WEBVTT 00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:09.519 We all know that this is average, which makes this an average PC. It's actually 00:00:06.720 --> 00:00:14.160 more than that. It's the most average PC made of only the most popular parts on 00:00:11.679 --> 00:00:17.920 the Steam hardware survey. It's actually not the first time that we've done this 00:00:15.920 --> 00:00:22.480 concept. It's been about 3 years, two GPU launches, and a Lionus beard shave 00:00:20.560 --> 00:00:28.080 since the last time we were shocked to discover that the typical gamer's PC had 00:00:25.519 --> 00:00:31.760 actually gotten worse. I have a feeling this year though it's going to be even 00:00:29.760 --> 00:00:36.239 more interesting between Windows 10 reaching end of life, game developers 00:00:33.840 --> 00:00:40.239 targeting higher minimum requirements, and an unprecedented market shift that 00:00:38.239 --> 00:00:44.640 at first glance looks kind of interesting. But when you crunch the 00:00:41.920 --> 00:00:50.079 numbers reveals a lot about what gamers are buying right now. So, let's take a 00:00:47.440 --> 00:00:55.280 look at all these parts. Oh, and let's build the average PC and see if it's 00:00:52.800 --> 00:01:00.239 enough for modern gaming. What is enough for our average games though is our 00:00:57.039 --> 00:01:01.920 sponsor enable. Their n central endpoint 00:01:00.239 --> 00:01:06.240 management software offers you the freedom to run it the way that you want 00:01:04.000 --> 00:01:10.560 to with highly customizable workflows without sacrificing security features. 00:01:08.640 --> 00:01:13.560 Learn more using our link in the video description. 00:01:20.720 --> 00:01:27.360 Right away, we're off to a similar start. With six cores and a base clock 00:01:24.320 --> 00:01:28.960 of 2.5 GHz, it aligns perfectly with the 00:01:27.360 --> 00:01:32.479 information Valve makes publicly available on their survey. Which 00:01:31.119 --> 00:01:38.000 actually brings me to my first little gripe with Valve survey. Guys, can you 00:01:35.520 --> 00:01:42.240 please give us more indication of the generation of these CPUs? It would make 00:01:40.240 --> 00:01:46.479 the hardware survey vastly more informative for its users and game 00:01:44.479 --> 00:01:51.600 developers, which could know which six core CPU they're targeting. It's either 00:01:49.119 --> 00:01:55.360 this one or some random Xeon chip from over a decade ago. The more likely 00:01:53.600 --> 00:02:00.000 answer is it's actually AMD that's driving up these six core sales. But how 00:01:57.759 --> 00:02:03.680 could that be when Intel is still out competing them? Well, this is actually 00:02:01.759 --> 00:02:08.560 where the numbers get uh really interesting. See, Intel is still ahead 00:02:05.840 --> 00:02:14.000 of the overall install base, but they've lost about 5% of their lead to AMD since 00:02:11.680 --> 00:02:19.200 the last time we did this. On the surface, that looks pretty bad for team 00:02:16.160 --> 00:02:22.000 blue. But if you break it down, it's 00:02:19.200 --> 00:02:26.000 actually much worse. You see, the Steam hardware survey has been including PCs 00:02:23.599 --> 00:02:30.720 that have been deployed for years, sometimes decades, which means that if 00:02:28.239 --> 00:02:35.519 AMD is moving the needle in such a short period of time, they need to be out 00:02:32.560 --> 00:02:40.239 selling Intel by substantially more than that 5%. And that seems to be the case 00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:46.319 according to TechSpot at least who found that AMD was out selling Intel 3 to one 00:02:44.400 --> 00:02:51.040 on Amazon. If you combine that with gaming handhelds