1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:06,399
it's here it is ripping fast and it's

2
00:00:03,600 --> 00:00:11,880
$2,000 but in exchange for your least favoritest of kidneys Invidia promises

3
00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:14,200
that their brand new GeForce RTX 590

4
00:00:11,880 --> 00:00:21,600
will deliver a level of performance that obliterates their only real competition

5
00:00:17,439 --> 00:00:25,039
NVIDIA more GPU cores boom more vram and

6
00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:28,320
faster vram boom boom enhanced RT and AI

7
00:00:25,039 --> 00:00:30,720
course wider memory bus and PCI Gen 5

8
00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:36,000
boom boom boom on top of that NVIDIA has packed in

9
00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:40,280
a deep learning super shedload of new features that I would love to tell you

10
00:00:37,600 --> 00:00:44,719
about but unless NVIDIA also invented AI teeth extraction I won't be able to so

11
00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:48,879
instead I leave this review in your capable hands see you

12
00:00:48,879 --> 00:00:55,320
later I got it I got it I got it first up graphics performance let's cut to the

13
00:00:53,440 --> 00:00:59,239
chase instead of being scammed online I found a way to prevent you from falling

14
00:00:56,840 --> 00:01:03,640
into traps when you buy and sell gpus our sponsored job is a legit Marketplace

15
00:01:01,239 --> 00:01:06,400
to score some deals Ang Jawa is always real never

16
00:01:13,439 --> 00:01:20,240
cake let's get right to Raw gaming results no rate tracing no upscaling and

17
00:01:18,000 --> 00:01:25,119
we're starting with 1440p across our suite of games at 1440p the 90 never

18
00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:29,600
Falls flat on its face obviously but still manages to be underwhelming in the

19
00:01:27,880 --> 00:01:34,520
Vulcan based Red Dead Redemption 2 we see less than a 10% improvement over the

20
00:01:32,360 --> 00:01:39,880
490 and that lackluster uplift is repeated in f124 more problematic is the

21
00:01:37,360 --> 00:01:46,880
embarrassingly small 30% lead over the 7900 XTX which frequently goes for a

22
00:01:43,240 --> 00:01:48,840
little over 2 fifths of the price o and

23
00:01:46,880 --> 00:01:53,119
veral doesn't bring better news but as we move on to newer more graphically

24
00:01:50,719 --> 00:01:57,240
intensive games the 1590 does start to pull away from the pack in the gorgeous

25
00:01:55,000 --> 00:02:02,960
Thriller Allen Wick 2 it beats the 3090 TI by more than double and looks great

26
00:01:59,920 --> 00:02:05,680
in Blackmouth Wukong beating the 490 by

27
00:02:02,960 --> 00:02:09,119
27% cyberpunk is another strong point compared to the previous generations but

28
00:02:07,520 --> 00:02:13,360
as low as they are on the chart it's worth noting AMD's strong performance

29
00:02:11,200 --> 00:02:17,560
per dollar in this game at least when R tracing isn't enabled we'll get to that

30
00:02:15,239 --> 00:02:23,000
later for now this might be obvious but if you are a 1440p player the 90 is

31
00:02:20,760 --> 00:02:27,040
overkill with the current crop of CPUs if you're on the latest 9800 x3d you

32
00:02:24,959 --> 00:02:30,680
might find that the 590 exerts a little bit more of a commanding lead but I

33
00:02:28,800 --> 00:02:34,519
think that anyone with this setup should be putting their money into a new

34
00:02:31,879 --> 00:02:37,879
monitor rather than a new CPU let's move on to 4K testing where the CPU

35
00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:43,319
bottlenecks are less likely to rear their ugly heads in cyberpunk the 590 is

36
00:02:40,879 --> 00:02:50,080
the first card to ever crack triple digits at our Ultra preset scoring a

37
00:02:45,879 --> 00:02:51,879
30fps lead over the 490 in Allen wake 2

38
00:02:50,080 --> 00:02:55,239
the story remains largely the same offering a noticeable difference in

39
00:02:53,239 --> 00:02:59,879
playability compared to any previous Flagship black myth Wukong at cinematic

40
00:02:57,680 --> 00:03:06,200
settings however is the Everest lik Summit where even the 59 falls short of

