1
00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:09,120
This is what happens when you run your mouth on the internet. I thought I was a

2
00:00:06,319 --> 00:00:14,480
cool guy. I was like, "Hey, this is a crazy curved ultrawide Alienware

3
00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:20,720
monitor. If anyone has one of these, I'll pay 10 grand for it so I can unbox

4
00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:23,760
it." I was 100% certain nobody had one.

5
00:00:20,720 --> 00:00:27,039
Alienware told me nobody had one. Well,

6
00:00:23,760 --> 00:00:28,560
as it turns out, Alienware was just

7
00:00:27,039 --> 00:00:36,200
rebranding a monitor from a littleknown company

8
00:00:30,800 --> 00:00:36,200
called Aendo called the CRVD43.

9
00:00:36,559 --> 00:00:42,719
This, my friends, is the world's first,

10
00:00:39,760 --> 00:00:49,840
as far as we can tell, curved desktop monitor and the world's first ultrawide

11
00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:54,800
desktop monitor. and it wasn't Alienware. So, I did get a bit of a

12
00:00:52,399 --> 00:00:59,520
discount, but I still ended up paying $6,000

13
00:00:57,039 --> 00:01:06,240
for this thing. So, it better be reallying

14
00:01:01,600 --> 00:01:09,040
cool. Welcome to Holy,

15
00:01:06,240 --> 00:01:12,040
the heaviest monitor that I have yet encountered.

16
00:01:19,200 --> 00:01:26,320
The genesis of all of this was a Reddit post that was brought up in our weekly

17
00:01:24,240 --> 00:01:30,880
writers meeting. It just it looks so cool. I was like, "Holy crap, that is

18
00:01:28,560 --> 00:01:36,000
such an amazing piece of computing history. Like, I need it." We reached

19
00:01:33,360 --> 00:01:41,360
out to everyone we could think of to get our hands on one of these puppies, but

20
00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:46,560
all of them were dead ends. In a few cases, they did actually have the

21
00:01:43,680 --> 00:01:51,360
display, but less of a dead end and more of a dead display. So then it ended up

22
00:01:49,600 --> 00:01:57,360
getting thrown in. Oh my god, it's heavy. Oh, it ended up getting thrown in

23
00:01:54,399 --> 00:02:02,560
as a topic for the WAN Show where I kind of jokingly

24
00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:04,479
kind of seriously put out a $10,000

25
00:02:02,560 --> 00:02:10,800
bounty. And when I did that, I will buy it from you for $10,000 if it works so

26
00:02:08,319 --> 00:02:17,680
that I can make a video about it. I was not expecting to actually pay

27
00:02:14,239 --> 00:02:19,760
$10,000. I expected to get nothing other

28
00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:27,200
than the same pictures we had already seen of non- workinging units. And yet,

29
00:02:22,480 --> 00:02:30,239
lo and behold, 10 days later, we got an

30
00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:32,800
email with a link to a video of a new

31
00:02:30,239 --> 00:02:39,360
inbox monitor. Like, look carefully at this. This is actual official packaging

32
00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:46,080
for this thing. We verified the monitor did in fact work and the deal was made.

33
00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:51,280
I'm sure that guy was not expecting to get $6,000 for this ancient technology.

34
00:02:49,280 --> 00:02:57,360
I mean, look at this thing. Even when it's off, the screen's not even black.

35
00:02:54,560 --> 00:03:03,280
There were three variants of this. The Alienware one from CES 2008 where no

36
00:03:00,640 --> 00:03:09,519
price was given. There was an NEC variant that was shown at the 2009 Mac

37
00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:12,400
World event where a hefty $8,000 price

38
00:03:09,519 --> 00:03:17,680
tag was given. Then there's ours, the Astendo Technologies CRVD 43in curved

39
00:03:15,519 --> 00:03:28,319
display. And when this was first sold for a very brief period in 2009 at its

40
00:03:21,760 --> 00:03:30,159
cheapest, it was a uh modest $6,500,

41
00:03:28,319 --> 00:03:34,159
which is kind of crazy because that's actually very close to what we ended up

42
00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:38,319
paying for. Now, at every event where the display was shown, it made

43
00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:44,799
headlines. Anyone who saw it, I mean, look at this 2008 was wowed by both the

44
00:03:42,239 --> 00:03:50,799
curved nature of the display and how wide it is. Like sitting about 2 ft from

