1
00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:08,960
This right here is a $560

2
00:00:04,799 --> 00:00:12,000
gaming monitor. It's got a 240 Hz

3
00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:13,840
refresh rate, G-Sync, and 1 millisecond

4
00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:20,240
response times. I mean, gaming on this thing is way better than gaming on this

5
00:00:17,840 --> 00:00:29,679
cheapo HP. But is it six times better?

6
00:00:24,560 --> 00:00:33,760
Now, take this one. This $5,000

7
00:00:29,679 --> 00:00:36,399
8K workstation monitor for creatives.

8
00:00:33,760 --> 00:00:40,480
It is way better to look at than this peasant trash.

9
00:00:38,399 --> 00:00:43,480
But is it 55.55

10
00:00:43,920 --> 00:00:51,039
repeating times better?

11
00:00:47,680 --> 00:00:54,480
Well, your mental math is correct. This

12
00:00:51,039 --> 00:00:58,000
monitor is only $90. And welcome back to

13
00:00:54,480 --> 00:01:00,160
another episode of why the actual holy

14
00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:07,720
advertiser friendly content. Are you guys all buying this? The best

15
00:01:03,359 --> 00:01:07,720
selling monitor on Amazon.com.

16
00:01:16,320 --> 00:01:23,439
The Pavilion 22 CWA, the bestselling

17
00:01:19,840 --> 00:01:26,320
monitor on Amazon.com, has over 3600

18
00:01:23,439 --> 00:01:31,439
reviews and an average rating of 4.4 stars. And admittedly, it does look a

19
00:01:29,759 --> 00:01:37,200
little out of place next to the kinds of products that we typically cover on this

20
00:01:33,759 --> 00:01:41,520
channel. But don't let its dimminitive

21
00:01:37,200 --> 00:01:45,280
21 1/2 in size and super light 8 1/2 lb

22
00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:48,640
weight fool you. This monitor is 100%

23
00:01:45,280 --> 00:01:51,840
pretty not bad. Just check out those

24
00:01:48,640 --> 00:01:54,720
colors. So, what's the deal here? Well,

25
00:01:51,840 --> 00:02:00,640
it's not just that HP is selling a cheap monitor. In fact, the number three best

26
00:01:57,200 --> 00:02:02,960
seller is only 65 bucks. It's that

27
00:02:00,640 --> 00:02:08,640
they're selling a cheap monitor that's equipped with an IPS panel, while these

28
00:02:06,640 --> 00:02:14,480
other cheapies are sporting your run-of-the-mill TN panels. But HP

29
00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:20,720
doesn't make LCD panels. They source them from other manufacturers. So if I

30
00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:23,280
take a spudger like this and

31
00:02:20,720 --> 00:02:31,680
work it around the edge, I might be able to see who actually made this thing.

32
00:02:27,520 --> 00:02:34,879
So, the sticker says LM215WF3,

33
00:02:31,680 --> 00:02:38,319
which according to the internet is an LG

34
00:02:34,879 --> 00:02:41,840
panel with a full 1920x 1080 resolution,

35
00:02:38,319 --> 00:02:44,640
typical brightness of 250 nits and 8bit

36
00:02:41,840 --> 00:02:51,360
color. But what's really interesting is that if I type that model number into

37
00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:55,840
Amazon, I get a page full of replacement

38
00:02:51,360 --> 00:02:58,000
2012 to 2014 iMac screens. and for over

39
00:02:55,840 --> 00:03:05,440
$200. So, either these prices have a heavy

40
00:03:02,159 --> 00:03:08,640
Apple tax applied to them or HP secured

41
00:03:05,440 --> 00:03:12,319
an awesome deal with LG because 90 bucks

42
00:03:08,640 --> 00:03:14,800
for an iMac screen ain't half bad. Plus,

43
00:03:12,319 --> 00:03:19,120
you aren't just getting the panel. HP is providing you with the casing, stand,

44
00:03:16,560 --> 00:03:24,319
IO, and their one-year limited warranty, which is of course required by law.

45
00:03:20,879 --> 00:03:26,959
Haha. And the casing itself isn't too

46
00:03:24,319 --> 00:03:31,519
bad either. It's made of not terrible quality plastic that doesn't easily get

47
00:03:29,040 --> 00:03:36,239
covered in fingerprints, and it is slim all the way around. Though, of course,

48
00:03:33,840 --> 00:03:42,959
they did have to cut some corners somewhere to get the price down. And the

49
00:03:39,599 --> 00:03:47,599
stand is the worst offender. It offers

50
00:03:42,959 --> 00:03:50,319
no swivel, no pivot or height adjust

51
00:03:47,599 --> 00:03:54,080
whatsoever. though it does include a little bit of tilt to that you'll

52
00:03:52,159 --> 00:03:58,560
probably need because the stand is so short. And that isn't even the worst

53
00:03:56,319 --> 00:04:03,840
part. It's that should you take the crappy stand off and opt to use a third

54
00:04:01,360 --> 00:04:09,040
party monitor ARM instead, perhaps in a multimonitor setup, which these are

55
00:04:06,319 --> 00:04:16,479
awesome for thanks to the thin bezels. It's not Vasa compatible. So, unless you

56
00:04:13,519 --> 00:04:22,000
get an adapter for an extra $20, you're going to have to get pretty creative.

57
00:04:18,959 --> 00:04:25,680
Bringing us to the IO,

58
00:04:22,000 --> 00:04:29,840
it's pretty spartan. You get one HDMI

59
00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:31,759
port and one VGA port. That's it. I

60
00:04:29,840 --> 00:04:37,280
mean, you probably have low expectations for such a budget product, but just make

61
00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:42,400
sure that they're low enough to also not be surprised when there is no HDMI cable

62
00:04:40,240 --> 00:04:48,080
included in the box. So, who should buy this monitor then?

63
00:04:45,840 --> 00:04:53,120
Well, if you want a secondary or tertiary or quatinary screen for that

64
00:04:51,199 --> 00:04:57,680
matter to supplement your main display or displays, the wide viewing angles

65
00:04:55,520 --> 00:05:04,240
here mean that you can put it way off to the side without much color distortion.

66
00:05:01,040 --> 00:05:07,600
As for using it for your main display,

67
00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:09,680
could you use it for gaming? Sure. While

68
00:05:07,600 --> 00:05:14,160
IPS displays aren't known to have the highest refresh rates or the fastest

69
00:05:11,680 --> 00:05:18,240
pixel response times, this one's input lag is better than most TVs. And while

70
00:05:16,240 --> 00:05:26,160
you will see some smearing and fastoving scenes, it's a far cry better than value

71
00:05:23,199 --> 00:05:32,639
monitors from 10 years ago. So, do we recommend it? Actually, yeah. It's a

72
00:05:30,240 --> 00:05:36,400
great value. And if you're hung up on the crappy stand, don't worry. An

73
00:05:34,720 --> 00:05:42,000
additional 40 bucks will get you the number two bestselling monitor, which is

74
00:05:38,320 --> 00:05:44,160
also from HP and basically the same, but

75
00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:49,199
an inch bigger and with a Vasa compatible pivoting stand.

76
00:05:47,759 --> 00:05:53,120
So, thanks for watching, guys. If this video sucked, you know what to do. But

77
00:05:50,880 --> 00:05:56,720
if it was awesome, get subscribed, hit that like button, or check out the link

78
00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:59,919
to where to buy the stuff we featured in the video description. Also linked down

79
00:05:58,720 --> 00:06:06,080
there is our merch drawer, which has cool shirts like this one, and our community forum, which you should

80
00:06:03,440 --> 00:06:06,080
totally join.