41
00:03:03,120 --> 00:03:08,480
60 FPS average perhaps an overclocking

42
00:03:06,200 --> 00:03:12,760
Sherpa could get us to the peak but that's a subject for another day in Red

43
00:03:10,200 --> 00:03:17,319
Dead Redemption 2 the 590 does not impress especially when you consider its

44
00:03:14,519 --> 00:03:20,519
price and in f124 the 90 continues to operate at that kind of level of

45
00:03:18,480 --> 00:03:24,560
performance that no one else can touch the problem is that for all the hype the

46
00:03:22,920 --> 00:03:29,920
performance bump is roughly on par with the price bump making the 590 look less

47
00:03:27,239 --> 00:03:35,360
like a truly Next Generation product and more like a 490 Super GT zai buai but

48
00:03:33,720 --> 00:03:38,959
what's the deal I thought that Blackwell was supposed to be the giant leap

49
00:03:36,879 --> 00:03:43,319
forward with all that flip metering and neural rendering and increased rate

50
00:03:41,000 --> 00:03:47,439
triangle intersections what the [ __ ] whoa whoa all right hold on that's a lot

51
00:03:45,560 --> 00:03:52,400
of words but to understand how they are going to impact performance and they

52
00:03:49,879 --> 00:03:58,000
will we need to understand what they mean see Blackwell brings so many new

53
00:03:55,799 --> 00:04:03,519
enhancements that inidia marketing doesn't even call it a GPU U

54
00:04:00,480 --> 00:04:08,319
architecture no it's called a neural

55
00:04:03,519 --> 00:04:10,519
rendering architecture so what is that

56
00:04:08,319 --> 00:04:15,360
as far as we can tell it's about equal parts genuine Innovation and marketing

57
00:04:12,879 --> 00:04:20,000
fluff we'll start with the Innovation up until this point NVIDIA's AI

58
00:04:17,359 --> 00:04:25,040
accelerating tensor course could not be accessed by a graphics API like Vulcan

59
00:04:22,680 --> 00:04:29,720
or DirectX but through collaboration with Microsoft directex now has the

60
00:04:27,479 --> 00:04:35,000
Cooperative vector's API which means means that Gamers can use neural shaders

61
00:04:32,919 --> 00:04:39,600
unlike typical shaders this allows geometry to be imbued with extra

62
00:04:37,199 --> 00:04:44,160
properties but now that extra property could be a small neural network that

63
00:04:41,759 --> 00:04:49,600
could generate more geometry or help ease Ray tracing calculations for

64
00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:52,160
instance Mega geometry this one allows

65
00:04:49,600 --> 00:04:58,080
for realtime generation of level of detail steps without requiring any

66
00:04:55,000 --> 00:05:00,320
normal Maps think of like UE 5's nanite

67
00:04:58,080 --> 00:05:05,360
which helps ease jarring l change effects and saves developer time but

68
00:05:02,600 --> 00:05:09,759
with you know AI to take advantage of these features NVIDIA loaded the 590

69
00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:14,639
with the hardware it needs to accelerate them it's got fifth gen tensor cores

70
00:05:12,400 --> 00:05:20,280
which drastically reduces memory usage for simpler AI models that don't require

71
00:05:17,600 --> 00:05:24,360
High precision as for the non- AI stuff we get upgraded fourth gen RT cores

72
00:05:22,479 --> 00:05:29,039
which now double the ray triangle intersection rate with just 75% of the

73
00:05:27,039 --> 00:05:33,600
memory footprint and as for the regular old Cuda course well those just don't

74
00:05:31,199 --> 00:05:38,720
seem to have changed very much so far the 90 has managed a best case scenario

75
00:05:36,080 --> 00:05:43,960
of about 30% faster than his predecessor seemingly entirely thanks to the 33%

76
00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:48,600
higher GPU core camp this combined with their reuse of tsmc's 4N process node

77
00:05:46,639 --> 00:05:52,039
from last gen explains why the new chip is so big and why NVIDIA had to

78
00:05:50,319 --> 00:05:57,319
sacrifice some clock speed to keep their yields and therefore pricing still

79
00:05:54,360 --> 00:06:01,479
attainable to the 1% GDDR 7 on the other hand is kind of a big deal it boasts

80
00:05:59,199 --> 00:06:06,160
doubled the data rate of gddr6 while using half as much power per bit this is