like the Steam Deck 00:02:48.239 --> 00:02:55.200 being almost exclusively AMD, you're getting a troubling trend on your hand 00:02:52.879 --> 00:03:00.239 for Intel who will eventually lose their throne as the most average gaming CPU. 00:02:58.400 --> 00:03:03.599 Very troubling indeed. Don't worry, that was actually empty. I slight to hand 00:03:01.599 --> 00:03:07.280 you. Anyways, for parts that aren't covered on the Steam hardware survey, 00:03:05.519 --> 00:03:12.319 such as the motherboard, we went to the top seller on Amazon. After sorting by 00:03:09.599 --> 00:03:18.640 Intel and dismissing the are you sure prompt, we grabbed the Asus TU Z790 Plus 00:03:15.519 --> 00:03:19.920 Wi-Fi. Compared to last time, boy are 00:03:18.640 --> 00:03:24.080 people ever spending more on their motherboards. I mean, it's a better 00:03:22.159 --> 00:03:29.040 board. It has more slots for expansion cards, more M.2 slots, more system 00:03:26.560 --> 00:03:35.040 memory, not to mention more modern IO, including Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth. But 00:03:31.599 --> 00:03:36.640 it's over $100 now. Jeez, people. 00:03:35.040 --> 00:03:43.680 Speaking of more RAM slots, we're still only going to use two, but at least it gets an upgrade from DDR4 to DDR5. 00:03:41.840 --> 00:03:49.519 Unfortunately, the most popular kit is this 5600 mega transfers uh, you know, 00:03:47.040 --> 00:03:53.920 crucial stick. It's much slower than the DDR4 we actually used last time, and we 00:03:52.159 --> 00:03:58.959 don't even get more capacity for our trouble. 32 gigs is climbing up the 00:03:56.480 --> 00:04:02.879 ladder in the hardware survey, but 16 gigs is king for now. At least our 00:04:01.120 --> 00:04:07.920 slowass RAM is only using two of those slots. The Thermalite Peerless Assassin 00:04:05.120 --> 00:04:12.000 120SE is an amazing value. I don't even know if it's the top seller on Amazon 00:04:09.439 --> 00:04:16.880 right now. I don't care. It's $35. You should buy it. Just installing the back 00:04:13.760 --> 00:04:18.079 plate here. Works with AMD or Intel. In 00:04:16.880 --> 00:04:21.600 our case, like we said, we're doing Intel. Moving on to storage. This is 00:04:20.400 --> 00:04:27.600 actually another pain point for me, Valve. 1 TBTE plus. Okay. And making 00:04:26.080 --> 00:04:31.919 matters worse is you guys don't even tell us what type of storage it is. 00:04:29.759 --> 00:04:37.759 Sure, in most cases, the difference between a SATA and an MVME SSD is, you 00:04:35.520 --> 00:04:42.400 know, almost non-existent today, but in the future, direct storage could be a 00:04:40.160 --> 00:04:46.720 massive gamecher to help reduce load times. And if you don't share with game 00:04:44.639 --> 00:04:51.280 developers what type of storage is being used on most gamers systems, they're 00:04:49.120 --> 00:04:54.720 probably less inclined to utilize it. The one we're using today, which is 00:04:52.639 --> 00:05:00.080 again the top seller on Amazon, has, holy cow, 10,000 plus people have bought 00:04:57.440 --> 00:05:05.440 this in the last month. Well, it's a two TBTE 990 EVO Plus. We're going to put it 00:05:02.800 --> 00:05:10.080 right in the top slot there. Oh, there we go. Now, we just need to 00:05:07.440 --> 00:05:15.199 put our board in a case. But which one? You see, the Corsair 3500X is the top 00:05:13.039 --> 00:05:21.759 seller, and it would be a very good choice. But what really caught my eye 00:05:18.000 --> 00:05:25.120 was the Aqua 7 by Okinos. Have you ever 00:05:21.759 --> 00:05:27.280 heard of Okinos? Neither have I. But 00:05:25.120 --> 00:05:31.440 they were Amazon's top pick. And according to their website, which by the 00:05:29.280 --> 