WEBVTT 00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:06.240 NVIDIA claims that the 5060 Ti is more than 50 times faster than the 1060. And 00:00:04.640 --> 00:00:11.840 if that sounds like a complete lie, that's because it is. Think about it. If 00:00:08.720 --> 00:00:14.080 your 1060 can run a game at 30 FPS, that 00:00:11.840 --> 00:00:20.000 would mean that the 5060 Ti will run it at 00:00:15.000 --> 00:00:22.720 1,500 frames per second. How? Well, I'm 00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:27.119 assuming is that they said max settings. So, one, they're probably using ray 00:00:24.560 --> 00:00:31.920 tracing, which the 1060 can't do. two, they're probably using the 1060 3 GB 00:00:29.760 --> 00:00:36.079 card, which definitely cannot handle modern games. If you think about it in 00:00:34.320 --> 00:00:41.760 that way, where the 1060 is probably getting 2 FPS in this scenario on 00:00:39.040 --> 00:00:47.520 average, well, then it makes a little bit more sense that maybe the 5060 Ti is 00:00:44.640 --> 00:00:54.320 getting around 100 FPS, though once you take out DLSS 4x frame gen, it's more 00:00:50.719 --> 00:00:57.520 like 25. So, does it suck? Let's unbox 00:00:54.320 --> 00:01:01.359 it and find out. This is the PNY 5060Ti 00:00:57.520 --> 00:01:02.960 16 GB OC. Just like the 4060 Ti, there's 00:01:01.359 --> 00:01:06.640 going to be two versions, an 8 GB version and a 16 GB version. Which one 00:01:05.199 --> 00:01:10.960 you choose will probably depend on your use case, and we'll talk about that a little bit more later. But let's just 00:01:09.040 --> 00:01:15.520 look at the card itself. It's a flow through cooler design, and it has some 00:01:13.040 --> 00:01:22.560 interesting choices in its construction. One, look at the PCB right here. It's 00:01:19.280 --> 00:01:24.880 like completely blank. They really just 00:01:22.560 --> 00:01:29.920 extended it long enough so that they could make sure that it had enough room 00:01:27.280 --> 00:01:33.040 for the full PCIe express port. And you can see from the traces on the back that 00:01:31.200 --> 00:01:36.320 this is a 8x card and the rest of this part of the connector is just kind of a 00:01:34.720 --> 00:01:41.680 formality. On the back we have three DisplayPort running at UHBR20 and an 00:01:38.720 --> 00:01:45.040 HDMI port with 2.1B for speedy connections far beyond the capabilities 00:01:43.280 --> 00:01:48.640 of this card. Though I guess with frame gen maybe uh you'll be able to get 00:01:46.880 --> 00:01:52.399 those. In terms of aesthetics, I think this card looks fine. It's pretty basic, 00:01:50.960 --> 00:01:57.200 but that's what you'd expect for these more budget type cards. It does have a 00:01:54.880 --> 00:02:02.240 metal back plate that uh will help with conducting some heat. There are thermal 00:01:58.880 --> 00:02:04.479 pads. It's not just for show. It's a two 00:02:02.240 --> 00:02:08.000 slot card. It could be even thinner, but they made it two slots thick on the back 00:02:06.399 --> 00:02:13.360 plate. And if you want to compare it to a 4060 Ti, we got this one from Asus. 00:02:11.000 --> 00:02:17.760 It's pretty reasonably sized. It's not too long. It's not too thick. Will fit 00:02:15.599 --> 00:02:21.200 into pretty much any standard case. And look at where this power connector is. 00:02:19.440 --> 00:02:25.280 You usually would expect the uh power connector to be at the end of the card 00:02:22.800 --> 00:02:29.599 towards the cutouts for like your cable management, but over here is where the 00:02:27.920 --> 00:02:33.760 power connector is on here, which might actually cause an issue if you have 00:02:31.040 --> 00:02:36.959 short cables because you have to like go all the way here, all the way around, 00:02:35.760 --> 00:02:41.440 all the way to the back where your power supply might be under here. It's not like a bad thing. It's just a little 00:02:39.760 --> 00:02:45.840 weird. You may have noticed on the box that this is a OC version of the card. 00:02:43.920 --> 00:02:50.560 The good news is that that OC version is coming in at the same price. The bad 00:02:47.680 --> 00:02:54.400 news is that that OC is also just 4.6%. Which isn't crazy from what