WEBVTT

00:00:00.420 --> 00:00:04.000
- AMD hasn't been, shall we say competitive

00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:07.680
at the top end of GPU's for a long time now,

00:00:07.680 --> 00:00:11.330
but that's changing. At least we think it is

00:00:11.330 --> 00:00:15.430
we don't have reviews available yet. And these guys here

00:00:15.430 --> 00:00:18.123
have not yet been opened but

00:00:20.070 --> 00:00:23.413
still pretty exciting. Isn't it? Like when was the last time? It was like

00:00:23.413 --> 00:00:26.810
I don't know, fury, you could make the argument for fury.

00:00:26.810 --> 00:00:30.410
Like, come on. (laughing)

00:00:30.410 --> 00:00:34.083
It's been such a long ride, but here we are.

00:00:34.083 --> 00:00:38.280
And now we've got the Radeon RX 6000 Series. We've got the 6800 on top here

00:00:38.280 --> 00:00:41.920
in this comparatively tiny box although it is quite fetching,

00:00:41.920 --> 00:00:46.400
I must say. And the 6800 XT.

00:00:46.400 --> 00:00:50.860
The RX 6800 XT is what AMD is pitting against the RTX 380.

00:00:50.860 --> 00:00:54.820
This guy here. And it looks like

00:00:54.820 --> 00:00:58.610
it's gonna be a little bit bigger physically. Don't know yet,

00:00:58.610 --> 00:01:02.840
but at $649, it's actually going to be about 50 bucks cheaper

00:01:02.840 --> 00:01:06.140
while purportedly having roughly the same performance

00:01:06.140 --> 00:01:10.660
in traditional games. The RX 6800 meanwhile

00:01:10.660 --> 00:01:15.030
is sort of a competitor for the RTX 3070.

00:01:15.030 --> 00:01:18.590
I mean, it looks like it completely trounces it

00:01:18.590 --> 00:01:22.317
based on AMD's data, but at the same time, it's like, what is it?

00:01:22.317 --> 00:01:26.370
$80 more? Yeah, 579. This

00:01:26.370 --> 00:01:28.563
only costs what?

00:01:29.656 --> 00:01:33.743
$70 less than this.

00:01:34.630 --> 00:01:36.533
What is AMD smoking right now?

00:01:38.090 --> 00:01:42.640
That's ridiculous. So let's get into it and let's start off with the little one.

00:01:42.640 --> 00:01:46.250
Look at that. It's never even been opened, not even in our inventory.

00:01:46.250 --> 00:01:50.190
I could walk away with this right now and nobody would know except for you guys.

00:01:50.190 --> 00:01:55.050
All right. Let's see what we got here. Actually really nice packaging so far.

00:01:55.050 --> 00:01:59.360
Uncompromised 4k gaming, AMD fidelity of FX optimized,

00:01:59.360 --> 00:02:03.360
16 gigabytes of memory and PCI express 4.0 ready.

00:02:03.360 --> 00:02:06.480
So we pulled this off. Oh yeah. Look at that. It's got a little fanning here

00:02:06.480 --> 00:02:08.940
for the card and we've also got

00:02:10.030 --> 00:02:12.783
safety precaution and FCC compliance.

00:02:15.970 --> 00:02:16.933
I am so sorry.

00:02:21.230 --> 00:02:23.420
And of course we have the main event in here.

00:02:25.545 --> 00:02:31.560
Oh man. That looks and feels really nice.

00:02:31.560 --> 00:02:36.640
Like this is, this is solid. And yet it's got curves to it.

00:02:36.640 --> 00:02:40.210
So our display outputs we've got a USB type C,

00:02:40.210 --> 00:02:45.260
two display ports which support display compression 1.4

00:02:45.260 --> 00:02:49.110
and HDMI 2.1 which supposedly supports

00:02:49.110 --> 00:02:52.640
the full 48 gigabits per second AMD doesn't specifically say this,

00:02:52.640 --> 00:02:56.960
what is it? Fixed rate link.

00:02:56.960 --> 00:03:01.200
I don't know why they called it that it makes no sense whatsoever, but Hey, HDMI.