00:05:37.280 way appears to be completely AI generated, from product descriptions to 00:05:34.639 --> 00:05:42.080 customer testimonials and even their hours of operation, Okonos has been a 00:05:40.160 --> 00:05:45.759 trusted name in the PC accessories industry, committed to delivering high 00:05:44.000 --> 00:05:51.360 performance cooling solutions and innovative cable management. That's AI, 00:05:48.560 --> 00:05:57.199 100% AI. At 90 bucks though, these two tempered 00:05:54.320 --> 00:06:01.280 glass panels and the six included RGB fans are kind of hard to beat, 00:05:59.360 --> 00:06:06.800 especially when Corsair wants anywhere between 20 and $40 for a single RGB fan. 00:06:05.280 --> 00:06:11.039 Honestly, if you kind of like the Lean Lee O1 dynamic look, this honestly seems 00:06:09.120 --> 00:06:14.240 pretty sick. Tons of intake for the ventilation for probably the power 00:06:12.479 --> 00:06:18.800 supply at the bottom. And then it kind of has the bottom to top airflow design, 00:06:16.880 --> 00:06:23.680 the wrapped glass look, and even your IO on the front here. 00:06:20.880 --> 00:06:28.440 Feels very light though for a case. Actually have to see what building in it 00:06:25.199 --> 00:06:28.440 is like. 00:06:28.880 --> 00:06:36.080 Oh, it's actually got like an included fan hub as well. 00:06:33.440 --> 00:06:41.520 Very nice. Oh man, once this glass is off though, I can really tell this thing 00:06:38.639 --> 00:06:45.840 weighs absolutely nothing. This weighs like 2 lb. 00:06:43.680 --> 00:06:49.520 All righty. Well, let's build in it. I didn't actually check the clearance if 00:06:47.600 --> 00:06:54.160 this cooler is going to fit. Uh I really hope it does. 00:06:51.919 --> 00:06:58.319 Oh boy. Oh yeah, it looks like it will. All righty. One thing I just got to as I 00:06:57.039 --> 00:07:02.960 did my other screws, I'm getting ready to do these bottom three. These fans are 00:07:01.039 --> 00:07:06.160 kind of in the way of reaching these bottom screws. 00:07:04.479 --> 00:07:09.360 might be a little bit annoying. We'll see if we can actually get them in here. 00:07:07.840 --> 00:07:12.720 Uh, you know what? You can probably make it 00:07:11.120 --> 00:07:17.199 work, but it's something to be considerate about. 00:07:15.360 --> 00:07:20.560 A bigger issue is this slot is now actually unusable if you decide to keep 00:07:18.960 --> 00:07:24.479 these fans in. Getting those bottom headers plugged in is probably also 00:07:22.240 --> 00:07:27.120 going to be a pain. We'll have to see here. We should wire 00:07:25.840 --> 00:07:31.039 everything up though, I guess, first. So, let's get our power supply, which in 00:07:29.120 --> 00:07:35.840 this case, we ended up with something that's probably a bit overkill for our 00:07:33.039 --> 00:07:39.440 system. The Corsair RM1000X. I'm not complaining though. It's a 00:07:37.360 --> 00:07:43.599 quality, fully modular unit that, according to our Labs teams, actually 00:07:41.280 --> 00:07:48.240 exceeds its rated efficiency at low loads. Plus, it's got a lot of headroom 00:07:45.199 --> 00:07:50.720 if you decide to install a beefier GPU. 00:07:48.240 --> 00:07:55.280 Definitely not a lot of managing room back here. There's our PCIe power. I 00:07:53.599 --> 00:07:59.360 guess we should install the GPU. Which brings us to the star of the show, the 00:07:57.360 --> 00:08:03.520 RTX 3060. 