WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.400
I would have bet money that Apple was going to announce

00:00:04.400 --> 00:00:07.800
a replacement for the Mac Pro at this year's WWDC

00:00:07.800 --> 00:00:12.520
because two years ago when they announced that they were going to be transitioning to Apple Silicon,

00:00:12.520 --> 00:00:17.200
they committed that they were going to finish it within about two years.

00:00:17.200 --> 00:00:23.640
Well, they didn't. But what Apple did show is that there is a whole new generation

00:00:23.640 --> 00:00:27.680
of Apple Silicon already, a brand new laptop,

00:00:27.680 --> 00:00:30.680
a leap in iPad productivity,

00:00:30.680 --> 00:00:35.120
and a whole bunch of features, further services, and software.

00:00:35.120 --> 00:00:39.000
So let's unpack all the announcements and I'll tell you what I think.

00:00:47.200 --> 00:00:52.280
It looks like less than two years after the M1 release, we're getting its successor, the M2.

00:00:52.280 --> 00:00:58.040
This update cadence is interesting to me as we only just got the M1 ultra variant a few months ago,

00:00:58.040 --> 00:01:03.680
which means that the M2 can't be faster than the M1 Pro found in the MacBook Pro.

00:01:03.680 --> 00:01:08.120
And it isn't. While the CPU core count remains the same as the vanilla M1,

00:01:08.120 --> 00:01:14.320
there are modest improvements everywhere. Two more GPU cores, a media engine with ProRes acceleration,

00:01:14.320 --> 00:01:18.920
more memory up to 24 gigabytes, faster memory bandwidth at 100 gigabytes per second,

00:01:18.920 --> 00:01:23.920
and a new five nanometer process, probably like the A15.

00:01:24.160 --> 00:01:27.240
Aside from significantly faster ProRes performance,

00:01:27.240 --> 00:01:31.160
things remain modest with Apple's claimed 18 and 35%

00:01:31.160 --> 00:01:36.600
performance increases compared to the M1. Still absent, his support for Thunderbolt 4

00:01:36.600 --> 00:01:41.280
and more than one display, the latter of which this much slower Intel MacBook Air

00:01:41.280 --> 00:01:46.840
can do, by the way. And speaking of MacBook Air, there's a new one.

00:01:46.840 --> 00:01:51.560
Arguably Apple's best and most important laptop has become much better.

00:01:51.600 --> 00:01:56.120
It essentially cribs the current MacBook Pro design in a much thinner package.

00:01:56.120 --> 00:02:01.280
It gets the same lovely MagSafe connector, same keyboard, and same notch.

00:02:01.280 --> 00:02:04.760
Despite the shape, this isn't the same screen

00:02:04.760 --> 00:02:08.200
you get in the Pro models with their ProMotion and XDR.

00:02:08.200 --> 00:02:12.760
But it is improved compared to the last year. Brightness is up 100 nits to 500,

00:02:12.760 --> 00:02:16.240
and it supports more color, billions, apparently.

00:02:16.240 --> 00:02:19.980
What I'm most disappointed with is the colors on the outside.

00:02:19.980 --> 00:02:25.460
Instead of the bright colors we have come to love on the iMac, what we get is midnight and starlight

00:02:25.460 --> 00:02:29.420
alongside the traditional silver and space gray.

00:02:29.420 --> 00:02:33.540
And I really can't figure out which one I would choose.

00:02:33.540 --> 00:02:38.540
Probably midnight, just because it's novel. New MacBook Air also costs more too,

00:02:38.540 --> 00:02:44.380
with a starting price of $1,200. For $100 more, you can get 10 GPU cores,

00:02:44.380 --> 00:02:48.260
or the still confusingly named 13-inch MacBook Pro,

00:02:48.300 --> 00:02:54.020
with the same chip and fan. Lovers of the touch bar, I'm guessing this is your last chance.

00:02:54.020 --> 00:02:58.740
This and the fact that Apple will still be selling the M1 MacBook Air for $1,000

00:02:58.740 --> 00:03:02.000
really completes the Apple laptop price spectrum.

