1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:05,759
this is the fastest seat the fastest CP

2
00:00:03,300 --> 00:00:10,500
fastest CPU on the planet in the world in the world and why do I feel like this

3
00:00:08,280 --> 00:00:16,400
has happened before it's because AMD keeps doing this they're all new epic

4
00:00:13,500 --> 00:00:23,580
Genoa CPUs are available with up to 96. Zen 4 cores and a single socket they

5
00:00:20,400 --> 00:00:28,560
support up to six terabytes of ddr5

6
00:00:23,580 --> 00:00:31,320
memory and feature 128 Lanes of PCI

7
00:00:28,560 --> 00:00:35,340
Express Gen 5 connectivity there is quite literally nothing else in the

8
00:00:33,120 --> 00:00:40,440
world like it even the size it's absolutely monstrous and this video is

9
00:00:38,340 --> 00:00:47,100
sponsored by super micro Who provided not one but two servers rocking a total

10
00:00:44,160 --> 00:00:51,840
of three of these CPUs does the math even work out to on that that's like

11
00:00:49,260 --> 00:00:55,399
almost 300 cores we've got to break some World Records today ladies and gentlemen

12
00:01:02,180 --> 00:01:08,700
the first thing that's new about epic Genoa aside from everything is the

13
00:01:06,180 --> 00:01:11,939
socket like its predecessors it uses an LGA style socket meaning that the pins

14
00:01:10,500 --> 00:01:16,820
are built into the motherboard rather than the bottom of the CPU but unlike

15
00:01:14,159 --> 00:01:23,400
its predecessors it has a whopping 600 and 96 pins necessitating a massive

16
00:01:21,060 --> 00:01:27,840
landing pad on the motherboard and a seven screw hold down mechanism in order

17
00:01:25,740 --> 00:01:31,979
to make sure that even contact is made with all those little pins but they

18
00:01:30,479 --> 00:01:36,720
absolutely need them and the biggest reason they need them is that to keep

19
00:01:33,540 --> 00:01:39,799
those 96 cores fed with data and working

20
00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:43,079
efficiently aside from having

21
00:01:39,799 --> 00:01:45,780
384 megabytes of onboard cache epic

22
00:01:43,079 --> 00:01:52,680
Genoa features a not two not four not six but 12 channel ddr5 memory

23
00:01:49,740 --> 00:01:58,860
controller yeah it only runs at 4 800 Mega transfers per second but it's 12

24
00:01:55,259 --> 00:02:01,500
channels that is an effective 12 Xing of

25
00:01:58,860 --> 00:02:06,240
the bandwidth of a single module hey we never did the size comparison with an

26
00:02:03,240 --> 00:02:08,220
Intel Desktop CPU check this out look at

27
00:02:06,240 --> 00:02:11,220
it like a little baby we seem to have run into a problem already I cleaned all

28
00:02:09,720 --> 00:02:15,239
the thermal compound off of this when we disassembled the server earlier and I

29
00:02:13,739 --> 00:02:22,379
don't know if we have enough paste in this building feeling like at like X for extreme

30
00:02:19,980 --> 00:02:26,580
we just used half a tube of thermal paste you ain't building more than one

31
00:02:24,840 --> 00:02:31,860
server with one of these if you got a dual CPU system on that note super micro

32
00:02:29,700 --> 00:02:36,180
who sponsored this video has a whole lineup of Epic Genoa systems available

33
00:02:34,319 --> 00:02:40,200
right at launch everything from their Cloud DC Workhorse affordable systems

34
00:02:38,819 --> 00:02:44,459
like the one I'm working on right now all the way up to their hyper and GPU

35
00:02:42,660 --> 00:02:49,140
oriented servers which are for absolutely zero compromises performance

36
00:02:47,160 --> 00:02:54,599
I mean can you really say it's a compromise and performance if you have

