WEBVTT 00:00:00.020 --> 00:00:05.819 500 Hertz is this real when it comes to 00:00:04.380 --> 00:00:10.200 competition or even just the satisfaction of crushing Bots we've 00:00:08.099 --> 00:00:15.719 demonstrated Beyond reasonable doubt that more is better when it comes to 00:00:12.480 --> 00:00:20.520 monitor refresh rates we've got more 00:00:15.719 --> 00:00:22.920 than ever the aw 2524 from Alienware is 00:00:20.520 --> 00:00:27.240 the first 500 Hertz monitor to hit our lab and it is absolutely incredible sit 00:00:25.740 --> 00:00:32.820 up straight Gamers because it's ergonomic color accurate and boasts 00:00:30.300 --> 00:00:39.660 speed that's at the edge of human visual perception finally I can go from 2.78 00:00:36.480 --> 00:00:41.879 milliseconds in latency to only two all 00:00:39.660 --> 00:00:47.700 the Unstoppable no one will see me coming with 0.78 milliseconds of time 00:00:44.460 --> 00:00:49.980 eliminated from my leg chain at last 00:00:47.700 --> 00:00:54.780 every every Farm 00:00:51.180 --> 00:00:56.820 except for one small problem we also 00:00:54.780 --> 00:01:02.460 demonstrated Beyond reasonable doubt that while 360 Hertz is technically 00:01:00.059 --> 00:01:07.920 better than 240 hertz the difference is kind of like going from a Supercar to an 00:01:04.680 --> 00:01:10.140 even more super car and making matters 00:01:07.920 --> 00:01:15.420 worse ultra high refresh rate monitors like this one are expensive do you even 00:01:13.860 --> 00:01:20.759 need one of these when there are less costly contenders that might actually 00:01:17.580 --> 00:01:22.920 even deliver a better gaming experience 00:01:20.759 --> 00:01:27.659 do you even need this message from our sponsor build Redux take the hassle out 00:01:25.680 --> 00:01:31.200 of building your own gaming PC with simple to navigate customization options 00:01:29.520 --> 00:01:35.159 and competitive pricing compared to building a PC yourself build Redux will 00:01:33.479 --> 00:01:39.360 help you dominate your favorite games with the perfect PC for you check them 00:01:37.740 --> 00:01:47.280 out at the link below I want to make this clear pun intended the aw 00:01:42.079 --> 00:01:51.899 2524h is amazing it's 24.5 inches 1080p 00:01:47.280 --> 00:01:54.420 so the Esports special but it's IPS with 00:01:51.899 --> 00:01:58.619 accurate coverage of 99 of the srgb color gamut boasts 0.5 milliseconds 00:01:56.579 --> 00:02:04.619 greater grade pixel response times and has an NVIDIA g-sync module on top of 00:02:00.899 --> 00:02:07.439 Yes you heard me right a 500 freaking 00:02:04.619 --> 00:02:11.760 Hertz panel I cannot believe the lab wouldn't let me play with this ahead of 00:02:08.880 --> 00:02:16.200 time we were testing it this is smooth frog like the UFO test on blurbusters 00:02:14.280 --> 00:02:20.760 it's a great way of evaluating the Motion Performance of a monitor or a 00:02:18.300 --> 00:02:25.140 television but unlike the UFO test it runs locally on the machine meaning that 00:02:22.500 --> 00:02:29.400 we can run this thing at 500 frames per second which is exactly where we land 00:02:27.180 --> 00:02:34.020 after the recommended 20 Hertz Factory overclock it's actually 480 Hertz out of 00:02:31.800 --> 00:02:37.980 the box I never thought I would live to see an IPS panel that performs like this 00:02:36.120 --> 00:02:43.440 I'm definitely seeing a little bit of blur along the back of my White Frog 00:02:39.780 --> 00:02:44.940 here but looking at these numbers 00:02:43.440 --> 00:02:49.200 I honestly I'm kind of Blown Away 00:02:47.220 --> 00:02:54.120 I've reviewed the script for this already so I know that overall we're not 00:02:51.360 --> 00:02:56.700 hyper