00:03:01.200 --> 00:03:05.300
Round back we've got that there power delivery. Those are really tiny

00:03:05.300 --> 00:03:09.150
surface-mount devices there. I really liked the look of this card.

00:03:09.150 --> 00:03:13.790
The two tone. It's just so nice. And they got this little guide here

00:03:13.790 --> 00:03:17.610
to say this is the screw you should take out first I guess. I can't take it apart for you

00:03:17.610 --> 00:03:21.640
unfortunately. But yeah, and these fans look really nice.

00:03:21.640 --> 00:03:25.950
They feel nice too. And yeah, the whole thing is basically made of metal.

00:03:25.950 --> 00:03:30.000
This is sweet. So this is the RTX 3080.

00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:33.810
Yeah, and bear in mind this is the 6800 non XT

00:03:33.810 --> 00:03:35.963
and it's a little shorter,

00:03:37.150 --> 00:03:41.680
roughly the same thickness. This is a little thicker actually.

00:03:41.680 --> 00:03:43.253
And as far as width goes,

00:03:45.660 --> 00:03:47.523
okay, the Radeon is a bit bigger.

00:03:50.970 --> 00:03:54.070
Which one weighs more. I feel like this weighs more.

00:03:54.070 --> 00:03:55.470
Let's get our scale and see.

00:03:57.380 --> 00:04:02.450
So this boy weighs about 1.29 kg

00:04:05.589 --> 00:04:08.680
or two pounds 13.5 ounces

00:04:08.680 --> 00:04:13.300
as for our Radeon 1.32 kg,

00:04:13.300 --> 00:04:17.120
two point 14. Sorry. That's not how pounds work.

00:04:17.120 --> 00:04:21.490
Two pounds, 14.5 ounces. I hate imperial. Thank you.

00:04:21.490 --> 00:04:26.940
2.91 pounds. So yeah, this is a little bit heavier

00:04:26.940 --> 00:04:31.270
and I guess that would be expected because they're not really relying on that

00:04:31.270 --> 00:04:34.310
revolutionary pass through flow-through design

00:04:34.310 --> 00:04:37.320
that NVIDIA has going here. Like you can

00:04:37.320 --> 00:04:40.590
let's put it over this. Yeah. You can see through the fan.

00:04:40.590 --> 00:04:44.150
So yeah, they don't have that going for them. This is just a straight, traditional

00:04:44.150 --> 00:04:47.850
blow through the, what's that? Oh, I bit my tongue.

00:04:47.850 --> 00:04:51.680
So this is just the traditional type of exhausting to the case kind of cooler.

00:04:51.680 --> 00:04:55.880
So this is what it's competing against. The RTX 3070

00:04:55.880 --> 00:05:02.370
and that is quite a size difference.

00:05:02.370 --> 00:05:06.190
And if I were to plop this down onto this

00:05:06.190 --> 00:05:10.053
that's not even a kilogram, which is two pounds, 2.8 ounces.

00:05:11.240 --> 00:05:15.440
But then again, I mean, this is the thing it's not directly competing

00:05:15.440 --> 00:05:18.350
which is kind of unfortunate because

00:05:19.520 --> 00:05:23.550
like how do we compare, like what this is compared to. Nothing.

00:05:23.550 --> 00:05:24.853
It doesn't compare to anything.

00:05:26.550 --> 00:05:31.670
This is gonna be a real nightmare to benchmark. It's closer to a 3080 than a 3070.

00:05:31.670 --> 00:05:34.390
Let's just put it that way. That's a very good segue

00:05:36.220 --> 00:05:37.053
into

00:05:39.850 --> 00:05:41.390
the 6800 XT

00:05:43.750 --> 00:05:47.710
which is a good $70 more. I think

00:05:47.710 --> 00:05:51.193
- [Jono] You had a good, really good segue to the sponsor.

00:05:52.610 --> 00:05:56.530
- Oh, I'm being told that I should have segue to the sponsor

00:05:56.530 --> 00:06:02.140
instead of this other card. Well, that's me for you, I guess.