37
00:02:50,459 --> 00:02:56,519
up to 192 CPU cores and up to 160 PCIe

38
00:02:54,599 --> 00:03:01,560
lanes and a single system you cannot even though AMD has switched

39
00:02:59,160 --> 00:03:05,760
to a heatsink actuated socket so that is to say screwing in the heatsink is what

40
00:03:03,599 --> 00:03:10,860
applies enough pressure to the CPU to make contact with the pins I Gotta Give

41
00:03:07,860 --> 00:03:12,659
Them credit for still having that tray

42
00:03:10,860 --> 00:03:17,640
and that holder to keep it in place because men when you install some of the

43
00:03:15,840 --> 00:03:24,540
competition CPUs where they don't have that retention it is scary

44
00:03:20,819 --> 00:03:26,280
oh wait okay this is bad CPU just lifted

45
00:03:24,540 --> 00:03:30,900
up quick note if it was important to have AMD's previous high performance

46
00:03:28,260 --> 00:03:34,980
sockets torqued correctly it is triply important to have these sockets torqued

47
00:03:32,940 --> 00:03:38,580
correctly because even one screw slightly over or under tightened is

48
00:03:37,019 --> 00:03:41,580
going to have the CPU sitting like this in the socket that's going to be a real

49
00:03:40,019 --> 00:03:46,500
bad time you can have everything from memory channels not detected to flaky

50
00:03:43,860 --> 00:03:50,760
PCI Express Behavior to A system that doesn't boot at all one of the drawbacks

51
00:03:48,900 --> 00:03:53,879
of having a 12 channel memory controller is that if you want to get the maximum

52
00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:59,580
performance out of your system you better be ready to install a lot of memory sticks which isn't to say that

53
00:03:57,239 --> 00:04:02,819
you have to use 12 though if you want to do less than that I would strongly

54
00:04:01,080 --> 00:04:07,560
recommend checking AMD's documentation because it is not as simple as just

55
00:04:05,220 --> 00:04:12,540
popping sticks in wherever you want oh this is the first time I've been hands

56
00:04:09,120 --> 00:04:15,599
on with a ddr5 server module now regular

57
00:04:12,540 --> 00:04:18,720
ddr5 has a form of error checking and

58
00:04:15,599 --> 00:04:22,440
correction or ECC but it's only handled

59
00:04:18,720 --> 00:04:25,320
at the Die Level whereas a full ECC

60
00:04:22,440 --> 00:04:33,180
module is going to have to have an extra die for every eight which actually is

61
00:04:29,940 --> 00:04:35,460
not how this is configured these have 10

62
00:04:33,180 --> 00:04:42,540
packages per side so do they actually have

63
00:04:38,240 --> 00:04:44,220
two ECC packages per eight after a bit

64
00:04:42,540 --> 00:04:49,080
of off-camera research it seems to be related to the way that individual ddr5

65
00:04:46,620 --> 00:04:53,580
memory dies operate more like two previous generation dies meaning that

66
00:04:51,180 --> 00:05:00,120
instead of needing one chip per group of eight you need one chip per group of

67
00:04:56,280 --> 00:05:01,800
four so these are fully proper ECC dimms

68
00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:06,419
that will protect data even when it's in flight there's some other differences

69
00:05:03,300 --> 00:05:09,000
too just like consumer ddr5 modules the

70
00:05:06,419 --> 00:05:13,139
power management IC or pmic is built into the module rather than into the

71
00:05:10,860 --> 00:05:16,919
motherboard but unlike consumer modules the notch is in a different place

72
00:05:14,820 --> 00:05:22,199
meaning that you won't be able to have a motherboard that will support both

73
00:05:18,860 --> 00:05:25,139
unbuffered and ECC memory at least as

74
00:05:22,199 --> 00:05:28,919
far as I can tell this is all very very new at the moment before we go too much

75
00:05:27,419 --> 00:05:32,940
further and start covering things up now is the perfect opportunity to talk not

76
00:05:30,720 --> 00:05:37,380
just about the performance but also the flexibility a platform like epic Genoa

