1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:06,240
NVIDIA claims that the 5060 Ti is more than 50 times faster than the 1060. And

2
00:00:04,640 --> 00:00:11,840
if that sounds like a complete lie, that's because it is. Think about it. If

3
00:00:08,720 --> 00:00:14,080
your 1060 can run a game at 30 FPS, that

4
00:00:11,840 --> 00:00:20,000
would mean that the 5060 Ti will run it at

5
00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:22,720
1,500 frames per second. How? Well, I'm

6
00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:27,119
assuming is that they said max settings. So, one, they're probably using ray

7
00:00:24,560 --> 00:00:31,920
tracing, which the 1060 can't do. two, they're probably using the 1060 3 GB

8
00:00:29,760 --> 00:00:36,079
card, which definitely cannot handle modern games. If you think about it in

9
00:00:34,320 --> 00:00:41,760
that way, where the 1060 is probably getting 2 FPS in this scenario on

10
00:00:39,040 --> 00:00:47,520
average, well, then it makes a little bit more sense that maybe the 5060 Ti is

11
00:00:44,640 --> 00:00:54,320
getting around 100 FPS, though once you take out DLSS 4x frame gen, it's more

12
00:00:50,719 --> 00:00:57,520
like 25. So, does it suck? Let's unbox

13
00:00:54,320 --> 00:01:01,359
it and find out. This is the PNY 5060Ti

14
00:00:57,520 --> 00:01:02,960
16 GB OC. Just like the 4060 Ti, there's

15
00:01:01,359 --> 00:01:06,640
going to be two versions, an 8 GB version and a 16 GB version. Which one

16
00:01:05,199 --> 00:01:10,960
you choose will probably depend on your use case, and we'll talk about that a little bit more later. But let's just

17
00:01:09,040 --> 00:01:15,520
look at the card itself. It's a flow through cooler design, and it has some

18
00:01:13,040 --> 00:01:22,560
interesting choices in its construction. One, look at the PCB right here. It's

19
00:01:19,280 --> 00:01:24,880
like completely blank. They really just

20
00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:29,920
extended it long enough so that they could make sure that it had enough room

21
00:01:27,280 --> 00:01:33,040
for the full PCIe express port. And you can see from the traces on the back that

22
00:01:31,200 --> 00:01:36,320
this is a 8x card and the rest of this part of the connector is just kind of a

23
00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:41,680
formality. On the back we have three DisplayPort running at UHBR20 and an

24
00:01:38,720 --> 00:01:45,040
HDMI port with 2.1B for speedy connections far beyond the capabilities

25
00:01:43,280 --> 00:01:48,640
of this card. Though I guess with frame gen maybe uh you'll be able to get

26
00:01:46,880 --> 00:01:52,399
those. In terms of aesthetics, I think this card looks fine. It's pretty basic,

27
00:01:50,960 --> 00:01:57,200
but that's what you'd expect for these more budget type cards. It does have a

28
00:01:54,880 --> 00:02:02,240
metal back plate that uh will help with conducting some heat. There are thermal

29
00:01:58,880 --> 00:02:04,479
pads. It's not just for show. It's a two

30
00:02:02,240 --> 00:02:08,000
slot card. It could be even thinner, but they made it two slots thick on the back

31
00:02:06,399 --> 00:02:13,360
plate. And if you want to compare it to a 4060 Ti, we got this one from Asus.

32
00:02:11,000 --> 00:02:17,760
It's pretty reasonably sized. It's not too long. It's not too thick. Will fit

33
00:02:15,599 --> 00:02:21,200
into pretty much any standard case. And look at where this power connector is.

34
00:02:19,440 --> 00:02:25,280
You usually would expect the uh power connector to be at the end of the card

35
00:02:22,800 --> 00:02:29,599
towards the cutouts for like your cable management, but over here is where the

36
00:02:27,920 --> 00:02:33,760
power connector is on here, which might actually cause an issue if you have

37
00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:36,959
short cables because you have to like go all the way here, all the way around,

38
00:02:35,760 --> 00:02:41,440
all the way to the back where your power supply might be under here. It's not like a bad thing. It's just a little

39
00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:45,840
weird. You may have noticed on the box that this is a OC version of the card.