00:06:02.140 --> 00:06:06.340
Thanks to SteelSeries

00:06:06.340 --> 00:06:10.170
for sponsoring this the SteelSeries Aerox 3 wireless

00:06:10.170 --> 00:06:13.470
is the newest mouse by SteelSeries. That weighs only 66 grams

00:06:13.470 --> 00:06:16.940
making it one of the latest mice available and uses quantum wireless 2.0

00:06:16.940 --> 00:06:21.250
for nearly zero latency for speed and stability it can use 2.4 gigahertz RF

00:06:21.250 --> 00:06:24.270
and Bluetooth connections along with a USB type C

00:06:24.270 --> 00:06:28.160
for fast charging end up with a 40 hours of battery life in 15 minutes

00:06:28.160 --> 00:06:33.030
awkward barrier technology makes it the first IP 54 dust and splash resistant gaming mouse.

00:06:33.030 --> 00:06:36.713
Go to steelseries.com to check out the Aerox 3 wireless today.

00:06:37.850 --> 00:06:40.890
Let's unbox this guy. There is also

00:06:40.890 --> 00:06:44.160
an unbroken seal here,

00:06:44.160 --> 00:06:46.060
but this box is much more substantial.

00:06:49.090 --> 00:06:50.403
I slashed the box.

00:06:52.980 --> 00:06:56.430
Just in case anyone's wondering there's basically nothing on the back of the box.

00:06:56.430 --> 00:07:01.110
Now this is the one that everyone wants to see. This is the one that everyone's kind of

00:07:01.110 --> 00:07:04.493
salivating over, aside with a 6900 XT, which is much nicer.

00:07:05.990 --> 00:07:09.640
Here we go. Welcome to the red team.

00:07:09.640 --> 00:07:12.640
You've joined a select community with an uncompromising passion

00:07:12.640 --> 00:07:17.660
for premium gaming that share desires at the heart of everything we do.

00:07:17.660 --> 00:07:22.010
It's why we've engineered the fastest AMD Radeon RX graphics cards ever

00:07:22.010 --> 00:07:25.110
to deliver a powerful gaming experience,

00:07:25.110 --> 00:07:27.120
have fun #AMDRedTeam.

00:07:28.131 --> 00:07:31.715
And then we had this useless little, thing again.

00:07:31.715 --> 00:07:33.323
It doesn't look much different,

00:07:39.230 --> 00:07:42.193
- [Jono] He thick! - But it feels different. Yeah.

00:07:43.420 --> 00:07:47.500
That is a thick stack of fins right there.

00:07:47.500 --> 00:07:52.640
Is it roughly the same size though? Yeah, it kinda is.

00:07:52.640 --> 00:07:56.820
There's more fan area. They're not more dense but they are definitely taller,

00:07:56.820 --> 00:08:00.453
but I know what this is. This is the 6800 XT and on the top,

00:08:00.453 --> 00:08:05.210
we've got exactly the same selection of ports. We have USB type C,

00:08:05.210 --> 00:08:08.740
two DisplayPort with displacement and compression 1.4

00:08:08.740 --> 00:08:11.830
and the HDMI 2.1 which presumably

00:08:11.830 --> 00:08:15.360
is the full 48 gigabits per second. I was hoping that I would have

00:08:15.360 --> 00:08:18.890
more to say about this, but it's just thicker.

00:08:18.890 --> 00:08:24.660
That's kind of weird. The Radeon text is a different color.

00:08:24.660 --> 00:08:29.070
So this is just red. This looks like it might be glossy

00:08:29.070 --> 00:08:33.100
or maybe it might even be hiding some RGB

00:08:33.100 --> 00:08:36.390
who knows. All right, let's see how much this guy weighs.

00:08:37.410 --> 00:08:39.653
1.366 kg,

00:08:40.700 --> 00:08:43.173
three pounds, 0.2 ounces.

00:08:45.090 --> 00:08:49.690
You're probably gonna want a GPU brace to support this guy.

00:08:49.690 --> 00:08:54.260
Good thing there's actually partner cards that are going to be coming out with a built-in liquid cooling.

00:08:54.260 --> 00:08:58.783
Note that AMD says that it's necessary actually, because both of these cards.

00:08:59.700 --> 00:09:03.960
And in fact even the 6900 XT are going to be

00:09:03.960 --> 00:09:09.390
potentially less power hungry and less thermally bad

00:09:09.390 --> 00:09:13.740
than either of these. Yeah, the 6800 XT is 250 Watts

00:09:13.740 --> 00:09:16.090
with a 650 Watt recommended power supply

00:09:16.960 --> 00:09:20.350
while the 6800 XT

00:09:20.350 --> 00:09:23.950
is 300 Watts with recommended 750 watt power supply.

