1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,880
the way I see it if you want to use the heated seats in your car you should just

2
00:00:04,020 --> 00:00:10,620
pay extra to activate them high beam assist just twist the iDrive dial after

3
00:00:09,059 --> 00:00:13,920
swiping your credit card in the convenient little reader down here I

4
00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:18,720
mean don't get me wrong I know this stuff was already in the car you paid

5
00:00:15,960 --> 00:00:24,720
for I just love the convenience of unlocking things later for more money

6
00:00:20,760 --> 00:00:26,640
thanks Big Otto said no one ever but at

7
00:00:24,720 --> 00:00:32,099
least when it comes to cars the only hurdle is the paywall Intel on the other

8
00:00:30,240 --> 00:00:36,960
hand has sort of been doing this for years except worse because in order to

9
00:00:34,739 --> 00:00:42,660
get access to those hidden features in your CPU you often need to buy outright

10
00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:44,820
different Hardware up front with no way

11
00:00:42,660 --> 00:00:51,600
to unlock them after the fact in today's case we want access to that sweet sweet

12
00:00:48,300 --> 00:00:53,820
ECC or error correcting memory that will

13
00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:59,480
give our 12th gen core processor an extra stability boost but we cannot has

14
00:00:56,879 --> 00:01:06,540
it unless we buy their special workstation grade motherboard with the

15
00:01:02,039 --> 00:01:07,860
w680 chipset which is like what 500 for

16
00:01:06,540 --> 00:01:13,680
a motherboard thing better be very special and very

17
00:01:10,860 --> 00:01:17,400
worth it like our sponsor build Redux build Redux makes it easy to configure

18
00:01:15,540 --> 00:01:20,220
your new build with support guides to help along the way they also offer

19
00:01:18,900 --> 00:01:26,700
competitive pricing as compared to building a PC yourself so head to build redux.com Linus and start your new build

20
00:01:24,479 --> 00:01:32,100
today this little guy is really cool it's got the ability to use either

21
00:01:28,500 --> 00:01:34,619
regular unbuffered memory modules or ECC

22
00:01:32,100 --> 00:01:39,360
modules but only if you shell out anywhere from two to three hundred

23
00:01:36,900 --> 00:01:46,259
dollars more for a w680 chipset motherboard in our case the Gigabyte

24
00:01:42,439 --> 00:01:49,740
mw34-sp0 but why this consumer grade

25
00:01:46,259 --> 00:01:52,200
board has the exact same CPU socket with

26
00:01:49,740 --> 00:01:57,600
the same copper traces connected to the same ddr4 dim slots and as The Savvy

27
00:01:55,979 --> 00:02:02,880
among you will know the memory controller is baked right into the CPU

28
00:02:00,180 --> 00:02:08,759
these days not the motherboard chipset so how is it that a motherboard could

29
00:02:05,759 --> 00:02:14,060
prevent you from taking this stick of ECC RAM and putting it into a z690 board

30
00:02:14,580 --> 00:02:21,360
the answer is Intel Intel prevents you and unfortunately this isn't exactly a

31
00:02:19,860 --> 00:02:26,700
new business practice from them let's take a little trip down memory lane to

32
00:02:23,340 --> 00:02:28,940
2010 and the first upgradeable Intel

33
00:02:26,700 --> 00:02:35,160
processor the Pentium g6951 nice out of the box it was a two

34
00:02:32,640 --> 00:02:40,140
core two-thread desktop chip with three megabytes of level 3 cash pretty

35
00:02:37,379 --> 00:02:45,300
pedestrian even for the time but the big selling feature was that for an extra 50

36
00:02:42,239 --> 00:02:47,879
bucks you could upgrade both the Chip's

37
00:02:45,300 --> 00:02:53,160
cash and hyper threading capabilities turning it into a g6952 even nicer now

38
00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:58,080
some of you might be thinking well hey that's kind of great isn't it I can save

39
00:02:55,920 --> 00:03:03,840
a buck today and then I can upgrade it later without tearing apart my PC or

40
00:03:00,599 --> 00:03:07,080
taking it to the Geek Squad and you're

41
00:03:03,840 --> 00:03:08,940
right seriously for many people I could

42
00:03:07,080 --> 00:03:13,560
actually see this kind of after the fact upgradeability being not only a

43
00:03:11,040 --> 00:03:18,000
non-issue but even a good thing but I'm not most people let's go back to

44
00:03:16,019 --> 00:03:22,860
cars for a moment many of them have Governors or limiters that cap their