40
00:02:43,920 --> 00:02:50,560
The good news is that that OC version is coming in at the same price. The bad

41
00:02:47,680 --> 00:02:54,400
news is that that OC is also just 4.6%. Which isn't crazy from what we've seen

42
00:02:53,040 --> 00:02:57,920
from other cards. But just take that into consideration compared to the rest

43
00:02:56,239 --> 00:03:03,040
of the 5060 Ti specs that we're showing on screen. The 5060 Ti comes with 4,608

44
00:03:00,800 --> 00:03:09,280
CUDA cores, which is more than the 4060 of last gen, but less than the 3060 Ti

45
00:03:06,319 --> 00:03:13,360
two gen prior. However, the 5060 CUDA cores and the 4060 CUDA corores are

46
00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:17,760
essentially identical. So, the real difference in performance is coming from

47
00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:22,080
improvements to ray tracing, uh, AI, as well as just higher clock speeds in

48
00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:27,200
general. We also get a bump up to GDDR7. However, on this card, we are still

49
00:03:23,440 --> 00:03:29,360
limited to a 128 bit bus width. It is

50
00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:32,400
kind of disappointing, but I think that the whole bus width thing is a little

51
00:03:30,720 --> 00:03:35,519
bit overblown, and we've yet to see any of these NVIDIA cards be truly

52
00:03:33,760 --> 00:03:38,720
bottlenecked by their bus width. You're also going to get access to NVIDIA's

53
00:03:36,959 --> 00:03:43,599
updated video engines that include Envink and Nv. Though you'll only get

54
00:03:41,120 --> 00:03:47,519
one of each. So, if you're doing really heavy video workloads, you might find

55
00:03:45,599 --> 00:03:50,480
yourself wanting for a bit more power. And all of this is supposed to be

56
00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:55,120
powered by 180 W, though they do recommend a 600 W power supply. This OC

57
00:03:53,599 --> 00:04:00,400
version doesn't have a higher power requirement. I can't speak for other partner models, but it's still a pretty

58
00:03:58,720 --> 00:04:03,280
low power card. Though, we don't have a 5060 to test and we don't plan on

59
00:04:02,000 --> 00:04:07,760
talking about it too much more in this video. You can infer some idea of its

60
00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:14,879
performance by looking at how many CUDA cores it has relative to the TI. And the

61
00:04:11,519 --> 00:04:15,920
TI has about 20% more CUDA cores. So I

62
00:04:14,879 --> 00:04:20,639
wouldn't be surprised if there's a roughly 20% difference in performance on

63
00:04:17,919 --> 00:04:25,040
the 5060, maybe even a little bit more, which would be a pretty sizable gap for

64
00:04:22,880 --> 00:04:32,520
a TI card. And despite the fact that this is an OC model, it is

65
00:04:27,479 --> 00:04:32,520
MSRP supposedly at $429.

66
00:04:33,440 --> 00:04:39,440
We'll see if you can get that. But how does it perform? To figure it out, I got

67
00:04:37,759 --> 00:04:45,280
John from the lab to help me. And we're going to be drag racing a 4060 Ti and a

68
00:04:41,919 --> 00:04:47,919
B580 against the 5060 Ti. Specifically

69
00:04:45,280 --> 00:04:51,919
460Ti 16 GB. So why B580 instead of an AMD card? Well, AMD doesn't really have

70
00:04:50,160 --> 00:04:58,000
a price competitor that you can actually buy. The 7700 XT has been discontinued

71
00:04:55,360 --> 00:05:02,960
and the 9070 is so much more expensive that it doesn't really feel relevant to

72
00:04:59,759 --> 00:05:05,360
this card. So, the B580 is the only

73
00:05:02,960 --> 00:05:08,160
other modern competitor, but if you have old cards, we also did some testing on

74
00:05:06,880 --> 00:05:13,039
those, and we'll talk about that in a little bit. Let's get racing. And I only

75
00:05:10,800 --> 00:05:17,120
just realized this, but it doesn't use the super melty power connector that's

76
00:05:14,800 --> 00:05:23,120
found on the higherend cards. It's just a usual 8 pin. There's no RGB on this at

77
00:05:20,560 --> 00:05:28,080
all. I like it. Stealthy. But you know what isn't stealthy? This segue to our

78
00:05:25,039 --> 00:05:30,560
sponsor, Java. In this age of outrageous

79
00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:35,120
GPU prices and scalping, it's as good a time as any to buy used. But can you

80
00:05:33,280 --> 00:05:39,840
really trust who or where you're buying from? Well, with Jawa, you can. Their

81
00:05:37,759 --> 00:05:44,000
verified sellers are personally vetted by the Jawua team to be a reliable

82
00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:49,280
source of quality components. They even have fully assembled ready to go builds

83
00:05:46,320 --> 00:05:53,600
like this valueoriented gaming beast. And you can offset the cost of your next

84
00:05:51,520 --> 00:05:58,560
upgrade by making your own listings on Java or even sell your GPUs and CPUs

85
00:05:56,400 --> 00:06:03,280
directly to them. So don't wait. Click our link in the description to check out

86
00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:06,240
Jawa the marketplace by PC enthusiasts

87
00:06:03,280 --> 00:06:10,240
for PC enthusiasts. Beat the tariffs with the Shiptorm sale event at