45
00:03:47,599 --> 00:03:53,920
it gives you a a natural 90° field of

46
00:03:50,799 --> 00:03:56,000
view. That's actually very comparable to

47
00:03:53,920 --> 00:04:01,280
high-end curved ultrawide displays today. This thing was literally a decade

48
00:03:58,879 --> 00:04:06,080
ahead of its time, which isn't to say that everything about it holds up

49
00:04:03,920 --> 00:04:09,519
particularly well today. Let's start getting it hooked up and talk through

50
00:04:07,439 --> 00:04:14,159
some of the specs. So, in terms of connectivity, DisplayPort, ladies and

51
00:04:11,760 --> 00:04:19,359
gentlemen, didn't exist yet. So, we're going to go ahead and Oh, it's fine.

52
00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:24,479
There's your power input right there, ladies and gentlemen. Got that dual link

53
00:04:21,759 --> 00:04:28,400
DVI input, HDMI port. I would actually be surprised if it runs full res on what

54
00:04:26,639 --> 00:04:35,040
what HDMI version would this have even been? 1.3. Oh, baby. USB 2 hub, though,

55
00:04:33,280 --> 00:04:41,360
ladies and gentlemen. It's a great value at $6,000. The stand looks like cast

56
00:04:38,639 --> 00:04:46,479
aluminum, I guess. 25 lbs without the stand. Well, the stand definitely adds

57
00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:48,639
more weight cuz it's pretty heavy. Wait,

58
00:04:46,479 --> 00:04:52,479
this is single link DVI to HDMI. Why would it come with such a weird stupid

59
00:04:50,160 --> 00:04:58,720
cable? Can I just have like a regular dual link DVI cable? How about HDMI? Oh,

60
00:04:56,720 --> 00:05:03,040
right. We're running like a 2080 or something here. Obviously, it doesn't

61
00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:08,560
have DVI on it, right? Who bought this thing and then never opened it? Oh my

62
00:05:05,680 --> 00:05:12,800
god. Do you hear those fans? It's as loud as a computer.

63
00:05:10,960 --> 00:05:17,440
Whoa. Giant cooling fan right here. Uh, based

64
00:05:15,520 --> 00:05:21,759
on the position, I would say it must be near the power supply cuz the power goes

65
00:05:19,759 --> 00:05:26,240
in right under there. And then check this shizz out. Look at these giant heat

66
00:05:24,160 --> 00:05:29,840
sinks here. It's funny. I didn't think about it, but that totally makes sense

67
00:05:28,400 --> 00:05:34,880
that this would have to have beefy cooling in it because the way that they

68
00:05:32,240 --> 00:05:41,280
built it is unlike anything that I've seen before. So, it's got a 2880x

69
00:05:38,479 --> 00:05:46,720
900 resolution. And how they achieved that and the curvature of the display is

70
00:05:44,639 --> 00:05:57,120
that it's actually instead of being just one display, four DLP LED lit screens in

71
00:05:52,240 --> 00:06:00,560
portrait mode just lined up. So pretty

72
00:05:57,120 --> 00:06:03,759
much it's kind of full of projectors.

73
00:06:00,560 --> 00:06:06,560
What's cool about being DLP though is

74
00:06:03,759 --> 00:06:11,440
that we might actually get a pretty decent gaming experience out of this

75
00:06:08,319 --> 00:06:14,319
thing because it boasts a point. 02

76
00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:19,120
millisecond response time. That's right. We're going to game on it. This is a

77
00:06:16,240 --> 00:06:25,520
classic in terms of uh interface down here. Hey, it works. Wow, that is really

78
00:06:23,199 --> 00:06:29,440
washed out. System error 1508 contact tech support. What are the odds?

79
00:06:26,639 --> 00:06:34,479
Extendo's tech support still around. Uh, some of the other specs, uh, lttore.com,

80
00:06:31,919 --> 00:06:41,440
by the way, include 200 nit peak brightness. Ouch. 10,000 to1 contrast

81
00:06:38,000 --> 00:06:45,199
ratio. Sure, that looks like a bad sign.

82
00:06:41,440 --> 00:06:47,759
100% sRGB coverage and 99% coverage of

83
00:06:45,199 --> 00:06:53,199
the Adobe RGB color space. Uh, should I be worried about that? So, let's try the

84
00:06:49,440 --> 00:06:54,960
power cycle trick here. Wow, it has like

85
00:06:53,199 --> 00:07:00,639
a boot down sequence almost. You can like hear the power supply.