bullish on this display but I guess I'm gonna have to see the 00:02:55.140 --> 00:03:00.900 competition because this looks really good to me even more 00:02:59.220 --> 00:03:05.459 remarkable is that there's no compromise with respect to vibrancy or viewing 00:03:02.819 --> 00:03:09.540 angles I mean it's IPS it looks fantastic I don't know what to tell you 00:03:07.379 --> 00:03:13.280 man I am damn impressed by this I haven't even moved a mouse yet oh 00:03:13.459 --> 00:03:20.760 wow hold on one second one second 00:03:17.099 --> 00:03:22.260 oh my God great okay sure oh yeah look 00:03:20.760 --> 00:03:25.019 if you're spending money on your chair when you don't already have the best 00:03:23.760 --> 00:03:30.480 computer you're doing it wrong 00:03:28.099 --> 00:03:35.940 but feel free to spend money on lttstore.com okay FPS underscore Max 00:03:33.239 --> 00:03:41.099 1000 like I don't know hey there we go boys 00:03:37.099 --> 00:03:44.159 600 FPS let's go this game is running at 00:03:41.099 --> 00:03:46.019 up to 900 frames per second this feels 00:03:44.159 --> 00:03:51.060 like looking through a window into the real world it's so smooth look at that 00:03:48.420 --> 00:03:54.599 clarity as I'm panning around though you know normally particularly on things 00:03:52.739 --> 00:04:00.620 like these power lines um I usually look to darks or high 00:03:58.080 --> 00:04:05.580 contrast objects against the skyline like you'll see that you'll see that 00:04:03.599 --> 00:04:13.080 blur or ghosting but man that is clear like you could you can 00:04:10.019 --> 00:04:15.959 read the text Graham here did she bought 00:04:13.080 --> 00:04:19.579 gray in there like what hold on hold on let's get right in here 00:04:20.000 --> 00:04:26.280 oh what even if we can't run at the same 00:04:24.180 --> 00:04:30.360 FPS I want to play something that has a bit of a longer time to kill because 00:04:27.860 --> 00:04:34.919 that's what we found where the biggest benefit of high refresh rate and high 00:04:32.580 --> 00:04:39.840 FPS for that matter comes in when you are tracking a moving Target that is 00:04:37.500 --> 00:04:43.259 changing direction it's not just about the smoothness of the animation and the 00:04:41.639 --> 00:04:48.000 clarity though those things don't hurt something to note is you do need to use 00:04:46.020 --> 00:04:52.080 DisplayPort in order to hit that 500 Hertz even though it's 1080p that's 00:04:50.160 --> 00:04:57.000 still a freaking lot of bandwidth and the HDMI port on this thing is only HDMI 00:04:54.419 --> 00:05:00.540 2.0 so you're going to be locked at 240 hertz if you stick with HDMI I mean 00:04:59.040 --> 00:05:05.220 realistically you're not spending this kind of money on a monitor and then not 00:05:02.100 --> 00:05:07.080 hooking up a DisplayPort cable to like a 00:05:05.220 --> 00:05:12.660 top tier graphics card like it that would be gross misallocation of funds 00:05:10.259 --> 00:05:16.080 button just making sure you know why do I have a bazooka what game mode is this 00:05:14.160 --> 00:05:20.100 probably like Fiesta or something what the hell is Fiesta this is where you get 00:05:17.820 --> 00:05:23.120 random weapons you're playing on medium how many frames are you getting I don't 00:05:22.259 --> 00:05:28.979 know like 350 FPS no okay hold on a second no 00:05:27.419 --> 00:05:33.000 I need to leave this game and just play a different one because like I the whole 00:05:31.020 --> 00:05:36.780 point of this was I wanted to like get in gunfights with people I get it 00:05:34.560 --> 00:05:41.759 Brandon our expert tells us that while it is definitely not as much of a 00:05:38.880 --> 00:05:46.020 benefit as outputting a higher