88
00:06:08,039 --> 00:06:16,479
ltdstore.com. We are offering free shipping on any order worldwide over

89
00:06:13,560 --> 00:06:20,960
$150. So, it's a great time to pick up a commuter backpack, a precision

90
00:06:18,080 --> 00:06:24,880
screwdriver, or a stylish framework hoodie. Oh, I took it off to put on this

91
00:06:22,720 --> 00:06:28,880
jacket. The point is, we've also got never-before-seen pricing on our MCM

92
00:06:26,800 --> 00:06:33,840
Essentials bundle. Don't miss it. We'll have it linked down below. First up,

93
00:06:30,800 --> 00:06:37,360
Cyberpunk 1080p raster, no ray tracing.

94
00:06:33,840 --> 00:06:40,880
Begins in 3 2 1. So, what are you

95
00:06:37,360 --> 00:06:43,520
expecting, John? Maybe 10%. Faster than

96
00:06:40,880 --> 00:06:49,360
the 4060Ti 16. Yeah, but it's supposed to be 50 times faster. Not the 1060.

97
00:06:46,560 --> 00:06:53,039
Than the 1060. Yes. They didn't say how fast it was compared to the 4060. It's

98
00:06:51,600 --> 00:06:57,319
got like a pretty solid lead. We're seeing 90 here. Maybe maybe 20%. And

99
00:06:56,319 --> 00:07:03,960
that's like 118. The B580 isn't slouching, though.

100
00:07:00,560 --> 00:07:09,120
On the 4060 Ti, we got an average of

101
00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:13,120
101.12. On the B580, 96.53. And on the

102
00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:15,360
new hotness, 127.53. Yeah. So, 20% bump.

103
00:07:13,120 --> 00:07:21,520
That's quite respectable. Even more than 20%. A good start for the 5060 Ti. Let's

104
00:07:17,759 --> 00:07:23,039
see. 1440p. 3 2 1. I'm mostly hearing I

105
00:07:21,520 --> 00:07:26,720
think the CPU cooler. So, this is a pretty quiet card, which makes sense cuz

106
00:07:24,560 --> 00:07:32,000
it has uh a low power draw. It's about the same as the 4060 Ti 16 GB. So, still

107
00:07:30,240 --> 00:07:36,960
quite an efficient card. Wow. It's actually doing pretty good. We have 80

108
00:07:33,599 --> 00:07:37,880
on the 5060 Ti. And on the 4060 Ti, we

109
00:07:36,960 --> 00:07:45,280
got 56.98, but it's being beat by the

110
00:07:41,479 --> 00:07:47,520
B580 at 64. Intel actually scales

111
00:07:45,280 --> 00:07:53,599
incredibly well. B580 really comes alive with high resolution. Yeah. Interesting.

112
00:07:50,560 --> 00:07:56,319
And very notable. Like remember that

113
00:07:53,599 --> 00:08:00,960
this is a much much cheaper card that's competing

114
00:07:57,560 --> 00:08:02,720
with well the 4060 Ti. It's not quite

115
00:08:00,960 --> 00:08:07,240
competing with this, but it's much cheaper. Let's take a look at its RT

116
00:08:04,560 --> 00:08:15,360
performance in returnal. This is at 1080p. 3 2 1 go. 4060 Ti gets 83

117
00:08:12,160 --> 00:08:18,720
average, 79 average on the B580, and our

118
00:08:15,360 --> 00:08:21,599
new boy gets 97 average. So again, a

119
00:08:18,720 --> 00:08:26,319
pretty decent lead, like a 15 to 20ish% lead. That's not bad, especially when

120
00:08:23,759 --> 00:08:30,400
you consider that this is $70 cheaper than the last gen card. Except for when

121
00:08:28,479 --> 00:08:35,440
you also think about how the last gen card was um probably the worst value GPU

122
00:08:33,279 --> 00:08:38,800
of the past decade, which is saying a lot cuz there's been a lot of bad value

123
00:08:37,200 --> 00:08:43,279
GPUs in the past 10 years. Let's take a moment to go through the rest of the results that we got from Labs. On

124
00:08:40,959 --> 00:08:49,279
average across our test suite at 1080, we see the 5060 Ti pull a 15-ish% lead

125
00:08:46,880 --> 00:08:54,560
over the 4060 Ti 16 gig. But against the 470 Super, it's 23% behind, which is

126
00:08:53,120 --> 00:08:59,760
disappointing when you would consider and usually expect that the nextG car to

127
00:08:57,600 --> 00:09:04,320
tier down will beat the last gen card to tier up by a healthy margin. Clearly,

128
00:09:02,399 --> 00:09:07,920
that's just not true. On the one hand, compared to last gen, it's impressive

