WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:07.259
while AMD endured a relatively lackluster ryzen 7000 launch thanks to

00:00:05.279 --> 00:00:13.380
Fierce competition from everyone's favorite budget offering Intel in the

00:00:10.080 --> 00:00:15.780
data center AMD is pulling no punches

00:00:13.380 --> 00:00:21.300
with today's announcement of Epic Genoa they're bringing double-digit IPC

00:00:18.119 --> 00:00:24.720
improvements a maximum of 96 cores per

00:00:21.300 --> 00:00:25.980
socket a whopping 12 channels of ddr5

00:00:24.720 --> 00:00:31.619
memory I don't even have that many fingers and so much more

00:00:29.099 --> 00:00:35.640
we're going to tell you what's new and why Intel's upcoming Sapphire Rapids

00:00:33.719 --> 00:00:39.079
probably won't be able to compete with this

00:00:36.840 --> 00:00:45.899
spicy salami Mamma Mia oh quasi Picante comic questo

00:00:43.140 --> 00:00:48.719
sponsor Segway build Redux build Redux makes it easy to configure your new

00:00:47.280 --> 00:00:52.500
build with support guides and competitive pricing compared to building

00:00:50.399 --> 00:00:57.059
a PC yourself head to build redux.com Linus and start your new build today for

00:00:55.860 --> 00:01:01.320
those that haven't been paying attention let's get you up to speed AMD has been

00:00:59.699 --> 00:01:05.280
releasing their epic line of server processors based on the Zen architecture

00:01:03.059 --> 00:01:09.600
since 2017 with the first generation dubbed Naples

00:01:06.840 --> 00:01:15.780
not until the more recent epic Rome in 2019 in Milan in 2021 however did AMD

00:01:12.780 --> 00:01:19.500
actually manage to compete and then beat

00:01:15.780 --> 00:01:21.600
Intel taking the performance Crown this

00:01:19.500 --> 00:01:27.180
is in part due to core count Intel's monolithic style processors capped out

00:01:23.520 --> 00:01:29.580
at a measly 40 chorus per socket

00:01:27.180 --> 00:01:34.140
compared to AMD's 64 core chiplet designs back in 2021 Intel hoped to

00:01:32.580 --> 00:01:38.820
compete against epic Milan with their own chiplet-based design codenamed

00:01:36.299 --> 00:01:43.920
Sapphire Rapids but ended up delaying due to technical difficulties and poor

00:01:40.799 --> 00:01:47.700
yields to a now confirmed January 2023

00:01:43.920 --> 00:01:49.740
launch and they're still on 10 nanometer

00:01:47.700 --> 00:01:54.479
or Intel 7 now they call it Intel seven we don't don't say nanometer come on

00:01:51.780 --> 00:01:57.720
things are not looking great for Intel's Enterprise sector right now because

00:01:55.860 --> 00:02:02.640
honestly Genoa looks awesome the most obvious

00:02:00.479 --> 00:02:07.320
change with the latest generation is the New Zen 4 architecture running on tsmc's

00:02:05.340 --> 00:02:12.000
five nanometer process zenfor is more of a refinement of Zen 3

00:02:10.200 --> 00:02:16.980
rather than a complete redesign but while much of the micro architecture

00:02:14.099 --> 00:02:22.140
layout is the same improvements have been sprinkled all over a big chunk of

00:02:19.680 --> 00:02:26.220
the clean 14 IPC uplift comes from optimizations to the architecture front

00:02:24.060 --> 00:02:30.239
end with improved Branch prediction that can predict two branches per cycle

00:02:27.720 --> 00:02:35.400
rather than just one and a hefty bump to L2 cache they also introduced AVX 512

00:02:33.780 --> 00:02:38.520
support which is going to be a huge help for machine learning and AI workloads in

00:02:37.379 --> 00:02:42.900
the data center speaking of which the other major

00:02:40.560 --> 00:02:48.420
upgrade this time around is core counts across the 18 total skus launching for

00:02:46.140 --> 00:02:54.840
Genoa the max cores per socket has increased by a whopping 50 percent from

00:02:50.940 --> 00:02:58.260
64 to 96 cores with the minimum core

00:02:54.840 --> 00:03:00.360
count seeing a bump from 8 to 16 cores

00:02:58.260 --> 00:03:03.239
on the lowest end skus despite the power efficiency

00:03:01.800 --> 00:03:08.220
improvements of the new architecture maximum socket power consumption is