00:09:23.950 --> 00:09:28.810
And that is exactly the same as the 6900 XT, despite that card's extra power

00:09:28.810 --> 00:09:34.360
which is interesting because the only real difference between this card and the 6900 XT

00:09:34.360 --> 00:09:38.070
is that this card has eight pure compute units.

00:09:38.070 --> 00:09:40.043
So this is 60 compute units.

00:09:41.310 --> 00:09:45.570
This is 72 and the big boy is 80.

00:09:45.570 --> 00:09:48.610
Each one of those has a Ray accelerator that AMD is adding

00:09:48.610 --> 00:09:52.610
for the first time in this generation. And presumably

00:09:52.610 --> 00:09:55.970
it'll just work with any game that supports RTX

00:09:55.970 --> 00:09:59.750
which is just really fancy words for Vulkan Raytracing

00:09:59.750 --> 00:10:01.713
or DirectX Raytracing.

00:10:03.010 --> 00:10:07.920
Interestingly, AMD is marketing both of these cards

00:10:07.920 --> 00:10:11.880
towards people who might have a GTX 1080 ti

00:10:11.880 --> 00:10:15.860
and they wanted to upgrade to something that's gonna handle a little bit higher frame rates

00:10:15.860 --> 00:10:19.790
or even Raytracing. The 6800 non XT

00:10:19.790 --> 00:10:23.360
AMD is kind of aiming at people who have 1440P or 1080P

00:10:23.360 --> 00:10:27.720
high refresh rate monitors, that they want to really drive at higher visual fidelity

00:10:27.720 --> 00:10:31.100
and higher frame rates. The 6800 XT

00:10:31.100 --> 00:10:36.380
is aimed more towards people who have 4k displays or 1440P high refresh rate displays

00:10:36.380 --> 00:10:42.310
who not only want to have that high refresh rate high gaming, new frame rate experience

00:10:42.310 --> 00:10:47.200
but also have the power to do a lot of sightseeing. So things like Rise of the Tomb Raider

00:10:47.200 --> 00:10:50.530
Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Minecraft RTX,

00:10:50.530 --> 00:10:53.330
that kind of thing. You know if you're looking at

00:10:54.220 --> 00:10:57.440
what is the best bang for the buck it really depends on what you're doing.

00:10:57.440 --> 00:11:00.710
If you're doing streaming or anything, really with,

00:11:00.710 --> 00:11:03.950
you know work from home, conferencing, that kind of thing.

00:11:03.950 --> 00:11:08.690
Then the 3070 is better all-rounder than this, even though this is more powerful.

00:11:08.690 --> 00:11:15.030
Really depends on what your priorities are. This guy though is actually priced below the 3080,

00:11:15.030 --> 00:11:17.490
meaning that you have less of a

00:11:18.580 --> 00:11:23.300
do I wanna go higher for less but better performance

00:11:23.300 --> 00:11:26.440
and more of a do I want to go lower for less, but

00:11:26.440 --> 00:11:30.680
the same or better performance? I think this is the better value proposition,

00:11:30.680 --> 00:11:34.040
personally but you know, your mileage may vary.

00:11:34.040 --> 00:11:37.640
Some people might prefer to have a little bit extra horsepower

00:11:37.640 --> 00:11:40.970
and they don't care about RTX voice noise canceling

00:11:40.970 --> 00:11:43.490
or anything like that. They just want the frames

00:11:44.490 --> 00:11:48.470
or maybe they're into content creation. All of them cards on lineup

00:11:48.470 --> 00:11:51.880
from the 6800, all the way up to the 6900 XT,

00:11:51.880 --> 00:11:55.730
not only have 16 gigabytes of GDDR6 memory

00:11:55.730 --> 00:11:59.200
but they also have 128 megabytes of Infinity Cache

00:11:59.200 --> 00:12:02.590
which is something that AMD is saying runs

00:12:02.590 --> 00:12:06.430
1.6 terabytes per second, in terms of speed,

00:12:06.430 --> 00:12:11.610
which is about three plus times faster than the main memory in this card.