77
00:05:35,580 --> 00:05:43,199
provides I mentioned already that each of these CPUs supports up to 128 Lanes

78
00:05:40,380 --> 00:05:47,600
of PCI Express gen 5. that means even on a basic server from Super micros Cloud

79
00:05:45,300 --> 00:05:54,000
DC lineup you are looking at an utterly unbelievable amount of connectivity this

80
00:05:50,639 --> 00:05:55,919
one alone we've got dual ocp 3.0 cards

81
00:05:54,000 --> 00:06:02,580
which are typically used for networking we've got these cxl slots okay each of

82
00:05:58,979 --> 00:06:04,500
these running at pciegen 5x16 and cxl is

83
00:06:02,580 --> 00:06:08,820
so cool it uses the same physical connections as PCI Express but a new

84
00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:13,860
protocol that allows you to do wild things like put a a separate memory

85
00:06:11,940 --> 00:06:19,740
controller into a slot in your computer and add a whole bunch more RAM to it

86
00:06:17,220 --> 00:06:23,639
like what and even if you fill all of this stuff up in a server like this one

87
00:06:21,840 --> 00:06:28,259
that's using three and a half inch Bays you are going to run out of slots before

88
00:06:25,979 --> 00:06:32,479
you're going to run out of PCIe lanes as you cram the front of it full of ssds

89
00:06:32,900 --> 00:06:39,180
now unfortunately PCI Express Gen 5 ssds

90
00:06:36,960 --> 00:06:44,340
haven't hit the market yet but when they do things are going to get really cool

91
00:06:41,280 --> 00:06:46,740
because instead of needing four lanes to

92
00:06:44,340 --> 00:06:50,819
get the most out of these ssds in non-performance critical applications

93
00:06:48,539 --> 00:06:55,319
like say it's more about capacity you're going to be able to take just two Gen 5

94
00:06:53,400 --> 00:07:00,720
lanes and get the same performance you would have gotten from four Gen 4 Lanes

95
00:06:58,139 --> 00:07:06,360
just one generation ago and what was really mind-blowing for me thinking

96
00:07:02,340 --> 00:07:09,900
about how fast PCI Express Gen 5 is a

97
00:07:06,360 --> 00:07:15,380
single PCIe Gen 5 Lane is the same speed

98
00:07:09,900 --> 00:07:15,380
as a 16x slot of PCIe gen 1.

99
00:07:16,199 --> 00:07:22,319
I think size doesn't matter that much Yvonne you're watching this right look

100
00:07:20,340 --> 00:07:27,060
they can't even put full-size slots on the board they just got these 8X are

101
00:07:24,720 --> 00:07:30,660
those 8X I think they're 8X and this has applications outside of just storage as

102
00:07:29,039 --> 00:07:35,940
well say for example we were going to take this PCIe gen 5x16 slot right here

103
00:07:33,780 --> 00:07:43,380
and plug a you know daughter board or mezzanine card into it we could plug in

104
00:07:38,639 --> 00:07:46,139
literally four PCIe gen 4x8 cards and

105
00:07:43,380 --> 00:07:49,259
have all of them run at full freaking speed

106
00:07:47,400 --> 00:07:53,520
that's wild well you need a pretty complex PCIe switch to go back to Gen 4

107
00:07:51,840 --> 00:07:57,120
and have that full bandwidth but but that's not the point the point is that

108
00:07:55,199 --> 00:08:01,919
outside of storage and networking almost nothing needs Gen 5 bandwidth anyway and

109
00:08:00,060 --> 00:08:06,240
you can see super micro knows that so this is just a simple daughter board

110
00:08:03,360 --> 00:08:13,259
that is absolutely covered in Gen 5 Lanes we go from 16 to

111
00:08:09,800 --> 00:08:15,660
16 to 80 lanes and they figure this will

112
00:08:13,259 --> 00:08:18,060
probably be fine and they're probably right

113
00:08:16,560 --> 00:08:22,020
not that we're doing anything like that with it we're just using one of these