00:03:02.000 --> 00:03:05.280
No longer do you choose the Mac you need and pay the price,

00:03:05.280 --> 00:03:09.040
now you can pick the price and get the MacBook to fit,

00:03:09.040 --> 00:03:14.020
because there are no deals. So I've been having pretty big arguments

00:03:14.020 --> 00:03:18.220
with people at the office about the iPad. There's a real desire to see the iPad

00:03:18.220 --> 00:03:21.380
become more Mac-like, something I don't agree with.

00:03:21.380 --> 00:03:26.100
Really, what a lot of people want is for the iPad to run macOS.

00:03:26.100 --> 00:03:32.380
Well, it still doesn't. But the improvements to iPad OS bring it closer,

00:03:32.380 --> 00:03:37.380
ever so slightly. Craig Federici announced desktop-class apps,

00:03:37.380 --> 00:03:42.260
which really just means that Apple's first-party system apps on iPad have features

00:03:42.260 --> 00:03:49.620
that have been in macOS for 20-plus years now. So customizable toolbars and find and replace.

00:03:49.620 --> 00:03:52.940
More importantly, the iPad now supports resizable Windows.

00:03:52.940 --> 00:03:57.700
And to organize all the Windows, Stage Manager groups them on the side,

00:03:57.700 --> 00:04:01.460
enabling you to retrieve and group them as you see fit.

00:04:01.460 --> 00:04:07.500
I'm not sure that this is all that great on a small iPad screen, but it is great for external displays with display scaling,

00:04:07.500 --> 00:04:14.420
which the iPad now supports. Stage Manager is coming to the Mac too, for some reason.

00:04:14.420 --> 00:04:19.340
Multitasking on the iPad has undergone a confusing evolution with mixed metaphors

00:04:19.340 --> 00:04:24.220
and undiscoverable implementation. So I'm curious how it's going to work in practice.

00:04:24.220 --> 00:04:30.740
It shows that the iPad is getting more capable, which is good, but there are still some structural issues

00:04:30.740 --> 00:04:34.100
the platform is going to have to figure out first.

00:04:34.100 --> 00:04:38.300
iPhone users should enjoy their lock screen getting more purposeful and customizable.

00:04:38.300 --> 00:04:42.740
Notifications have been pushed down to a bottom wheel to free up your background picture.

00:04:42.740 --> 00:04:46.820
The clock numbers can peek behind your image subject and be in a different font.

00:04:46.820 --> 00:04:50.100
You have a choice of six and you can add widgets.

00:04:50.100 --> 00:04:55.660
By all appearances, the customizations look a lot like Apple Watch complications.

00:04:55.660 --> 00:04:59.820
Speaking of Apple Watch, the focus on health has been interesting.

00:04:59.820 --> 00:05:03.380
For runners, the watch gets a feature called sensor fusion,

00:05:03.380 --> 00:05:07.100
which interprets how you're running just from your ARM movement.

00:05:07.100 --> 00:05:12.580
This includes measurements of vertical oscillation, ground contact time and stride length.

00:05:12.580 --> 00:05:15.980
For me, I'm happy to see sleep track and get improved with sleep stages

00:05:15.980 --> 00:05:20.500
until it tells me I'm sleeping badly. I felt a bit of deja vu during this event.

00:05:20.500 --> 00:05:23.740
They literally mentioned that you can get sports scores from Siri.

00:05:23.740 --> 00:05:30.180
Being able to ask Siri about players or teams. Scott Forstall announced that 10 years ago with iOS 6,

00:05:30.180 --> 00:05:34.860
then there's iCloud shared photo library. This is a new feature specifically for families

00:05:34.860 --> 00:05:37.900
using family sharing, allowing them to have one place

00:05:37.900 --> 00:05:42.300
where all their family photos can go. This is great for that very specific circumstance,

00:05:42.380 --> 00:05:47.580
but you might be interested in knowing that Scott Forstall also announced iCloud photo albums

00:05:47.580 --> 00:05:50.580
10 years ago too. Those albums are lower quality,

00:05:50.580 --> 00:05:54.220
but they also don't use your iCloud storage either.

