WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:05.480
Wait, what happened to over-the-ear headphones?

00:00:05.480 --> 00:00:13.120
Well, Apple's AirPods happened, that's what. They are arguably the best way to experience wireless headphones with your iPhone.

00:00:13.120 --> 00:00:17.600
You know, the excellent auto-switching, noise cancellation and all that other magic.

00:00:17.600 --> 00:00:22.320
But unless you want to spend 500 plus on AirPods Max, you're using earbuds.

00:00:22.320 --> 00:00:26.240
That's quite a shame, as I'm not a huge fan of earbuds, especially if they have silicon

00:00:26.240 --> 00:00:31.240
tips. This makes me realize I miss using over-the-ear headphones.

00:00:31.240 --> 00:00:38.640
Is there really nothing for me? Well, there is a new pair of over-ear headphones with a loft of Apple magic without the max

00:00:38.640 --> 00:00:42.240
price. Meet the Beats Studio Pros.

00:00:42.240 --> 00:00:49.440
Beats? There haven't been new over-the-ear headphones from Beats since 2017, and despite companies

00:00:49.440 --> 00:00:53.720
like Sony, Bose and Apple making big improvements to their headphones, especially to active

00:00:53.720 --> 00:00:59.960
noise cancelling, Beats is still using micro-USB and selling for $350.

00:00:59.960 --> 00:01:03.680
That was the same price they launched at, I mean it's just sad to see.

00:01:03.680 --> 00:01:08.560
This is Beats, the same company that a decade ago popularized the whole idea of over-ear

00:01:08.560 --> 00:01:12.120
headphones. See them languish like this, it's just sad.

00:01:12.120 --> 00:01:17.440
Oh yeah, I remember everyone having huge and bassy Beats headphones, I was definitely

00:01:17.440 --> 00:01:21.600
not cool enough for those. Well, you won't have to worry about that anymore, because the new Studio Pros are a

00:01:21.600 --> 00:01:26.000
lot more mature. In many appearances, almost everything here is new or improved.

00:01:26.000 --> 00:01:30.480
New speaker drivers, plus your ear pads, improved active noise cancelling, transparency and

00:01:30.480 --> 00:01:34.040
microphone quality, and a USB-C port with wired playback.

00:01:34.040 --> 00:01:37.760
There's even a 3.5mm port, which is refreshingly not new.

00:01:37.760 --> 00:01:42.120
These also continue the trend of Beats appealing to everyone regardless of ecosystem, meaning

00:01:42.120 --> 00:01:45.340
it includes all the same Android fast-pair and device switching tricks that we saw in

00:01:45.340 --> 00:01:50.720
the Studio Buds Plus on top of the usual Apple luxuries, though not quite all of them,

00:01:50.720 --> 00:01:54.760
as they still lack some features like audio sharing and automatic device switching.

00:01:54.760 --> 00:02:00.100
How kind of them. I did joke about this in our last Beats review, but I do wish that Apple would afford some

00:02:00.100 --> 00:02:04.880
of the benefits to Android users with their AirPods, but it appears that Beats will fill

00:02:04.880 --> 00:02:11.720
that role instead. In fact, these are the first headphones without an H chip to feature head-track spatial audio.

00:02:11.720 --> 00:02:18.560
And check out the Settings app and Control Center. These feel exactly like AirPods here, while they also remind me how much I love over-ear

00:02:18.560 --> 00:02:23.580
headphones. Performance-wise, these do a good job of holding their own against stalwarts like the Sony

00:02:23.580 --> 00:02:28.900
XM5s. Despite the Beats coming in at $50 less, these two are pretty evenly matched.

00:02:28.900 --> 00:02:33.540
Surprisingly, the Beats are more neutral than the XM5s, which skew a bit bass-heavy.

00:02:33.540 --> 00:02:37.100
This may not be to your liking if you want some extra thump in your songs.

00:02:37.100 --> 00:02:41.700
That said, a lot of people prefer to hear a signal closer to your synth tent.

00:02:41.700 --> 00:02:45.100
It's clear that the company has grown a lot since their pre-Apple days, when their

00:02:45.100 --> 00:02:49.840
products were known for nothing but bass. I agree, I really like the neutral sound.