114
00:08:19,740 --> 00:08:28,680
slots for an RJ45 network card because we don't have the PC build corner wired

115
00:08:25,020 --> 00:08:30,479
up with qsfp which is with the network

116
00:08:28,680 --> 00:08:34,560
card that super micro sent over with this thing uses okay there's one more

117
00:08:33,060 --> 00:08:41,940
thing about this socket that I didn't tell you guys yet unlike AMD's previous

118
00:08:37,320 --> 00:08:44,760
server socket sp5 is rated for up to 400

119
00:08:41,940 --> 00:08:49,800
watts which is like what I thought Zen 4 was more efficient

120
00:08:46,380 --> 00:08:54,240
well yeah it is but we went from up to

121
00:08:49,800 --> 00:08:56,040
64 cores to up to 96 cores some

122
00:08:54,240 --> 00:09:00,720
concessions had to be made and that's why can I remind you again this is a

123
00:08:58,440 --> 00:09:06,300
cloud DC like Workhorse class server super micro is shipping 1200 watt

124
00:09:04,019 --> 00:09:11,459
redundant power supplies in a server that's not even designed for GPU use

125
00:09:08,240 --> 00:09:13,560
spicy look how long this thing is not

126
00:09:11,459 --> 00:09:16,080
that it's about length Yvonne you're watching this right it's

127
00:09:14,820 --> 00:09:21,480
not about length but is it longer than a 40 90. oh

128
00:09:19,320 --> 00:09:24,320
40 90 for scale okay

129
00:09:22,680 --> 00:09:30,720
let's fire this thing up we have a liftoff now for best possible

130
00:09:28,980 --> 00:09:35,459
cooling we're going to want to put the top cover on this because otherwise

131
00:09:32,399 --> 00:09:38,519
these fans instead of drawing air across

132
00:09:35,459 --> 00:09:41,160
these NVMe drives and blowing it through

133
00:09:38,519 --> 00:09:46,380
the CPU heatsink they're just drawing air from here and blowing it out here

134
00:09:42,839 --> 00:09:48,959
also that's really annoying

135
00:09:46,380 --> 00:09:53,880
that's a little better three hours later no but in all seriousness at the moment

136
00:09:51,779 --> 00:09:59,519
epic Genoa takes about 10 minutes to boot up but AMD says they

137
00:09:56,640 --> 00:10:03,060
are working on that so good

138
00:10:00,600 --> 00:10:07,620
gotta get that memory training going hey hey

139
00:10:05,040 --> 00:10:11,459
we had time to go get monitors plug them all in get

140
00:10:09,420 --> 00:10:15,120
all the network and we're only halfway there oh good

141
00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:20,100
since we're still waiting we might as well take this opportunity to talk about

142
00:10:16,920 --> 00:10:22,560
one of Super micro's Hyper servers the

143
00:10:20,100 --> 00:10:28,140
main difference between Cloud DC and Hyper platform servers is that instead

144
00:10:24,959 --> 00:10:31,860
of one CPU with up to 96 cores you've

145
00:10:28,140 --> 00:10:33,680
got up to two CPUs with up to 96 cores

146
00:10:31,860 --> 00:10:41,519
that's right 192 cores that's

147
00:10:36,980 --> 00:10:44,760
384 threads and up to 12 terabytes of

148
00:10:41,519 --> 00:10:47,519
ddr5 memory you've also got okay you

149
00:10:44,760 --> 00:10:54,300
lose some of the PCIe lanes in CPU to CPU connectivity so 160 Lanes of PCIe

150
00:10:51,959 --> 00:10:59,339
Gen 5 and that means that whether you want to connect 10 flip and gpus to one

151
00:10:56,760 --> 00:11:04,260
of these things or many many additional nodes of storage devices

152
00:11:02,040 --> 00:11:07,740
they have got the horses one cool thing is that if you're more