81
00:06:04,039 --> 00:06:11,440
an enlarged part thanks to the shift to Pam 3 signaling Pam short for pulse

82
00:06:09,160 --> 00:06:16,560
amplitude modulation is akin to how we store data in multi-level cell flash

83
00:06:13,479 --> 00:06:18,720
storage gddr6 uses Pam four meaning that

84
00:06:16,560 --> 00:06:23,120
each clock can be encoded for four different states rather than just two

85
00:06:20,960 --> 00:06:27,240
but it came with a big trade-off the error rate since the signals are so

86
00:06:25,240 --> 00:06:30,199
similar in amplitude that sometimes they can be hard to tell apart especially

87
00:06:28,919 --> 00:06:34,400
when there's interf Pam 3 improves the situation by just

88
00:06:32,599 --> 00:06:37,960
trying to handle three states instead of four giving a little bit more room

89
00:06:36,400 --> 00:06:43,039
between each of them this improves signal Integrity allowing GDDR 7 to run

90
00:06:40,400 --> 00:06:46,919
at higher frequency while consuming less power to make up for the trade-offs oh

91
00:06:44,840 --> 00:06:53,479
and let's not forget that we finally got 32 gigs of vram this will be a huge jump

92
00:06:49,639 --> 00:06:54,880
for AI dorks and maybe Gamers someday

93
00:06:53,479 --> 00:06:59,199
but there are some other cool things like NVIDIA's new 9th gen nank Hardware

94
00:06:57,560 --> 00:07:05,080
video encoders which support higher quality 422 10bit video this for the

95
00:07:02,560 --> 00:07:09,400
right people is a huge deal and might make Blackwell a must-have upgrade and

96
00:07:07,599 --> 00:07:15,120
for the folks out there who own monitors hi plof we finally get a card that can

97
00:07:11,639 --> 00:07:17,000
actually take advantage of DP 2.1 uh2 a

98
00:07:15,120 --> 00:07:21,639
new DisplayPort standard that can drive 4K 240 HZ without display stream

99
00:07:19,720 --> 00:07:27,479
compression and all of this while talking to your computer at PCIe Gen 5

100
00:07:25,080 --> 00:07:31,960
it's 2025 and rate tracing is no longer an afterthought or even a choice in some

101
00:07:29,960 --> 00:07:37,120
cases with the new Jones being the first game to outright require support so

102
00:07:35,000 --> 00:07:40,840
let's talk about it for RT testing we use the highest settings starting at

103
00:07:38,919 --> 00:07:45,680
1440 uh and I want to get this out of the way AMD does not R Trace well n wake

104
00:07:43,680 --> 00:07:50,599
2 makes for a very playable experience on the 590 with 1% lows well above 60

105
00:07:48,280 --> 00:07:55,159
FPS numbers it can't quite hit yet on the absolutely brutal black myth Wukong

106
00:07:53,039 --> 00:08:02,440
though it is playable unlike the poor 7900 XTX ouch in cyberpunk the 59 has

107
00:07:59,759 --> 00:08:06,560
just a 20% lead over the 490 but compared to the 480 super it maintains

108
00:08:04,639 --> 00:08:10,240
its price to Performance ratio which I generally consider to be pretty darn

109
00:08:08,120 --> 00:08:15,800
acceptable for a Halo class card in the lightly rate traced f124 AMD comes back

110
00:08:13,280 --> 00:08:20,599
to life a little performing well against the 480 super and the same can be said

111
00:08:17,960 --> 00:08:26,479
for returnal but there's no question that the 590 is King for RT at

112
00:08:24,080 --> 00:08:30,840
1440p with a crown that only gets more dazzling at 4K black myth Wukong Falls

113
00:08:28,919 --> 00:08:35,320
below what we consider playable for an intense action game don't worry we'll

114
00:08:32,680 --> 00:08:39,760
talk about AI upscaling later cuz first dang look at this thing maintaining

115
00:08:37,680 --> 00:08:44,519
performance in the 50s at these settings in this economy dang NVIDIA that's

116
00:08:42,560 --> 00:08:49,200
pretty impressive and if you care more about absolute Cinema then frame rate

117
00:08:46,920 --> 00:08:53,480
well it holds above 30 FPS in Allen wake 2 which should go great with your

118
00:08:51,240 --> 00:08:58,720
popcorn f124 and returnal are similar stories as the 1440p results just with