00:03:05.700 --> 00:03:14.459
jumping from 280 Watts on the last generation to a whopping 400 watts per

00:03:11.760 --> 00:03:18.599
socket a level that AMD's high performance compute customers have

00:03:16.440 --> 00:03:21.840
actually been asking for though the company tells us they don't expect the

00:03:19.980 --> 00:03:25.379
power envelope to climb much Beyond this point and don't expect to get much

00:03:24.000 --> 00:03:30.300
further into this video without a mention of our beanies on ltdstore.com

00:03:28.560 --> 00:03:34.080
uh they put LOL in there but you know what it's actually getting colder

00:03:31.560 --> 00:03:39.780
unfortunately with great power draw comes great socket demands and Genoa is

00:03:37.200 --> 00:03:46.140
no exception gone are the days of rectangular oppression say hello to our

00:03:43.440 --> 00:03:50.959
new Square overlords Jokes Aside genoa's new sp5 socket packs

00:03:49.440 --> 00:03:57.659
a whopping 6096 pins nice more like a like a nice

00:03:55.680 --> 00:04:03.000
backwards it's a similar trade design to the previous sp3 socket but it's now

00:04:00.780 --> 00:04:07.200
heatsink actuated rather than socket actuated that's fancy speak for the

00:04:05.459 --> 00:04:11.640
cooler providing the necessary pressure to ensure proper contact between the CPU

00:04:09.420 --> 00:04:15.120
and the socket's pins it's not dissimilar to the approach Intel has

00:04:13.319 --> 00:04:19.139
been taking for a few years now except AMD thoughtfully included the lockdown

00:04:17.459 --> 00:04:23.040
plate for the CPU to prevent you from accidentally dropping a chip into the

00:04:20.820 --> 00:04:28.380
socket which you wouldn't want to do since

00:04:24.020 --> 00:04:31.620
6096 nice pins are tiny head expensive

00:04:28.380 --> 00:04:33.780
however they are not as expensive as the

00:04:31.620 --> 00:04:40.919
copious amounts of memory this thing supports across 12 channels we're

00:04:37.020 --> 00:04:43.800
talking up to six terabytes of ddr5

00:04:40.919 --> 00:04:48.080
running at 4 800 Mega transfer per second allowing for a theoretical Peak

00:04:45.780 --> 00:04:53.699
throughput it a 480 gigabytes per second across the whole thing six terabytes all

00:04:51.419 --> 00:04:58.860
without taking too big of a hit in total latency oh and if that isn't enough fast

00:04:56.400 --> 00:05:06.180
memory for you AMD is introducing support for cxl

00:05:02.040 --> 00:05:08.699
wait what the hell cxl cxl is short for

00:05:06.180 --> 00:05:12.180
compute express link and it could very well be a game changer in the service

00:05:10.259 --> 00:05:16.500
space and potentially for Consumer Tech in the future it's a cash coherent

00:05:14.759 --> 00:05:21.780
interconnect standard built on top of PCI Express 5 that allows for huge

00:05:19.500 --> 00:05:25.259
increases to i o memory and storage flexibility

00:05:22.979 --> 00:05:30.060
in the same way that AMD uses PCI Express Lanes as Infinity Fabric in

00:05:26.940 --> 00:05:32.100
their dual socket servers cxl uses PCI

00:05:30.060 --> 00:05:36.900
Express Lanes as low latency high bandwidth interconnects allowing the

00:05:33.840 --> 00:05:38.520
system to pool or expand memory and

00:05:36.900 --> 00:05:43.139
improve the performance of various types of Hardware accelerators like gpus or

00:05:40.979 --> 00:05:47.759
network cards maybe you need an extra four terabytes of RAM for more

00:05:44.820 --> 00:05:52.919
virtualization I know I do slap in a cxl memory card and you are good to go and

00:05:50.340 --> 00:05:59.039
cxl lets you allocate that extra RAM to other devices if you want to generos

00:05:55.080 --> 00:06:00.900
supports cxl 1.1 plus type 3 which is

00:05:59.039 --> 00:06:06.900
the catchiest name I've read all week and is primarily focused on memory

00:06:03.479 --> 00:06:08.639
expansion rather than accelerators cxl

00:06:06.900 --> 00:06:12.060
is only just coming to the server Market but is primed to be a very important

00:06:10.740 --> 00:06:16.139
technology for the future of our computers so keep an eye on it it might

00:06:14.280 --> 00:06:19.740
come to Consumer Hardware sooner than you think if you're worried that you