153
00:11:05,820 --> 00:11:12,240
into compute than expansion you can configure the CPUs to allocate more of

154
00:11:09,899 --> 00:11:17,040
their PCIe Lanes to socket to socket communication leaving you only 128 Lanes

155
00:11:15,300 --> 00:11:21,839
but more bandwidth between your sockets

156
00:11:19,500 --> 00:11:23,820
indeed huh we're gonna try and put this in here

157
00:11:23,040 --> 00:11:30,959
um hmm hey did it finally boot yeah we're in

158
00:11:27,959 --> 00:11:33,420
Windows now that was literally over 15

159
00:11:30,959 --> 00:11:36,660
minutes we need something to put that GPU on because it's sitting a little

160
00:11:34,800 --> 00:11:39,920
funky what could go wrong huh

161
00:11:38,399 --> 00:11:45,720
perfect holy crap

162
00:11:43,019 --> 00:11:50,820
this is one CPU 96 cores I mean I only have 1.85

163
00:11:49,560 --> 00:11:55,680
gigahertz right now but they'll get faster what we're expecting is somewhere

164
00:11:53,220 --> 00:11:59,459
in the range of around 2.4 gigahertz when all cores are under load which

165
00:11:57,420 --> 00:12:04,019
means you actually kind of need to think carefully about your application when

166
00:12:01,440 --> 00:12:08,760
picking an epic Genoa processor if you want higher clock speeds you may not

167
00:12:06,480 --> 00:12:12,899
necessarily be better off with the the higher tier higher core chip one cool

168
00:12:11,459 --> 00:12:17,100
thing by the way about Super micro's Hyper lineup that we're not showing off

169
00:12:14,820 --> 00:12:22,260
very well is that compared to Cloud DC they are totally tool-less it's pretty

170
00:12:19,920 --> 00:12:26,940
nice when you got to work on a hundred of them so how will I use my Screwdriver

171
00:12:24,480 --> 00:12:30,779
from lttstore.com we ready

172
00:12:28,920 --> 00:12:36,720
boom well that's a disappointment JK JK JK I

173
00:12:34,980 --> 00:12:40,980
ran it in single core mode I actually just wanted to see what it would clock

174
00:12:38,040 --> 00:12:44,600
to and it looks like task manager is not going to give us a useful account of

175
00:12:42,720 --> 00:12:49,800
that so on here

176
00:12:46,500 --> 00:12:52,620
you don't have HW if I put it I I

177
00:12:49,800 --> 00:12:56,519
focused on the other server you focused because I had two of them oh he focused

178
00:12:54,480 --> 00:13:01,019
he says you should be thankful I got it I should be thankful Hardware info has

179
00:12:59,459 --> 00:13:05,279
either crashed or hung both times I've tried to launch it I'm not blaming them

180
00:13:02,940 --> 00:13:09,300
this is an extremely new platform I'm just saying we're not going to know

181
00:13:07,500 --> 00:13:15,079
exactly what frequency that chorus running at

182
00:13:10,980 --> 00:13:15,079
sorry here we go

183
00:13:15,240 --> 00:13:23,399
uh oh my goodness

184
00:13:18,959 --> 00:13:27,120
whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa whoa buddy

185
00:13:23,399 --> 00:13:29,160
to put it's done that's a 32 core

186
00:13:27,120 --> 00:13:34,740
threadripper with that tiny little blue bar 75

187
00:13:31,200 --> 00:13:36,899
000 and this is this is one chip

188
00:13:34,740 --> 00:13:42,540
now that's not that impressive compared to a threadripper which obviously will

189
00:13:39,180 --> 00:13:45,779
Turbo quite a bit higher but it's just

190
00:13:42,540 --> 00:13:48,600
one it's just one we can have

191
00:13:45,779 --> 00:13:51,899
two think this one's done booting up now is it is it in have we hacked the