86
00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:06,080
Yes. Oh, wow. It actually looks a lot better, too, now that it's warmed up.

87
00:07:02,800 --> 00:07:08,720
That's crazy. You can still absolutely

88
00:07:06,080 --> 00:07:16,160
see the seams between the projectors. Like, it's Hello. So, right there, right

89
00:07:12,800 --> 00:07:18,560
there, right there, and right there,

90
00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:25,120
there's your four. Are they LED back lit? Yep. That would

91
00:07:21,759 --> 00:07:27,360
have been like crazy town technology at

92
00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:31,599
the time. That's insane. Check it out from this angle. Like, see how stark

93
00:07:29,919 --> 00:07:37,599
those lines are between the the projectors. To be clear, it's not great,

94
00:07:34,479 --> 00:07:40,960
but it's not that bad. Actually, let's

95
00:07:37,599 --> 00:07:43,440
give it a little calibrate.

96
00:07:40,960 --> 00:07:47,039
Calibrate. Wow. Look at this. It's got a menu and everything. I would have given

97
00:07:45,280 --> 00:07:53,840
basically anything for this 10 years ago. So, you're actually aligning the

98
00:07:48,960 --> 00:07:58,319
two different projectors. Holy crap.

99
00:07:53,840 --> 00:08:00,879
So, it can move them. It can move them.

100
00:07:58,319 --> 00:08:05,199
You got to be kidding me. It's definitely blurriier towards the

101
00:08:03,120 --> 00:08:11,520
outside, but that's pretty typical of a projection style display. Okay. So, how

102
00:08:07,440 --> 00:08:14,800
do you make white smooth? Okay, then.

103
00:08:11,520 --> 00:08:17,199
Oh, I see. So, it's adjusting the

104
00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:20,800
brightness at the at the meeting point where they overlap. Oh, that's a little

105
00:08:19,039 --> 00:08:26,639
better, actually. I just darkened it a bit more. Uh, information. Yes, please

106
00:08:23,599 --> 00:08:30,479
tell me more information. 2880 by 900 60

107
00:08:26,639 --> 00:08:35,360
Hz native sync type digital. Yeah. Okay.

108
00:08:30,479 --> 00:08:38,719
In terms of responsiveness here,

109
00:08:35,360 --> 00:08:41,760
yeah, for a 60 Hz display, it's not bad.

110
00:08:38,719 --> 00:08:44,240
Like it feels it feels fine. Now, there

111
00:08:41,760 --> 00:08:50,000
was a lot of confusion at the time because the thickness, the girth of this

112
00:08:47,920 --> 00:08:55,440
display led people to believe that it was a CRT. but it wasn't. And quite

113
00:08:53,920 --> 00:08:59,600
frankly, that's a bit of an unfortunate thing. If it was a CRT, it would

114
00:08:57,440 --> 00:09:04,080
definitely be even heavier than it is actually by a considerable margin. But

115
00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:09,839
it would also have better image clarity and better brightness. It kind of buzzes

116
00:09:07,279 --> 00:09:15,440
different sounds depending on how much of the display is actually active.

117
00:09:13,120 --> 00:09:20,240
That's so weird. Everything about this thing is so

118
00:09:18,720 --> 00:09:27,120
weird. What even is this aspect ratio? 32x10 in

119
00:09:23,920 --> 00:09:29,600
game. The lines are really not that

120
00:09:27,120 --> 00:09:34,240
noticeable, especially from that twoft sweet spot. Like it's really tuned. Like

121
00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:43,040
if I'm in here, I can make it out. And if I'm out here, I can make it out. But

122
00:09:37,519 --> 00:09:46,720
like right here, holy crap. Like

123
00:09:43,040 --> 00:09:51,360
it feels really responsive.

124
00:09:46,720 --> 00:09:54,480
Like holy crap. My mind would have been

125
00:09:51,360 --> 00:09:57,200
absolutely blown to try something like

126
00:09:54,480 --> 00:10:02,720
this. No wonder it made headlines at every show that they demoed the thing.

127
00:09:59,839 --> 00:10:08,000
Interestingly, I'm not getting any noticeable rainbow effect. And normally,

128
00:10:05,519 --> 00:10:13,519
I find it quite noticeable on DLP displays. I don't know if that just has

129
00:10:10,800 --> 00:10:19,839
to do with the small size of it or my proximity to it or or what the deal is

130
00:10:16,480 --> 00:10:23,200
there. Aendo specialty was LEDs back

131
00:10:19,839 --> 00:10:27,360
then. Interesting.

