1
00:00:00,199 --> 00:00:07,799
5 years ago I stood on this very Street and I told you guys how much I loved

2
00:00:05,400 --> 00:00:12,040
AMD's roadmap if it hadn't been such an ethical issue I would have bought their

3
00:00:09,679 --> 00:00:17,600
stock obviously that wasn't Financial advice and it still isn't but man did I

4
00:00:15,200 --> 00:00:22,640
ever nail it because the hits keep coming and it's all at Intel's expense

5
00:00:20,680 --> 00:00:27,599
there are a lot of reasons to be excited about the new CPUs that AMD just

6
00:00:24,320 --> 00:00:29,400
announced but I'm not here to just talk

7
00:00:27,599 --> 00:00:34,480
about that because there are also reasons to we only cautiously

8
00:00:32,040 --> 00:00:39,680
enthusiastic so let's talk about that but first this enthusiastic segue to our

9
00:00:36,960 --> 00:00:43,480
sponsor pulseway Monitor and take control of your systems while you're on

10
00:00:41,200 --> 00:00:48,000
the move and respond to it alerts right from your phone with pulseway you can

11
00:00:45,320 --> 00:00:53,160
try it for free today and secure 40% off any plan including their month-to-month

12
00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:56,199
options who wants 16% more performance

13
00:00:53,160 --> 00:00:58,559
for reportedly the same price yeah me

14
00:00:56,199 --> 00:01:02,879
too and that's what AMD is claiming to deliver with the ryzen 9 950x

15
00:01:01,280 --> 00:01:08,240
considering that there's no bumping boost clocks or cash and their base

16
00:01:06,119 --> 00:01:12,759
clocks are actually a little bit lower that is a very respectable result and

17
00:01:10,759 --> 00:01:19,799
enough to absolutely blow the doors off of Intel's consumer Flagship The Core i

18
00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:21,759
94900 k now these are AMD's Z numbers

19
00:01:19,799 --> 00:01:26,079
and you should take them with a sodium tablet until we get a chance to run them

20
00:01:23,479 --> 00:01:30,040
through the lab but the performance leader is rarely the one that's going to

21
00:01:28,079 --> 00:01:35,720
be caught stretching the truth and there is no doubt that the performance leader

22
00:01:31,960 --> 00:01:38,439
right now is AMD unfortunately that's

23
00:01:35,720 --> 00:01:42,560
all AMD gave us as far as performance numbers go they are not sharing

24
00:01:40,439 --> 00:01:47,159
benchmarks for the rest of the 9000 Series lineup though they did give us

25
00:01:44,439 --> 00:01:52,280
specs for the ryzen 5 and the ryzen 7 that would indicate a similar

26
00:01:49,040 --> 00:01:55,439
performance uplift over last gen with a

27
00:01:52,280 --> 00:01:59,520
reduction in heat and power consumption

28
00:01:55,439 --> 00:02:01,000
to go along with the performance D until

29
00:01:59,520 --> 00:02:06,680
that's sicker burn than you'll get from a core I9 it gets even better for the

30
00:02:04,360 --> 00:02:11,680
gamers out there precedent suggests that the five and the Seven class chips are

31
00:02:08,959 --> 00:02:18,239
going to be single CCD SKS making them the goto for minmaxer gamers that is at

32
00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:23,200
least until we get an x3d variant which AMD hasn't announced at this

33
00:02:20,800 --> 00:02:27,920
time the most exciting part for me though is what's not new while AMD has

34
00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:33,120
been hard at work on a new motherboard chipet to launch alongside these CPUs

35
00:02:30,840 --> 00:02:36,920
it's going to be on the same am5 socket that we've come to know and they've

36
00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:41,400
recommitted to their long-term relationship confirming support for am5

37
00:02:39,879 --> 00:02:47,280
until at least 2027 this is such great news if you

38
00:02:44,280 --> 00:02:50,480
already have a 600 series board you've

39
00:02:47,280 --> 00:02:54,519
got to love just drop in performance

40
00:02:50,480 --> 00:02:56,760
upgrades but with how strong some of

41
00:02:54,519 --> 00:03:01,840
these new boards look I suspect some people are going to be tempted to

42
00:02:58,360 --> 00:03:01,840
upgrade anyway

43
00:03:02,040 --> 00:03:09,480
for one thing USB 4.0 is now standard on

44
00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:11,920
all x870 and x870 or extreme

45
00:03:09,480 --> 00:03:17,879
motherboards which means Thunderbolt 3 capability which is an optional part of