192
00:13:50,519 --> 00:13:57,480
Mainframe are we getting the Windows spinny unfortunately our RTX 49d

193
00:13:54,600 --> 00:14:01,860
experiment did not work it's not showing up we did manage to get a Quadro GPU

194
00:14:00,060 --> 00:14:05,880
working earlier but we're not going to break any world records with that so

195
00:14:03,600 --> 00:14:13,079
we're going to focus on CPU performance for the time being starting of course

196
00:14:08,639 --> 00:14:15,500
with cinebench but now with two 96 core

197
00:14:13,079 --> 00:14:21,540
CPUs 384 threads

198
00:14:18,660 --> 00:14:25,740
and two sockets they completely break the UI

199
00:14:23,100 --> 00:14:30,660
look at this you have to scroll it's full screen and you have to scroll look

200
00:14:27,899 --> 00:14:34,500
at the L3 cache oh shoot I had level three Cash on the Mind earlier when I

201
00:14:32,700 --> 00:14:40,740
said these things had three quarters of a gig of cash no no they've got almost

202
00:14:36,779 --> 00:14:43,860
an entire Gigabyte of cash the 768 Megs

203
00:14:40,740 --> 00:14:47,459
is just level three this thing has more

204
00:14:43,860 --> 00:14:49,920
cash than my first gaming system had RAM

205
00:14:47,459 --> 00:14:56,459
we've got a problem this is only running 256 of our

206
00:14:54,199 --> 00:15:01,800
368 threads I didn't think about that but cinebench

207
00:14:59,279 --> 00:15:07,560
actually has a thread count limit we only got 82 000 points

208
00:15:04,740 --> 00:15:12,839
now hold on just a gosh darn minute here is there a quick and easy way for us to

209
00:15:09,839 --> 00:15:14,339
turn off smt oh no oh my God we have to

210
00:15:12,839 --> 00:15:18,120
reboot we're not rebooting we're gonna find other benchmarks to run time to

211
00:15:16,680 --> 00:15:22,500
Benchmark pie for those unfamiliar why cruncher

212
00:15:20,100 --> 00:15:26,639
calculates Pi up to what is this two quadrillion decimal places we have

213
00:15:24,720 --> 00:15:30,899
absolutely no idea what we're doing which is why it'll be so embarrassing

214
00:15:28,980 --> 00:15:35,160
when we're at the top of the league enter your choice Benchmark pie one

215
00:15:33,600 --> 00:15:39,540
multi-threaded okay so we need two and a half billion

216
00:15:37,680 --> 00:15:45,660
seven or nine no we'll do seven we're going for seven let's go one moment

217
00:15:42,360 --> 00:15:47,160
please wow it's done and the fans barely

218
00:15:45,660 --> 00:15:53,399
even kicked in holy crap

219
00:15:49,639 --> 00:15:55,199
15.783 seconds holy crap this is not

220
00:15:53,399 --> 00:15:59,699
just faster this is like

221
00:15:56,579 --> 00:16:02,880
half the time and this record was set

222
00:15:59,699 --> 00:16:05,100
back in December of 2021 okay how do we

223
00:16:02,880 --> 00:16:12,240
submit a score I have no idea we're logged into hardware bot Linus Tech 6969

224
00:16:08,880 --> 00:16:14,579
and wait what invalid data file but

225
00:16:12,240 --> 00:16:19,320
unable to encrypt the what what I'm able to encrypt what it's a text file what

226
00:16:17,399 --> 00:16:24,180
does it say in the instructions blah blah blah blah blah blah well I have no

227
00:16:21,779 --> 00:16:29,279
idea this is not encrypted you guys saw it it's fast this video is wrong past

228
00:16:27,240 --> 00:16:33,180
Linus we moved the server over to the server room and we are remote into it

229
00:16:31,199 --> 00:16:37,620
right now using super micro's integrated ipmi KVM and all we're gonna do is Click