00:08:00.960 --> 00:08:07.360 Specifically, the 8 gig version. Okay, this is actually a lot better than 00:08:05.520 --> 00:08:12.400 the last time we did a Steam Average PC cuz that GPU got a downgrade during the 00:08:09.520 --> 00:08:15.919 great GPU shortage. Plus, that GPU did not have a lot of modern features 00:08:14.000 --> 00:08:20.160 presented on these newer cards, specifically like DLSS resolution 00:08:17.759 --> 00:08:23.520 upscaling or even ray tracing. It's not powerful enough that I would actually 00:08:21.440 --> 00:08:27.680 turn ray tracing on, especially in demanding titles. But, it's still a very 00:08:25.599 --> 00:08:31.039 competent GPU. You should just try to get the 12 GB version if you're 00:08:29.440 --> 00:08:35.200 considering getting one of these today. This might be kind of a bowed out side 00:08:33.279 --> 00:08:40.200 panel. There's not a ton of cable management room here. Sometimes you got 00:08:36.719 --> 00:08:40.200 to give it the old. 00:08:42.080 --> 00:08:49.680 Dang it. Oh yeah, she's a little bowed. Wow. It's 00:08:47.600 --> 00:08:53.360 not a bad looking system. The white GPU is a little bit of an eyesore. I should 00:08:51.120 --> 00:08:56.880 have gone with an all black GPU, but whatever. Let's fire it up. With the 00:08:54.800 --> 00:09:00.640 average PC complete, we just have a few finishing touches. The only information 00:08:58.880 --> 00:09:06.000 we have on monitors is actually the resolution. So, for our setup, we're 00:09:02.720 --> 00:09:08.080 rocking the 1080p lifestyle. 1440p has 00:09:06.000 --> 00:09:12.160 gained about 8% share since the last time we did this, but it is still miles 00:09:10.800 --> 00:09:16.160 away from becoming the most common gaming resolution. One stat that I would 00:09:14.399 --> 00:09:19.120 love to see in the future would be the refresh rate, cuz I have a feeling that 00:09:17.839 --> 00:09:25.200 more and more users are actually switching to higher refresh rate displays now that you can get a 165 Hz 00:09:23.680 --> 00:09:31.279 monitor for as little as a hundred bucks. But Valve doesn't include that 00:09:27.120 --> 00:09:33.200 information yet. Valve, 00:09:31.279 --> 00:09:37.680 let's turn the computer on. As for our final survey stat, we just need an 00:09:34.800 --> 00:09:41.200 operating system. And it looks like 2025 is still the year of the Windows 00:09:39.040 --> 00:09:46.399 desktop. But hey, at least it's Windows 11 now, thanks to Microsoft killing 00:09:42.880 --> 00:09:48.160 Windows 10. Neat. Linux has actually 00:09:46.399 --> 00:09:52.959 made a little bit of progress towards gaming domination. But if you were 00:09:50.000 --> 00:09:56.959 expecting Tux to ride in like this, that 1% gain, most likely due to products 00:09:55.200 --> 00:10:00.480 like the Steam Deck, is going to come as a disappointment. I know I said I wasn't 00:09:58.720 --> 00:10:05.760 going to turn RTX on this card, but I kind of want to see how it handles Indiana Jones. All right. So, we're on 00:10:03.200 --> 00:10:11.200 native 1080p, no upscaling, no frame gen, very minimal RTX settings, and 00:10:08.160 --> 00:10:14.240 we're on medium to low, but in our intro 00:10:11.200 --> 00:10:18.240 scene here, we're getting about 75 00:10:14.240 --> 00:10:21.360 average FPS, and it's not dropping below 00:10:18.240 --> 00:10:23.839 60 in our 1%. Man, at any point in this 00:10:21.360 --> 00:10:28.079 game, if you just like pause and stand still, like everything looks fantastic. 00:10:26.800 --> 00:10:33.600 again, especially since we're not doing any sort of DLSS upscaling or anything. 