WEBVTT

00:00:14.120 --> 00:00:21.119
this is a very special technology preview and while I will be doing an

00:00:18.359 --> 00:00:28.920
unboxing the monitor inside this box is an ASUS VG 248 QE that has been modified

00:00:25.840 --> 00:00:30.599
to have its scaler replaced by an NVIDIA

00:00:28.920 --> 00:00:35.040
g-sync module it is not a finished product and

00:00:33.280 --> 00:00:42.680
therefore we won't be evaluating the merits of this monitor specifically but

00:00:39.239 --> 00:00:44.480
rather the technology in general so

00:00:42.680 --> 00:00:50.680
without getting too Technical and boring here let's talk about what gsync is and

00:00:47.039 --> 00:00:52.840
why we need it a graphics card renders

00:00:50.680 --> 00:00:57.039
each frame of your game as fast as it possibly can then makes it available to

00:00:54.760 --> 00:01:02.600
your monitor monitors typically by contrast operate on fixed refresh interv

00:01:00.199 --> 00:01:07.200
they will grab whatever is available to them at the exact time that they are

00:01:04.479 --> 00:01:11.040
ready to refresh in a perfect world the video card would render exactly one

00:01:09.159 --> 00:01:15.920
frame just before the monitor was ready for each refresh and we'd see beautiful

00:01:13.280 --> 00:01:20.439
smooth animation the problem is that different frames in games can be

00:01:17.640 --> 00:01:24.720
rendered in different amounts of time looking at the floor for example is much

00:01:23.079 --> 00:01:29.000
less demanding than looking at a suddenly exploding vehicle that means

00:01:26.960 --> 00:01:33.520
that in the real world the frame rate output by your graphics card doesn't

00:01:31.320 --> 00:01:37.920
match the refresh rate of your monitor vsync or vertical sync forces the

00:01:36.360 --> 00:01:42.399
graphics card to wait around for the monitor to be ready before it sends a

00:01:40.320 --> 00:01:47.799
rendered frame with frames being delivered at even intervals animation

00:01:45.159 --> 00:01:53.439
appears a much smoother even if the frame rate isn't that great see 24 frame

00:01:51.040 --> 00:01:58.320
per second movies as an example this is great until something demanding comes on

00:01:55.600 --> 00:02:02.039
screen and the frame rate drops below the refresh rate of the monitor in most

00:01:59.960 --> 00:02:07.960
cases this will be 60 HZ when that happens one image will stay on screen

00:02:04.960 --> 00:02:10.520
for two whole monitor refreshes this is

00:02:07.960 --> 00:02:15.120
perceived as a stutter in the animation on top of that vsync also introduces

00:02:12.879 --> 00:02:19.280
additional input lag meaning that the delay between when you move your mouse

00:02:17.640 --> 00:02:23.440
and when the image on screen reflects your movement is increased some game

00:02:21.640 --> 00:02:28.239
engines handle this better than others but for example I just playe couldn't

00:02:25.720 --> 00:02:33.239
play Left 4 Dead with vsync on it was just too laggy so why not just turn

00:02:30.680 --> 00:02:38.239
vsync off well then we end up with a visual anomaly called tearing the GPU

00:02:36.080 --> 00:02:41.480
outputs a frame as soon as it's done but if the monitor is in the middle of

00:02:39.599 --> 00:02:45.599
drawing an image on the screen already we'll end up with multiple different

00:02:43.360 --> 00:02:50.360
frames on the screen at the same time this manifests as vertical objects being

00:02:48.040 --> 00:02:55.360
out of alignment in extreme examples like this one you can actually see more

00:02:52.920 --> 00:03:00.040
than two frames on screen at the same time in practice this is extremely

00:02:57.519 --> 00:03:04.280
distracting to look at but I like many gamers out there have simply learned to

00:03:02.200 --> 00:03:08.159
suck it up because I'd rather get screen updates as soon as they're available and

00:03:06.360 --> 00:03:13.239
have it look stupid rather than be looking at something pretty on my screen

00:03:10.040 --> 00:03:17.879
that happened a frame ago now on

00:03:13.239 --> 00:03:19.959
to this guy gsync it allows your monitor

00:03:17.879 --> 00:03:25.280
to wait for your graphics card to be ready to deliver a new frame and update

00:03:22.360 --> 00:03:29.920
itself at that exact moment this eliminates the lag and stuttering

00:03:27.239 --> 00:03:34.959
associated with vsync on and low frame rates and it eliminates the tearing

00:03:32.280 --> 00:03:38.959
associated with vsync off and high frame rates because we never need to Output

00:03:37.000 --> 00:03:43.519
multiple frames to the screen during a single refresh all right so it sounds

00:03:41.239 --> 00:03:48.120
magical what do I need well you'll need a gsync compatible graphics card a

00:03:45.439 --> 00:03:52.680
gtx650 TI booster higher has to be Kepler based until Maxwell launches next

