storage is soldered to the

202
00:14:45,240 --> 00:14:51,060
motherboard not only does that make future repairs more expensive you also

203
00:14:49,139 --> 00:14:54,120
need to order what you think you'll need by the time you replace the laptop not

204
00:14:53,100 --> 00:14:57,959
what you think you'll need today personally I wouldn't go lower than 32

205
00:14:56,459 --> 00:15:01,440
gigabytes of memory to make a machine of this caliber last a while particularly

206
00:14:59,820 --> 00:15:05,760
considering its unified memory that both the CPU and GPU need to share I also

207
00:15:04,139 --> 00:15:09,720
wouldn't go higher than two terabytes of internal storage because you've got

208
00:15:07,560 --> 00:15:12,720
Thunderbolt for high-speed expansion if you need it

209
00:15:10,740 --> 00:15:17,459
that puts my sweet spot recommendation at about 2 900 U.S which is 200 more

210
00:15:15,839 --> 00:15:21,240
expensive than a similar configuration for the surface laptop Studio at a

211
00:15:19,860 --> 00:15:24,899
thousand dollars more expensive than the 13-inch M1 MacBook Pro albeit with

212
00:15:23,160 --> 00:15:29,100
double the memory is it a thousand dollars more worth it you really need to

213
00:15:26,760 --> 00:15:33,240
look at what tasks you do daily to see how long it'll take to recoup that cost

214
00:15:30,779 --> 00:15:38,339
but what Apple has here What attracted me to my 2011 MacBook Pro in the first

215
00:15:35,339 --> 00:15:40,620
place is a combination of power form

216
00:15:38,339 --> 00:15:45,839
factor build quality display quality versatility and especially battery life

217
00:15:43,320 --> 00:15:50,459
that while outclassed by less expensive machines than any one metric is not even

218
00:15:48,300 --> 00:15:54,480
remotely matched in all still early days for Apple silicon and

219
00:15:52,440 --> 00:15:58,260
the grand scheme of things and macOS isn't everyone's cup of tea but you

220
00:15:56,880 --> 00:16:02,519
can't deny that Apple's got a good thing going here and some of her sponsor

221
00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:06,920
nordpass today's sponsor is nordpass Security Experts agree humans are the

222
00:16:05,339 --> 00:16:11,519
weakest link when it comes to security managing multiple complex passwords

223
00:16:09,480 --> 00:16:16,800
across all your apps and devices is a pain in the butt it takes a bit of a

224
00:16:14,519 --> 00:16:21,000
leap for some but it's hard to look back once you do get a password manager even

225
00:16:19,320 --> 00:16:24,600
before updating your passwords you'll find re-logging in from device to device

226
00:16:22,680 --> 00:16:29,339
a breeze setting up your new Mac streaming at a buddy's house online

227
00:16:26,040 --> 00:16:31,740
payments and so much more now faster and

228
00:16:29,339 --> 00:16:35,279
encrypted on your device so only you have access there are a few things as

229
00:16:33,839 --> 00:16:40,740
universally agreed upon in cyber security than the need for a password manager nordpass makes it simple to

230
00:16:39,000 --> 00:16:44,339
remove that vulnerability and brings tons of conveniences along the way

231
00:16:42,360 --> 00:16:48,180
they're offering LTD fans a special cyber month discount of 70 off a

232
00:16:46,500 --> 00:16:53,100
two-year plan plus an additional month for free go to nordpass.com Linus and

233
00:16:51,360 --> 00:16:57,540
use code Linus to start making your logins safer and easier today thanks for

234
00:16:55,860 --> 00:17:00,660
watching guys go check out our initial coverage of the 14-inch MacBook Pro

235
00:16:59,040 --> 00:17:03,240
announcement where we made the decision to buy all these laptops in the first

236
00:17:02,399 --> 00:17:09,000
place kind of want to take one home play with

237
00:17:06,600 --> 00:17:11,780
you've got enough of them coming in to cover for me right

238
00:17:15,179 --> 00:17:18,140
stop safe