45
00:03:20,459 --> 00:03:26,220
maximum speed and these days they're typically way higher than you should

46
00:03:24,300 --> 00:03:31,980
ever drive on a public road for example in the UK most cars are limited to about

47
00:03:28,340 --> 00:03:35,159
155 miles per hour so most people are

48
00:03:31,980 --> 00:03:37,620
pretty indifferent to them but I also

49
00:03:35,159 --> 00:03:41,400
understand the car enthusiasts who feel like well damn it if I paid for the

50
00:03:39,780 --> 00:03:45,120
whole speedometer then I should be allowed to use it you even if it is only

51
00:03:43,739 --> 00:03:49,860
on track days and that's exactly how I feel about

52
00:03:47,220 --> 00:03:54,060
Electronics if it was already Factory validated to handle the additional

53
00:03:51,599 --> 00:03:59,280
strain whether it's a clock speed Target or a feature then darn it it should be

54
00:03:57,180 --> 00:04:03,780
accessible I mean imagine this in other Industries you buy a backpack from

55
00:04:01,200 --> 00:04:07,920
lttstore.com and half the pockets won't open until you send us another

56
00:04:05,159 --> 00:04:11,400
micropayment I mean to be clear it's a great product and frankly it would still

57
00:04:09,540 --> 00:04:17,519
hold a lot of stuff but have you not already spent enough and in the Pentium

58
00:04:14,659 --> 00:04:22,560
g6951s case we were talking about hyper threading on a dual core chip where it

59
00:04:19,859 --> 00:04:27,660
really does make a huge difference to be clear it's normal to bin

60
00:04:26,340 --> 00:04:32,400
processors according to their capabilities and then turn around and

61
00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:37,199
sell the same silicon at a bunch of different price points in fact around

62
00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:41,520
that same time AMD had tri-core processors in their lineup that were

63
00:04:39,180 --> 00:04:45,780
just quad core processors with one of the cores disabled

64
00:04:42,960 --> 00:04:52,259
the big difference though is that AMD allowed you to play silicon roulette and

65
00:04:48,900 --> 00:04:54,000
turn the extra core on sometimes yeah it

66
00:04:52,259 --> 00:04:57,780
was unstable the thing really was defective but sometimes you got free

67
00:04:56,699 --> 00:05:02,699
real estate good guy AMD enough about ancient history though

68
00:05:01,139 --> 00:05:08,340
let's turn our attention back to the paywall du jour ECC memory on Intel's

69
00:05:05,580 --> 00:05:12,419
12th gen CPU most people think it doesn't matter for gaming rigs but do

70
00:05:10,259 --> 00:05:17,160
they actually know that or have they just bought into the marketing error

71
00:05:14,759 --> 00:05:20,100
correction code or ECC memory is more important than you might think and

72
00:05:18,660 --> 00:05:24,660
there's a reason that it's used in servers around the world the difference

73
00:05:22,020 --> 00:05:30,900
between these two modules the non-ecc and ecc-1 lies primarily in this extra

74
00:05:28,380 --> 00:05:36,660
chip of dram on either side of the stick it acts as a parity check that says hey

75
00:05:34,500 --> 00:05:41,460
all of these bits are valid you're good to go before passing data back and forth

76
00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:46,560
between the RAM and the CPU we explain this in a bit more depth in our last ECC

77
00:05:43,560 --> 00:05:49,080
video but essentially bits can flip

78
00:05:46,560 --> 00:05:53,820
spontaneously and cause soft errors like data corruption or crashes if they

79
00:05:51,300 --> 00:05:58,860
aren't detected and corrected there are a few factors that affect the soft error

80
00:05:56,160 --> 00:06:04,500
rate of memory notable ones include the capacity speed and density all of which

81
00:06:02,639 --> 00:06:10,080
will increase the probability of bit flips as they go up and unfortunately

82
00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:16,259
for us or fortunately I suppose for our gaming FPS RAM does keep getting bigger

83
00:06:13,080 --> 00:06:18,120
faster and denser so perhaps the more

84
00:06:16,259 --> 00:06:24,300
relevant study was one done by Google that showed that roughly 32 percent of

85
00:06:21,479 --> 00:06:29,460
all servers and eight percent of all dims experienced at least one memory

86
00:06:27,360 --> 00:06:33,720
error per year now fortunately for them they were servers and they were using

87
00:06:31,380 --> 00:06:39,360
ECC so these errors were caught and corrected before they could bung up your