119
00:08:56,240 --> 00:09:03,279
more pixels and fewer FPS all of this taken together means we're looking at a

120
00:09:00,519 --> 00:09:08,720
greater than 30% lead over last gen at a 25% higher price meaning the new RT

121
00:09:06,079 --> 00:09:12,959
cores are providing some benefit but it's pretty small compared to the impact

122
00:09:10,279 --> 00:09:16,720
of NVIDIA just plunking in more of them this is obviously a downer compared to

123
00:09:14,760 --> 00:09:20,640
the good old days when we used to get yearly GPU refreshes with dramatic

124
00:09:18,839 --> 00:09:24,320
improvements to Performance per dollar but it's clear that unless cuttingedge

125
00:09:22,200 --> 00:09:30,440
semiconductor manufacturing miraculously gets cheaper those days are never coming

126
00:09:26,920 --> 00:09:32,880
back so if we compare this more to say

127
00:09:30,440 --> 00:09:38,399
adding a second card an SLI a feature NVIDIA no longer supports then the glass

128
00:09:35,360 --> 00:09:40,200
half full take is hey at least it costs

129
00:09:38,399 --> 00:09:45,839
less than 2490 but NVIDIA still has some tricks up

130
00:09:43,320 --> 00:09:49,600
their sleeve holy heck that's one tight leather jacket how the heck did you fit

131
00:09:47,240 --> 00:09:53,480
that stuff in those sleeves with dlss 4 and multiframe gen by making use of flip

132
00:09:52,079 --> 00:09:59,480
metering and swapping them from convolution neural networks to Transformer based

133
00:09:56,720 --> 00:10:04,680
models there lot of words again lots of words again let's break it down dlss 4

134
00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:09,279
is NVIDIA's latest Suite of AI enhancements and it's the biggest change

135
00:10:06,680 --> 00:10:14,680
in years previous versions of dlss included a convolutional neural network

136
00:10:11,680 --> 00:10:17,640
or CNN a CNN can be thought of as a

137
00:10:14,680 --> 00:10:22,120
series of filters that look for specific details when used for image processing

138
00:10:20,360 --> 00:10:27,880
one layer could be looking for vertical edges one for horizontal edges and one

139
00:10:24,839 --> 00:10:29,320
for contrast Etc the neural network then

140
00:10:27,880 --> 00:10:33,760
observes the results from the fil filters and can use that information to

141
00:10:31,720 --> 00:10:39,680
identify things like if an image contains a dog or a stop sign seems

142
00:10:36,160 --> 00:10:41,639
convoluted well it literally is on 4,000

143
00:10:39,680 --> 00:10:45,600
Series gpus this information was combined with an optical flow

144
00:10:43,560 --> 00:10:51,160
accelerator that interpreted the motion in the scene to upscale or generate

145
00:10:47,839 --> 00:10:54,120
frames so why the switch scaling each

146
00:10:51,160 --> 00:10:58,800
filter can only scan and compute a small number of pixels at a time when we have

147
00:10:56,519 --> 00:11:04,160
millions of pixels dozens of times per second increasing performance can be

148
00:11:01,040 --> 00:11:06,760
tough so dlss uses a new Transformer

149
00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:11,800
model which as NVIDIA explains allows them to evaluate the relative importance

150
00:11:08,760 --> 00:11:14,839
of each pixel across an entire frame and

151
00:11:11,800 --> 00:11:16,639
over multiple frames to achieve a deeper

152
00:11:14,839 --> 00:11:21,040
understanding of the scenes that offers greater stability reduced ghosting

153
00:11:18,600 --> 00:11:25,800
higher detail in motion and smoother edges they also scale better which is

154
00:11:23,720 --> 00:11:30,959
part of why they have become so heavily used in things like large language

155
00:11:27,440 --> 00:11:33,519
models Transformer is the T in chat GPT

156
00:11:30,959 --> 00:11:38,440
so well a CNN can see this picture and say there is a cat there is a product

157
00:11:35,800 --> 00:11:44,480
from LTT Store.com a Transformer might say there is a cat enjoying the premium

158
00:11:41,079 --> 00:11:46,920
CRT themed pet cave from LTT

159
00:11:44,480 --> 00:11:52,120
store.com however while a Transformer can process complete images faster it

