1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,080
Tech tends to be a copycat kind of business, and it looks like Microsoft is considering

2
00:00:05,080 --> 00:00:08,080
a high-profile copycat move at the moment,

3
00:00:08,080 --> 00:00:11,480
making its own CPUs. The company they'd be copying, of course,

4
00:00:11,480 --> 00:00:17,640
is none other than their old rival, Apple, whose M1 and M2 chips, based on the ARM architecture,

5
00:00:17,640 --> 00:00:22,600
have been extremely impressive in terms of performance and power efficiency.

6
00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:25,760
Though this isn't that surprising, considering that Apple designed them

7
00:00:25,760 --> 00:00:29,160
to integrate tightly with the company's own software.

8
00:00:29,200 --> 00:00:35,240
But Windows is a very different beast in the sense that it'll run on just about any PC,

9
00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:38,520
and it doesn't just ship on Microsoft's own systems,

10
00:00:38,520 --> 00:00:44,160
like the Surface lineup. And believe it or not, Microsoft has recently tried to do bespoke silicon

11
00:00:44,160 --> 00:00:48,840
with the SQ1, which showed up in 2019's Surface Pro X.

12
00:00:48,840 --> 00:00:52,480
Thing is, it didn't go as well as Apple's M series.

13
00:00:52,480 --> 00:00:55,920
So then, why would Microsoft be trying to design its own chips again?

14
00:00:55,920 --> 00:00:59,920
Massacism? At this point, we can only offer some educated speculation,

15
00:00:59,920 --> 00:01:05,880
as the rumors are based on a couple of facts. One, that Microsoft is hiring chip architects,

16
00:01:05,880 --> 00:01:09,880
and just the broader market forces that seem to be at play,

17
00:01:09,880 --> 00:01:15,680
being that Redmond is likely threatened by the success that Apple has had with their M1 and M2.

18
00:01:15,680 --> 00:01:19,160
Apple Silicon has created a multi-billion dollar increase

19
00:01:19,160 --> 00:01:24,080
in revenue for the Mac division, and this doesn't just spell bad news for Surface,

20
00:01:24,080 --> 00:01:28,000
but for all Windows devices, especially on the mobile side,

21
00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:32,560
since the superior battery life of M Silicon is a major selling point.

22
00:01:32,560 --> 00:01:35,800
But there's another reason that Microsoft might dive into chip design

23
00:01:35,800 --> 00:01:38,960
that has both everything and nothing to do with Apple.

24
00:01:38,960 --> 00:01:44,280
Apple's breakup with Intel wasn't just about wanting to optimize its hardware for its own software.

25
00:01:44,280 --> 00:01:47,360
There have been lots of rumblings about Apple's frustration

26
00:01:47,360 --> 00:01:53,840
with Intel's slow pace of development, and even though Team Blue has shifted to hybrid CPU design,

27
00:01:53,840 --> 00:01:58,520
specifically to improve battery life on laptops, there hasn't been too much from Intel

28
00:01:58,520 --> 00:02:01,960
that you could truly call groundbreaking in quite some time.

29
00:02:01,960 --> 00:02:06,800
And to be fair to them, part of this may be due to the x86 architecture itself,

30
00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:10,200
as it's not like Apple ditched Intel just to make a deal with AMD.

31
00:02:10,200 --> 00:02:14,520
So it's natural that Microsoft would also want to go a completely different route

32
00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:20,560
to take advantage of the higher performance per watt that is typically associated with ARM-based chip designs,

33
00:02:20,560 --> 00:02:24,240
especially if they feel that the Intel AMD duopoly is holding them back.

34
00:02:24,240 --> 00:02:27,440
But one big obstacle that Microsoft may have to face

35
00:02:27,440 --> 00:02:30,720
is exactly how they will integrate Windows

36
00:02:30,720 --> 00:02:34,400
with a different chip architecture, even one that they developed for themselves.

37
00:02:34,400 --> 00:02:37,680
Windows has been primarily written for x86 chips

38
00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:40,880
for over 35 years. And although Microsoft has been trying

39
00:02:40,880 --> 00:02:44,280
to push Windows on ARM for, I mean, over a decade now,

40
00:02:44,280 --> 00:02:49,960
the vast majority of Windows software is written to run on x86 chips.

41
00:02:49,960 --> 00:02:54,640
And unlike a typical Mac user, there are a huge number of Windows users

42
00:02:54,640 --> 00:02:59,400
who don't necessarily make extensive use of the included first-party software.

43
00:02:59,400 --> 00:03:03,680
Meaning that without a plan for robust third-party software support,

44
00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:06,920
Microsoft's foray into throwing significant resources

45
00:03:06,920 --> 00:03:11,680
at its own chip could end up backfiring. But there's another consideration we haven't discussed yet.

46
00:03:11,680 --> 00:03:16,320
The fact that Windows 12 is expected to rely more heavily on AI features.

47
00:03:16,320 --> 00:03:21,000
We've already seen Microsoft integrate chat GPT into Bing and Office.

48
00:03:21,000 --> 00:03:26,160
And it looks like they would like a chip with part of the dye dedicated to AI and machine learning

49
00:03:26,160 --> 00:03:29,400
without waiting around to see what Intel and AMD come up with.

50
00:03:29,400 --> 00:03:33,120
This reflects a broader trend where companies like Amazon and Google

51
00:03:33,120 --> 00:03:37,560
have been putting their own silicon into everything from data centers to smartphones.

52
00:03:37,560 --> 00:03:40,880
And Microsoft has even been reported to be looking at custom chips

53
00:03:40,880 --> 00:03:46,800
for its Azure cloud computing platform as well. Ultimately, we're gonna find out exactly what their plan is

54
00:03:46,800 --> 00:03:51,400
no sooner than late 2024 when most industry insiders are expecting Windows 12

55
00:03:51,400 --> 00:03:55,200
to be released. But until then, all we can do is hope that it goes better

56
00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:59,080
than when Microsoft tried to sell us the Zoom RIP.

57
00:03:59,080 --> 00:04:03,240
If you enjoyed this video, hey, leave a like and check out our other videos.

58
00:04:03,240 --> 00:04:08,480
Or you can leave a comment with suggestions for how we could do better or any future topics you'd like to see covered.

59
00:04:08,480 --> 00:04:10,080
And don't forget to subscribe.