88
00:06:35,819 --> 00:06:40,979
YouTube so so so so so so so clearly

89
00:06:39,360 --> 00:06:45,419
there's a valid argument to be made for ECC in modern computers what's the

90
00:06:43,680 --> 00:06:50,699
drawback then there are actually a couple first up is that using ECC memory

91
00:06:48,000 --> 00:06:54,840
in our system did result in lower Benchmark results across the board

92
00:06:52,259 --> 00:06:58,259
compared to regular gaming RAM even running at the same frequency our

93
00:06:56,819 --> 00:07:03,840
crucial ballistics RAM managed performance anywhere from the same to as

94
00:07:00,600 --> 00:07:05,699
much as 20 percent higher than our safe

95
00:07:03,840 --> 00:07:10,440
and stable choice and there's also the small matter of

96
00:07:08,100 --> 00:07:16,139
price while they do use the same commodity chips ECC modules legitimately

97
00:07:13,979 --> 00:07:22,259
cost more to manufacture than typical dims because of those extra parity chips

98
00:07:19,139 --> 00:07:25,319
so this is not just paywall BS with that

99
00:07:22,259 --> 00:07:27,840
said we're talking at best a 12 increase

100
00:07:25,319 --> 00:07:32,520
in materials cost and as for the performance issue well nothing would

101
00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:37,740
actually prevent a memory manufacturer from designing and building higher

102
00:07:34,680 --> 00:07:39,960
performance ECC modules in fact mushkin

103
00:07:37,740 --> 00:07:43,860
does just that and their pricing is pretty reasonable for them kind of like

104
00:07:41,639 --> 00:07:47,759
Floatplane.com which has exclusives like this extra footage from the build with

105
00:07:45,360 --> 00:07:53,280
my sister the big question then is why aren't we all using ECC and basically

106
00:07:51,360 --> 00:07:58,020
it's because Intel decided that consumers either didn't need it or

107
00:07:55,740 --> 00:08:02,639
couldn't afford it and artificially locked the feature to their business

108
00:07:59,759 --> 00:08:07,560
class products for decades the only real difference now is that it's more obvious

109
00:08:05,220 --> 00:08:12,120
now that they've dropped the facade of having parallel Xeon and core branded

110
00:08:10,080 --> 00:08:17,580
product lines that use the exact same silicon but have overclocking and ECC

111
00:08:15,479 --> 00:08:24,900
support as their main differentiating features however the uncomfortable truth

112
00:08:21,419 --> 00:08:27,660
is that Intel really isn't that wrong

113
00:08:24,900 --> 00:08:31,860
about this most consumer desktops are far more likely to crash because of a

114
00:08:29,400 --> 00:08:36,719
Windows update or a driver error Than A Memory bit flip and consumers have shown

115
00:08:34,080 --> 00:08:40,800
time and time again that they would rather save a buck than invest in

116
00:08:38,399 --> 00:08:45,620
Mission critical features like redundant power supplies and ECC

117
00:08:43,020 --> 00:08:51,899
which raises a pretty important question are paywalls actually a better solution

118
00:08:49,260 --> 00:08:57,000
Intel showed us a special motherboard in their Testing Lab that could have its

119
00:08:53,640 --> 00:08:59,100
chipset ID reconfigured on the Fly and

120
00:08:57,000 --> 00:09:03,120
if you could just change your mind and you wanted to overclocking support a

121
00:09:00,839 --> 00:09:08,519
year later wouldn't it be kinda awesome to add the K designation after the fact

122
00:09:06,360 --> 00:09:12,420
I mean if only a fraction of the buyers of a product will use a given feature

123
00:09:10,200 --> 00:09:16,740
doesn't it kind of make sense that they should be the ones to pay for it even if

124
00:09:14,399 --> 00:09:21,000
the cost is disproportionately high this is the defense that I usually see

125
00:09:18,779 --> 00:09:26,339
for Tesla's heated rear seat option in the model 3. it simplifies manufacturing

126
00:09:23,880 --> 00:09:30,360
to just put it in every car they say and that way only the people who buy it end

127
00:09:28,440 --> 00:09:34,380
up covering the cost allowing Tesla to hit a more aggressive base model price

128
00:09:31,920 --> 00:09:40,380
point for everyone else so who cares they say well I do just because a

129
00:09:37,980 --> 00:09:45,660
decision makes business sense doesn't mean that we should lie down and take it