160
00:11:49,639 --> 00:11:56,200
does require more data for training and honestly with the side by-side

161
00:11:53,680 --> 00:11:59,880
comparisons it is tough to tell the difference in image quality between the

162
00:11:58,320 --> 00:12:05,079
two models like really tough there are clear benefits in

163
00:12:02,680 --> 00:12:09,760
specific areas that NVIDIA points out things like fences power lines and

164
00:12:07,000 --> 00:12:14,079
Barbed wires but there's still obvious artifacts when dealing with

165
00:12:11,240 --> 00:12:19,839
semi-transparent objects or just very busy scenes a lot of the artifacts are

166
00:12:16,880 --> 00:12:24,480
different than dlss 3 but are still present on the bright side at least on

167
00:12:22,320 --> 00:12:29,360
high-end cards the Transformer models don't show a substantial performance hit

168
00:12:27,399 --> 00:12:34,000
enough Theory I want to talk about m effing G multiframe gen is perhaps the

169
00:12:32,240 --> 00:12:37,720
most game-changing tech Landing with these new cards like the previous

170
00:12:35,920 --> 00:12:41,920
version of frame gen it uses AI to generate in between frames based on

171
00:12:39,800 --> 00:12:46,680
optical flow data and rendered frames but multiframe gen now allows users to

172
00:12:44,320 --> 00:12:52,279
generate up to three inet rather than just one boosting frame rates to up to

173
00:12:48,800 --> 00:12:55,519
four times native does it work well

174
00:12:52,279 --> 00:12:57,920
according to our charts yes very yes the

175
00:12:55,519 --> 00:13:03,040
numbers double triple and quadruple and make the 590 look absolutely ridiculous

176
00:13:00,920 --> 00:13:09,120
at least in the charts but as big as that bar is the real frames haven't

177
00:13:05,440 --> 00:13:11,600
changed so what's the deal well MFG is

178
00:13:09,120 --> 00:13:16,360
pretty wild dlss 3 frame required specific Optical flow accelerating

179
00:13:13,639 --> 00:13:19,600
Hardware on gpus combined that with the game data like depth and motion vectors

180
00:13:17,880 --> 00:13:25,360
to generate in between frames and it was an okay solution but you had to have two

181
00:13:22,639 --> 00:13:29,399
bits of Hardware processing each frame and that's just inefficient and could

182
00:13:27,320 --> 00:13:33,120
even cause the GPU to throttle resulting in a lower base frame rate to multiply

183
00:13:31,680 --> 00:13:37,480
off of that's why you didn't just see a straight doubling of frame rate when you

184
00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:42,040
turn frame gen on the 590 and multiframe gen is Shue A's Optical flow accelerator

185
00:13:40,079 --> 00:13:47,120
and instead utilize tightly integrated tensor and Cuda cores in Blackwell to

186
00:13:44,160 --> 00:13:51,440
run a lightweight AI Optical flow model not Hardware accelerated it's just an AI

187
00:13:49,279 --> 00:13:56,839
model this means that single frame gen should now run 40% faster while using

188
00:13:53,800 --> 00:13:59,639
30% less vram we know it works but how

189
00:13:56,839 --> 00:14:03,519
does it look well it depends on who you ask if you want to see your FPS number

190
00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:07,560
much higher then it works great nothing else sort of hacking your FPS counter

191
00:14:05,560 --> 00:14:12,320
will let you get nearly 600 FPS in cyberpunk but visually it's not perfect

192
00:14:10,079 --> 00:14:15,759
and frame gen weirdness still persists look at the combing on these crosswalks

193
00:14:14,079 --> 00:14:19,199
in cyberpunk or this bottle phasing in and out in the Benchmark or the doubling

194
00:14:17,320 --> 00:14:23,160
of the fan blades in these large HVAC units in Allen W 2 there's obvious

195
00:14:21,440 --> 00:14:26,480
artifacting around the player model and around the edge of your flashlight which

196
00:14:24,519 --> 00:14:30,920
is sadly exactly where you will be looking 100% of the time and it's worth

197
00:14:29,440 --> 00:14:34,800
noting that these artifacts are not present when we're just using dlss for

198
00:14:32,800 --> 00:14:39,160
upscaling curiously while cyberpunk and Allen Wick both updated with explicit