we've seen 00:02:53.040 --> 00:02:57.920 from other cards. But just take that into consideration compared to the rest 00:02:56.239 --> 00:03:03.040 of the 5060 Ti specs that we're showing on screen. The 5060 Ti comes with 4,608 00:03:00.800 --> 00:03:09.280 CUDA cores, which is more than the 4060 of last gen, but less than the 3060 Ti 00:03:06.319 --> 00:03:13.360 two gen prior. However, the 5060 CUDA cores and the 4060 CUDA corores are 00:03:11.200 --> 00:03:17.760 essentially identical. So, the real difference in performance is coming from 00:03:14.800 --> 00:03:22.080 improvements to ray tracing, uh, AI, as well as just higher clock speeds in 00:03:19.840 --> 00:03:27.200 general. We also get a bump up to GDDR7. However, on this card, we are still 00:03:23.440 --> 00:03:29.360 limited to a 128 bit bus width. It is 00:03:27.200 --> 00:03:32.400 kind of disappointing, but I think that the whole bus width thing is a little 00:03:30.720 --> 00:03:35.519 bit overblown, and we've yet to see any of these NVIDIA cards be truly 00:03:33.760 --> 00:03:38.720 bottlenecked by their bus width. You're also going to get access to NVIDIA's 00:03:36.959 --> 00:03:43.599 updated video engines that include Envink and Nv. Though you'll only get 00:03:41.120 --> 00:03:47.519 one of each. So, if you're doing really heavy video workloads, you might find 00:03:45.599 --> 00:03:50.480 yourself wanting for a bit more power. And all of this is supposed to be 00:03:48.640 --> 00:03:55.120 powered by 180 W, though they do recommend a 600 W power supply. This OC 00:03:53.599 --> 00:04:00.400 version doesn't have a higher power requirement. I can't speak for other partner models, but it's still a pretty 00:03:58.720 --> 00:04:03.280 low power card. Though, we don't have a 5060 to test and we don't plan on 00:04:02.000 --> 00:04:07.760 talking about it too much more in this video. You can infer some idea of its 00:04:06.000 --> 00:04:14.879 performance by looking at how many CUDA cores it has relative to the TI. And the 00:04:11.519 --> 00:04:15.920 TI has about 20% more CUDA cores. So I 00:04:14.879 --> 00:04:20.639 wouldn't be surprised if there's a roughly 20% difference in performance on 00:04:17.919 --> 00:04:25.040 the 5060, maybe even a little bit more, which would be a pretty sizable gap for 00:04:22.880 --> 00:04:32.520 a TI card. And despite the fact that this is an OC model, it is 00:04:27.479 --> 00:04:32.520 MSRP supposedly at $429. 00:04:33.440 --> 00:04:39.440 We'll see if you can get that. But how does it perform? To figure it out, I got 00:04:37.759 --> 00:04:45.280 John from the lab to help me. And we're going to be drag racing a 4060 Ti and a 00:04:41.919 --> 00:04:47.919 B580 against the 5060 Ti. Specifically 00:04:45.280 --> 00:04:51.919 460Ti 16 GB. So why B580 instead of an AMD card? Well, AMD doesn't really have 00:04:50.160 --> 00:04:58.000 a price competitor that you can actually buy. The 7700 XT has been discontinued 00:04:55.360 --> 00:05:02.960 and the 9070 is so much more expensive that it doesn't really feel relevant to 00:04:59.759 --> 00:05:05.360 this card. So, the B580 is the only 00:05:02.960 --> 00:05:08.160 other modern competitor, but if you have old cards, we also did some testing on 00:05:06.880 --> 00:05:13.039 those, and we'll talk about that in a little bit. Let's get racing. And I only 00:05:10.800 --> 00:05:17.120 just realized this, but it doesn't use the super melty power connector that's 00:05:14.800 --> 00:05:23.120 found on the higherend cards. It's just a usual 8 pin. There's no RGB on this at 00:05:20.560 --> 00:05:28.080 all. I like it. Stealthy. But you know what isn't stealthy? This segue to our 00:05:25.039 --> 00:05:30.560 sponsor, Java. In this age of outrageous 00:05:28.080 --> 00:05:35.120 GPU prices and scalping, it's as good a time as any to buy used. But can you 00:05:33.280 --> 00:05:39.840 really trust who or where you're buying from? Well, with Jawa, you can. Their 00:05:37.759 --> 00:05:44.000 verified sellers are personally vetted by the Jawua team to be a reliable 00:05:41.680 --> 00:05:49.280 source of quality components. They even have fully assembled ready to go builds 00:05:46.320 --> 00:05:53.600 like this valueoriented