00:06:18.000 --> 00:06:26.580
won't have enough PCIe lanes for all this stuff then don't be a single CPU

00:06:22.319 --> 00:06:30.900
provides you with 128 PCI Express Gen 5

00:06:26.580 --> 00:06:33.120
lanes and up to 160 in two CPU systems

00:06:30.900 --> 00:06:38.039
providing ample flexibility in terms of expansion and if you want to see just

00:06:35.880 --> 00:06:42.720
how much you can fit into these things super micro let us unveil their new h13

00:06:40.680 --> 00:06:47.160
Genoa Suite check out the link in the description to see some Hands-On

00:06:44.340 --> 00:06:51.300
Hardware content and last but certainly not least AMD introduced a few

00:06:49.620 --> 00:06:56.580
improvements to their security such as support for over a thousand encrypted

00:06:53.819 --> 00:07:00.479
virtualizations that is pretty neat especially for vps's what kind of

00:06:58.860 --> 00:07:04.979
perform from all of these slick new feature

00:07:02.039 --> 00:07:09.419
enhancements though for starters more than double the performance in integer

00:07:06.720 --> 00:07:14.160
arithmetic over Intel's 40 core Xeon 8380 Flagship which is expected

00:07:12.300 --> 00:07:19.800
considering AMD has more than double the cores and ends up being just an eight

00:07:16.800 --> 00:07:22.380
percent increase per core but the

00:07:19.800 --> 00:07:25.919
customer is buying 96 core CPUs like this one

00:07:23.819 --> 00:07:32.400
they would probably actually just want the more cores rather than faster cores

00:07:28.860 --> 00:07:34.380
so does AMD's dominance then carry over

00:07:32.400 --> 00:07:39.840
to the rest of the product stack according to AMD yes very yes

00:07:37.500 --> 00:07:44.460
but before we get too far please note that AMD has been pretty liberal with

00:07:42.780 --> 00:07:48.900
the scaling in their performance graphs so try to focus on the numbers

00:07:46.259 --> 00:07:55.919
themselves rather than the pictures AMD claims that their 24 core epic 9274f

00:07:53.520 --> 00:08:01.740
will compete with that same 40 core Intel CPU at least in integer operations

00:07:59.000 --> 00:08:06.479
calling integer operations general purpose computing

00:08:03.479 --> 00:08:08.099
is a bit of a stretch but

00:08:06.479 --> 00:08:13.560
technically assume that all of these CPUs will perform 25 percent worse than

00:08:11.039 --> 00:08:18.900
AMD promises you'll still see comparably cord AMD skus competing with Intel's

00:08:16.400 --> 00:08:23.280
flagships maybe you shouldn't be quite so cynical because the way AMD tested

00:08:21.660 --> 00:08:28.199
their CPUs for this could be leaving performance on the table let me explain

00:08:25.520 --> 00:08:32.399
AMD has embraced the Silicon Lottery with their new power management feature

00:08:29.759 --> 00:08:36.959
called determinism wow just like gonna take a philosophy there

00:08:34.380 --> 00:08:41.520
well it comes in two flavors performance and power oh it is philosophy it's kind

00:08:39.659 --> 00:08:45.420
of like AMD's Precision boost found on their ryzen chips and allows you to bump

00:08:43.620 --> 00:08:50.880
up your performance within spec if you have the thermal or power Headroom to do

00:08:47.279 --> 00:08:53.399
so in the performance determinism mode

00:08:50.880 --> 00:08:57.660
the CPU will Target the maximum performance at a given TDP with power

00:08:55.740 --> 00:09:01.860
varying to maintain stable performance power determinism is flipped with the

00:09:00.240 --> 00:09:06.240
CPU targeting the highest frequencies while maintaining stable power drop

00:09:03.779 --> 00:09:10.980
while a consumer might want more performance at all times Well if you run

00:09:08.640 --> 00:09:15.180
servers that vary and load having a constant power draw can actually improve

00:09:13.380 --> 00:09:19.980
efficiency and reduce stress on the components increasing the lifetime of

00:09:17.160 --> 00:09:24.360
your server now back to the graphs for these reported benchmarks AMD didn't use

00:09:22.320 --> 00:09:27.300
their determinism modes which means that customers could end up seeing extra

00:09:25.800 --> 00:09:31.500
performance on their chips should they decide to take advantage of this feature

00:09:28.860 --> 00:09:36.600
and even without that extra Edge AMD still claims massive per core increases

00:09:33.959 --> 00:09:41.100
over Intel's lineup promising as much as twice the performance per core in high

