1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:06,879
The way I see it, you clicked on this video for one of just three reasons. You

2
00:00:04,640 --> 00:00:11,200
either want to watch tech giants in a CPU dunking contest. You could

3
00:00:09,280 --> 00:00:15,440
legitimately be shopping for the fastest PC hardware on the planet.

4
00:00:13,040 --> 00:00:19,600
Congratulations, by the way. Or most likely, you just want to eat some

5
00:00:17,199 --> 00:00:24,080
popcorn and watch the fanboys squabble in the comments about an overpriced CPU.

6
00:00:21,920 --> 00:00:30,400
Well, guess what? Buckle in tight, cuz you're going to see all three today. The

7
00:00:26,400 --> 00:00:32,640
Ryzen 9950 X3D2 Dual Edition is an

8
00:00:30,400 --> 00:00:37,600
eyewateringly expensive, zero compromised product, and I love it. It's

9
00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:41,680
the perfect purebred show horse to excite geeks like us by pushing the

10
00:00:39,680 --> 00:00:47,120
limits of modern technology while also serving as a reminder that most people

11
00:00:44,320 --> 00:00:50,399
really don't need one. What everyone does need though is this segue to our

12
00:00:49,520 --> 00:00:55,680
sponsor, >> Acuity Scheduling. It's a flexible scheduling software that offers calendar

13
00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:59,840
management, booking tools, client communications, secure payments, custom

14
00:00:57,199 --> 00:01:04,680
branding, and much more. Save 20% today with the code LT20 at our link below.

15
00:01:11,200 --> 00:01:17,040
Hi. If you're wondering why this video is a day late, well, AMD didn't send us

16
00:01:14,720 --> 00:01:20,640
a chip to review, and they also didn't send a lot of people chips to review.

17
00:01:18,880 --> 00:01:24,960
Make of that information what you will. Anyway, here is our review. Getting

18
00:01:23,200 --> 00:01:30,000
right into the meat of things, I can understand why AMD struggled to name

19
00:01:27,360 --> 00:01:36,159
this chip. And they clearly did because what is this thing? Let's break it down.

20
00:01:32,799 --> 00:01:39,200
It's a 9950X, so that means you got 16

21
00:01:36,159 --> 00:01:42,400
of AMD's latest Zen 5 architecture cores

22
00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:44,799
and 32 threads. It's 3D, which means it

23
00:01:42,400 --> 00:01:48,560
features a large stacked 3D vcache, which can offer a major performance

24
00:01:46,320 --> 00:01:54,880
benefit in certain workloads, notably gaming. and it's two and also dual both

25
00:01:53,360 --> 00:02:00,799
of which seem to mean the same thing because compared to a regular 9950X3D

26
00:01:57,920 --> 00:02:06,560
non two non-dual the big change that the dual edition brings is that AMD's super

27
00:02:03,520 --> 00:02:08,879
large 3DV cache now sits on both of the

28
00:02:06,560 --> 00:02:13,440
core complex dies or CCDs that are under the gray heat spreader rather than only

29
00:02:11,039 --> 00:02:17,760
on one of them. That gives the duel a whopping

30
00:02:14,959 --> 00:02:23,280
192 MGB of level three cache. That's enough to install Windows 95 on your CPU

31
00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:27,120
three times over. Doesn't really work like that. We just thought it was kind

32
00:02:24,800 --> 00:02:32,080
of a funny thing to point out. But hold on a second. If 3DV cache is so great,

33
00:02:29,599 --> 00:02:36,800
then why didn't AMD use it across all of their cores in the past? Well, because

34
00:02:34,560 --> 00:02:41,599
there are some trade-offs. the price for one, but also a considerable 30 watt

35
00:02:39,840 --> 00:02:47,200
increase to total design power that brings the duel to a sweaty 200 watts

36
00:02:44,480 --> 00:02:51,680
that in some situations it even exceeded by a significant margin. And this extra

37
00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:57,200
power seems to have resulted in a small decrease in boost clock speeds.