199
00:14:36,680 --> 00:14:43,959
support for multiframe Gen the feature can be forced in any dlss 3 single frame

200
00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:48,199
gen supported games through the NVIDIA driver and the game that fared the best

201
00:14:46,240 --> 00:14:52,079
was Dragon Age Veil guard the world's full of magic so who's to say exactly

202
00:14:50,000 --> 00:14:56,519
what a Vortex of Shadow is supposed to look like and since it already ran at a

203
00:14:54,279 --> 00:15:00,920
solid 70 FPS with all the settings cranked no frame gen it kept input put

204
00:14:59,199 --> 00:15:05,600
latency manageable which is really important because if your base FPS is

205
00:15:03,040 --> 00:15:10,560
only 30 frames well frame gen will make it look smooth but you'll observe many

206
00:15:07,639 --> 00:15:15,360
visual anomalies and latency is still dictated by your true frame rate meaning

207
00:15:12,759 --> 00:15:19,240
that the game feels far less responsive than it looks like it should be the good

208
00:15:17,279 --> 00:15:23,199
news says NVIDIA is that MFG at least isn't adding any latency compared to the

209
00:15:21,560 --> 00:15:27,680
base frame rate but we felt like it would be a good idea to verify that and

210
00:15:25,160 --> 00:15:31,920
verify we did using our trusty lat our click to Photon test result showed that

211
00:15:29,560 --> 00:15:36,680
frame gen does not increase latency over native with Reflex on in fact it seems

212
00:15:34,480 --> 00:15:39,600
to actually lower the latency slightly it doesn't really make sense to us so

213
00:15:38,199 --> 00:15:43,519
we're going to Chu that up to sampling error but if there is any effect on

214
00:15:41,399 --> 00:15:47,720
latency it's so minor that it's not noticeable compared to our total system

215
00:15:45,240 --> 00:15:51,959
latency and that is mighty impressive but the issue remains you can't beat

216
00:15:50,040 --> 00:15:56,360
your base frame rat's latency and when it's disconnected from the motion you

217
00:15:53,360 --> 00:15:57,839
see on screen it almost makes it worse

218
00:15:56,360 --> 00:16:01,440
perhaps the situation will improve with reflex 2 but that's not here yet so we

219
00:16:00,000 --> 00:16:05,240
aren't going to dwell on it even if the tech is really cool our take on

220
00:16:03,440 --> 00:16:10,440
multiframe gen right now is that it has the same key flaws before it's a win

221
00:16:07,880 --> 00:16:14,839
more feature that works the best when it makes the least sense to use which means

222
00:16:12,839 --> 00:16:18,959
it is definitely not the Silver Bullet that NVIDIA's graphs make it out to be

223
00:16:17,160 --> 00:16:22,360
with all this power it would make a lot more sense to use the 590 to make some

224
00:16:20,480 --> 00:16:26,800
money right so let's talk productivity hey you might not know me

225
00:16:24,639 --> 00:16:30,880
but I do this kind of thing and this kind of thing and NVIDIA's new

226
00:16:28,920 --> 00:16:34,639
architecture has benefits for me too the encoder and decoders provide support for

227
00:16:32,759 --> 00:16:38,279
422 chroma sampling which will make working with high-end video files much

228
00:16:36,480 --> 00:16:42,759
faster especially for multi- camera video edits the encoders also provide

229
00:16:40,560 --> 00:16:46,800
better quality at smaller file sizes sadly we can't verify that for you today

230
00:16:44,720 --> 00:16:50,519
as we are currently re-evaluating our encoding benchmarks but the New Media

231
00:16:48,720 --> 00:16:55,199
engine is almost certainly playing a role in Puget bench where we see a nice

232
00:16:52,560 --> 00:17:00,720
9% bump in Premier Pro performance and an even nicer nearly 20% Improvement to

233
00:16:58,120 --> 00:17:04,799
Vinci resolve when compared to the 490 in blender NVIDIA has us considering

234
00:17:02,600 --> 00:17:08,600
finding a new Benchmark as the 590 has brought Barber Shop render times to less

235
00:17:06,959 --> 00:17:14,760
than half a minute more than double the speed of the 3090 TI nice overw editing

236
00:17:12,400 --> 00:17:20,360
transition here double the 3090 TI you say AI nerds Rejoice if you're like me