this is the same stupid thing why is this oh 00:05:44.280 --> 00:05:48.620 shoot I just sat on the power button oh my God 00:05:50.400 --> 00:05:56.400 damn it well 00:05:53.880 --> 00:06:02.520 it doesn't make you a better player but the monitor though right but the monitor 00:05:58.800 --> 00:06:04.259 yes yes hold on it's so fast 00:06:02.520 --> 00:06:08.460 got him look at this guy he's hanging from the 00:06:06.300 --> 00:06:12.900 door this is how you know it's a really good display when all he does is just 00:06:10.620 --> 00:06:18.060 end up playing Halo the whole time okay this thing is pretty amazing 00:06:15.960 --> 00:06:22.979 just like tracking moving objects like this like again I don't compensate for 00:06:21.060 --> 00:06:31.139 spread so I suck but if you look back that Crosshair was 00:06:25.800 --> 00:06:32.819 on him like ah I love this thing okay 00:06:31.139 --> 00:06:37.080 whoops sorry now seems like as good a time as I need 00:06:35.580 --> 00:06:41.280 to point out that this display supports g-sync what's cool about that is if 00:06:39.780 --> 00:06:46.740 we're running variable refresh rate there is technically a latency benefit 00:06:43.560 --> 00:06:48.600 to having this 500 Hertz display even if 00:06:46.740 --> 00:06:54.300 our game is not managing to hit 500 frames per second and Halo infinite did 00:06:51.360 --> 00:06:59.639 not we did at best around 350. that benefit is very 00:06:56.160 --> 00:07:02.580 so small there's just one problem this 00:06:59.639 --> 00:07:07.680 240 hertz OLED from LG is running at less than half the refresh rate but 00:07:04.800 --> 00:07:11.280 looks clearer to just about everyone we showed it to the vibes from this one 00:07:09.600 --> 00:07:15.840 feel a little better I'm going to say this one this I think has the best 00:07:13.259 --> 00:07:22.680 motion tracking it's a different kind of clarity there is far 00:07:19.020 --> 00:07:24.599 far less blur behind our frogs here but 00:07:22.680 --> 00:07:31.139 what I'm actually noticing is that relatively speaking the text is less 00:07:27.000 --> 00:07:34.560 visible so these finer objects are 00:07:31.139 --> 00:07:35.340 still very legible but not quite the 00:07:34.560 --> 00:07:41.039 same I can definitely see why people like this image more though 00:07:39.000 --> 00:07:46.199 but if you look at readability of text it's not even close part of it is 00:07:44.220 --> 00:07:50.039 probably the resolution this is a 1440p display so these elements are smaller 00:07:48.599 --> 00:07:54.599 but I should be able to compensate by just getting closer and I can that could 00:07:51.960 --> 00:07:59.520 just as easily be 255 or 256 whereas here I can clearly see that is 255. 00:07:57.960 --> 00:08:02.940 ghosting on the back of basically every leg of the Frog it's just much more 00:08:01.199 --> 00:08:08.280 noticeable on the white guy whereas that ghosting is just gone on the OLED 00:08:05.039 --> 00:08:10.680 however you can also almost see the the 00:08:08.280 --> 00:08:15.599 judder on the OLED yeah so there's a there's a doubling of the image even if 00:08:12.660 --> 00:08:19.919 it's not blurry whatever our subjective opinions might be there's no doubt that 00:08:17.580 --> 00:08:23.520 when captured in a still frame the clarity of the LG OLED is higher and 00:08:22.500 --> 00:08:28.620 this is where things get a little technical while the Alienware display 00:08:26.220 --> 00:08:32.580 might refresh at lightning speed processing the data needed to Output a 00:08:30.660 --> 00:08:38.279 new frame once every two milliseconds the individual pixels that make up the 00:08:36.060 --> 00:08:43.380 panel here they still need a moment to catch up right