129
00:09:05,519 --> 00:09:12,880
that it's getting this much of an uplift with only having 6%ish more CUDA cores,

130
00:09:10,720 --> 00:09:17,279
but it's still just disappointing. In the 1440 raster, we see pretty similar

131
00:09:15,200 --> 00:09:23,200
margins with the 5060 Ti getting about 17% uplift over the 4060 Ti 16 GB. I

132
00:09:21,360 --> 00:09:27,920
hate how I have to specify it. And the RTX 4070 Super pulls away with a

133
00:09:25,519 --> 00:09:32,640
slightly larger lead. The B580 is supposed to be barely half the price of

134
00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:35,920
this 5060 Ti. To be getting just 20% less performance while saving that much

135
00:09:34,000 --> 00:09:39,440
money is pretty compelling. Sure, the B580 has driver problems, but the 5000

136
00:09:37,920 --> 00:09:44,720
series has been having its own share of driver problems. Not as bad, but it's

137
00:09:42,399 --> 00:09:48,480
worth considering though. I guess what are your other options? It's not like

138
00:09:46,000 --> 00:09:54,480
AMD has an option yet. Let's talk about RT though. Rate tracing 1080. The 5060

139
00:09:51,279 --> 00:09:57,200
Ti, it's worse. The 4060 Ti 16 GB closes

140
00:09:54,480 --> 00:10:02,080
the gap to closer to 15% while the 5060 Ti trails even further behind the 4070

141
00:09:59,279 --> 00:10:05,440
Super in ray tracing. For 1440 RT, we kind of felt that that was outside of

142
00:10:03,680 --> 00:10:09,440
the parameters of what this card is designed for, but we wanted to check it

143
00:10:06,880 --> 00:10:14,079
out anyways. And in Cyberpunk, well, it gets, you won't believe this, roughly

144
00:10:11,279 --> 00:10:21,279
30% behind the 4070 Super and roughly 15% in front of the 4060 Ti 16 gig. For

145
00:10:18,399 --> 00:10:26,560
thermals, the PNY 5060Ti 16 GB performs adequately with a of roughly 69 average

146
00:10:23,920 --> 00:10:31,519
degrees C temperatures. And in F1, we see a max temp of 68 and a average of

147
00:10:29,279 --> 00:10:35,839
65. In terms of power draw, we're seeing a similar trend to other Blackwell GPUs

148
00:10:33,519 --> 00:10:39,519
where yes, they perform around their average rated power rating, but they do

149
00:10:37,600 --> 00:10:43,680
like to pull a little bit extra with the most we ever saw it pulling across our

150
00:10:41,040 --> 00:10:49,279
tests being around 213 watts, substantially higher than the 180 watt

151
00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:52,320
TGP. Wow, NVIDIA, you've done it again.

152
00:10:49,279 --> 00:10:54,320
You've released another dud and you did

153
00:10:52,320 --> 00:10:59,839
it all in style while completely lying and misrepresenting your performance.

154
00:10:56,480 --> 00:11:03,040
Sure, DLSS4 it's good, especially the

155
00:10:59,839 --> 00:11:05,440
upscaler. Frame gen is neat and works

156
00:11:03,040 --> 00:11:10,800
nicely in specific scenarios, but comes with its own downsides. So, what is

157
00:11:08,240 --> 00:11:17,839
NVIDIA really offering us here that we don't already have? 50 bucks in savings

158
00:11:15,839 --> 00:11:22,240
and that's it on a card that already sucks in value. We haven't tested the

159
00:11:19,680 --> 00:11:27,440
5060Ti 8 gigabyte version, so we don't know if the 16 gigabyte version gets you

160
00:11:24,880 --> 00:11:30,640
that much more performance, and we also don't know what the 5060 is going to

161
00:11:28,959 --> 00:11:35,920
look like. So, considering that those have their own price gaps, who knows if

162
00:11:33,360 --> 00:11:40,959
the 5060 Ti 16 gig is going to be good. The GPU market right now is rough and

163
00:11:38,880 --> 00:11:44,399
all we can do is wait and see. Maybe in a few months prices will settle and we

164
00:11:42,480 --> 00:11:49,440
can be happy that there's at least some cards that are available on the lower

165
00:11:46,800 --> 00:11:54,000
price ranges because it's been a desert for the past several months. So, that's

166
00:11:52,240 --> 00:11:57,279
something to be thankful for. And I'm thankful for you for watching this short

167
00:11:55,680 --> 00:12:00,079
circuit. If you like this format, why don't you check out our 5080 roundup

168
00:11:59,200 --> 00:12:03,440
where we looked at three different 5080s. Yeah, they're expensive, but if

169
00:12:02,240 --> 00:12:07,200
you're going to spend that much money, you might as well know which one to