237
00:17:17,959 --> 00:17:24,439
and for your sake I hope you're not uh you've been dying for NVIDIA to release

238
00:17:22,039 --> 00:17:29,160
a new 32 gig consumer card so with all the bragging and vide been doing about

239
00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:31,480
AI tops I'm expecting some big numbers

240
00:17:29,160 --> 00:17:37,080
and in the proon textt benchmarks what the number is not big sure the 590 is

241
00:17:35,080 --> 00:17:41,240
still the best card on the charts but I was expecting more than this we'll see

242
00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:47,520
roughly 20 to 30% improvement over the 4090 depending on the Benchmark and 60

243
00:17:44,039 --> 00:17:49,960
to 70% over the 390 TI I can see why

244
00:17:47,520 --> 00:17:55,080
they keep talking about AI tops and not specific performance in ml perf the

245
00:17:52,880 --> 00:17:59,480
story remains largely the same in the time to First token and the token

246
00:17:56,960 --> 00:18:04,120
generation rate benchmarks for image generation Our preferred proon Benchmark

247
00:18:01,559 --> 00:18:08,720
doesn't support the 59 yet so we tested using the Benchmark provided by NVIDIA

248
00:18:06,200 --> 00:18:13,840
prepare your salt grains for the taking in the proen flux fp8 image generation

249
00:18:11,760 --> 00:18:18,080
the 590 leads by a margin in line with the rest of our benchmarks but when we

250
00:18:15,760 --> 00:18:22,120
switch to fp4 Precision the 590 shows how powerful the native Hardware support

251
00:18:20,039 --> 00:18:26,240
can be taking less than one quarter of the time to generate images compared to

252
00:18:23,919 --> 00:18:30,440
the 490 we'd love to see how this fares against the 390 TI but this NVIDIA

253
00:18:28,480 --> 00:18:34,520
provides Benchmark doesn't support older cards I was expecting AI to be the place

254
00:18:32,840 --> 00:18:41,120
where this card really shines but I guess potential buyers will have to settle for just having the best consumer

255
00:18:38,880 --> 00:18:45,400
friendly grade card for AI we'll call it the Nifty

256
00:18:42,640 --> 00:18:49,400
FY somehow there is still more review to go good thing this is so digestible and

257
00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:52,799
uncomplicated so far right Blackwell's main efficiency improvements over Ada

258
00:18:51,120 --> 00:18:57,679
seem to come from what they're calling Max Q functionality it boils down to a

259
00:18:55,039 --> 00:19:01,880
few small but significant changes improvements to power thanks to an

260
00:18:59,480 --> 00:19:06,120
additional power Rail and improved logic allows more of the GPU to switch to a

261
00:19:03,840 --> 00:19:09,720
low power State more rapidly in CPU bound or frame cap scenarios this could

262
00:19:08,120 --> 00:19:14,600
help save some power especially on mobile chips but in GPU bound full load

263
00:19:12,600 --> 00:19:22,400
scenarios this monster will absolutely draw its fully rated 575 Watts including

264
00:19:18,400 --> 00:19:23,840
transient spikes of as high as 637 watts

265
00:19:22,400 --> 00:19:29,159
and you can see even in real world gaming it will pull space heater levels

266
00:19:25,760 --> 00:19:31,720
of Power with an average of 554 w an

267
00:19:29,159 --> 00:19:35,480
f124 and to manage all that power they had to make a unique cooler design while

268
00:19:34,120 --> 00:19:39,960
everyone else was making four slot behemoths NVIDIA built something very

269
00:19:37,240 --> 00:19:44,440
different and man does it look good not only is it classy it's also Innovative

270
00:19:42,159 --> 00:19:47,520
over ambitious even the main board of the video card is just the middle

271
00:19:45,799 --> 00:19:50,440
section and the outputs in PCIe connector are on daughterboards

272
00:19:48,799 --> 00:19:54,600
connected via what they call a flexible PCB it's like a stiff ribbon cable I

273
00:19:52,480 --> 00:19:59,240
guess this allows for a double flowthrough design with fans blowing

274
00:19:56,480 --> 00:20:04,039
through dense heat sinks and odly the fans run quiet too quiet even so like

275
00:20:02,240 --> 00:20:07,520
the 4090 most of the time the loudest thing about the card will be its coil