gaming beast. And you can offset the cost of your next 00:05:51.520 --> 00:05:58.560 upgrade by making your own listings on Java or even sell your GPUs and CPUs 00:05:56.400 --> 00:06:03.280 directly to them. So don't wait. Click our link in the description to check out 00:06:00.160 --> 00:06:06.240 Jawa the marketplace by PC enthusiasts 00:06:03.280 --> 00:06:10.240 for PC enthusiasts. Beat the tariffs with the Shiptorm sale event at 00:06:08.039 --> 00:06:16.479 ltdstore.com. We are offering free shipping on any order worldwide over 00:06:13.560 --> 00:06:20.960 $150. So, it's a great time to pick up a commuter backpack, a precision 00:06:18.080 --> 00:06:24.880 screwdriver, or a stylish framework hoodie. Oh, I took it off to put on this 00:06:22.720 --> 00:06:28.880 jacket. The point is, we've also got never-before-seen pricing on our MCM 00:06:26.800 --> 00:06:33.840 Essentials bundle. Don't miss it. We'll have it linked down below. First up, 00:06:30.800 --> 00:06:37.360 Cyberpunk 1080p raster, no ray tracing. 00:06:33.840 --> 00:06:40.880 Begins in 3 2 1. So, what are you 00:06:37.360 --> 00:06:43.520 expecting, John? Maybe 10%. Faster than 00:06:40.880 --> 00:06:49.360 the 4060Ti 16. Yeah, but it's supposed to be 50 times faster. Not the 1060. 00:06:46.560 --> 00:06:53.039 Than the 1060. Yes. They didn't say how fast it was compared to the 4060. It's 00:06:51.600 --> 00:06:57.319 got like a pretty solid lead. We're seeing 90 here. Maybe maybe 20%. And 00:06:56.319 --> 00:07:03.960 that's like 118. The B580 isn't slouching, though. 00:07:00.560 --> 00:07:09.120 On the 4060 Ti, we got an average of 00:07:03.960 --> 00:07:13.120 101.12. On the B580, 96.53. And on the 00:07:09.120 --> 00:07:15.360 new hotness, 127.53. Yeah. So, 20% bump. 00:07:13.120 --> 00:07:21.520 That's quite respectable. Even more than 20%. A good start for the 5060 Ti. Let's 00:07:17.759 --> 00:07:23.039 see. 1440p. 3 2 1. I'm mostly hearing I 00:07:21.520 --> 00:07:26.720 think the CPU cooler. So, this is a pretty quiet card, which makes sense cuz 00:07:24.560 --> 00:07:32.000 it has uh a low power draw. It's about the same as the 4060 Ti 16 GB. So, still 00:07:30.240 --> 00:07:36.960 quite an efficient card. Wow. It's actually doing pretty good. We have 80 00:07:33.599 --> 00:07:37.880 on the 5060 Ti. And on the 4060 Ti, we 00:07:36.960 --> 00:07:45.280 got 56.98, but it's being beat by the 00:07:41.479 --> 00:07:47.520 B580 at 64. Intel actually scales 00:07:45.280 --> 00:07:53.599 incredibly well. B580 really comes alive with high resolution. Yeah. Interesting. 00:07:50.560 --> 00:07:56.319 And very notable. Like remember that 00:07:53.599 --> 00:08:00.960 this is a much much cheaper card that's competing 00:07:57.560 --> 00:08:02.720 with well the 4060 Ti. It's not quite 00:08:00.960 --> 00:08:07.240 competing with this, but it's much cheaper. Let's take a look at its RT 00:08:04.560 --> 00:08:15.360 performance in returnal. This is at 1080p. 3 2 1 go. 4060 Ti gets 83 00:08:12.160 --> 00:08:18.720 average, 79 average on the B580, and our 00:08:15.360 --> 00:08:21.599 new boy gets 97 average. So again, a 00:08:18.720 --> 00:08:26.319 pretty decent lead, like a 15 to 20ish% lead. That's not bad, especially when 00:08:23.759 --> 00:08:30.400 you consider that this is $70 cheaper than the last gen card. Except for when 00:08:28.479 --> 00:08:35.440 you also think about how the last gen card was um probably the worst value GPU 00:08:33.279 --> 00:08:38.800 of the past decade, which is saying a lot cuz there's been a lot of bad value 00:08:37.200 --> 00:08:43.279 GPUs in the past 10 years. Let's take a moment to go through the rest of the results that we got from Labs. On 00:08:40.959 --> 00:08:49.279 average across our test suite at 1080, we see the 5060 Ti pull a 15-ish% lead 00:08:46.880 --> 00:08:54.560 over the 4060 Ti 16 gig. But against the 470 Super, it's 23% behind, which is 00:08:53.120 --> 00:08:59.760 disappointing when you would consider and usually expect that the nextG car to 00:08:57.600 --> 00:09:04.320 tier down will beat the last gen card to tier up by a healthy margin. Clearly, 00:09:02.399 --> 00:09:07.920 that's just not true. On the one hand, compared to last gen, it's