I mean don't get me wrong 00:08:40.680 --> 00:08:47.580 it looks incredible and in most cases it's almost imperceptible as we saw when 00:08:45.839 --> 00:08:53.640 I was playing actual games but when we compare that to the micro 00:08:51.000 --> 00:08:57.360 second response times of an OLED I mean take a look at this frog capture it 00:08:55.980 --> 00:09:01.860 might be hard to see through our camera but in person the white frog has clear 00:09:00.120 --> 00:09:07.260 ghosting as it slides across our IPS panel whereas on the OLED it is simply 00:09:04.500 --> 00:09:11.420 not there kind of like how you can see our behind the scenes content on 00:09:08.700 --> 00:09:16.380 Floatplane.com but on Utah but on YouTube it's simply not there get 00:09:14.700 --> 00:09:20.339 subscribed so you can meet the team and check out how we shoot our merge photos 00:09:17.820 --> 00:09:24.360 you can see a great example of why image Clarity matters in addition to having a 00:09:22.680 --> 00:09:30.899 high refresh rate when you look at this video we did on a DIY 480 Hertz monitor 00:09:27.720 --> 00:09:33.120 like five years ago sure we've got the 00:09:30.899 --> 00:09:37.920 most up-to-date frame being streamed to us through the scalar but the actual 00:09:35.519 --> 00:09:42.000 image was a blurry mess anytime it was in motion for the sake of fairness we 00:09:40.440 --> 00:09:46.019 tried all the different response time settings that are available on the 00:09:43.440 --> 00:09:51.720 Alienware monitor it has four fast super fast extreme and Esports extreme and 00:09:49.200 --> 00:09:56.279 while Esports extreme is 0.2 milliseconds faster than fast based on 00:09:53.820 --> 00:09:59.760 our testing the amount of overshoot and therefore visual anomalies that are 00:09:57.779 --> 00:10:04.800 introduced just is not worth it at all especially for such a tiny Improvement 00:10:01.980 --> 00:10:08.519 can you tell the difference between 2.4 and 2.2 milliseconds 00:10:06.959 --> 00:10:15.180 I know I can't but back to our original question what 00:10:11.160 --> 00:10:17.399 about 2.78 versus 2 milliseconds that's 00:10:15.180 --> 00:10:21.480 the difference between a 360 Hertz Monitor and a 500 Hertz one okay here's 00:10:20.640 --> 00:10:26.459 the thing as we make our displays refresh faster 00:10:24.180 --> 00:10:31.200 and faster we get these shorter frame times meaning more frames displayed over 00:10:28.860 --> 00:10:34.860 the same period of time I mean I was an early advocate for the benefits of high 00:10:32.640 --> 00:10:42.480 refresh rate gaming the jump from 60 hertz at 16.67 milliseconds per frame up 00:10:38.760 --> 00:10:45.600 to 120 hertz at only 8.33 milliseconds 00:10:42.480 --> 00:10:47.519 per frame that was huge and just about 00:10:45.600 --> 00:10:51.360 everyone in their grand Pappy can feel the difference even when you're simply 00:10:49.320 --> 00:10:55.380 browsing the web or chilling on the desktop 00:10:52.500 --> 00:11:00.360 but as we've shown in the past the faster you go the Lesser rare of a 00:10:58.500 --> 00:11:05.160 difference you are bound to notice and the math for why that is is pretty 00:11:02.160 --> 00:11:07.920 simple even if we were to take that 120 00:11:05.160 --> 00:11:13.800 hertz and double our refresh rate again look at that we cut our benefit in half 00:11:10.680 --> 00:11:16.500 and by the time we land at 360 each 00:11:13.800 --> 00:11:20.399 frame is on the display for at most 2.78 milliseconds 00:11:17.760 --> 00:11:25.019 back then to Dell alienware's own marketing where they say that 500 Hertz 00:11:22.560 --> 00:11:29.760 is reaching speed that's at the edge of human visual perception well I think 00:11:27.959 --> 00:11:36.660 they kind of hit the nail on their own head here can anyone tell even now 00:11:34.079 --> 00:11:43.680 we brought in zawi's new flagship the 360 Hertz TN gaming display the 00:11:40.820 --> 00:11:46.440 xl2566k to find out oh look at that it appeared I can't really feel the 00:11:45.120 --> 00:11:52.320 difference I can't recognize a different I don't think I could really tell which one's a 500 Hertz Monitor and which 00:11:49.380 --> 00:11:57.240 one's a 360. I helped set up this test I know this one's 500. I ca I literally 00:11:54.720 --> 00:12:00.600 cannot see any difference at all in terms of like frame times between these 00:11:59.040 --> 00:12:04.440 two I'm surprised how bright this is with black frame insertion 00:12:03.540 --> 00:12:11.040 actually that looks really good for a TN 00:12:07.079 --> 00:12:12.360 oh well yeah as soon as you go until 00:12:11.040 --> 00:12:15.779 you're anywhere other than right in front of it okay okay okay uh Andrew you 00:12:14.399 --> 00:12:18.839 should yeah yeah shoot it shoot it straight on okay shoot its good side 00:12:17.459 --> 00:12:23.399 which is Dot from the side while you get the 00:12:21.300 --> 00:12:27.720 crispness that's associated with black frame insertion or backlight strobing 00:12:25.560 --> 00:12:32.579 and you can you can really see that on some of these Boulder lines 00:12:30.000 --> 00:12:36.540 because these pixels are simply not switching as fast as on the Dell 00:12:33.959 --> 00:12:42.779 Alienware as far as I can tell you're also getting a nice crisp ghost of an 00:12:39.600 --> 00:12:44.940 image on every fine line every single 00:12:42.779 --> 00:12:50.160 color while I don't see a blur behind the object I see a clear shadow of the 00:12:47.459 --> 00:12:55.260 object behind it and that's on every color transition not just on the super 00:12:52.860 --> 00:12:58.800 high contrast ones like I'm I'm really noticing especially on these color 00:12:57.000 --> 00:13:02.100 circles yeah we literally were just talking about this there's a name for 00:13:00.360 --> 00:13:05.880 this artifact that you see I forget the name of it though anyway the point is 00:13:03.779 --> 00:13:10.500 especially on this red one I'm actually seeing an overshoot and I'm 00:13:08.700 --> 00:13:14.940 seeing an after image yeah so that's inherent with LCD BFI because the 00:13:12.899 --> 00:13:19.200 backlight can't turn in in sync with their scanner at every line so you're 00:13:16.740 --> 00:13:23.880 always going to have that issue and people are saying they prefer this 00:13:20.760 --> 00:13:25.860 well this test is meant for it to look 00:13:23.880 --> 00:13:29.940 to find these things basically but maybe it looks really good in CS go or 00:13:27.180 --> 00:13:36.180 something and what's really important in all of this is that all of us other 00:13:32.639 --> 00:13:39.360 reviewers Brandon me ploof we are 00:13:36.180 --> 00:13:42.120 splitting hairs at this point so yeah it 00:13:39.360 --> 00:13:47.040 might be faster it might be clearer but to my eye imperceptibly so and to put 00:13:45.060 --> 00:13:50.820 things into perspective the average gaming mouse is going to have anywhere 00:13:48.959 --> 00:13:55.500 from one and a half to three milliseconds of processing latency on 00:13:53.160 --> 00:13:59.579 its own I mean your keyboard if it has a thousand Hertz pulling rate might manage 00:13:57.360 --> 00:14:03.779 one millisecond but we are getting to the point where these numbers are so low 00:14:01.380 --> 00:14:08.700 and so fast that we are realistically gated by our weak human flesh not by the 00:14:06.839 --> 00:14:13.380 gear that we're using regardless of which of these three