1
00:00:00,199 --> 00:00:05,400
usb4 is an absolute Game Changer we're

2
00:00:03,419 --> 00:00:12,000
talking 40 gigabit per second data rates support for 8K displays and external

3
00:00:08,220 --> 00:00:15,240
gpus a single cable docking at up to 240

4
00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:17,520
watt charging rates and all over the

5
00:00:15,240 --> 00:00:25,439
same USB type-c connectors and cables that you have come to know into yes what

6
00:00:21,500 --> 00:00:27,599
actually usb4 is more like a collection

7
00:00:25,439 --> 00:00:33,000
of optional standards okay it sounds like what you're talking about is USB 4

8
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:35,280
gen 3x2 with some of those optional

9
00:00:33,000 --> 00:00:39,120
features implemented so your sponsor origin pz would probably want you to

10
00:00:37,320 --> 00:00:43,860
clarify that so pedantic Riley is very annoying but he's

11
00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:47,280
also right I mean it shouldn't surprise me coming from the same industry

12
00:00:45,480 --> 00:00:52,379
Consortium that brought us naming like USB 3.2 gen 2x2 but five years after

13
00:00:51,059 --> 00:00:58,620
Intel's announcement that they would open source Thunderbolt USB 4 is finally

14
00:00:55,860 --> 00:01:04,500
out in force and has turned out to be one of the most confusing standards ever

15
00:01:01,620 --> 00:01:07,920
to make it onto a consumer PC the good news though is that by the time we're

16
00:01:06,180 --> 00:01:13,260
finished here you will understand both its pros and cons and how it operates or

17
00:01:11,700 --> 00:01:18,140
doesn't with other standards like Thunderbolt including real world

18
00:01:15,360 --> 00:01:18,140
examples

19
00:01:24,799 --> 00:01:31,500
the simple explanation really is that

20
00:01:27,900 --> 00:01:33,420
usb4 is an open version of Thunderbolt 3

21
00:01:31,500 --> 00:01:39,540
based on the specifications the Intel released back in 2017. there is a lot to

22
00:01:37,140 --> 00:01:43,079
love about this move for one thing it frees vendors from the shackles of

23
00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:49,020
Intel's notoriously onerous certification process and for another it

24
00:01:45,840 --> 00:01:51,479
allows non-Intel CPU manufacturers like

25
00:01:49,020 --> 00:01:55,680
apple or especially AMD who didn't co-develop the standard to support

26
00:01:53,340 --> 00:02:00,659
features that used to be Thunderbolt exclusive like 40 gigabit data rates

27
00:01:58,500 --> 00:02:07,140
daisy chaining together multiple devices and PCIe tunneling which is super cool

28
00:02:04,439 --> 00:02:12,360
and allows you to turn your USBC Port into a PCI Express connection for

29
00:02:09,479 --> 00:02:18,660
devices like external gpus and other add-on cards the problem is that when

30
00:02:16,080 --> 00:02:24,239
you free the notoriously Cheapskate computer industry from compliance

31
00:02:20,340 --> 00:02:27,840
programs you invite shortcuts and usb4

32
00:02:24,239 --> 00:02:30,120
invites a lot of shortcuts in no

33
00:02:27,840 --> 00:02:34,920
particular order here are the optional components of the spec that can be left

34
00:02:32,160 --> 00:02:40,560
off of your device while still allowing the vendor to slap usb4 on the spec

35
00:02:37,440 --> 00:02:43,680
sheet 40 gigabit transfer rates 20

36
00:02:40,560 --> 00:02:47,340
gigabit USB 3.2 Thunderbolt alternate

37
00:02:43,680 --> 00:02:50,819
mode USBC alternate mode and yes PCIe

38
00:02:47,340 --> 00:02:52,739
tunneling yeah in a world where almost

39
00:02:50,819 --> 00:02:57,900
nothing you can connect to a laptop needs the speed of even a last gen USB

40
00:02:55,379 --> 00:03:03,480
320 gig Port isn't the whole point of usb4 PCIe tunneling and interoperability