276
00:20:05,679 --> 00:20:12,039
wine it's not the worst we've heard but it's noticeable and if you expected it

277
00:20:09,320 --> 00:20:15,880
to run cooler than the 4090 Founders uh it doesn't but given how much smaller it

278
00:20:14,360 --> 00:20:19,760
is not to mention the enormous thermal load it's dealing with I'd say it's

279
00:20:17,559 --> 00:20:23,200
doing a great job but the new cooler style brings new build considerations we

280
00:20:21,840 --> 00:20:26,360
know that flowr coolers can have a noticeable impact on CPU temps

281
00:20:25,080 --> 00:20:30,760
especially for those using tower heat sinks so is a double flow through double

282
00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:35,400
bad we took the 590 and the 490 Fe and put them in a corser 4000d and even with

283
00:20:33,360 --> 00:20:40,919
both running at 450 watts to control the experiment our poor noctua nhd15 saw CPU

284
00:20:38,520 --> 00:20:45,240
temps that are roughly 3° higher in both synthetic and gaming workloads a CPU

285
00:20:43,400 --> 00:20:49,720
Cooler upgrade perhaps an intake mounted radiator could be in order for some

286
00:20:46,960 --> 00:20:53,919
folks wow that was a lot to talk about so what's our conclusion well if you're

287
00:20:51,679 --> 00:20:58,039
professional game developer or any other professional or basically anyone who can

288
00:20:56,200 --> 00:21:02,880
use the new performance and especially the new features to make money it's a

289
00:21:00,559 --> 00:21:09,200
no-brainer as for the gamers well if the 490 was stupid stupid price but stupid

290
00:21:06,120 --> 00:21:11,559
performance the 590 is stupider it

291
00:21:09,200 --> 00:21:16,840
provides 30ish per more performance by using 33% more hardware and 30ish per

292
00:21:14,200 --> 00:21:21,960
more power and it gets a roughly 25% price increase it's a 4090 plus plus on

293
00:21:20,559 --> 00:21:26,640
the one hand you could look at this and say wow this doesn't look good for the

294
00:21:24,760 --> 00:21:30,919
rest of the 50 Series lineup but it's also worth considering that the 49 was

295
00:21:29,120 --> 00:21:34,760
kind of an outlier for 40 series offering a huge boost over its

296
00:21:32,960 --> 00:21:38,880
predecessor with the rest offering smaller upgrades so if you're on 30

297
00:21:36,720 --> 00:21:43,679
series and still not in the mega mega baller income bracket I guess all we can

298
00:21:41,080 --> 00:21:49,400
do is wait and see see if lus Has the strength to do this segue who

299
00:21:46,679 --> 00:21:54,080
our Squarespace building a userfriendly visually captivating website for your

300
00:21:51,440 --> 00:21:58,039
business is not particularly easy is what I used to say but with Squarespace

301
00:21:56,480 --> 00:22:02,360
you're set up with a blueprint for success their new guided design system

302
00:22:00,240 --> 00:22:05,679
aptly named Squarespace blueprint helps you build your own unique online

303
00:22:04,000 --> 00:22:09,159
presence from the ground up with professionally curated layouts and

304
00:22:07,159 --> 00:22:12,600
styling options then you can dive into the details with their fluid engine

305
00:22:10,720 --> 00:22:15,760
editor which features intuitive drag and drop building blocks once you're happy

306
00:22:14,279 --> 00:22:19,000
with your marvelous creation you can then use their comprehensive email

307
00:22:17,360 --> 00:22:23,080
marketing tools to engage with your audience generate leads and make sales

308
00:22:21,480 --> 00:22:26,640
then it's just time to watch the D roll in or you could go deeper with their

309
00:22:24,880 --> 00:22:29,960
Advanced analytics tools that let you see what's working and what you need to

310
00:22:28,200 --> 00:22:35,840
tweak for your next campaign so don't wait go visit squarespace.com

311
00:22:32,320 --> 00:22:38,440
to get a free trial and to receive 10%

312
00:22:35,840 --> 00:22:45,159
off your first purchase of a website or domain if you like this video check out

313
00:22:42,279 --> 00:22:51,840
the one get on Hing lot of big nuggets in

314
00:22:48,480 --> 00:22:54,840
there I wish I could eat a nugget right

315
00:22:51,840 --> 00:22:54,840
now