1
00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:07,120
eight cores 12 cores 16 cores

2
00:00:04,319 --> 00:00:12,160
it wasn't long ago that just single core cpus were the norm on home computers but

3
00:00:09,920 --> 00:00:18,240
these days we're seeing ever increasing core counts for less and less money but

4
00:00:15,679 --> 00:00:21,119
if we can have lots of cores on just one CPU

5
00:00:19,279 --> 00:00:25,600
what's preventing the powers that be from just putting multiple CPU sockets

6
00:00:23,680 --> 00:00:30,960
on the motherboard and letting us have even more cores that way i'm glad you

7
00:00:28,160 --> 00:00:36,719
asked well as it turns out we actually did have multi-CPU platforms for

8
00:00:34,160 --> 00:00:41,200
consumer-grade chips for quite a long time in fact you can find them going all

9
00:00:39,280 --> 00:00:46,000
the way back to the pre-pentium days when we were all rocking

10
00:00:42,840 --> 00:00:48,000
486s in our desktop rigs but

11
00:00:46,000 --> 00:00:52,640
understandably these setups were quite rare for home users with one of the big

12
00:00:50,160 --> 00:00:58,320
reasons being simply cost now although a good CPU these days isn't

13
00:00:55,199 --> 00:01:01,440
exactly cheap it pales in comparison to

14
00:00:58,320 --> 00:01:04,640
many popular cpus of the late 1980s and

15
00:01:01,440 --> 00:01:06,640
early 90s the 486 for example cost

16
00:01:04,640 --> 00:01:12,080
around a thousand dollars when it launched and remember guys this was a

17
00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:17,040
single core processor another reason was that most applications for Windows were

18
00:01:14,400 --> 00:01:22,080
simply not designed to take advantage of multiple processor cores i mean this is

19
00:01:19,600 --> 00:01:25,920
still true to a lesser extent today especially with games but

20
00:01:23,840 --> 00:01:30,799
multi-threading for most consumer applications was almost unheard of until

21
00:01:28,159 --> 00:01:35,680
the mid-2000s and if you were doing something at home that would benefit

22
00:01:32,159 --> 00:01:36,479
from parallel core such as video editing

23
00:01:35,680 --> 00:01:42,880
well you're back to that same problem of having to take out a second mortgage but

24
00:01:40,320 --> 00:01:48,000
as time went on silicon prices fell and we ended up with some multi-CPU

25
00:01:45,439 --> 00:01:53,520
platforms that became somewhat popular with home users

26
00:01:49,680 --> 00:01:56,880
one was athlon mp released in 2001 with

27
00:01:53,520 --> 00:01:59,360
the mp standing for multiprocessor it

28
00:01:56,880 --> 00:02:04,240
was AMD's first ever attempt at a dual socket platform and while it was

29
00:02:01,759 --> 00:02:08,959
designed with servers and workstations in mind it did gain some traction among

30
00:02:06,799 --> 00:02:14,000
enthusiasts and a small handful of systems built around athlon mp even made

31
00:02:11,760 --> 00:02:19,040
their way onto store shelves at local retailers another platform that was more

32
00:02:16,800 --> 00:02:25,360
specifically focused on home users was Intel's skull trail from 2008. now this

33
00:02:22,160 --> 00:02:27,920
dual CPU solution was also derived from

34
00:02:25,360 --> 00:02:33,360
a server or workstation oriented product in this case Intel z online but the

35
00:02:30,800 --> 00:02:37,840
motherboards had more features that home users and gamers would want like

36
00:02:35,519 --> 00:02:42,720
overclocking and fewer of the more obscure standards you'd typically see on

37
00:02:39,599 --> 00:02:45,360
a server board like remote management

38
00:02:42,720 --> 00:02:49,680
Intel built skull trail as the ultimate gaming platform partly because of the

39
00:02:47,519 --> 00:02:56,160
raw power that you could get from two cpus and partly because it could support

40
00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:58,879
multiple graphics cards in NVIDIA sli

41
00:02:56,160 --> 00:03:03,120
without an NVIDIA chipset which at the time was a pretty huge deal

42
00:03:00,400 --> 00:03:08,400
unfortunately the platform is mostly remembered as a failure because it was