00:02:49.840 --> 00:02:53.880
As for noise cancelling, the Sony's do a better job of handling low and high frequencies,

00:02:53.880 --> 00:02:59.840
while the Beats are better at everything in between. It means the Sony's might be ideal for something like keying out engine noise from a plane,

00:02:59.840 --> 00:03:03.560
while you may want to go for the Beats if you're using them in a chatty office or coffee

00:03:03.560 --> 00:03:09.400
shop. I found the ANC mics in the Beats to be more sensitive to wind noise, sounding quite harsh

00:03:09.400 --> 00:03:13.920
and sharp. Otherwise, the ANC transparency are similar to the XM5.

00:03:13.920 --> 00:03:18.600
They also improve the microphones, which is to say that you're clear enough to understand,

00:03:18.880 --> 00:03:27.800
also clearly, still using a headset mic.

00:03:27.800 --> 00:03:32.680
Now when it comes to features, you can get higher quality audio with the wired USB mode.

00:03:32.680 --> 00:03:38.240
Plugging into your device enables lossless from Apple Music, and title, and Amazon, and

00:03:38.240 --> 00:03:47.120
so on and so forth. Where it does work, however, you get access to a few EQ modes.

00:03:47.120 --> 00:03:52.080
The Beats signature profile, an entertainment profile, and a conversation profile.

00:03:52.080 --> 00:03:56.520
Plus, there's no ANC or transparency when using USB playback, though there's no reason

00:03:56.520 --> 00:04:04.040
this could come in a future update. Now when you're using these in USB mode, they obviously charge, but better yet, you

00:04:04.040 --> 00:04:10.520
can also charge them while using them in Bluetooth, unlike the XM5's.

00:04:10.520 --> 00:04:16.560
Now Comfort is a bit of a mixed bag. When you put these things on, they are snug, and you feel it.

00:04:16.560 --> 00:04:20.880
This is in part due to the clamping force being unchanged from the previous model.

00:04:20.880 --> 00:04:25.120
Between this and the air cups being fairly shallow and small, these can almost feel like

00:04:25.120 --> 00:04:30.120
on-ear headphones. The pressure and discomfort went away after wearing them for a bit, though, at which point

00:04:30.120 --> 00:04:35.720
they felt perfectly fine. And thanks to a nice wide headband, I didn't experience any of the crown fatigue, which

00:04:35.720 --> 00:04:39.400
both the XM5's and AirPods Max are susceptible to.

00:04:39.400 --> 00:04:45.440
These might actually be a better choice for the gym. Thanks to the extra clamping force, they stay on much better during exercise than something

00:04:45.440 --> 00:04:49.240
like the XM5's, which I found fell off quite easily.

00:04:49.240 --> 00:04:54.600
My issue with over-the-ear headphones is feeling them pressed against my glasses, which I hate.

00:04:54.600 --> 00:04:57.880
However, I actually didn't notice that at all with these.

00:04:57.880 --> 00:05:02.920
Weirdly, where I feel the pressure is below my ears at the jaw joint.

00:05:02.920 --> 00:05:05.920
I can get used to it, but I wasn't expecting to feel them there.

00:05:05.920 --> 00:05:09.320
You know, I actually felt the same thing and also got used to it.

00:05:09.320 --> 00:05:12.400
The glasses, though, that's still going to be an issue.

00:05:12.400 --> 00:05:17.120
Why is that? Because with something like the XM5's, these don't actively compensate for a gap in the

00:05:17.120 --> 00:05:23.520
seal. So, while these beats sound good in a best-case scenario, your results may vary, depending

00:05:23.520 --> 00:05:29.480
on how you wear them. In our tests, the Sonys and AirPods Max give us consistent results across multiple tests,

00:05:29.480 --> 00:05:32.480
whereas the beats show different measurements every time.

00:05:32.480 --> 00:05:37.080
They're also missing other pretty standard smart features that we'd expect, like transparency

00:05:37.080 --> 00:05:41.200
kicking in when you start talking, or music pausing when you take them off.

00:05:41.200 --> 00:05:48.760
So they're kind of dumb headphones there. I do have to admit, they do look nice, even in this brown color, which many will wrongly

00:05:48.760 --> 00:05:53.480
overlook. The other colors, navy, black, and sandstone, are decent, too.

00:05:53.480 --> 00:05:57.360
Yeah, I really like the navy color. It reminds me a lot of the Midnight Mac book.

00:05:57.360 --> 00:06:03.600
But the smudges. Yeah, I mean, I used to be worried about it, but that color is just too nice and I don't

00:06:03.600 --> 00:06:06.720
care anymore. Though I do think most people will go for sandstone.

00:06:06.720 --> 00:06:10.000
So the design is exactly the same as the Studio 3's.