230
00:16:36,240 --> 00:16:43,800
right here and ready ready wait for it

231
00:16:40,079 --> 00:16:46,980
bloody hell where is it yeah there it is

232
00:16:43,800 --> 00:16:48,959
go Team Canada not only do we have the

233
00:16:46,980 --> 00:16:54,899
record in this No Holds Barred competition but we are holding it by

234
00:16:51,300 --> 00:16:57,300
nearly half the time but one record is

235
00:16:54,899 --> 00:17:01,199
not enough for us that's why we installed Ubuntu and fired up the

236
00:16:59,639 --> 00:17:03,919
faronix test Suite where we will be benchmarking I don't know why don't we

237
00:17:02,940 --> 00:17:11,900
start with x264 ah boss first four okay

238
00:17:08,660 --> 00:17:15,740
winner dinner

239
00:17:11,900 --> 00:17:19,980
made of chicken

240
00:17:15,740 --> 00:17:23,880
uh can chickens here's what we're going

241
00:17:19,980 --> 00:17:26,640
for the number to beat is 75 frames per

242
00:17:23,880 --> 00:17:30,179
second average for this test we compare results on open benchmarking.org which

243
00:17:28,679 --> 00:17:35,160
isn't a competitive site like hardware bot but it does show us the top result

244
00:17:32,520 --> 00:17:41,280
which was a dual 32 core epic system that managed 75 frames per second plus

245
00:17:37,919 --> 00:17:43,860
or minus two where are we at here 108

246
00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:50,760
frames per second see you later record goodbye

247
00:17:45,200 --> 00:17:54,000
box plot of samples old line new line

248
00:17:50,760 --> 00:17:56,880
yes I certainly would like to upload

249
00:17:54,000 --> 00:18:00,720
this now it's time to take a run at John the Ripper which is a password cracking

250
00:17:59,340 --> 00:18:04,260
benchmark recently saved to enter a name of the

251
00:18:02,760 --> 00:18:09,360
results file okay dinner fish winner delicious but

252
00:18:08,160 --> 00:18:17,160
fishy estimated time to completion four

253
00:18:11,640 --> 00:18:19,100
minutes no unacceptable wait am I

254
00:18:17,160 --> 00:18:23,400
reading this right 26 million I would like to upload it

255
00:18:22,679 --> 00:18:28,380
though see you later records previous winner

256
00:18:26,940 --> 00:18:34,160
fish dinner time to run blender let's go classroom

257
00:18:34,440 --> 00:18:42,960
let's see if we can cause some trouble on their site here we go estimated time to completion

258
00:18:39,419 --> 00:18:44,940
two minutes I doubt it 19 seconds is the

259
00:18:42,960 --> 00:18:51,960
time to beat for classroom oh crap my file name was too long

260
00:18:48,840 --> 00:18:53,100
um whoops oh crap I definitely broke

261
00:18:51,960 --> 00:18:59,940
some things um wait 21.9 seconds uncool

262
00:18:58,320 --> 00:19:03,840
uncool it's not that this system isn't ripping

263
00:19:01,799 --> 00:19:12,020
fast it's just that clearly someone with another dual 96 core test system got

264
00:19:06,780 --> 00:19:12,020
here first well it's a long day

265
00:19:12,299 --> 00:19:14,900
breaking record

266
00:19:16,620 --> 00:19:25,260
four seems seems pretty good in conclusion epic Genoa really fast super

267
00:19:23,039 --> 00:19:29,100
micro really cool hardware for epic Genoa check them out with the link down

268
00:19:27,000 --> 00:19:32,640
below if you guys enjoyed this video I think I probably recorded one of these

269
00:19:30,539 --> 00:19:36,780
before so let's just cut that back in if you guys enjoyed this video you might

270
00:19:34,020 --> 00:19:41,220
also enjoy the uh maybe more a structured platform overview that we did

271
00:19:38,460 --> 00:19:45,740
when AMD announced epic Genoa and you can check that out here here somewhere