WEBVTT

00:00:06.640 --> 00:00:12.920
with its power loss protection affordability and performance the sp920

00:00:10.719 --> 00:00:18.039
from a data makes upgrading to an SSD remarkably safe and simple some years

00:00:15.839 --> 00:00:21.920
back Chinese tube amplifier companies came crashing onto the headphone amp

00:00:19.960 --> 00:00:26.400
scene offering impressive specs and features at prices that traditional

00:00:23.640 --> 00:00:30.160
audio companies were simply nowhere near if you wanted something with similar

00:00:28.199 --> 00:00:35.600
performance and inexpensive worldwide shipping but all of the usual questions

00:00:33.440 --> 00:00:40.000
must be asked when buying something from China before investing your hard-earned

00:00:37.520 --> 00:00:43.920
dollars because they're still not cheap will the manufacturing quality be

00:00:41.520 --> 00:00:48.120
consistent are they using high quality componentry what about after sales

00:00:45.960 --> 00:00:52.199
support well over the last few years one of these Chinese brands has expended

00:00:50.120 --> 00:00:55.960
their portfolio Beyond a few products established a solid track record for

00:00:53.640 --> 00:01:00.760
user support and has turned into pretty much the go-to for inexpensive but high

00:00:58.320 --> 00:01:06.159
quality Chinese built tube amps and that is little Dot and this is the MK4 a

00:01:03.840 --> 00:01:12.240
premium single-ended headphone amplifier and one of the most famous with a

00:01:08.680 --> 00:01:14.240
469 deep appreciation thread on headfi

00:01:12.240 --> 00:01:19.080
that's actually been running since 2010 but was even posted in today but before

00:01:17.560 --> 00:01:22.439
we get into this product you're probably asking yourself already well why would I

00:01:21.000 --> 00:01:27.280
even want a tube based headphone amplifier I heard from oh I don't know

00:01:24.720 --> 00:01:31.680
my plumber or some tall dark techsavvy hippie or something that they're bad and

00:01:29.400 --> 00:01:37.000
solid state amps are much better great question and it comes down to the

00:01:33.840 --> 00:01:39.320
subjectivity versus objectivity argument

00:01:37.000 --> 00:01:43.880
that has been and continues to be a raging internet War hopefully I can

00:01:41.560 --> 00:01:49.520
clarify things a little bit objectively tube amplifiers do typically sound

00:01:46.560 --> 00:01:54.159
different than accuracy Above All Else solid state amplifiers like the

00:01:51.159 --> 00:01:56.719
objective 2 they're less bright more

00:01:54.159 --> 00:02:00.920
natural sound signature is real and a result of a number of factors including

00:01:58.439 --> 00:02:05.240
their relatively high output impedance also objectively they straight up do

00:02:03.360 --> 00:02:09.160
introduce Distortion and therefore will not achieve that purest For Better or

00:02:07.560 --> 00:02:13.000
For Worse it sounds exactly like the original recording goal that you might

00:02:10.959 --> 00:02:16.959
be going for but that is where subjectivity comes in a lot of people

00:02:15.239 --> 00:02:20.840
don't give any cares about that they just want an enjoyable listening

00:02:18.319 --> 00:02:25.519
experience and to their ears the Richer base warmer sound and subdued highs of a

00:02:23.440 --> 00:02:29.879
tube amp sounds a okay and to those people I'll say this rock on just keep

00:02:28.519 --> 00:02:34.160
your thoughts about the obvious Superior I ority of tubes to yourself but before

00:02:32.560 --> 00:02:38.239
the solid state Fanboys get all high and mighty now lonus and Logan are on our

00:02:36.400 --> 00:02:42.440
side about this frankly I don't want to hear about the obvious superiority of

00:02:39.640 --> 00:02:45.400
solid state either enjoying music is not that black and white and there are other

00:02:43.879 --> 00:02:49.519
variables at play here like the fact that everyone hears a little differently

00:02:47.280 --> 00:02:54.200
that make it actually impossible to have a one-size fits-all solution so take the

00:02:52.120 --> 00:02:58.680
rest of this video for what it is my own subjective personal experience with the

00:02:56.400 --> 00:03:02.840
little dot markv tube headphone amplifier the the manual is functional

00:03:01.280 --> 00:03:06.480
if not amazing the only things I really needed it for were the Fairly Specific

00:03:05.080 --> 00:03:10.080
Instructions for powering the unit on and off and the procedure for flipping

00:03:08.200 --> 00:03:15.480
the dip switches on the underside to increase gain to five when I was testing

00:03:12.400 --> 00:03:17.000
my fairly inefficient lcd2 headphones

00:03:15.480 --> 00:03:21.080
the warning about how hot it gets was also pretty helpful as well the unit

00:03:18.959 --> 00:03:25.560
itself was well packed in soft foam and looks absolutely stunning the vacuum

00:03:23.799 --> 00:03:31.159
tubes and the gold accents give it a very steampunk look and frankly the

00:03:28.319 --> 00:03:35.040
wasted desk space a if I was going to go pick a headphone amplifier just based on