46
00:03:13,959 --> 00:03:20,599
USB 4 may become more common on AMD and

47
00:03:17,879 --> 00:03:26,760
the same goes for PCI Express Gen 5 which is now on all x800 series chipsets

48
00:03:23,360 --> 00:03:29,239
for both the GPU and for NVMe storage

49
00:03:26,760 --> 00:03:35,959
though how many ports are required to be Gen 5 remains to be seen PCIe Gen 5 has

50
00:03:33,599 --> 00:03:40,000
double the bandwidth of Gen 4 which while we aren't likely to actually use

51
00:03:37,640 --> 00:03:44,159
it to its full potential today means that devices can use fewer lanes for the

52
00:03:42,280 --> 00:03:47,959
same performance level that's going to pair nicely with the higher speed Expo

53
00:03:46,200 --> 00:03:54,280
certified memory kits that AMD is promising for this generation but wait

54
00:03:50,840 --> 00:03:58,519
there's even more am4 users are getting

55
00:03:54,280 --> 00:04:01,879
new Chips that's right the ryzen 9 5900

56
00:03:58,519 --> 00:04:03,640
XT and ryzen 7 5800 XT are coming to

57
00:04:01,879 --> 00:04:08,879
give you a nice little performance boost for your older system this puts am4

58
00:04:06,079 --> 00:04:14,280
users on par with the 13700 K and the 13600 K respectively all of which is

59
00:04:11,840 --> 00:04:18,400
pretty great but is anyone else feeling like something's missing like look over

60
00:04:16,280 --> 00:04:23,199
the spec tables again it's going to be kind of familiar maximum of 16 cores

61
00:04:20,959 --> 00:04:28,040
same boost clock same cash mostly the same TDP yeah IPC is up or instructions

62
00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:32,080
per clock so we're going to get more performance but does this feel a little

63
00:04:30,280 --> 00:04:37,000
bit like the Habit that Intel got stuck in during the years between the 2000

64
00:04:34,520 --> 00:04:42,120
series and 7,000 Series where each generation gave us modest speed

65
00:04:39,479 --> 00:04:47,320
increases or IPC increases and not much else I mean to be clear up to 16 cores

66
00:04:45,400 --> 00:04:53,199
is great compared to where Intel left us with four but there's something much

67
00:04:49,479 --> 00:04:55,440
more important missing here ryzen 3 I

68
00:04:53,199 --> 00:05:00,680
mean AMD strategy of selling their last gen product for a discount is an okay

69
00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:04,759
option for gamers and enthus and certainly AMD's pocketbook I mean you

70
00:05:03,199 --> 00:05:09,440
can't blame them for wanting to get the most possible back on their R&D

71
00:05:06,759 --> 00:05:13,400
investment but it just stings a little knowing that unless you're one of their

72
00:05:11,360 --> 00:05:18,919
most affluent customers you're not going to be able to take advantage of the IPC

73
00:05:15,840 --> 00:05:21,479
and the power efficiency gains on this

74
00:05:18,919 --> 00:05:26,560
generation at least not if things keep going the way they are so I guess I've

75
00:05:23,800 --> 00:05:30,080
got a bit of a challenge for AMD guys it's easy to be the hero for Budget

76
00:05:28,520 --> 00:05:34,000
Gamers when your products aren't good enough for you to charge more but can

77
00:05:31,960 --> 00:05:38,919
you be better than Intel now that you're the ones on top cuz it really doesn't

78
00:05:36,440 --> 00:05:42,880
seem like it at the moment case in point the top end first gen Threadripper

79
00:05:40,880 --> 00:05:47,560
launched at $999 now even the cheapest one costs

80
00:05:46,240 --> 00:05:52,039
more than 1,400 that is where performance

81
00:05:49,639 --> 00:05:56,319
leadership has gotten AMD and it smells like complacency I hope it's not the

82
00:05:54,479 --> 00:06:00,360
case but I'm starting to feel like we need Intel to step up their game to keep

83
00:05:58,319 --> 00:06:06,000
AMD motivated to deliver better products for gamers rather than the other way

84
00:06:03,319 --> 00:06:12,800
around changing gear somewhat abruptly AMD also announced their ryzen AI 300

85
00:06:09,280 --> 00:06:14,960
series so Windows 11 recall is coming to

86
00:06:12,800 --> 00:06:19,400
x86 so woo sorry that was about as enthusiastic

87
00:06:17,479 --> 00:06:23,639
as I could pretend to be about that with 50 tops of neural processing compute

88
00:06:22,199 --> 00:06:28,000
these new chips are capable of the newest AI features and they were very

89
00:06:25,919 --> 00:06:33,240
clear about this they are doing it without emulation a roundabout