monitors it is when 00:14:11.100 --> 00:14:17.459 we're talking about an extra four or five milliseconds for your peripherals 00:14:15.240 --> 00:14:24.300 and the average person's reaction time is about 250 outside of the most extreme 00:14:21.480 --> 00:14:26.820 instances of Esports gaming the bottom line is it just doesn't 00:14:25.680 --> 00:14:30.899 matter which doesn't mean that gaming displays 00:14:28.800 --> 00:14:34.920 don't have any redeeming features the zowie model for example we've talked a 00:14:32.639 --> 00:14:39.300 lot about BFI or black frame insertion that dramatically improves motion 00:14:36.959 --> 00:14:43.980 Clarity it's not for everyone I personally don't like the generally 00:14:41.639 --> 00:14:49.500 reduced brightness or perceived flicker but for some folks it's a must-have and 00:14:47.100 --> 00:14:54.720 I've got to say to their credit this one actually has very little perceptible 00:14:51.600 --> 00:14:56.160 Flicker and is really bright so kudos to 00:14:54.720 --> 00:15:01.920 zali this is my first time seeing this one and compared to our OLED it manages 00:14:58.260 --> 00:15:04.740 to refresh 120 hertz faster I mean this 00:15:01.920 --> 00:15:10.139 is an incredibly crisp LCD display even for a TN one and that feature black 00:15:07.800 --> 00:15:15.720 frame insertion is notably absent from the aw2524h meaning that Alienware is 00:15:13.320 --> 00:15:21.240 counting on the Lightning Fast 500 Hertz refresh rate in order to sell this thing 00:15:17.399 --> 00:15:24.300 can they then well at 830 dollars 00:15:21.240 --> 00:15:27.899 this is a very premium 1080p monitor 00:15:24.300 --> 00:15:30.660 even compared to the 600 Valley 00:15:27.899 --> 00:15:35.880 but it's not entirely unjustified it's the first it looks much better thanks to 00:15:33.480 --> 00:15:40.680 its IPS panel and in its default standard picture mode we measured an 00:15:37.860 --> 00:15:44.940 average Delta e of just 1.5 with a maximum of six on red in particular it 00:15:43.320 --> 00:15:49.560 also seems to cover more of the advertised 99 of the srgb color space 00:15:47.279 --> 00:15:53.639 particularly red and purple so those might look a touch more saturated but 00:15:51.420 --> 00:15:59.100 not abnormally so this thing looks great it's also bright enough hitting about 00:15:55.820 --> 00:16:02.100 390 nits with local dimming disabled 400 00:15:59.100 --> 00:16:05.040 nits with it on and about 450 nits at 00:16:02.100 --> 00:16:08.820 all window sizes with HDR on with that being said there aren't many dimming 00:16:06.779 --> 00:16:13.380 zones on it and the HDR color accuracy wasn't great so don't expect an amazing 00:16:11.579 --> 00:16:18.899 cinematic experience with movies or games with it enabled as for the i o 00:16:16.019 --> 00:16:22.980 it's all right we get two HDMI 2.0 ports so that you can have I don't know nice 00:16:21.240 --> 00:16:27.240 fast pixel response times on your Xbox or your PlayStation or whatever a 00:16:25.079 --> 00:16:31.019 DisplayPort 1.4 with display stream compression which you will need in order 00:16:28.920 --> 00:16:34.740 to get to 500 Hertz though any GPU that could possibly drive a game 00:16:33.180 --> 00:16:39.839 at 500 frames per second is going to have DSC you get four USB a ports one of 00:16:38.160 --> 00:16:44.940 which is for an NVIDIA reflex latency analyzer a headphone jack an audio line 00:16:42.000 --> 00:16:50.220 out and this super secret port for NVIDIA to update the firmware ah yes if 00:16:48.480 --> 00:16:54.060 that sounds exciting to you you must have missed the memo it has a g-sync 00:16:52.259 --> 00:16:58.259 module so if you like updating your own firmware in the event that fixes