130
00:09:42,240 --> 00:09:46,680
if it is actually a negligible cost to

131
00:09:45,660 --> 00:09:50,760
the point where they're just going to put the seat heating Hardware in every

132
00:09:48,660 --> 00:09:58,320
single car it is then it should just be active on a

133
00:09:54,240 --> 00:10:02,399
forty thousand dollar car just like ECC

134
00:09:58,320 --> 00:10:04,260
should be active on my 500 CPU and

135
00:10:02,399 --> 00:10:09,420
that's without requiring an additional couple hundred bucks for the arbitrary

136
00:10:06,779 --> 00:10:13,560
workstation board that to its credit worked well in our testing but is

137
00:10:11,580 --> 00:10:19,320
missing features that I might care about as a consumer like better IO better vrms

138
00:10:17,160 --> 00:10:24,120
or even aesthetic gimmicks like RGB lighting headers the very worst part of

139
00:10:21,360 --> 00:10:30,720
all of this is that AMD has already shown Intel the path forward Intel just

140
00:10:27,120 --> 00:10:32,820
refuses to take it for years AMD has

141
00:10:30,720 --> 00:10:38,160
taken actually a very similar stance that ECC is a workstation and server

142
00:10:36,300 --> 00:10:43,560
class feature that general consumers probably don't need they only validate

143
00:10:41,339 --> 00:10:47,880
it on their professional products the difference is that like that third core

144
00:10:46,019 --> 00:10:52,860
unlocking situation they haven't outright disabled the function on their

145
00:10:50,040 --> 00:10:56,760
consumer CPUs and chipsets this allows their ecosystem Partners like

146
00:10:54,480 --> 00:11:01,560
motherboard makers to activate it should they choose and this is the best of both

147
00:10:59,160 --> 00:11:06,480
worlds because it gives businesses a validated solution one that they will

148
00:11:03,779 --> 00:11:12,959
pay extra for AMD server CPU sales are clearly doing just fine while still

149
00:11:09,720 --> 00:11:15,779
giving consumers the choice to Save A

150
00:11:12,959 --> 00:11:20,040
Buck or seek out an ECC compatible motherboard and ECC RAM whether it's

151
00:11:18,300 --> 00:11:25,019
because they're sticklers for stability or because they are repurposing their

152
00:11:22,440 --> 00:11:29,760
gaming CPU years down the line as a home storage server which has a clear E-Waste

153
00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:33,839
reduction benefit the ECC controversy though is arguably coming to a close now

154
00:11:32,100 --> 00:11:39,779
that we're moving on to ddr5 which contains eight ECC bits per Channel

155
00:11:36,660 --> 00:11:42,000
but my main point here is not the ECC

156
00:11:39,779 --> 00:11:46,260
memory my main point is that there are many examples of this practice of

157
00:11:43,920 --> 00:11:51,899
locking performance or features behind additional paywalls be it GPU driver

158
00:11:48,779 --> 00:11:54,120
features or overclocking support and as

159
00:11:51,899 --> 00:11:58,560
consumers we should be thinking long and hard about whether it's something that

160
00:11:55,980 --> 00:12:04,680
we actually want before we stop making noise and just accept it like you accept

161
00:12:01,260 --> 00:12:06,360
the segue to our sponsor jackery jackery

162
00:12:04,680 --> 00:12:10,200
makes solar ready portable power stations designed to improve outdoor

163
00:12:08,339 --> 00:12:15,480
Life by providing power Outdoors whenever and wherever you need it the

164
00:12:12,779 --> 00:12:18,779
new solar generator 1000 Pro is their fastest solar and wall recharging

165
00:12:17,160 --> 00:12:23,399
generator yet boasting three times faster charging than the normal sg-1000

166
00:12:21,240 --> 00:12:27,720
it consists of a jackery Explorer 1000 Pro portable power station and 80 watt

167
00:12:25,740 --> 00:12:31,560
solar panels plug it into the wall and get a full charge in under two hours and

168
00:12:29,459 --> 00:12:35,880
deliver up to 100 watts of power thanks to the two 100 watt power delivery ports

169
00:12:33,959 --> 00:12:40,440
you can plug stuff into this thing check out the new jackery solar generator 1000

170
00:12:38,100 --> 00:12:42,600
pro at the link below thanks for watching if you liked this video check

171
00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:46,920
out the one where we talked about Microsoft's dirty practices and that

172
00:12:44,880 --> 00:12:48,990
whole Internet Explorer debacle