00:10:31.680 --> 00:10:36.959 But now it's a 30 series card, so now you'd have access to it. We should try 00:10:35.519 --> 00:10:40.800 something else, though. Let's try the new Doom. Just came out like last week 00:10:38.880 --> 00:10:46.480 at at the time of filming. Doom Dark Ages. It's kind of averaged out at 50 00:10:43.519 --> 00:10:51.200 average FPS, and that's my 1% lows. I mean, 60 is what I would call bare 00:10:49.200 --> 00:10:57.279 minimum nowadays. But hey, you know what? We have access 00:10:54.240 --> 00:10:59.760 to DLSS. I am going to turn it on just 00:10:57.279 --> 00:11:07.120 because I want to do a sanity check. And I am immediately 00:11:02.000 --> 00:11:10.480 at about 20 FPS higher, 70 average FPS, 00:11:07.120 --> 00:11:12.160 65 in my 1% lows. But I want to see what 00:11:10.480 --> 00:11:16.880 some other people think about the Steam average PC. I'll play games even if 00:11:14.079 --> 00:11:22.079 they're not like, you know, 120. I'm I'm chilling if it's at 50. And this so far 00:11:19.760 --> 00:11:25.519 looks really playable, at least to me. Is this like the hardest part in the 00:11:23.600 --> 00:11:28.800 game to like run at the beginning with all the foliage? Yeah, it's very 00:11:27.279 --> 00:11:33.360 physically demanding. Yeah. So, I mean, if this is the hardest part of the game, I'd imagine the rest of it I'd be more 00:11:32.000 --> 00:11:38.320 than happy to play it like this. Probably runs better than my home PC. 00:11:35.839 --> 00:11:42.320 It's chugging, right? Because the moment I think we're entering a more densely 00:11:40.399 --> 00:11:46.240 populated area where like there's so much more light refracting off the 00:11:44.079 --> 00:11:52.000 leaves and stuff like that, too. It fullon stopped for a bit. What is going 00:11:50.000 --> 00:11:57.519 on? What? That was the ultimate ray tracing 00:11:54.959 --> 00:12:01.760 experience. Yeah. So, you see like the environment 00:11:59.519 --> 00:12:06.880 is pretty responsive, but yeah, I I go here and it's like, oh, all the rays. 00:12:04.160 --> 00:12:11.440 God, is that you? Is this a playable experience? It is a playable experience, 00:12:08.800 --> 00:12:18.320 especially a game like this. It's a bit of a more relaxed cinematic experience. 00:12:16.240 --> 00:12:21.519 It looks pretty soft. It doesn't look bad, but it definitely looks low 00:12:20.000 --> 00:12:27.680 resolution. And it might not help that this monitor is a really crappy old 00:12:23.839 --> 00:12:29.440 monitor. As far as average computers go, 00:12:27.680 --> 00:12:33.040 if this is what the average gamer has, not so bad. I can definitely tell some 00:12:31.600 --> 00:12:38.800 of the settings are down. Like the shading of the foliage is pretty 00:12:35.360 --> 00:12:42.000 unremarkable. But I also think we're in 00:12:38.800 --> 00:12:44.399 this weird era of PC gaming where we're 00:12:42.000 --> 00:12:47.120 so obsessed with fidelity and it's like it doesn't freaking matter. Just turn 00:12:45.839 --> 00:12:50.720 that part of your brain off and just enjoy the art. Would you be happy with 00:12:49.040 --> 00:12:54.720 this gaming experience? I would be fine with this gaming experience. If you're 00:12:52.560 --> 00:12:59.200 playing it at these settings, uh, and you're unable to have fun, that's a you 00:12:57.440 --> 00:13:02.639 problem, man. That's that is not the game's problem. Give us your experience 00:13:01.040 --> 00:13:06.240 on Doom. I mean, it runs better than Indiana Jones, but it's that hard. I 00:13:04.959 --> 00:13:10.240 mean, I think it's a good sign that I'm just like kind of locking in and just 00:13:08.240 --> 00:13:14.240 like, oh, I'm just gaming. This is fun. No problems. You know, basically, if I 00:13:12.800 --> 00:13:18.320 didn't have frame view in the top left, I'd just be happy, you know? Yeah. Hey, 00:13:16.320 --> 00:13:20.480 this is feeling good. If I was like, "Hey, this is the PC you're going to 00:13:19.440 --> 00:13:25.680 game with." I'd make Doom. I'd be like, "Okay, cool. I can play Doom on this." And then I would adjust my settings 00:13:23.760 --> 00:13:31.200 accordingly. Um, I haven't hit