00:03:32.959 --> 00:03:39.560
how badass it's going to look I would probably go this route in the Box Little

00:03:37.319 --> 00:03:44.080
Dot includes a power cord a headphone adapter and a set of RCA cables so

00:03:42.319 --> 00:03:49.640
you'll be able to easily plug into an existing external deck they're perfectly

00:03:46.640 --> 00:03:51.599
nice and only folks who believe in fancy

00:03:49.640 --> 00:03:56.400
cables are likely to replace them on to the listening tests with my senheiser

00:03:53.720 --> 00:04:00.400
hd8 DJs frankly it was impossible for me to tell the difference between my

00:03:58.360 --> 00:04:04.879
stack and the mark I figured the strong base and lack of

00:04:02.840 --> 00:04:09.159
Sparkle in the hd8 in the first place was making it hard to make out those

00:04:06.840 --> 00:04:14.319
characteristics in the tube amp so I moved on to my dt990 Pro 250 ohms from

00:04:11.959 --> 00:04:18.000
be Dynamics these headphones have a lot of fans but I don't personally really

00:04:16.199 --> 00:04:22.720
like them because the clear and accurate Highs are a little bit too bright for me

00:04:20.359 --> 00:04:27.919
and I find them fatiguing to listen to still couldn't tell moving on to the

00:04:24.520 --> 00:04:30.120
ad's LCD 2s whether it's my music tastes

00:04:27.919 --> 00:04:35.360
un as shamed top 40 listener here or something else I still just couldn't

00:04:32.600 --> 00:04:40.320
tell as it happens the lcd2 sound fantastic on the markv but I guess that

00:04:38.280 --> 00:04:45.960
leads to the only real conclusion that I could draw from this buy whatever makes

00:04:43.080 --> 00:04:50.680
you happy aside from the high price and the usual tube inconveniences uh it does

00:04:48.479 --> 00:04:54.000
take a few seconds to power on you may get the occasional audible anomaly and

00:04:52.759 --> 00:04:57.919
you should clean and replace your tubes from time to time the mark 4's build

00:04:55.919 --> 00:05:02.039
quality looks and sound quality out of the box left nothing to be designed Des

00:04:59.800 --> 00:05:05.840
ired for me another selling point is the fact that it allows you to tube roll or

00:05:04.280 --> 00:05:09.280
swap out for different tubes which will be a lot of fun if you're a tinkerer who

00:05:07.759 --> 00:05:13.080
wants to experiment with different pairings the way wine enthusiasts will

00:05:11.560 --> 00:05:18.440
look for dishes that go well with their favorite vintages personally I'm not and

00:05:15.840 --> 00:05:21.720
for me the much more obvious differences between one pair of headphones and

00:05:19.880 --> 00:05:25.960
another make them a more Sound Investment than searching for the

00:05:22.880 --> 00:05:27.600
perfect amp but your mileage may vary so

00:05:25.960 --> 00:05:30.639
there it is guys I mean feel free to call me out on this video I don't mind

00:05:29.240 --> 00:05:34.520
and I'll even save you the trouble of debating the validity of my tests in the

00:05:32.479 --> 00:05:38.880
comments aside from being inconclusive they are not scientific at all a double

00:05:36.960 --> 00:05:43.000
blind experiment with normalized output volumes would have been a better more

00:05:41.120 --> 00:05:46.680
scientific way of testing the two against each other and while I do plan

00:05:44.919 --> 00:05:49.880
to obtain an SPL meter and take another crack at this on my own time for the

00:05:48.080 --> 00:05:54.440
sake of training my ears and refining my audio Gear review process you the buyer

00:05:52.360 --> 00:05:58.120
won't have any of that stuff anyway and if I can't tell the difference when I

00:05:56.199 --> 00:06:02.240
know which is which sitting right next to them in the time it takes to switch

00:05:59.720 --> 00:06:06.800
between them then my recommendation of buy whatever will make your friends

00:06:03.960 --> 00:06:11.440
think that you're cooler won't change either way so I just don't think it's

00:06:09.240 --> 00:06:15.160
that big of a deal thank you for watching guys the link to pricing and

00:06:13.599 --> 00:06:18.960
availability of this product is in the video description below the like dislike

00:06:17.319 --> 00:06:22.479
and share buttons which I would love for you to use accordingly also in the video

00:06:20.759 --> 00:06:26.120
description is a support link that we'd love for you to use if you appreciate

00:06:24.160 --> 00:06:29.280
what we do you can get a t-shirt give us a monthly contribution or change your

00:06:27.800 --> 00:06:33.160
browser bookmarks to sites that give us an Kickback whenever you buy stuff it

00:06:31.479 --> 00:06:38.599
helps us out a lot thanks again for watching and as always don't forget to

00:06:35.880 --> 00:06:43.039
mash that subscribe button if you haven't

00:06:39.840 --> 00:06:44.560
already I mean not that it works half

00:06:43.039 --> 00:06:48.160
the time anywh or whatever you can also follow on Twitter release our videos we

00:06:46.599 --> 00:07:01.019
tweet about them tweet tweet tweet anyway