41
00:03:01,260 --> 00:03:08,819
with Thunderbolt 3 devices well Microsoft sure thought so which is

42
00:03:05,819 --> 00:03:11,760
why they actually require external usb4

43
00:03:08,819 --> 00:03:16,500
ports on Windows 11 devices to support PCIe tunneling which theoretically

44
00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:21,659
ensures backwards compatibility with Thunderbolt 3 devices but there is no

45
00:03:19,080 --> 00:03:26,459
such guarantee if you were to buy a bare motherboard or a non-Windows device and

46
00:03:24,840 --> 00:03:31,140
from my conversations with a device maker whose previous Thunderbolt 3

47
00:03:28,739 --> 00:03:36,840
notebook actually never ended up getting certified by Intel there is a lot more

48
00:03:33,959 --> 00:03:41,580
to this interoperability than just checking a box for PCIe tunneling making

49
00:03:39,420 --> 00:03:46,739
matters even more confusing Microsoft does not appear to have mandates in

50
00:03:43,799 --> 00:03:52,379
place for any of the other features the good news is that when it works it works

51
00:03:49,500 --> 00:03:57,599
really well here is a small bushel of Thunderbolt 3 Thunderbolt 4 and USB 4

52
00:03:55,080 --> 00:04:02,760
devices that we've tried on the Voyager a1600 gaming and content creation laptop

53
00:04:00,540 --> 00:04:06,780
that Corsair provided for this video and I'm going to show you guys what the

54
00:04:04,200 --> 00:04:11,519
experience is like on a usb4 laptop after the short message from our sponsor

55
00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:15,780
Corsair packs the Voyager a1600 with high performance gear like their

56
00:04:12,959 --> 00:04:20,220
Vengeance ddr5 memory and yet managed to keep it amazingly slim the integrated

57
00:04:18,540 --> 00:04:24,360
Elgato steam deck allows you to map streaming commands and keyboard

58
00:04:21,780 --> 00:04:29,040
shortcuts to 10 easy access customizable shortcut buttons using simple drag and

59
00:04:26,460 --> 00:04:33,360
drop customization and Corsair's IQ software lets you fully customize the

60
00:04:31,139 --> 00:04:36,540
system's look monitor performance and manage your Corsair devices so you can

61
00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:39,840
update and fine-tune the settings to your needs it comes with a one-year

62
00:04:38,280 --> 00:04:44,699
comprehensive warranty for peace of mind making it the Premier Choice for laptop

63
00:04:41,820 --> 00:04:48,540
PC gaming or content Creation in a super compact package visit the link down

64
00:04:46,560 --> 00:04:52,259
below to learn more for our first trick we'll be trying to connect a couple of

65
00:04:49,800 --> 00:04:56,639
Thunderbolt 3 devices to our USB 4 laptop and the reason this matters is

66
00:04:54,780 --> 00:05:00,960
because these older devices would have been designed at a time that usb4

67
00:04:59,220 --> 00:05:07,380
compatibility wouldn't have been a consideration so if they work it means

68
00:05:04,139 --> 00:05:10,919
that usb4 is transparently compatible

69
00:05:07,380 --> 00:05:13,020
with Thunderbolt 3 at least okay this

70
00:05:10,919 --> 00:05:18,660
one works for these particular devices now that first one I plugged in using a

71
00:05:15,540 --> 00:05:20,699
usb4 cable and the second one we're

72
00:05:18,660 --> 00:05:25,080
going to try an older Thunderbolt 3 cable

73
00:05:21,660 --> 00:05:26,940
we got it there it is Cal digit 10 gig

74
00:05:25,080 --> 00:05:34,199
network adapter this backwards compatibility means that any Thunderbolt

75
00:05:29,699 --> 00:05:36,660
3 device and USB 4 system should work

76
00:05:34,199 --> 00:05:41,580
with each other now I would expect to find some edge cases particularly with

77
00:05:39,060 --> 00:05:46,020
very old devices due to Intel specific handshakes that used to be required but

78
00:05:44,039 --> 00:05:50,520
we didn't run into any of them while we were working on this video now let's try