impressive 00:09:05.519 --> 00:09:12.880 that it's getting this much of an uplift with only having 6%ish more CUDA cores, 00:09:10.720 --> 00:09:17.279 but it's still just disappointing. In the 1440 raster, we see pretty similar 00:09:15.200 --> 00:09:23.200 margins with the 5060 Ti getting about 17% uplift over the 4060 Ti 16 GB. I 00:09:21.360 --> 00:09:27.920 hate how I have to specify it. And the RTX 4070 Super pulls away with a 00:09:25.519 --> 00:09:32.640 slightly larger lead. The B580 is supposed to be barely half the price of 00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:35.920 this 5060 Ti. To be getting just 20% less performance while saving that much 00:09:34.000 --> 00:09:39.440 money is pretty compelling. Sure, the B580 has driver problems, but the 5000 00:09:37.920 --> 00:09:44.720 series has been having its own share of driver problems. Not as bad, but it's 00:09:42.399 --> 00:09:48.480 worth considering though. I guess what are your other options? It's not like 00:09:46.000 --> 00:09:54.480 AMD has an option yet. Let's talk about RT though. Rate tracing 1080. The 5060 00:09:51.279 --> 00:09:57.200 Ti, it's worse. The 4060 Ti 16 GB closes 00:09:54.480 --> 00:10:02.080 the gap to closer to 15% while the 5060 Ti trails even further behind the 4070 00:09:59.279 --> 00:10:05.440 Super in ray tracing. For 1440 RT, we kind of felt that that was outside of 00:10:03.680 --> 00:10:09.440 the parameters of what this card is designed for, but we wanted to check it 00:10:06.880 --> 00:10:14.079 out anyways. And in Cyberpunk, well, it gets, you won't believe this, roughly 00:10:11.279 --> 00:10:21.279 30% behind the 4070 Super and roughly 15% in front of the 4060 Ti 16 gig. For 00:10:18.399 --> 00:10:26.560 thermals, the PNY 5060Ti 16 GB performs adequately with a of roughly 69 average 00:10:23.920 --> 00:10:31.519 degrees C temperatures. And in F1, we see a max temp of 68 and a average of 00:10:29.279 --> 00:10:35.839 65. In terms of power draw, we're seeing a similar trend to other Blackwell GPUs 00:10:33.519 --> 00:10:39.519 where yes, they perform around their average rated power rating, but they do 00:10:37.600 --> 00:10:43.680 like to pull a little bit extra with the most we ever saw it pulling across our 00:10:41.040 --> 00:10:49.279 tests being around 213 watts, substantially higher than the 180 watt 00:10:45.360 --> 00:10:52.320 TGP. Wow, NVIDIA, you've done it again. 00:10:49.279 --> 00:10:54.320 You've released another dud and you did 00:10:52.320 --> 00:10:59.839 it all in style while completely lying and misrepresenting your performance. 00:10:56.480 --> 00:11:03.040 Sure, DLSS4 it's good, especially the 00:10:59.839 --> 00:11:05.440 upscaler. Frame gen is neat and works 00:11:03.040 --> 00:11:10.800 nicely in specific scenarios, but comes with its own downsides. So, what is 00:11:08.240 --> 00:11:17.839 NVIDIA really offering us here that we don't already have? 50 bucks in savings 00:11:15.839 --> 00:11:22.240 and that's it on a card that already sucks in value. We haven't tested the 00:11:19.680 --> 00:11:27.440 5060Ti 8 gigabyte version, so we don't know if the 16 gigabyte version gets you 00:11:24.880 --> 00:11:30.640 that much more performance, and we also don't know what the 5060 is going to 00:11:28.959 --> 00:11:35.920 look like. So, considering that those have their own price gaps, who knows if 00:11:33.360 --> 00:11:40.959 the 5060 Ti 16 gig is going to be good. The GPU market right now is rough and 00:11:38.880 --> 00:11:44.399 all we can do is wait and see. Maybe in a few months prices will settle and we 00:11:42.480 --> 00:11:49.440 can be happy that there's at least some cards that are available on the lower 00:11:46.800 --> 00:11:54.000 price ranges because it's been a desert for the past several months. So, that's 00:11:52.240 --> 00:11:57.279 something to be thankful for. And I'm thankful for you for watching this short 00:11:55.680 --> 00:12:00.079 circuit. If you like this format, why don't you check out our 5080 roundup 00:11:59.200 --> 00:12:03.440 where we looked at three different 5080s. Yeah, they're expensive, but if 00:12:02.240 --> 00:12:07.200 you're going to spend that much money, you might as well know which one to