90
00:06:30,639 --> 00:06:37,000
acknowledgement that ARM might be more competitive on Windows than they might

91
00:06:34,800 --> 00:06:41,599
have hoped they also made bold performance claims about General non AI

92
00:06:39,919 --> 00:06:45,759
Computing performance saying that they could beat Apple silicon M3 in many

93
00:06:43,520 --> 00:06:48,560
workloads though it's tough to make an Apples to Apples comparison there and

94
00:06:47,319 --> 00:06:53,240
then against Intel I'm not even sure they see core

95
00:06:50,880 --> 00:06:59,280
Ultra as a competitor especially against anything that utilizes AMD's Radeon 800

96
00:06:55,599 --> 00:07:01,000
series integrated gpus AI or not AMD

97
00:06:59,280 --> 00:07:05,680
looks like they may be the better option for performance battery life and

98
00:07:03,560 --> 00:07:09,800
thermals as long as you don't mind paying the AMD tax through the grape

99
00:07:08,120 --> 00:07:15,440
vine I've heard that pricing for these upcoming stricks mobile chips is going

100
00:07:11,680 --> 00:07:17,319
to be pretty friendly that is to AMD's

101
00:07:15,440 --> 00:07:21,319
shareholders in other good news for those folks AMD unveiled their epic

102
00:07:19,280 --> 00:07:25,000
Turin lineup which seems destined to capture even more market share from

103
00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:31,199
Intel's Bel leaguered data center division just like its predecessors did

104
00:07:27,720 --> 00:07:35,759
it boasts up to a truly daggering 192

105
00:07:31,199 --> 00:07:37,319
cores and 384 threads on a single CPU

106
00:07:35,759 --> 00:07:42,440
and while they didn't show any specific performance numbers for that particular

107
00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:49,199
CPU in the teaser AMD is claiming a 2 and2 to 5.4 times performance lead over

108
00:07:46,720 --> 00:07:52,400
Intel's Emerald rapid xeons depending on the workload I mean it's kind of a

109
00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:56,280
foregone conclusion that you're going to win when you have twice as many corses

110
00:07:54,159 --> 00:08:00,159
the competition but still impressive nonetheless seems like Intel's main

111
00:07:58,560 --> 00:08:04,000
selling point for the data center product seems to come down to

112
00:08:02,280 --> 00:08:08,639
manufacturing capacity at this point unless they've got an ace up their

113
00:08:05,400 --> 00:08:09,919
sleeves that uh I don't know about all

114
00:08:08,639 --> 00:08:16,520
of these new products are going to be hitting shelves starting in July which is very exciting news for AMD's

115
00:08:13,680 --> 00:08:19,599
customers but in spite of that I'm not going to be making the same bold

116
00:08:18,080 --> 00:08:24,120
statement predicting that their stock with Skyrocket that I did 5 years ago

117
00:08:22,560 --> 00:08:28,639
while they have somewhat ridden the wave of AI excitement and may continue to do

118
00:08:26,440 --> 00:08:34,360
so I mean they did announce new GPU products as well as a one-year Cadence

119
00:08:30,639 --> 00:08:36,240
for AI processor refreshes I just don't

120
00:08:34,360 --> 00:08:44,160
know if I believe that they can close the gap against NVIDIA though I do hope

121
00:08:40,519 --> 00:08:46,399
I hope for a message from our sponsor

122
00:08:44,160 --> 00:08:50,279
pulseway what would you do if you were out of the office and a critical service

123
00:08:48,240 --> 00:08:54,040
on one of your systems crashed I mean you could drive in and try and sort

124
00:08:52,160 --> 00:08:57,640
things out that way but with pulse way it could be so much simpler you'll get a

125
00:08:56,240 --> 00:09:03,640
notification on your phone letting you know something went wrong and you can fix it right there and that even assumes

126
00:09:01,560 --> 00:09:07,680
that you have't already set up pulseway automations which can just sort it out

127
00:09:05,480 --> 00:09:11,839
for you in the background also if you want more control over system patches

128
00:09:09,800 --> 00:09:15,560
you can tell pulseway what where and when you want them to go through

129
00:09:13,680 --> 00:09:20,600
pulseway does it all and on flexible terms including a commitment free pay as

130
00:09:17,800 --> 00:09:25,680
you go option and exclusively for our viewers they're offering 40% off of all

131
00:09:23,480 --> 00:09:29,040
of their plans so start your free twoe trial using the link in the video

132
00:09:27,560 --> 00:09:33,000
description if you guys enjoyed this video maybe go check out the one from 5

133
00:09:30,959 --> 00:09:35,920
years ago let me know how close do you think I got it