00:03:50.040 --> 00:03:56.519
year you'll need a g-sync monitor like this one with the g-sync module built in

00:03:55.159 --> 00:04:02.519
although there may be some upgrades available for this particular model later on you know depending what happens

00:04:00.720 --> 00:04:06.000
you'll also need a DisplayPort connection on your graphics card a

00:04:04.159 --> 00:04:10.720
DisplayPort cable and you'll need to use the DisplayPort input on your

00:04:08.519 --> 00:04:16.199
monitor all right lonus so you're asking for a pretty big investment here show me

00:04:12.840 --> 00:04:17.799
what it can do well that's a problem I

00:04:16.199 --> 00:04:22.560
can't really show you because in order to experience the smoothness of g-sync

00:04:20.320 --> 00:04:27.240
every part of the chain needs to support it if I were to use a capture card or

00:04:24.440 --> 00:04:31.479
take a high-speed video of gsync running my capture card or camera would operate

00:04:28.919 --> 00:04:35.680
at exactly 60 FPS then it would be played back on your 60 HZ Monitor and

00:04:34.160 --> 00:04:39.960
you'd be able to see that there's no tearing but you'd see frame doubling

00:04:38.120 --> 00:04:44.120
during performance tips as if we were just recording gameplay with regular

00:04:41.639 --> 00:04:48.400
vsync on I could just record footage of games running with no tearing but that's

00:04:46.400 --> 00:04:52.919
only part of the experience you have to try it to really understand it I'm

00:04:51.080 --> 00:04:57.160
hoping to work with NVIDIA to do a live Meetup where viewers can come and try

00:04:55.240 --> 00:05:00.639
gsync for themselves but I think that's still a little ways off speaking of

00:04:59.240 --> 00:05:04.440
understanding g-sync there are some misconceptions about the technology that

00:05:03.000 --> 00:05:08.360
I would like to clear up things you don't even have to be there in person to

00:05:06.400 --> 00:05:13.479
understand so number one is that other than this particular model which has

00:05:10.039 --> 00:05:15.199
like a g-sync module DIY upgrade coming

00:05:13.479 --> 00:05:19.039
aftermarket modding of monitors to add the functionality is extremely

00:05:16.960 --> 00:05:23.319
improbable it would require extensive modifications to the monitor's internals

00:05:21.520 --> 00:05:27.440
and just someone figures it out great but I wouldn't count on it number two

00:05:25.639 --> 00:05:31.560
ASUS does not have any kind of exclusivity on gsync in 2014 I'm not

00:05:29.680 --> 00:05:37.120
sure where this came from number three g-sync will work on any panel size TVs

00:05:35.080 --> 00:05:41.800
monitors you name it it's a matter of time before we even start to see it on

00:05:39.120 --> 00:05:46.400
VR devices and phones and whatnot like kind mobile devices and stuff like that

00:05:43.800 --> 00:05:51.000
number four g-sync will work with light boost compatible monitors or with non-l

00:05:48.720 --> 00:05:54.960
Boost compatible monitors at this time g-sync and the low persistence mode that

00:05:53.600 --> 00:05:59.199
folks have been running on light boost monitors don't work at the same time but

00:05:57.319 --> 00:06:04.199
that may change in the future number five gsync will work on 60 HZ 120 HZ or

00:06:02.120 --> 00:06:10.080
whatever Hertz panels the fixed refresh rate of the monitor simply becomes the

00:06:06.400 --> 00:06:12.560
maximum refresh rate number five or six

00:06:10.080 --> 00:06:16.400
not sure g-sync will work with any panel resolution the sample here is 1080p but

00:06:14.759 --> 00:06:22.280
there's no reason g-sync couldn't work at 1440p or even 4K I've also had quite

00:06:19.720 --> 00:06:26.800
a few folks ask about g-sync on AMD and there are many conflicting reports but

00:06:24.759 --> 00:06:30.400
all I really have to say right now is that there's no real evidence that

00:06:28.440 --> 00:06:37.840
NVIDIA is planning to provide a license to AMD in any way shape or form last one

00:06:34.080 --> 00:06:40.479
is what about SLI and Surround SLI will

00:06:37.840 --> 00:06:44.400
work just fine in gsync the master card that is plugged into your display will

00:06:42.400 --> 00:06:49.360
dictate what refresh rate the monitor should run at and as for surround at

00:06:47.360 --> 00:06:53.160
this time it should be just fine if you have three matching monitors although

00:06:50.919 --> 00:06:56.879
there may be some driver reconfigure mation that may enable you to have

00:06:55.039 --> 00:07:00.039
g-sync here and not g-sync there but that's kind of up in the air at the

00:06:58.599 --> 00:07:04.360
moment so you've got most of the information now let's take a look at why

00:07:02.280 --> 00:07:09.240
I believe this will be extremely hard for NVIDIA to sell one day we're going