79
00:05:48,300 --> 00:05:53,580
a Thunderbolt 4 device in the interest of giving ourselves our best shot here

80
00:05:52,259 --> 00:05:57,479
we're going to go ahead and use a Thunderbolt 4 validated cable look at

81
00:05:56,460 --> 00:06:01,560
that easy and we don't even need that old

82
00:05:59,639 --> 00:06:06,479
Intel application for managing all of our connected devices I mean I expected

83
00:06:04,560 --> 00:06:11,880
this to work the main difference between Thunderbolt 3 and Thunderbolt 4 is

84
00:06:09,360 --> 00:06:17,759
actually also in enforcement of compliance so Thunderbolt 4 requires in

85
00:06:15,419 --> 00:06:23,280
order to get the Intel badge support for two 4K displays or a single 8K display

86
00:06:20,479 --> 00:06:27,000
computers must have 32 gigabit per second of PCIe bandwidth this is to

87
00:06:25,500 --> 00:06:30,479
address the issues folks would have with high bandwidth devices on some

88
00:06:28,620 --> 00:06:35,759
Thunderbolt 3 laptops particularly e-gpus and they must support security

89
00:06:33,840 --> 00:06:39,780
improvements that protect your device from malicious connected devices

90
00:06:37,759 --> 00:06:43,919
plugable.com actually has a great write-up on the differences between

91
00:06:41,220 --> 00:06:48,300
Thunderbolt 3 and Thunderbolt 4. what about speed though in an attempt to

92
00:06:45,960 --> 00:06:54,960
crack over 20 gigabit per second of transfers we are using three separate

93
00:06:51,000 --> 00:06:56,759
ssds and our Network share and copying

94
00:06:54,960 --> 00:07:02,280
all to our boot drive at the same time three more six gigabytes a second yes

95
00:06:59,340 --> 00:07:08,280
can confirm that we are not limited to 20 gigabit per second even though that

96
00:07:04,139 --> 00:07:10,319
could be the case with usb4 wow those

97
00:07:08,280 --> 00:07:15,120
transfers are almost all done that's really impressive those were 22 Gigabyte

98
00:07:12,600 --> 00:07:19,080
files mind-blowing and the most mind-blowing thing is that aside from

99
00:07:17,160 --> 00:07:22,979
some Cal digit devices that took a little while to be detected we didn't

100
00:07:20,819 --> 00:07:26,699
run into any issues using Thunderbolt devices on this laptop and those Cal

101
00:07:25,199 --> 00:07:31,979
digit ones they were actually just downloading drivers in the background

102
00:07:28,919 --> 00:07:34,199
wow but there is definitely more to know

103
00:07:31,979 --> 00:07:39,419
here we tested a lot of configurations and discovered not only some differences

104
00:07:36,419 --> 00:07:41,819
between Thunderbolt and usb4 but also

105
00:07:39,419 --> 00:07:47,940
between Apple's implementation and the one we found on the Corsair Voyager see

106
00:07:44,280 --> 00:07:49,740
on a Mac two Cinema 5K displays this

107
00:07:47,940 --> 00:07:54,720
would work just connect them to any Thunderbolt Port you want and it works

108
00:07:52,259 --> 00:08:00,840
as expected however when we attempt to do the same thing with the Voyager

109
00:07:56,520 --> 00:08:03,419
either only one display works or if we

110
00:08:00,840 --> 00:08:08,300
go through a hub we can run both of them but they're limited to 4K resolution

111
00:08:05,819 --> 00:08:13,139
unless we actually unplug them from our

112
00:08:10,800 --> 00:08:20,840
Thunderbolt ports plug one into Thunderbolt and one into the regular

113
00:08:15,979 --> 00:08:24,840
USBC 3.2 Port over on the other side

114
00:08:20,840 --> 00:08:27,120
both running at 5K the reason for this

115
00:08:24,840 --> 00:08:30,660
is quite interesting in the verges coverage of this laptop Corsair senior

116
00:08:28,860 --> 00:08:36,300
Public Relations Specialist Justin oakbina revealed that the USB 4 ports