any stuttering. Like, I'm not blaming any 00:13:27.360 --> 00:13:32.800 missed shots on the hardware yet yet. 00:13:31.200 --> 00:13:37.120 The performance is totally good. This is absolutely playable. Uh, Doom is a game 00:13:34.959 --> 00:13:40.720 that I'd like to see above 100 frames, but I know that this one has mandatory 00:13:39.360 --> 00:13:45.839 rate tracing stuff, so that's kind of unrealistic on a budget system. This is 00:13:43.839 --> 00:13:49.760 an adequate experience. It looks pretty good. It plays well. The responsiveness 00:13:48.079 --> 00:13:55.200 is good. It's certainly not getting the in the way of my fun. Is it uh a 00:13:53.040 --> 00:13:58.079 perfectly optimized experience for me? Probably not. I'm going to adjust one 00:13:57.040 --> 00:14:02.959 thing to settings. I'm not going to tell you what I'm adjusting. Oh, we're back. 00:14:01.040 --> 00:14:06.560 The number is higher in the top left. Yes, I made a settings change to give 00:14:04.639 --> 00:14:10.720 you more FPS. I want you to tell me, does it feel better, worse, the same? 00:14:08.560 --> 00:14:14.320 How do you feel? Um, it definitely feels like smoother. Would you play with this 00:14:12.959 --> 00:14:18.720 setting versus what you just played with? I'd probably play on this setting 00:14:16.560 --> 00:14:23.440 just because so far all that I notice is that it's smoother and so I would 00:14:21.279 --> 00:14:26.079 definitely just take those frames unless there's something else that I'm missing 00:14:24.399 --> 00:14:30.880 out on. But right now it just it feels like a good experience. Oh, it does feel 00:14:28.160 --> 00:14:36.320 a little little worse. Okay. Even though you have higher 00:14:33.199 --> 00:14:38.160 FPS right now, it just feels chunk like 00:14:36.320 --> 00:14:41.519 choppier a little bit. Like I'm looking at this wall with some particles. moment 00:14:39.839 --> 00:14:46.079 I look at these enemies, I can tell there's a discernable difference here in 00:14:43.680 --> 00:14:51.360 terms of how the screen how I'm perceiving the screen, right? So, yeah. 00:14:48.959 --> 00:14:58.240 Yeah, it's a little too much. They uh I like upscaling, but this every raw piece 00:14:55.279 --> 00:15:02.079 of data that they have is too low res that it even with like the the 00:15:00.240 --> 00:15:08.800 sophisticated upscaling, it still looks very low detail. Is it nice to be above 00:15:05.519 --> 00:15:10.480 100 frames? Sure. But it's I think this 00:15:08.800 --> 00:15:15.839 is a little bit too much. Like even that uh animation on the screen, I can see 00:15:12.639 --> 00:15:17.279 the the the resolution of the sprite or 00:15:15.839 --> 00:15:23.040 whatever that was. I want you to guess the price in US. Uh 00:15:21.120 --> 00:15:32.199 I could see it for not going any more than a grand. Um probably from the 800 00:15:27.040 --> 00:15:32.199 $800 to $1,000 USD range. 00:15:32.320 --> 00:15:39.920 700 US, maybe around two grand US. It's way 00:15:37.120 --> 00:15:43.040 overpriced. Oh, way over. Yeah, you're playing high on the safe end cuz you 00:15:41.519 --> 00:15:46.320 don't want to go under. It was $1,250. This This performs better than what I 00:15:44.560 --> 00:15:50.880 have at home. And so for that price point and it's cheaper, so that's 00:15:47.839 --> 00:15:53.199 amazing. It's $1250. Oh wow. To buy all 00:15:50.880 --> 00:15:58.000 the parts right now, this config, this exact computer, it's a little bit on the 00:15:55.360 --> 00:16:01.880 expensive side. Wow. With that GPU in it? Yes. 1250. 00:16:02.800 --> 00:16:08.880 Are youing kidding me? That is a $200 plus dollar motherboard and they are 00:16:07.279 --> 00:16:12.639 selling 10,000 of them a month on Amazon. People, if you're watching this 00:16:10.959 --> 00:16:17.920 video, go watch some of our videos on how to build a budget system for $1250. 