38
00:02:55,519 --> 00:03:01,360
But hey, that should be more than made up for by the extra 3D cache, right?

39
00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:05,760
Especially in gaming, right? Well, let's talk about that. Out of the gate, things

40
00:03:03,200 --> 00:03:10,640
are looking good in City Skylines 2. a game we chose more for its ability to

41
00:03:07,680 --> 00:03:15,760
bring CPUs to their knees than its uh community appeal. Here, the Duel leads

42
00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:19,680
the pack with the other 9000X3D chips in tow behind it. Makes sense. After all,

43
00:03:18,480 --> 00:03:26,080
they're supposed to be good for gaming, right? And we see the same deal in Cyberpunk 2077. Though, it is worth

44
00:03:23,680 --> 00:03:29,599
noting here that while these high average FPS numbers here are very

45
00:03:28,080 --> 00:03:34,000
impressive, when it comes to the all-important 1% lows, which represent

46
00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:40,319
the performance you can expect in the most demanding moments, some older and

47
00:03:36,879 --> 00:03:42,799
uh much less expensive chips are nipping

48
00:03:40,319 --> 00:03:46,879
dangerously close to their heels. In F124, it seems like any high-end

49
00:03:45,519 --> 00:03:51,200
processor from the past couple generations is going to do you just

50
00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:55,280
fine. Shout out to the venerable 5800 X3D by the way, which is rumored to be

51
00:03:53,120 --> 00:04:00,080
returning for a celebration of the AM4 socket's 10th anniversary. Then in The

52
00:03:57,360 --> 00:04:03,599
Last of Us Part One, the 9950X3D2 duel returns to the top position and is also

53
00:04:02,480 --> 00:04:08,000
about as fast as it gets in Counter-Strike 2, at least as far as 1%

54
00:04:06,000 --> 00:04:14,080
lows are concerned. Across our suite of gaming benchmarks, the Ryzen 9 9950XD2

55
00:04:11,120 --> 00:04:20,320
dual edition is just plain ripping fast, and yet still nearly impossible for me

56
00:04:17,040 --> 00:04:23,520
to recommend. Why? Well, for starters,

57
00:04:20,320 --> 00:04:25,919
we benchmark gaming CPUs at 1080p. This

58
00:04:23,520 --> 00:04:29,919
gives us a clear view of which chips will separate themselves from the pack

59
00:04:27,759 --> 00:04:35,360
in an intentionally CPU bottleneck situation. But if you're buying a $900

60
00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:41,280
chip, you're almost guaranteed to be running at at least 1440p, if not 4K,

61
00:04:38,720 --> 00:04:45,600
where a GPU bottleneck is way more likely than a CPU one. The second reason

62
00:04:43,600 --> 00:04:49,680
is that even if you were an esports professional trying to eek out every

63
00:04:47,280 --> 00:04:53,840
last frame, I still wouldn't sell you a duel. Because while it does have more

64
00:04:52,080 --> 00:04:58,639
3DV cache goodness than anything we've ever seen before, which is cool, in the

65
00:04:56,320 --> 00:05:04,880
real world, it performs basically the same as any of the other 9000 series X3D

66
00:05:01,520 --> 00:05:07,360
chips. But why is that? Well, as some of

67
00:05:04,880 --> 00:05:11,280
you might know, high-end X3D chips have always come with kind of a weird

68
00:05:09,199 --> 00:05:16,479
trade-off. They had all these cores on them, but only some of the cores were

69
00:05:13,600 --> 00:05:20,560
best for gaming, the 3D vcache ones. So, you always wanted to make sure that your

70
00:05:18,240 --> 00:05:25,199
games were running on those. To do this, AMD uses a technique called core

71
00:05:22,639 --> 00:05:29,919
parking, which unintuitively does not stop the core from doing any work, but

72
00:05:27,039 --> 00:05:34,720
rather it forces a given program to only use specific CPU cores and then ignore

73
00:05:32,639 --> 00:05:38,320
the rest. Over the past couple of years, AMD and Microsoft have worked on