117
00:08:33,719 --> 00:08:44,279
are hooked up to the CPU for display meanwhile the 3.2 ports are hooked up to

118
00:08:40,380 --> 00:08:46,740
the GPU so they might look the same but

119
00:08:44,279 --> 00:08:51,779
because they're running DisplayPort alt mode they're limited to the capabilities

120
00:08:48,540 --> 00:08:54,240
of whichever GPU is physically attached

121
00:08:51,779 --> 00:08:59,760
to them so we're able to run more than one 5K display by connecting to each of

122
00:08:57,120 --> 00:09:05,100
those gpus separately this is another really interesting

123
00:09:02,339 --> 00:09:10,140
example of different protocols behaving in different ways even if they go over

124
00:09:07,320 --> 00:09:15,300
the same connectors now alt mode what we're talking about here uses a physical

125
00:09:12,000 --> 00:09:17,459
chip connected to the USB port to send a

126
00:09:15,300 --> 00:09:22,740
signal down that differs from standard USB tunneling is not the same it

127
00:09:20,820 --> 00:09:28,080
converts the DisplayPort signal to packets that can be sent along a USB

128
00:09:25,260 --> 00:09:33,360
connection allowing for things like data and PCIe tunnel packets to be sent

129
00:09:30,560 --> 00:09:39,420
alongside so your mileage may vary depending on whether your machine uses

130
00:09:35,820 --> 00:09:40,620
alt mode or tunneled DisplayPort in poor

131
00:09:39,420 --> 00:09:44,760
Tanner if only Apple could have provided a

132
00:09:43,140 --> 00:09:47,580
display with an actual stand okay you're good you're unplugged yeah he's got the

133
00:09:46,260 --> 00:09:54,839
tracksuit and everything okay thank you let's try some older more obscure stuff

134
00:09:50,100 --> 00:09:57,839
like this akitio dual Drive Dock and uh

135
00:09:54,839 --> 00:10:00,060
how about this Thunderbolt archival tape

136
00:09:57,839 --> 00:10:03,779
backup system I remember the tape drive actually requiring special software so

137
00:10:02,220 --> 00:10:07,680
it's possible this hard drive will show up even if the tape drive wouldn't oh

138
00:10:05,519 --> 00:10:12,480
hey there we go look at that that's awesome all right goodbye monitor

139
00:10:10,019 --> 00:10:17,339
external drive and there they are that's wild I mean it

140
00:10:15,779 --> 00:10:22,980
shouldn't surprise me that much given that usb4 is supposed to be based on the

141
00:10:20,820 --> 00:10:26,940
Thunderbolt spec and therefore should be the same thing but you just don't expect

142
00:10:24,959 --> 00:10:31,260
heck to work that well right out of the gate and there were some things that led

143
00:10:29,760 --> 00:10:36,660
me to believe that maybe they weren't quite the same for example Thunderbolt

144
00:10:34,380 --> 00:10:42,060
has supported multiple Thunderbolt devices Daisy chained together since the

145
00:10:39,720 --> 00:10:48,660
beginning but the Wikipedia page for usb4 explicitly says that such daisy

146
00:10:45,720 --> 00:10:54,120
chaining is not supported to clarify you could totally plug a Thunderbolt Hub

147
00:10:50,459 --> 00:10:56,579
into your usb4 laptop and then a USB hub

148
00:10:54,120 --> 00:11:01,019
into that and another one into that and so on and so forth until the signal

149
00:10:58,380 --> 00:11:06,959
timing becomes an issue but Intel seems to believe that connecting additional

150
00:11:03,260 --> 00:11:08,399
PCIe tunneling devices Downstream well

151
00:11:06,959 --> 00:11:15,300
that's their jam so what happens if we try it I guess

152
00:11:13,260 --> 00:11:19,680
we've already got this guy right here so instead of plugging our additional

153
00:11:17,160 --> 00:11:24,540
drives into the laptop directly why don't we daisy chain I see the hard