00:09:39.240 --> 00:09:46.860
performance Computing which makes them an obvious choice for simulation

00:09:43.140 --> 00:09:50.040
workloads AMD has far faster cores which

00:09:46.860 --> 00:09:51.959
helps them win an HPC and they have way

00:09:50.040 --> 00:09:57.540
more cores which gives them the upper hand virtualization and hyperscaling but

00:09:54.420 --> 00:09:59.760
here is the most damning comparison this

00:09:57.540 --> 00:10:07.680
performance per server chart AMD can fit the same number of cores in

00:10:03.540 --> 00:10:09.920
60 percent fewer servers using just half

00:10:07.680 --> 00:10:16.320
the power despite the extra socket draw at this point Intel isn't even competing

00:10:13.500 --> 00:10:20.040
they're sitting on the bench but all this performance of course means nothing

00:10:17.820 --> 00:10:24.060
if the price isn't right is AMD leveraging their performance leadership

00:10:21.660 --> 00:10:29.339
and charging through the nose well their Flagship

00:10:26.540 --> 00:10:35.580
9654 that I'm holding in my hand right here is coming in at effectively 12 000

00:10:33.000 --> 00:10:40.260
US Dollars which means the price per core remains virtually identical to

00:10:37.320 --> 00:10:44.519
their Milan Flagship but they are charging around a 10 premium on most of

00:10:42.720 --> 00:10:48.540
the product stack compared to Zen 3 which is a bit of a bump considering

00:10:46.800 --> 00:10:52.320
customers are likely going to need all new servers in addition to all new Chips

00:10:50.579 --> 00:10:56.459
thanks to the socket change and probably also all new RAM yeah it's gonna get

00:10:54.480 --> 00:10:59.399
pricey but with the ever increasing amount of computing being done in the

00:10:58.440 --> 00:11:04.440
cloud I'm sure that major players like AWS and

00:11:01.560 --> 00:11:08.100
Google will happily pay the premium or you know just have their own CPUs like

00:11:06.480 --> 00:11:12.959
you do and what's coming in the future well we know that we'll be seeing 3D V

00:11:11.279 --> 00:11:18.600
cash verses of these chips with the upcoming Genoa X lineup and that the

00:11:15.180 --> 00:11:21.660
Bergamo lineup will max out at 128 cores

00:11:18.600 --> 00:11:23.760
on a single die while we've yet to see

00:11:21.660 --> 00:11:28.260
what kind of upgrades Intel will bring with sapphire Rapids

00:11:25.740 --> 00:11:32.160
it's clear that AMD isn't resting on its Laurels employing every trick in the

00:11:30.360 --> 00:11:35.579
book to maintain the massive growth they've seen in the past couple of years

00:11:33.480 --> 00:11:39.420
in the server space and with the ever-growing presence and threat of

00:11:37.200 --> 00:11:45.480
ARM-based servers it's going to be tough for Intel to keep up now just make me

00:11:42.360 --> 00:11:48.060
some non-pro Zen 4 threadrippers and

00:11:45.480 --> 00:11:52.860
I'll be really happy almost as happy as I am to tell you about our sponsor MSI

00:11:50.339 --> 00:11:56.579
the holidays are coming quickly but MSI has you covered for gifts this year

00:11:54.360 --> 00:12:00.720
MSI's holiday deals are on now where you can save on their 12th gen laptops

00:11:58.260 --> 00:12:04.680
desktops peripherals and components do the kids need a new laptop for school or

00:12:03.000 --> 00:12:08.820
maybe your partner needs an upgrade to their outdated gaming rig there's

00:12:06.480 --> 00:12:14.220
something for everyone on sale now and for those of you in the US there's the

00:12:10.500 --> 00:12:16.019
hashtag timsi holiday giveaway tell MSI

00:12:14.220 --> 00:12:20.880
what you're thankful for and enter to win gift cards apparel and more so what

00:12:19.200 --> 00:12:25.380
are you waiting for check out MSI's deals and the hashtag Ty MSI holiday

00:12:23.399 --> 00:12:29.700
giveaway at the link below to start saving today thanks for watching guys

00:12:27.839 --> 00:12:34.620
obviously we haven't had a chance to put this guy through its Paces yet but maybe

00:12:32.100 --> 00:12:39.060
if you want to see some epic action we have our holy on the Epic Milan

00:12:37.920 --> 00:12:44.480
which was wow 2021

00:12:41.519 --> 00:12:44.480
how time flies