or new 00:16:56.100 --> 00:17:03.180 features roll out this model might not be for you only NVIDIA can use that it 00:17:01.079 --> 00:17:06.959 has height adjustment swivel and tilt and this is kind of cool the stand 00:17:04.740 --> 00:17:11.100 itself takes up very little space on your desk meaning that you can get as 00:17:08.579 --> 00:17:15.179 close as you could reasonably want to to your monitor when you're trying to get 00:17:13.319 --> 00:17:21.120 every headshot and Counter-Strike speaking of which will it help you do 00:17:17.939 --> 00:17:22.980 that technically speaking sure I bet if 00:17:21.120 --> 00:17:26.699 you give this thing to a pro it could marginally improve their game because 00:17:24.660 --> 00:17:31.620 once you're at the top that's all you're chasing but if you are literally anyone 00:17:29.340 --> 00:17:36.299 else you're probably better off with just about anything else I mean on the 00:17:34.320 --> 00:17:40.620 premium side that lgola that we showed you earlier is almost two hundred 00:17:37.740 --> 00:17:47.280 dollars more but it's also a few inches larger higher resolution and will give 00:17:43.500 --> 00:17:50.220 you a great HDR experience and it's not 00:17:47.280 --> 00:17:54.600 even the only option a 240 hertz monitor will get you almost the same Real World 00:17:52.200 --> 00:17:58.380 experience as these and there is ample competition in that space meaning that 00:17:56.220 --> 00:18:03.900 those can be had for about 200 US dollars these days literally a quarter 00:18:01.080 --> 00:18:07.860 the cost of this and a third the cost of this whichever route you go we're going 00:18:06.120 --> 00:18:11.820 to have links down below I mean who knows maybe once we double up again and 00:18:09.780 --> 00:18:14.580 hit a thousand Hertz for one millisecond frame times I'll have a different 00:18:12.780 --> 00:18:19.440 Outlook you know with everything at a thousand Hertz the Thousand Hertz gaming 00:18:16.500 --> 00:18:25.260 PC but for now the only difference to my Outlook is 00:18:22.080 --> 00:18:27.720 this look at our sponsor flexi spot sure 00:18:25.260 --> 00:18:32.520 most people love sitting motionless at a desk all day but for everyone else 00:18:29.280 --> 00:18:34.980 there's flexi spots E7 standing desk the 00:18:32.520 --> 00:18:39.780 E7 is super stable and moves smoothly so your monitors and other precious devices 00:18:37.200 --> 00:18:45.240 stay put as the desk moves up and down powered by its dual motors the E7 is 00:18:42.660 --> 00:18:49.740 capable of easily holding up to 355 pounds with a unique embedded Junction 00:18:47.340 --> 00:18:55.080 to increase stability and a rock-solid carbon steel desk frame its LCD keypad 00:18:53.039 --> 00:19:00.900 panel lets you set four height presets or adjust the height manually within a 00:18:57.600 --> 00:19:03.480 wide range from 22.8 inches to 48.4 00:19:00.900 --> 00:19:07.140 inches plus there's a USB port to conveniently charge a device while you 00:19:05.400 --> 00:19:11.520 make your setup more ergonomic and active at the same time 00:19:09.600 --> 00:19:15.299 the E7 has its own Cable Management board under the desk as well as cable 00:19:13.500 --> 00:19:20.520 ties so you can keep your desk space extra neat and tidy the best part it 00:19:17.760 --> 00:19:24.840 comes with a 15 year warranty now is the best time to get the E7 with Flexi spots 00:19:22.679 --> 00:19:28.919 spring promotional discount save up to 40 using the link below if you guys 00:19:27.299 --> 00:19:33.419 enjoyed this video you might enjoy the last time we tried to see if bigger 00:19:30.660 --> 00:19:37.700 number better when 360 Hertz was all the rage spoiler it wasn't then either