154
00:11:22,260 --> 00:11:30,839
drive in here so but there they are the ssds in here have shown up but how far

155
00:11:26,940 --> 00:11:32,640
can we go uh why don't we do a hub

156
00:11:30,839 --> 00:11:35,399
right oh yeah I don't know if we have to go all the

157
00:11:33,899 --> 00:11:38,399
way to six but Let's do let's do one more at least here here comes another

158
00:11:37,079 --> 00:11:44,760
one there they are it's all showing up I

159
00:11:41,640 --> 00:11:47,360
want one more I want my 10 gig Ethernet

160
00:11:44,760 --> 00:11:50,899
say cool

161
00:11:49,860 --> 00:11:57,180
oh I like that one we got it working with

162
00:11:54,300 --> 00:12:04,019
anywhere from two to three devices pretty consistently but as you can see

163
00:12:00,300 --> 00:12:06,660
your mileage may vary though this is

164
00:12:04,019 --> 00:12:11,339
unlikely to ever affect you many newer Thunderbolt devices expect the hubs and

165
00:12:09,300 --> 00:12:17,100
docs have controllers in them that can communicate either using Thunderbolt

166
00:12:14,160 --> 00:12:22,920
like PCIe tunneling protocols or traditional USB protocols so in many

167
00:12:20,339 --> 00:12:28,200
cases it won't necessarily be obvious to you until you try to plug in another

168
00:12:25,320 --> 00:12:33,779
Downstream device which protocol your device is using now rather than trying

169
00:12:31,500 --> 00:12:39,899
to run all five of these devices let's go for a single really demanding one an

170
00:12:37,260 --> 00:12:47,399
external GPU here we go oh fan spinning that's a good sign there

171
00:12:42,839 --> 00:12:49,139
it is our RTX 2070 external GPU not that

172
00:12:47,399 --> 00:12:54,120
we'll need to upgrade the GPU anytime soon given that this laptop has a Radeon

173
00:12:51,420 --> 00:13:00,420
6800 in it already anyway but the point is that it does work and the a1600 does

174
00:12:58,320 --> 00:13:06,480
all of this partly thanks to AMD's inclusion of usb4 on their Zen 3 plus

175
00:13:02,940 --> 00:13:08,579
ryzen 7000 processors but in the absence

176
00:13:06,480 --> 00:13:12,120
of Intel standards compliance team it's also thanks to the way that Corsair has

177
00:13:10,440 --> 00:13:18,899
worked with their OEM to internally validate their implementation however

178
00:13:14,279 --> 00:13:20,220
watch how easily I can break things

179
00:13:18,899 --> 00:13:25,139
whoops here's what happened there while

180
00:13:22,260 --> 00:13:30,240
Thunderbolt has used the same USBC connector as USB devices for half a

181
00:13:27,959 --> 00:13:33,839
decade now the Thunderbolt protocol which you've heard me refer to a few

182
00:13:31,860 --> 00:13:39,360
times and it's kind of like the language that's actually being spoken over the

183
00:13:36,300 --> 00:13:43,500
cable well it's closer to PCI Express

184
00:13:39,360 --> 00:13:45,180
than it is to USB so this along with its

185
00:13:43,500 --> 00:13:50,279
traditionally much higher data rates means that it has far less tolerance for

186
00:13:47,820 --> 00:13:56,760
latency and inconsistency which means that cable quality matters a lot it's

187
00:13:53,700 --> 00:13:58,980
not all that like here uh oh this anchor

188
00:13:56,760 --> 00:14:03,300
cable is one that I specifically pulled aside for this this is pretty cool

189
00:14:01,079 --> 00:14:08,100
because this cable is older than the usb4 spec it's just a high quality C2C

190
00:14:06,779 --> 00:14:12,300
cable and give it a second

191
00:14:10,320 --> 00:14:16,860
oh wait did that not work actually tried it on a different

192
00:14:14,339 --> 00:14:22,200
Thunderbolt only device this network adapter

193
00:14:18,839 --> 00:14:25,139
and on the network adapter it totally

194
00:14:22,200 --> 00:14:31,980
works in spite of this thing not having a USB operating mode that's wild let's