00:07:06.919 --> 00:07:13.360
to look back at non- g-sync monitors and we're going to laugh going back to

00:07:11.000 --> 00:07:17.759
tearing stuttering and leg will feel like ancient technology but with that

00:07:15.599 --> 00:07:22.240
said g-sync is going to be a tough sell for NVIDIA because we're all used to

00:07:19.879 --> 00:07:27.479
living without it let's look at another recent Paradigm shifting change in PC

00:07:24.840 --> 00:07:32.440
Hardware solid state drives at least with an SSD you can benchmark versus a

00:07:29.960 --> 00:07:36.879
hard drive and show people the numbers but even then many insisted well I don't

00:07:35.120 --> 00:07:42.560
mind waiting another two seconds blah blah blah it's expensive who cares but

00:07:39.800 --> 00:07:45.759
ask yourself this if you've gone SSD in the last couple of years in fact leave a

00:07:44.159 --> 00:07:50.199
comment on the video and tell me about this how hard is it when you have to go

00:07:48.680 --> 00:07:54.400
back and use a hard drive based system now particularly when it's not on a

00:07:52.400 --> 00:07:59.400
fresh OS and you have to do some real work on it that is how we're all going

00:07:57.080 --> 00:08:02.479
to feel about g-sync in a while so i' actually like to take a moment here to

00:08:00.639 --> 00:08:06.240
let lukee give his thoughts on g-sync so you can hear more than just my opinion

00:08:04.919 --> 00:08:11.000
the fact that we had one in house and we were able to try it was awesome when I

00:08:09.120 --> 00:08:14.520
finally got my hands on g-sync the first thing I did was grab a copy of

00:08:12.319 --> 00:08:18.360
Assassin's Creed 4 Black Flag and run around the abstergo hallways because in

00:08:16.479 --> 00:08:23.319
those hallways I found some of the worst tearing I've ever seen and I noticed

00:08:20.720 --> 00:08:27.639
with g-sync no tearing also no mouse input lag which is a big thing because

00:08:25.680 --> 00:08:31.440
with g-sync you're not compromising anything for the awesomeness of g-sync

00:08:29.280 --> 00:08:34.120
and I find that to be the biggest deal with g-sync I don't think a bunch of

00:08:32.959 --> 00:08:39.440
people are going to run out and get this but I think in the future it's going to be really nice because you can get all

00:08:37.479 --> 00:08:42.320
the awesomeness of these Technologies but you don't have to sacrifice lag

00:08:41.120 --> 00:08:46.720
which is a big reason why a lot of people don't run it so let's be clear

00:08:44.159 --> 00:08:50.600
guys this is just a tech preview it's not a full review but there are still

00:08:48.760 --> 00:08:53.560
some conclusions that we can draw so having tried it myself outside of

00:08:52.000 --> 00:08:57.640
NVIDIA's conference controlled environment and having talk to Luke

00:08:55.519 --> 00:09:02.760
about it off camera I think our feelings about it are fairly similar um I don't

00:09:00.200 --> 00:09:06.680
think everyone will or even necessarily should rush out and buy all the

00:09:04.839 --> 00:09:10.440
necessary components on the day they're available and completely replace

00:09:08.320 --> 00:09:13.720
perfectly good Hardware U some of the hardcore guys will and that's cool

00:09:12.399 --> 00:09:18.000
you're going to have a better gaming experience but I think that the more

00:09:15.680 --> 00:09:22.200
likely scenario is that the next time you're at a natural uh upgrade point for

00:09:20.440 --> 00:09:27.279
your monitor or your graphics card you're going to want to carefully

00:09:24.519 --> 00:09:32.120
consider gsync capability when you're making your purchasing decision uh at

00:09:29.720 --> 00:09:37.640
this point another very important conclusion is that I cannot recommend

00:09:35.160 --> 00:09:43.360
while I can't recommend a monitor to buy I can recommend what not to buy don't

00:09:40.600 --> 00:09:48.079
buy anything until quarter 1 next year when we have a clearer idea of what will

00:09:46.240 --> 00:09:51.560
or what won't be available with gsync because the most important thing here is

00:09:49.959 --> 00:09:56.360
to make sure that you're making an educated decision and right now we just

00:09:54.279 --> 00:09:58.760
don't quite know enough so stay tuned guys we're going to definitely have more

00:09:57.680 --> 00:10:02.600
content on this we're going to be covering at CES we're going to be

00:10:00.800 --> 00:10:06.399
covering it once there's retail availability of the proper finished

00:10:04.440 --> 00:10:09.279
hardware and as always guys like the video if you liked it dislike it if you

00:10:07.839 --> 00:10:14.040
disliked it leave a comment let me know how you felt about it and as always

00:10:11.160 --> 00:10:14.040
don't forget to

00:10:28.040 --> 00:10:33.320
subscribe a