74
00:05:36,479 --> 00:05:41,600
dejenifying this behavior to the point where as long as you're running an

75
00:05:39,759 --> 00:05:47,039
up-to-date chipset, BIOS, and operating system, you should find that your 2CD

76
00:05:44,320 --> 00:05:51,360
CPU is using the right cores for any given job. That is, assuming, of course,

77
00:05:48,960 --> 00:05:55,759
that Windows recognizes your games as a game. But we have 3D Vcash on all the

78
00:05:54,160 --> 00:06:00,880
cores now. So, why are we talking about parking anything anywhere? Vroom v room,

79
00:05:57,520 --> 00:06:03,120
right? Well, as it turns out, most games

80
00:06:00,880 --> 00:06:07,360
just plain don't need more than eight cores. And regardless of what type of

81
00:06:05,280 --> 00:06:12,560
cache your cores have if they have to coordinate work across multiple CCDs,

82
00:06:10,479 --> 00:06:17,520
the data has to travel across the Infinity Fabric and the IO die, which is

83
00:06:15,199 --> 00:06:23,360
going to introduce extra latency. So, the solution, the same jank we were

84
00:06:20,479 --> 00:06:28,000
already using, core parking. And that is why the new dual edition performs

85
00:06:25,360 --> 00:06:33,360
basically exactly the same in gaming. So then who is it useful for? Well, for

86
00:06:30,639 --> 00:06:36,800
starters, anyone who might run multiple workloads that benefit from extra cache.

87
00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:41,360
A great example would be someone who wants to stream or record their gameplay

88
00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:46,400
while they're gaming without burdening their GPU. A more niche benefit is that

89
00:06:43,759 --> 00:06:50,639
overclockers and system tuners could identify which of their CCDs runs the

90
00:06:48,800 --> 00:06:54,800
fastest and then put their most performance sensitive workloads on those

91
00:06:52,560 --> 00:06:59,039
cores. Or at least that would be an option if AMD and Windows allowed you to

92
00:06:57,039 --> 00:07:03,840
choose. From our testing, it seems that games are locked to CCD0 for the time

93
00:07:01,599 --> 00:07:08,800
being. Another focus for AMD's marketing for this chip is a claimed 5 to 10%

94
00:07:06,720 --> 00:07:14,960
increase in productivity. Let's take a look at that. And unsurprisingly, the

95
00:07:11,599 --> 00:07:17,280
Ryzen 9 9950 X3D2 dual edition Core 2

96
00:07:14,960 --> 00:07:21,360
dual extreme max plus the sequel is an absolute monster here as well. In 7zip,

97
00:07:19,360 --> 00:07:26,000
the duel has a clear lead over any other consumer CPU both in compression and in

98
00:07:23,840 --> 00:07:29,919
decompression. And in Cinebench, it sits at the top of the chart or darn near it

99
00:07:27,919 --> 00:07:35,840
in both multi-core and single core performance. The only problem is that

100
00:07:31,919 --> 00:07:39,520
its closest competitor is uh

101
00:07:35,840 --> 00:07:41,680
five $550 cheaper at retail right now.

102
00:07:39,520 --> 00:07:45,280
Uh but hey, those are kind of just benchmarks, right? And if you're in the

103
00:07:43,199 --> 00:07:48,639
market for a CPU this expensive, you probably want to get some real work done

104
00:07:46,720 --> 00:07:53,680
with it, right? Where in Blender, the dual edition does manage an as

105
00:07:50,960 --> 00:08:00,720
advertised 5% improvement over its less endowed twin and a considerable 15ish%

106
00:07:57,360 --> 00:08:02,879
over the 7950 X3D. This is one of the

107
00:08:00,720 --> 00:08:07,680
first cases we've seen where the Duel actually kind of stands out for its

108
00:08:04,879 --> 00:08:12,879
value. To be clear, it only beats the much more affordable 270K Plus by 10

109
00:08:10,639 --> 00:08:17,360
seconds. But if you use your system to make money, every second counts, and the