43
00:03:05,760 --> 00:03:12,239
you guessed it extremely expensive especially when you factor in the

44
00:03:10,000 --> 00:03:16,560
high-end cpus that were required in order to use it not to mention that the

45
00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:21,360
dual cpus didn't provide much gaming benefit even though it was kind of

46
00:03:18,480 --> 00:03:27,840
marketed towards gamers and enthusiasts AMD's similar quad fx suffered a similar

47
00:03:24,959 --> 00:03:32,640
fate as performance simply didn't stack up compared to the high costs and

48
00:03:30,159 --> 00:03:37,200
demanding power requirements these days most folks running dual CPU setups at

49
00:03:34,640 --> 00:03:41,680
home are using repurposed workstation or server boards but despite the greater

50
00:03:39,519 --> 00:03:47,360
prevalence of multi-threaded programs these enthusiasts still remain a tiny

51
00:03:44,319 --> 00:03:49,440
minority of users you see unlike earlier

52
00:03:47,360 --> 00:03:53,280
high-end platforms where you could only get four or eight cores maximum in a

53
00:03:52,000 --> 00:03:56,720
single socket shrinking transistor sizes and greater

54
00:03:55,200 --> 00:04:02,319
power efficiency mean that we can now have as many as 64 cores on a single CPU

55
00:04:00,159 --> 00:04:05,680
package like what we've seen with AMD's latest threadripper processors and

56
00:04:04,400 --> 00:04:10,480
especially when you factor in simultaneous multithreading which allows

57
00:04:07,599 --> 00:04:14,080
one core to work on two or more threads at the same time

58
00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:18,720
that many cores is enough performance for just about any home user even if

59
00:04:17,359 --> 00:04:23,280
you're doing something insanely demanding then you've got the fact that

60
00:04:20,959 --> 00:04:27,199
there are potentially latency issues with having two physical processors on

61
00:04:25,199 --> 00:04:31,840
the same board that you don't deal with in a single socket system that means

62
00:04:29,440 --> 00:04:37,120
that multi-threaded workloads even if they are well designed won't necessarily

63
00:04:34,639 --> 00:04:40,960
scale perfectly when you add more physical cpus which you can learn more

64
00:04:39,199 --> 00:04:44,880
about in this video on our sister channel minus tech tips so the short

65
00:04:43,280 --> 00:04:48,240
answer to the question we asked at the beginning of the episode can simply be

66
00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:53,520
summed up as diminishing returns in much the same way

67
00:04:50,880 --> 00:04:56,880
that adding a 13th subwoofer to your car couldn't possibly make your neighbors

68
00:04:55,040 --> 00:05:02,479
any more upset than they already are adding a second or third or fourth CPU

69
00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:06,479
to your motherboard is probably not going to make much difference to the

70
00:05:03,680 --> 00:05:10,720
workloads you actually care about but you know what you should care about

71
00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:17,120
Corsair's vengeance a4100 streaming and gaming pc features an AMD ryzen 3000

72
00:05:13,520 --> 00:05:20,000
series 8 core CPU NVIDIA GeForce rtx

73
00:05:17,120 --> 00:05:26,160
graphics and Corsair vengeance RGB pro ddr4 memory optimized verizon it also

74
00:05:23,360 --> 00:05:30,400
comes with an elgato 4k60 pro video capture card for high definition

75
00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:34,800
streaming as well as dynamic RGB lighting for great looks learn more at

76
00:05:32,479 --> 00:05:39,199
the link down below so thanks for watching guys like dislike check out our

77
00:05:37,440 --> 00:05:42,800
other videos and leave a comment if you have a suggestion for a future fast as

78
00:05:41,039 --> 00:05:46,560
possible we love making videos about your suggestions it saves us a lot of

79
00:05:44,479 --> 00:05:50,720
work coming up with ideas also don't forget to subscribe or all of your

80
00:05:48,240 --> 00:05:54,560
zippers will fail they'll all fail every zipper on every article of clothing and

81
00:05:52,560 --> 00:05:59,039
every backpack you own will stop working immediately if you don't subscribe to

82
00:05:56,240 --> 00:05:59,039
techwiki