00:05:54.220 --> 00:05:57.460
Now, if only Apple made their operating system look

00:05:57.460 --> 00:06:02.020
like iOS 6, bring skeuomorphism back, please.

00:06:02.020 --> 00:06:07.220
Likewise, collaboration was already a part of notes in Apple's productivity suite for years,

00:06:07.220 --> 00:06:11.020
but it was announced here. Sure, the interaction is a little more robust

00:06:11.060 --> 00:06:16.620
as it's integrated in the operating system share sheet, letting you collaborate within iMessage chat groups.

00:06:16.620 --> 00:06:21.540
All the more reason for those Android holdouts in your life to switch over.

00:06:21.540 --> 00:06:26.660
iMessage. Apple also announced that CarPlay will now be able to go much deeper into your car

00:06:26.660 --> 00:06:29.740
with the ability to take over all of your dashboard screens

00:06:29.740 --> 00:06:33.380
with Apple's interface. As a car guy, I found the concept design they showed

00:06:33.380 --> 00:06:38.900
not very compelling. Bunch of car makers have signed on, including ones who are switching over to Google's

00:06:38.900 --> 00:06:44.580
infotainment operating system. I'll be really cross though, if they don't have an option for classic CarPlay,

00:06:44.580 --> 00:06:48.420
if I prefer my car's instruments, but Apple's infotainment.

00:06:48.420 --> 00:06:52.180
This feature is a long ways off. If you remember, CarPlay was originally announced

00:06:52.180 --> 00:06:56.820
with iOS 7, but didn't get added to car systems for two years,

00:06:56.820 --> 00:07:01.340
which brings me back to these updates. There's a lot in here that got announced,

00:07:01.340 --> 00:07:05.940
editable and deleteable iMessages, pass keys instead of passwords in Safari,

00:07:05.940 --> 00:07:11.780
cool machine learning intelligence with text recognition and the ability to lift the subject out of images.

00:07:11.780 --> 00:07:18.380
In terms of what devices will get these updates, well, the iPhone 8 and 10 are now the oldest to get iOS 16.

00:07:18.380 --> 00:07:23.300
iPad OS cuts off with the A9 powered fifth generation model.

00:07:23.300 --> 00:07:27.340
Okay. And WatchOS 9 is not available with the Series 3,

00:07:27.340 --> 00:07:30.380
which is still available in the store.

00:07:30.380 --> 00:07:34.260
But what I felt was missing here was a cohesive story.

00:07:34.260 --> 00:07:39.140
What are the problems Apple is trying to solve for their users and developers?

00:07:39.140 --> 00:07:45.060
I heard a lot of everyone requested this, but with no curiosity or explanation as to why.

00:07:45.060 --> 00:07:48.460
I think that would help with the development of these features, no?

00:07:48.460 --> 00:07:51.820
Apple has diversified itself into remarkable complexity.

00:07:51.820 --> 00:07:57.300
There are so many different hardware models you can buy now. It almost feels like the 90s all over again.

00:07:57.300 --> 00:08:00.540
And the list of features to go through is exhausting,

00:08:00.540 --> 00:08:04.060
even if many are really just part of cross-device services.

00:08:04.100 --> 00:08:08.380
My big question is, how many will make it to launch in the fall?

00:08:08.380 --> 00:08:12.740
Last year with iOS 15, many of the headline features weren't ready yet.

00:08:12.740 --> 00:08:16.500
Some not even until a few months ago. It begs the question,

00:08:16.500 --> 00:08:19.220
is Apple running faster than it needs to?

00:08:20.340 --> 00:08:23.780
Thanks for coming outside for this Mac Address. If you like the new MacBook Air,

00:08:23.780 --> 00:08:27.020
then give this video a like. And if you are a lover of the touch bar,

00:08:27.020 --> 00:08:30.220
then you must subscribe. Now, I'm curious in the comments,

00:08:30.220 --> 00:08:34.260
what of the new features announced today at this WWDC? You're most interested in.

00:08:34.260 --> 00:08:36.220
I'm curious, who are there for?