00:06:10.000 --> 00:06:15.040
Yes. The beats is clearly proud of this fact, banking on an iconic design to help them sell units.

00:06:15.040 --> 00:06:20.360
But I'm not sure that that's the right move. If I saw someone walking around with these, I'd probably just think they're the old

00:06:20.360 --> 00:06:27.680
model and ignore them. Yeah, I really am curious what a modern interpretation of this beats design would look like.

00:06:27.680 --> 00:06:31.800
Redesigns can be risky. Look at Bose, who abandoned theirs after just one attempt.

00:06:31.800 --> 00:06:35.640
On the other hand, Sonys' new design for the XM5s are a radical departure, and even

00:06:35.640 --> 00:06:42.240
sacrificed some function for form. But despite that, they've hit a level of mainstream appeal that used to exclusively

00:06:42.240 --> 00:06:45.640
belong to beats. Seriously, these things are everywhere now.

00:06:45.640 --> 00:06:51.360
The beats also have the least flexible ear cups of the bunch, meaning that they're easily

00:06:51.360 --> 00:06:56.320
the worst choice for one-eared usage, something which I frequently like to do.

00:06:56.320 --> 00:07:04.160
This old design is still pretty usable. Compared to the XM5s and the much more expensive AirPods Max, these actually do something called

00:07:04.160 --> 00:07:09.200
folding, which also means that they fit nicely into their small case.

00:07:09.200 --> 00:07:16.120
And yes, it even comes with an actual case. And look, there are even physical and clicky buttons on the ear cup.

00:07:16.120 --> 00:07:19.560
I hate touch controls, so I'm happy to hear this.

00:07:19.560 --> 00:07:23.240
But do you like hearing it, though?

00:07:23.240 --> 00:07:30.800
Uh, yeah. These have a really prominent and frankly cheap-sounding click whenever you use them.

00:07:30.800 --> 00:07:35.080
It's so annoying. I try to just avoid it altogether, use my phone instead.

00:07:35.080 --> 00:07:39.240
It's a sacrifice I'm willing to make.

00:07:39.240 --> 00:07:44.880
You know, I personally have the Sonys, they cost $50 more, and you know, between the two,

00:07:44.880 --> 00:07:48.160
it's close by think I'd still buy the Sonys again.

00:07:48.160 --> 00:07:52.040
You know, I like to travel, so the noise cancelling is better for that.

00:07:52.040 --> 00:07:56.120
I like a bit of extra bass in my songs, and it's so nice to put them on and feel like

00:07:56.120 --> 00:08:00.680
I'm wearing a cloud. But the beats are definitely better for working out in, and having all the fancy Apple features

00:08:00.680 --> 00:08:07.440
is nice. Jonathan said, for example, it can read your messages out to you, and since you can use

00:08:07.440 --> 00:08:10.880
Siri to reply, you don't need to pull out your phone as much.

00:08:10.880 --> 00:08:14.760
You know, the beats are good, but overall, I just don't think they're the ones for

00:08:14.760 --> 00:08:21.880
me. Interesting. It is really nice that Beats has finally updated their iconic over-the-ear headphones.

00:08:21.880 --> 00:08:25.880
For the last half decade, they've given a lot of attention to the many earbuds in their

00:08:25.880 --> 00:08:30.760
lineup, and left people like me to almost forget about the over-the-ear option.

00:08:30.760 --> 00:08:35.400
Until now, for a good set of Apple headphones, you need to swallow a huge price jump over

00:08:35.400 --> 00:08:41.160
the AirPods Pro. Sure, these have better frequency response, ANC and transparency, and mic quality, but

00:08:41.160 --> 00:08:44.360
they're just in a completely different price category.

00:08:44.360 --> 00:08:48.360
Now though, these are much more reasonable, and for someone who wants to stay in this

00:08:48.360 --> 00:08:55.360
ecosystem, these are a great choice. Oh no, the train put on your ANC headphones!

00:08:55.360 --> 00:09:03.120
Thanks for covering your ears with this Mac Address. If you're excited that they're finally cheaper ANC over-the-ear headphones, give this video

00:09:03.120 --> 00:09:07.960
a like. And if you want to see how long it takes for Beats to release another pair of headphones,

00:09:07.960 --> 00:09:13.440
you may as well subscribe. I'm curious, in the comments below, how many of you are over-the-ear headphones?

00:09:13.440 --> 00:09:14.480
Or do you all just like earbuds?