00:12:11.610 --> 00:12:15.090
It's ridiculous. But at the same time

00:12:15.090 --> 00:12:17.600
for a lot of the things that your GPU is going to be doing

00:12:18.940 --> 00:12:22.270
it's not going to be like that major I'm gonna write the whole

00:12:22.270 --> 00:12:25.740
video memory back again kind of deal you know.

00:12:25.740 --> 00:12:29.273
It's gonna be the same kind of thing that's updating over and over and over again,

00:12:29.273 --> 00:12:32.340
while you have your assets all in the main memory.

00:12:32.340 --> 00:12:37.750
So in that respect AMD might have the right idea here.

00:12:37.750 --> 00:12:41.820
They're saving money on the memory and then just giving you the same amount of memory

00:12:41.820 --> 00:12:45.890
across the board. And then they're just going to give you

00:12:45.890 --> 00:12:49.223
really fast cache memory. That's on the actual GPU diet itself.

00:12:50.260 --> 00:12:54.050
It's an interesting take on things and I'm very excited to figure out

00:12:54.050 --> 00:12:56.300
whether or not that's actually going to help them.

00:12:57.350 --> 00:13:02.320
Obviously I haven't tested these yet. And you guys won't know until

00:13:02.320 --> 00:13:05.320
I think two days from now whether or not it's any good.

00:13:05.320 --> 00:13:10.020
Aside from that the only question that's really left to answer is

00:13:10.020 --> 00:13:13.700
will it be available at launch 'cause NVIDIA has had

00:13:13.700 --> 00:13:17.630
nothing but problems with their RTX 3000 series

00:13:17.630 --> 00:13:21.440
and AMD's launch of Ryzen 5000

00:13:21.440 --> 00:13:24.680
has been similarly disastrous.

00:13:24.680 --> 00:13:28.780
And I mean, depending on who you ask that's because it's a paper launch,

00:13:28.780 --> 00:13:33.010
which I don't think is true or it could be because scalpers,

00:13:33.010 --> 00:13:37.670
which I guess is also true but it's also because there's unprecedented demand

00:13:37.670 --> 00:13:41.870
for new computers and faster parts because we just haven't had anything

00:13:41.870 --> 00:13:46.630
that was this good in a long time. So the appetite is there.

00:13:46.630 --> 00:13:50.980
People have seen that the appetite is there and they're very much willing to go out

00:13:50.980 --> 00:13:54.890
and spend the money to get it now so that they can charge you way more

00:13:54.890 --> 00:13:59.173
later. Is it gonna be the same for the Radeon RX 6000 series?

00:14:00.330 --> 00:14:02.463
According to AMD and I quote

00:14:03.750 --> 00:14:07.030
I can tell you that we've planned for a successful launch.

00:14:07.030 --> 00:14:11.370
We are working very hard to ensure we have product supplied at launch time around the world.

00:14:11.370 --> 00:14:14.490
And we were actively, working with our partners to at least be sure

00:14:14.490 --> 00:14:16.803
that we can get the products out in the hands of gamers.

00:14:17.650 --> 00:14:21.420
We do expect that we're going to have great global availability at launch,

00:14:21.420 --> 00:14:24.470
and we're really excited to get products out to as many people we can.

00:14:25.600 --> 00:14:28.930
Which I mean of course, they're gonna say that.

00:14:29.860 --> 00:14:33.390
You believe them? I don't know. I guess it all depends on

00:14:34.240 --> 00:14:39.080
actually, you know what? It doesn't depend on anything. Nobody's going to wait for our purview.

00:14:39.080 --> 00:14:42.690
You should, but most people won't.

00:14:42.690 --> 00:14:47.020
So I don't know. I guess we'll just have to see.

00:14:48.063 --> 00:14:51.150
- [Brandon] Subscribe! (laughing)

00:14:51.150 --> 00:14:55.830
- Yeah, we'll just have to see, just like you'll have to see another episode of ShortCircuit

00:14:55.830 --> 00:14:58.840
sometime later. Subscribe. Thanks for watching.

00:14:58.840 --> 00:15:01.513
Take care and good luck.