00:16:15.920 --> 00:16:21.519 You could be having 4K gaming, man. You could you could have such a better 00:16:19.279 --> 00:16:26.880 experience than this. This is totally adequate if you spent like $400 on a 00:16:25.279 --> 00:16:32.240 used computer. Like that would be like that's pretty good. This is ridiculous. 00:16:29.680 --> 00:16:36.160 This is I'm so upset that it costs this much money. 00:16:34.079 --> 00:16:41.519 What a ripoff. Well, there it is. The 2025 average PC. 00:16:39.600 --> 00:16:45.839 It's a reasonable budget, and I think most people would be okay with this 00:16:43.360 --> 00:16:51.279 gaming experience, even in fairly demanding modern games. However, that 00:16:49.440 --> 00:16:55.120 doesn't mean it's the best choice for your money. You could also check out 00:16:53.279 --> 00:17:00.480 this parts list which we'll have linked below that includes double the RAM, a 00:16:57.759 --> 00:17:03.839 better CPU, and a better GPU for about the same price. I think the biggest 00:17:02.240 --> 00:17:08.959 takeaway this year is actually for Valve. The Steam hardware survey is an 00:17:06.480 --> 00:17:13.679 amazing tool, but in its current form, it's not as useful as it could be. To 00:17:11.839 --> 00:17:18.079 correctly guide game developers, it needs to provide more information on the 00:17:15.439 --> 00:17:22.400 CPUs, give more details about user storage, and I think it could also stand 00:17:20.079 --> 00:17:26.880 to be updated to tell us more about the displays that gamers are using. YouTube, 00:17:24.959 --> 00:17:31.440 for instance, has seen a huge trend towards living room viewing. Is a 00:17:29.120 --> 00:17:35.840 similar thing happening in PC gaming? Who the [ __ ] knows? What I do know, 00:17:33.280 --> 00:17:39.039 though, is our sponsor, Grammarly. You know, it's not easy for business team to 00:17:37.440 --> 00:17:42.000 write all these scripts, and it takes a lot longer than you might think. If 00:17:40.720 --> 00:17:46.160 writer's block is something you're experiencing as well, Grammarly might be 00:17:44.000 --> 00:17:50.400 able to help. They're an AI partner that gives you real time and highquality 00:17:48.080 --> 00:17:55.120 suggestions that adapts to your voice so it sounds like you, not AI. It can even 00:17:53.120 --> 00:17:59.200 whip up a full draft for you to simply touch up and finalize, all while making 00:17:57.039 --> 00:18:02.480 sure the tone of your writing is in line with the context of each unique 00:18:00.880 --> 00:18:06.799 scenario. And forget about switching tabs, hopping between Windows, or even 00:18:04.559 --> 00:18:10.559 monotonous copy and pasting. Simply install Grammarly and it can provide 00:18:08.640 --> 00:18:15.679 real-time feedback right where you're working across 500,000 apps and websites 00:18:13.520 --> 00:18:19.919 like Word and Slack. Get your work done in a few clicks, not a few hours, so you 00:18:18.080 --> 00:18:24.080 can focus your time on other things like going to Happy Hour. So, use our link in 00:18:22.240 --> 00:18:28.160 the description to download Grammarly for free and take a bit of time back in 00:18:26.000 --> 00:18:31.120 your day. If you guys enjoyed this video and are interested in grabbing any of 00:18:29.679 --> 00:18:34.160 the parts we featured today, we're going to have them all linked below, but you 00:18:32.880 --> 00:18:39.440 should also go back and see the last time we did this, which I think was in 00:18:36.080 --> 00:18:42.559 Oh my god. 2022, 2021, just to see how 00:18:39.440 --> 00:18:42.559 much it's changed.