110
00:08:15,440 --> 00:08:21,840
Duel is as fast as it gets without paying a considerable premium for a

111
00:08:19,599 --> 00:08:26,639
workstation platform motherboard. And it even continues AMD's bro move of

112
00:08:24,479 --> 00:08:30,800
supporting ECCU dims on select motherboards, making it a great semi-pro

113
00:08:28,960 --> 00:08:35,919
offering. And that carries over to encoding as well, where the X3D2 is

114
00:08:33,279 --> 00:08:40,959
again at the top of the charts in H.264 and close in AB1. In Puget Bench's

115
00:08:38,719 --> 00:08:47,279
Photoshop benchmark, the Duel is the first consumer x86 CPU we've tested that

116
00:08:43,440 --> 00:08:49,120
cracks 14,000 points, which is cool, but

117
00:08:47,279 --> 00:08:53,920
only a negligible increase over the rest of the Zen 5 contenders. and NVIDIA

118
00:08:51,279 --> 00:08:57,760
editing. She's a chart topper again and more importantly can offer an uplift

119
00:08:55,760 --> 00:09:03,040
that you might actually feel compared to an older generation 3D cache chip like

120
00:09:00,240 --> 00:09:07,120
the 7950 X3D. Now, you wouldn't think that based on the overall score from

121
00:09:05,040 --> 00:09:10,320
Puget Bench, but we found that depending on the files you're working with, you

122
00:09:08,720 --> 00:09:15,600
might find performance enhancements that are much greater than the two-ish% on

123
00:09:12,640 --> 00:09:19,519
our chart. However, as with gaming, the situations where we see large

124
00:09:16,880 --> 00:09:23,440
improvements over the non-duel are few and far between. As for Premier Pro,

125
00:09:22,080 --> 00:09:28,480
it's kind of like a grade schooler going to the gym. The gains are there, but

126
00:09:25,519 --> 00:09:32,640
they're minor. So, yeah, in our creator focused testing, the duel doesn't offer

127
00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:36,959
much, but to be fair, there are lots of kinds of productivity, and the extra

128
00:09:34,320 --> 00:09:41,279
level three cache can be huge in mathy and sciency workloads. Check out this

129
00:09:39,440 --> 00:09:45,760
result from Feronx's review of the original 9950 X3D. Since we're a day

130
00:09:44,160 --> 00:09:49,360
late, we have the rare second mover advantage. And we can actually just show

131
00:09:47,200 --> 00:09:52,480
you some of Feronx's results. And you can see that there are some workloads

132
00:09:50,560 --> 00:09:58,560
where the chip benefits a lot from the extra vc. You might be thinking that's

133
00:09:54,560 --> 00:10:00,640
not very many workloads. And uh yeah.

134
00:09:58,560 --> 00:10:03,760
Yeah. Anyways, if you do want to learn more, we highly recommend going over to

135
00:10:01,920 --> 00:10:07,360
Feronics, looking at their Linux and scientific benchmarking. It's pretty

136
00:10:06,000 --> 00:10:12,399
cool. There's going to be a link in the description. >> But I will say there's a solid chance

137
00:10:09,680 --> 00:10:18,240
that if you are degridding radio signals from space, this could be your new

138
00:10:14,959 --> 00:10:20,560
powerhouse. Speaking of power, at 200 W,

139
00:10:18,240 --> 00:10:25,600
this is the highest TDP that AMD has ever set on a consumer chip. And does it

140
00:10:23,760 --> 00:10:31,200
ever deliver on its promise. In Cinebench, this thing pulls up to 260

141
00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:36,959
watts across the total CPU package. That is like Intel 14900K levels of power

142
00:10:34,399 --> 00:10:42,959
draw. But thankfully, it doesn't have the same power density and IHS problems

143
00:10:40,079 --> 00:10:47,360
as the 14900K. With that said, if you were thinking of upgrading from a Ryzen

144
00:10:44,880 --> 00:10:51,120
5950X to this new CPU, you should make sure that your power supply can handle