132
00:10:23,200 --> 00:10:31,680
I mean, the advertised contrast ratio is

133
00:10:27,360 --> 00:10:35,600
obviously complete bull. Um, to put it

134
00:10:31,680 --> 00:10:38,399
as charitably as I possibly can, but

135
00:10:35,600 --> 00:10:43,200
pretty much everything else about it is really impressive. So, when I whip the

136
00:10:41,440 --> 00:10:47,040
camera, like when I pan the camera like this, you see a little bit of display

137
00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:52,480
tearing. But for not having VSSync enabled,

138
00:10:49,760 --> 00:10:59,120
that's normal. What's shocking to me, so here, if we turn VSYNC on,

139
00:10:56,000 --> 00:11:01,680
what's shocking to me is that in between

140
00:10:59,120 --> 00:11:05,920
the displays, I don't notice anything like I don't

141
00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:12,240
notice like a kind of a compression expansion kind of artifact or or

142
00:11:09,279 --> 00:11:16,800
anything like that. It just it really does feel like one big display. There's

143
00:11:14,560 --> 00:11:23,040
things that they lied about for sure, but there's also things they got really,

144
00:11:19,760 --> 00:11:25,040
really right. Gaming aside, from like a

145
00:11:23,040 --> 00:11:29,360
creative standpoint, something like this would have been absolutely

146
00:11:27,120 --> 00:11:33,920
game-changing. With that said, I think you'd still need another display for

147
00:11:32,320 --> 00:11:38,240
certain types of work. Like, I mean, if I was doing anything that I expected to

148
00:11:35,600 --> 00:11:42,720
be color accurate on here, get real. It might have that gamut

149
00:11:40,160 --> 00:11:47,839
coverage or whatever, but I mean with the amount of, you know, fringing for

150
00:11:44,640 --> 00:11:50,320
example on borders and with how much

151
00:11:47,839 --> 00:11:53,839
variation there is with a single color across the entire width of the display.

152
00:11:52,160 --> 00:11:59,040
Like here, you can see how the start menu is like kind of pink over on this

153
00:11:55,600 --> 00:12:01,120
side and then it's more like dark here.

154
00:11:59,040 --> 00:12:06,800
There's no way that you'd be doing any kind of like color accurate work. But

155
00:12:03,440 --> 00:12:09,440
from just a a sheer screen real estate

156
00:12:06,800 --> 00:12:14,800
standpoint, we're looking at a very modern amount of screen real estate for,

157
00:12:12,399 --> 00:12:21,040
you know, timelines and uh you know, media bins and graphics and all that

158
00:12:18,160 --> 00:12:26,639
kind of stuff. Like this again would have been absolutely

159
00:12:23,519 --> 00:12:29,040
mindblowing to 10 years ago me. In

160
00:12:26,639 --> 00:12:35,600
conclusion, as a 10year ago tech demo, absolutely

161
00:12:32,800 --> 00:12:39,600
freaking unreal, I don't know that I would have spent this kind of money on

162
00:12:37,279 --> 00:12:44,079
it, just because there are some serious quality of life problems with it with

163
00:12:41,839 --> 00:12:48,560
respect to, you know, the changes in the zones, particularly the the maximum

164
00:12:46,160 --> 00:12:54,000
brightness is really not great. Contrast isn't great. But as a 10 years ago tech

165
00:12:51,120 --> 00:12:58,160
demo, unfreaking real. Uh, I'm still not stoked that I

166
00:12:56,320 --> 00:13:02,160
paid six grand for it, but hey, maybe we'll do a live stream. You want to see

167
00:12:59,360 --> 00:13:05,279
a tear down live stream tearown? Let us know in the comments below. Let's get

168
00:13:03,760 --> 00:13:09,120
let's squeeze two videos out of this thing. Let's make make up some some

169
00:13:06,959 --> 00:13:12,000
ground there. Um, make sure you're subscribed so you don't miss that. If

170
00:13:10,720 --> 00:13:16,800
you guys are looking for another video to watch right now, maybe check out uh

171
00:13:14,399 --> 00:13:21,600
oh, this one on the light field hollow display. That's like, you know,

172
00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:24,639
tomorrow's technology today instead of today's technology