WEBVTT

00:00:00.360 --> 00:00:03.880
Let's begin today's video at the beginning

00:00:03.880 --> 00:00:08.460
by talking about the Intel 8086. Released on June 8th, 1978,

00:00:08.460 --> 00:00:11.480
it wasn't Intel's first CPU.

00:00:11.480 --> 00:00:16.360
That distinction goes to the 4004, but the 8086 was the front runner of the CPU

00:00:16.360 --> 00:00:19.520
that sits inside your desktop or laptop PC right now,

00:00:19.520 --> 00:00:22.640
unless you want a Mac, a newer Mac anyway.

00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:25.880
You see the 8086 introduced the x86 architecture,

00:00:25.880 --> 00:00:29.080
the dominant design scheme for the past 40-ish years

00:00:29.080 --> 00:00:33.320
that underpinned almost every consumer CPU from Intel to AMD.

00:00:33.320 --> 00:00:36.880
Now that could be shifting nowadays with the growth of non-x86 designs

00:00:36.880 --> 00:00:41.640
like Apple's new M1 chip, but x86 still dominates the PC market,

00:00:41.640 --> 00:00:46.800
and it all started with the 8086. Of course, it originally only ran at a clock speed

00:00:46.800 --> 00:00:52.720
of five megahertz, which is about 1,000 times slower than a modern CPU before you even consider

00:00:52.720 --> 00:00:55.760
like all the architectural improvements since then.

00:00:55.760 --> 00:00:58.840
But nonetheless, the x86 architecture became a mainstay,

00:00:58.840 --> 00:01:05.040
the large part because the original IBM PC used the Intel 8088, a slightly modified 8086

00:01:05.040 --> 00:01:09.360
that IBM was able to get in large quantities for a relatively low price.

00:01:09.360 --> 00:01:13.720
As the IBM PC became an industry standard, the x86 architecture took off

00:01:13.720 --> 00:01:18.480
and was eventually licensed out to other chip makers, including AMD.

00:01:18.480 --> 00:01:22.960
Speaking of AMD, let's move on to our next featured CPU,

00:01:22.960 --> 00:01:26.700
the AMD Athlon 64. Although it was Intel that created

00:01:26.700 --> 00:01:32.460
the original 16-bit x86 architecture and refined it into a 32-bit platform,

00:01:32.460 --> 00:01:36.460
AMD was the first to develop a 64-bit version of x86,

00:01:36.460 --> 00:01:39.500
which they released for the consumer market in 2003.

00:01:39.500 --> 00:01:45.100
Athlon 64 was quite ahead of its time, considering that in 2003, Windows XP ruled the world,

00:01:45.100 --> 00:01:50.980
and most people were still using 32-bit platforms. However, 64-bit computing quickly became popular

00:01:50.980 --> 00:01:54.820
toward the end of the 2000s, which was very important as it allowed systems

00:01:54.820 --> 00:01:59.700
to access more than four gigabytes of memory at once without trickery.

00:01:59.700 --> 00:02:03.060
With even low-ran systems today, typically having at least eight gigs of RAM,

00:02:03.060 --> 00:02:08.060
staying on 32-bit platforms would seriously hamper the experience for many users.

00:02:08.060 --> 00:02:12.340
Athlon 64 was still on the shelves until 2009, but during that time,

00:02:12.340 --> 00:02:17.660
another big-time innovation came onto the scene that was just as important as the transition to 64-bit.

00:02:17.660 --> 00:02:22.660
I'm talking about dual-core processing, and we're actually gonna mention two chips in this section,

00:02:22.660 --> 00:02:27.020
the Intel Pentium Xtreme 840, which came out in April 2005,

00:02:27.020 --> 00:02:31.300
and the AMD Athlon 64X2, which debuted the next month.

00:02:31.300 --> 00:02:35.100
The Xtreme Edition 840 actually wasn't even that complicated of a design.

00:02:35.100 --> 00:02:40.260
It was really just two Xeon cores from Intel's server lineup, just mashed onto one chip,

00:02:40.260 --> 00:02:43.100
or glued together, as you might call them.

00:02:44.100 --> 00:02:49.460
AMD, meanwhile, was a little bit more forward-thinking, as the Athlon 64X2 had a direct link

00:02:49.460 --> 00:02:53.680
between its two cores to speed things up, where Intel cores had to pass information

00:02:53.680 --> 00:02:57.560
through the front-side bus in order to coordinate their activity.

00:02:57.560 --> 00:03:02.040
Whoa, that's bafflingly slow, trust me. AMD's offering also had the advantages

00:03:02.040 --> 00:03:05.600
of being more power-efficient, and it didn't even need a brand-new motherboard.

00:03:05.600 --> 00:03:10.960
It could just work on existing boards with a BIOS update, so Team Red, or Green back then,

00:03:10.960 --> 00:03:14.320
was actually ahead of Team Blue in the multi-core CPU game for a while,

00:03:14.320 --> 00:03:17.640
even though Intel pulled way ahead in the market share a few years later.

00:03:17.640 --> 00:03:21.800
But we'd be remiss if we only talked about desktop and laptop CPUs.

00:03:21.800 --> 00:03:25.920
What about the chips that live inside of our phones? These were developed very incrementally,

00:03:25.920 --> 00:03:31.640
but arguably the most important one was the ARM Cortex-A8, released in 2005.

00:03:31.640 --> 00:03:34.680
Now, the Cortex-A8 isn't just one chip.

00:03:34.680 --> 00:03:40.480
ARM doesn't actually manufacture chips, but rather they license out the designs to third parties.

00:03:40.480 --> 00:03:44.040
Although the Cortex-A8 was far from ARM's first chip,

00:03:44.040 --> 00:03:48.240
it was probably the first that became broadly popular in consumer gadgets.

00:03:48.240 --> 00:03:53.640
Cortex-A8 cores were featured in the first ever Samsung Exynos mobile CPU, as well as the Apple A4,

00:03:53.640 --> 00:03:59.480
which powered the iPhone 4 and the original iPad. Cortex-A8 also featured super-scaler technology,

00:03:59.480 --> 00:04:03.480
meaning it could execute more than one instruction per clock cycle, as well as a branch predictor

00:04:03.480 --> 00:04:06.880
that was much more advanced than preceding designs.

00:04:06.880 --> 00:04:10.480
The cement that the chip could anticipate system needs ahead of time more effectively,

00:04:10.480 --> 00:04:15.760
representing a significantly forward in performance. Although ARM chips were already popular on smartphones,

00:04:15.760 --> 00:04:20.040
the A8 really cemented ARM's design as a go-to for mobile devices.

00:04:20.040 --> 00:04:24.920
As subsequent Cortex models enabled many of the features we've come to expect on modern smartphones,

00:04:24.920 --> 00:04:30.000
as well as performance that has closed the gap significantly between PCs and mobile devices.

00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:33.720
In 2005, there were fewer than two billion ARM-based chips sold.

00:04:33.720 --> 00:04:37.400
This jumped to over 21 billion in the year 2017.

00:04:37.400 --> 00:04:40.480
Of course, there are plenty of notable chips that we didn't have time to cover today,

00:04:40.480 --> 00:04:44.640
so let us know down in the comments which ones you'd like to see in a future episode.

00:04:44.640 --> 00:04:47.840
Maybe we'll get to do those a little bit later on.

00:04:47.840 --> 00:04:52.520
Thanks for watching this Techquickie. Like, dislike, and maybe check out our other videos.

00:04:52.520 --> 00:04:57.280
Comment with some video suggestions, as I said before, and don't forget to subscribe and follow.