145
00:10:48,880 --> 00:10:56,079
the extra power draw. And uh oh yeah, probably also your CPU cooler. That's a

146
00:10:53,760 --> 00:11:01,600
tech tip. The good news in all this is that the extra power draw only rears its

147
00:10:58,079 --> 00:11:04,000
head in heavy all core CPU workloads. In

148
00:11:01,600 --> 00:11:07,519
F-124, for example, we found this chip drew about the same power as its

149
00:11:05,920 --> 00:11:11,680
siblings, meaning that you can enjoy manageable temperatures while just

150
00:11:09,279 --> 00:11:17,440
pretending to race in the uh Las Vegas heat. In conclusion, the Ryzen 9

151
00:11:14,079 --> 00:11:20,160
9950X3D2 dual edition puts a punctuation

152
00:11:17,440 --> 00:11:26,240
point on AMD's last 3 years of CPU domination. But while I love the new

153
00:11:23,680 --> 00:11:31,120
fastest one as much as anyone does, it's hard to recommend a chip that demands

154
00:11:28,320 --> 00:11:35,519
such a price for such small gains. And it feels a little bit like this is an

155
00:11:33,360 --> 00:11:38,959
unnecessary victory lap. And I would rather AMD focus their development

156
00:11:37,279 --> 00:11:45,760
efforts on things their community really wants. Like, oh, I don't know, maybe

157
00:11:41,920 --> 00:11:48,160
bringing FSR4 to RDNA3 GPUs. Or, hey,

158
00:11:45,760 --> 00:11:54,720
how about finally bringing Zen 5 to budget buyers? Where is Ryzen 3 AMD?

159
00:11:52,000 --> 00:11:58,240
Also, where is my sponsor? >> Acuity scheduling. The busier your life

160
00:11:56,640 --> 00:12:01,440
gets, the harder it can be to be at the right place at any given time, let alone

161
00:11:59,839 --> 00:12:04,880
prioritizing the right tasks to be doing. But Acuity Scheduling can help

162
00:12:03,279 --> 00:12:08,079
you keep your work in order thanks to its flexible calendar management and

163
00:12:06,560 --> 00:12:12,240
booking. Clients, colleagues, and acquaintances can schedule, cancel, and

164
00:12:09,920 --> 00:12:15,440
rebook time with you on their own, so all you have to do is show up as your

165
00:12:13,920 --> 00:12:18,959
best self. And even if you need to juggle several calendars, Acuity

166
00:12:17,040 --> 00:12:22,000
Scheduling can sync with multiple apps, making sure you don't accidentally

167
00:12:20,399 --> 00:12:25,839
overbook. It will automate things like confirmation emails, text reminders,

168
00:12:23,519 --> 00:12:29,040
follow-ups, and intake forms. Plus, it can prepare you with all of the relevant

169
00:12:27,360 --> 00:12:32,240
client history so you can stay informed. Acuity Scheduling also has gift

170
00:12:30,800 --> 00:12:37,120
certificates and subscription tools built right into the platform, which means less planning and more repeat

171
00:12:35,360 --> 00:12:40,079
business for you. They'll even help your entire team get on the same page with

172
00:12:38,639 --> 00:12:43,519
custom staff permissions, as well as push notifications, so everyone knows if

173
00:12:42,160 --> 00:12:48,079
things are moved or canceled. When it comes time to invoice clients, Acuity Scheduling works with the most popular

174
00:12:46,560 --> 00:12:52,800
payment providers, so you can get paid in person or set up recurring billing.

175
00:12:50,240 --> 00:12:57,360
So, go to acuityccheduling.com/LTT for a free trial and use offer code

176
00:12:54,320 --> 00:12:58,800
ltt20 to save 20% off your first Acuity

177
00:12:57,360 --> 00:13:05,200
Scheduling subscription. If you guys enjoyed this video, why not check out the one we did recently on how X3D chips

178
00:13:02,800 --> 00:13:08,160
in particular don't really need the fastest memory for gaming, which could

179
00:13:06,959 --> 00:13:10,959
help save you some money if you're putting together a new