WEBVTT

00:00:00.440 --> 00:00:07.280
all right well there's our GTX 480 on the test bench and our total score in 3D

00:00:05.279 --> 00:00:13.719
Mark Vantage is 23,000 3D marks so you can see that the

00:00:10.200 --> 00:00:16.720
460 Hawk with its

00:00:13.719 --> 00:00:18.760
uh fairly outstanding overclocking

00:00:16.720 --> 00:00:24.119
performance uh my understanding actually based on uh talking to a couple others

00:00:21.480 --> 00:00:29.400
who have sample cards and uh to the team at MSI is that mine actually was a a

00:00:26.960 --> 00:00:34.559
subpar overclocker for a hawk so this is kind of a a worst case scenario but even

00:00:32.480 --> 00:00:40.520
then we're able to get within spitting distance of a stock GTX

00:00:37.719 --> 00:00:45.440
480 and the difference in price is probably the most interesting part

00:00:42.760 --> 00:00:50.719
because uh here hold on I got a bunch of stuff on my screen that probably there's

00:00:48.120 --> 00:00:54.520
no need to uh show to the entire YouTube audience

00:00:52.199 --> 00:00:58.640
480 by the way for everyone who keeps complaining that I'm not running Windows

00:00:56.160 --> 00:01:04.239
7 I am now running Windows 7 on my work machine uh I don't know why that was so

00:01:01.480 --> 00:01:08.080
important but uh I'd get all these comments every time i' show something on

00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:14.200
my work computer and no he's not running Windows 7 why isn't he running Windows 7

00:01:09.920 --> 00:01:16.479
well now I am okay so $549.99 for a 480

00:01:14.200 --> 00:01:22.479
and for a 460 Hawk wait for it bam

00:01:19.720 --> 00:01:26.840
$269.99 so I mean yeah if you can afford a 480 you know what yes it does perform

00:01:24.439 --> 00:01:32.479
better yes it will continue to overclock past what we were able to achieve with a

00:01:28.960 --> 00:01:35.320
460 remember that's like maxed out but

00:01:32.479 --> 00:01:39.240
you can't really argue with the value of something like a hawk Edition card so

00:01:37.560 --> 00:01:42.759
anyway I thought that was a pretty cool demonstration and uh thank you for

00:01:41.320 --> 00:01:50.719
checking out my video blog don't forget to subscribe and that was GTX 460 Hawk

00:01:47.560 --> 00:01:53.719
versus gtx480 not

00:01:50.719 --> 00:01:53.719
Hawk