195
00:14:28,920 --> 00:14:34,800
try this usb4 type c cable one that is

196
00:14:31,980 --> 00:14:40,500
actually a newer validated one and see if the external GPU picks up that one no

197
00:14:37,500 --> 00:14:43,019
as you can see standard USBC cables

198
00:14:40,500 --> 00:14:49,260
might work fine even with Thunderbolt only devices but only the ones with the

199
00:14:46,860 --> 00:14:53,820
built-in signal stabilizer like this one are actually guaranteed to work with

200
00:14:51,899 --> 00:14:58,139
Thunderbolt devices and that's going to be true for any connection using that

201
00:14:56,160 --> 00:15:05,339
PCIe based Thunderbolt protocol regardless of whether it's on an Intel

202
00:15:01,260 --> 00:15:08,399
certified Thunderbolt device or a USB 4

203
00:15:05,339 --> 00:15:10,560
device this is why USB 4 is only rated

204
00:15:08,399 --> 00:15:16,320
at 40 gigabit per second over a one meter cable while Thunderbolt 4 is rated

205
00:15:12,899 --> 00:15:19,199
at that same speed at up to 2 meters to

206
00:15:16,320 --> 00:15:25,800
my knowledge there are no non in tell Thunderbolt usb4 signal stabilized cable

207
00:15:22,680 --> 00:15:28,320
products and curiously this is another

208
00:15:25,800 --> 00:15:34,680
really interesting one this active Thunderbolt 3 cable from Corning didn't

209
00:15:31,320 --> 00:15:36,060
work on any of our devices on our usb4

210
00:15:34,680 --> 00:15:41,639
laptop here hold on I can just demonstrate this real quick there we go

211
00:15:38,040 --> 00:15:43,800
yeah no dice which means that our days

212
00:15:41,639 --> 00:15:50,220
of Hit or Miss cable compatibility are not over even if they are a lot better

213
00:15:47,220 --> 00:15:52,139
to answer the question then is usb4

214
00:15:50,220 --> 00:15:58,260
compatible with Thunderbolt 3 and 4 devices the answer is yes

215
00:15:54,899 --> 00:16:00,180
but also no the level of compatibility

216
00:15:58,260 --> 00:16:05,579
really is going to come down to how good of an implementation you get the Corsair

217
00:16:02,100 --> 00:16:07,560
Voyager a 1600 performed admirably but

218
00:16:05,579 --> 00:16:11,820
it's a machine that implements far better than the bare minimum spec and

219
00:16:09,779 --> 00:16:16,019
one that doesn't go this far may not be as smooth and as we saw today your

220
00:16:14,579 --> 00:16:21,060
mileage may vary when it comes to unofficial features like daisy chaining

221
00:16:18,240 --> 00:16:25,620
and support for specialty cables like these Optical ones from Corning the big

222
00:16:23,040 --> 00:16:30,779
question this phrases then is why did the usbif allow half-baked usb4 at all

223
00:16:29,220 --> 00:16:36,420
well it seems to come down to phones mobile devices could get some very valid

224
00:16:33,480 --> 00:16:40,740
benefits from usb4 like higher data rates and DisplayPort tunneling for

225
00:16:38,160 --> 00:16:44,459
external devices with Samsung Dex or whatever but they're unlikely to need

226
00:16:42,600 --> 00:16:49,800
the PCIe tunneling that Thunderbolt is known for or daisy chaining and the like

227
00:16:46,740 --> 00:16:51,480
they're also unlikely to need this segue

228
00:16:49,800 --> 00:16:55,620
to our sponsor that I'm known for because we already told you it's sponsored by Corsair if you guys enjoyed

229
00:16:54,420 --> 00:17:01,980
this video and you're looking to learn more about Thunderbolt this video on ShortCircuit shows off my very favorite

230
00:16:59,160 --> 00:17:06,559
Thunderbolt 4 dock it's actually uh this one freaking awesome two and a half kick

231
00:17:04,260 --> 00:17:06,559
land
