1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,760
23 major news outlets are blocking the Internet Archive's incredibly useful Wayback Machine

2
00:00:05,760 --> 00:00:11,980
from crawling their sites. We cannot, in fact, have nice things anymore. USA Today just recently

3
00:00:11,980 --> 00:00:16,460
used the Wayback Machine to call out ICE for altering detention stats, and then immediately

4
00:00:16,460 --> 00:00:20,960
blocked the archival tool from crawling their own site. Just rude. The news outlets say this

5
00:00:20,960 --> 00:00:26,080
is necessary to stop AI crawlers from treating their sites like an all-you-can-scrape buffet.

6
00:00:26,080 --> 00:00:30,920
The Guardian's director of business affairs said that the Wayback Machine's API is a real AI risk,

7
00:00:31,000 --> 00:00:34,840
so they are only going to be blocking that. Maybe don't attack them on social media.

8
00:00:34,980 --> 00:00:40,700
Wayback's director Mark Graham responded, calling those AI fears unfounded and restating how much

9
00:00:40,700 --> 00:00:45,460
effort they put into preventing possible abuses of the crawler. Groups like Fight for the Future

10
00:00:45,460 --> 00:00:50,420
and Electronic Frontier Foundation are rallying journalists to publicly back the Archive,

11
00:00:50,680 --> 00:00:55,960
and over 100 of them have signed a letter thanking the Internet Archive and the Wayback Machine for

12
00:00:55,960 --> 00:00:56,060
being a part of it.

13
00:00:56,080 --> 00:00:58,080
Being an essential and critical tool.
