WEBVTT

00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:07.040
AMD, I need you to try harder. I mean, it's not like you're actively

00:00:04.880 --> 00:00:12.320
antagonizing your partners, customers, and the media. That's more NVIDIA's jam.

00:00:09.840 --> 00:00:19.760
It's just that if you want to have your Ryzen moment in GPUs, now is the time to

00:00:16.720 --> 00:00:22.560
find the hunger that turned you from a

00:00:19.760 --> 00:00:28.320
player in the CPU space to the A player that you've become. I mean, don't get me

00:00:25.519 --> 00:00:33.520
wrong, the new Radeon 960 XT looks pretty good compared to NVIDIA's

00:00:30.240 --> 00:00:35.920
lukewarm 5060 series, and that might win

00:00:33.520 --> 00:00:40.960
you some sales, but I want you to look at the big picture. This is an

00:00:38.800 --> 00:00:46.079
opportunity while your main competitor is distracted by their rapidly growing

00:00:43.200 --> 00:00:52.000
AI business to change the perception of Radeon from that brand for scrub gamers

00:00:49.440 --> 00:00:57.120
to that brand that I never knew how much I liked until I tried it. It's an

00:00:54.399 --> 00:01:01.760
opportunity to build an army of loyal Radeon customers who through their sheer

00:00:59.600 --> 00:01:06.400
numbers will incentivize your board partners to build exciting solutions and

00:01:04.080 --> 00:01:10.640
incentivize developers to focus on Radeon when they're optimizing their

00:01:08.000 --> 00:01:14.400
games and software. But I'm getting ahead of myself a little bit. Adam just

00:01:12.720 --> 00:01:19.360
walked out of the keynote and he's got the details on everything from the new

00:01:16.479 --> 00:01:23.560
Radeon cards to AMD's fastest Thread Rippers ever. He's also got a segue to

00:01:22.479 --> 00:01:27.799
our sponsor. Touch me again. You're going to

00:01:25.520 --> 00:01:32.320
find out exactly who I am. I'm your sponsor, ODU. They have

00:01:30.479 --> 00:01:35.920
over 50 apps to help you cook up your business. Whether you want to put your

00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:42.240
hands on marketing, accounting, or even HR, they have you covered. The RX960 XT

00:01:39.920 --> 00:01:47.920
is AMD's attempt to appeal to gamers who reject NVIDIA's lackluster 8 GB cards

00:01:45.520 --> 00:01:52.880
while also offering a profit marginfriendly 8 GB option for

00:01:50.159 --> 00:01:56.720
shareholders. To their credit, unlike Team Green, who has a history of quietly

00:01:54.880 --> 00:02:02.079
downgrading their lower VRAMm variants in other ways, AMD has built both of

00:01:59.280 --> 00:02:08.879
these new cards using the same Na'vi 44 GPU with 32 compute units, up to 3.1 GHz

00:02:05.360 --> 00:02:12.400
boost clocks, and up to 821 AI tops

00:02:08.879 --> 00:02:14.640
running through a 16 lane PCIe Gen 5

00:02:12.400 --> 00:02:19.200
interface. Thank you AMD for understanding that budget cards often

00:02:16.879 --> 00:02:24.959
end up in budget systems with older gen PCIe slots and having those extra lanes

00:02:22.640 --> 00:02:30.400
makes a big difference in compensating for those lower speeds. Power targets

00:02:27.040 --> 00:02:33.120
are 150 and 180 watts for the 8 GB and

00:02:30.400 --> 00:02:40.280
16 GB cards respectively. And according to AMD, the 960 XT6 GB will be the

00:02:37.760 --> 00:02:44.480
world's best GPU under $350. and I'd like to believe them

00:02:42.560 --> 00:02:47.519
because is pretty dire for budget gamers right now, but there's a couple of red

00:02:45.920 --> 00:02:51.280
flags that I want to point out. AMD hasn't presented a clear path to ensure

00:02:48.959 --> 00:02:55.120
that the 960 XTs will be actually available at their MSRPs. And for

00:02:53.519 --> 00:02:59.440
another, I couldn't help but noting the way that AMD focused on comparisons

00:02:57.280 --> 00:03:04.560
between their 16 GB card and NVIDIA's 5060 Ti 8 GB. It's a valid comparison,

00:03:02.800 --> 00:03:09.360
and the numbers do look impressive with AMD claiming a roughly 15% better

00:03:06.879 --> 00:03:13.680
performance per dollar in raster and in rateracing at 1440p.

00:03:11.519 --> 00:03:21.480
How much of that margin comes from VRAM issues that will pop up on the 960 XT 8

00:03:17.040 --> 00:03:24.159
GB as well? Also, what is that? And

00:03:21.480 --> 00:03:28.480
hence, is that just three display outputs? AMD at least did confirm during

00:03:26.959 --> 00:03:35.760
the press briefing that these are DisplayPort 2.1A, UHPR 13.5, and HDMI

00:03:33.080 --> 00:03:41.120
2.1B. So, at least you'll be able to natively drive all but the highest

00:03:37.840 --> 00:03:42.640
bandwidth displays. And I guess if you

00:03:41.120 --> 00:03:46.959
really need more monitors, there's always DisplayPort multiream transport.

00:03:44.799 --> 00:03:52.000
But it just feels like a bit of a weird spot for them to cut costs. Although if

00:03:50.319 --> 00:03:59.280
it helps contribute to their competitive pricing, then maybe that's a good thing.

00:03:54.799 --> 00:04:01.120
Well, sort of. See, the 960 XT 16 gig is

00:03:59.280 --> 00:04:09.200
looking pretty good, undercutting the MSRP of the 5060Ti 16 gig and even the 8

00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:12.000
gig by 80 and $30, respectively. But the

00:04:09.200 --> 00:04:15.599
8 gig version of the 960 XT is stunningly

00:04:13.400 --> 00:04:20.239
non-competitive. Something that AMD tacitly acknowledges when they gave it

00:04:17.799 --> 00:04:25.259
approximately 2 seconds of screen time during their

00:04:26.919 --> 00:04:33.360
announcement. Yikes. I mean, sure, they

00:04:30.400 --> 00:04:37.680
price match NVIDIA's 5060, but this is exactly what I was getting at during the

00:04:35.199 --> 00:04:42.880
intro. price matching the guy that everyone hates for overcharging is not

00:04:40.400 --> 00:04:47.919
enough. And it doesn't seem like they're even trying to compete with Intel's B

00:04:45.120 --> 00:04:53.040
series GPUs. The whole thing even just feels like backwards progress compared

00:04:50.320 --> 00:04:58.520
to AMD's own lineup with gamers expected to pay $30 more than last gen's

00:04:56.000 --> 00:05:03.199
disappointing 8 gig card, the RX7600. Anyway, these cards will be

00:05:01.120 --> 00:05:07.440
launching on June 5th, so keep your eyes peeled for our upcoming coverage. While

00:05:05.520 --> 00:05:11.919
we don't know for sure if their prices will be fake, what we do know for sure

00:05:09.520 --> 00:05:15.759
is there will be fake frames. The latest version of FSR, AMD's AI upscaling tech,

00:05:14.160 --> 00:05:20.960
brought massive improvements earlier this year, and AMD plans to keep mining

00:05:18.080 --> 00:05:24.479
for extra performance with FSR Redstone, which focuses on improving path tracing

00:05:22.880 --> 00:05:28.160
workloads. Specifically, to demonstrate this, they showed off this unflattering

00:05:26.560 --> 00:05:33.199
demo that looks like it was ripped out of a Project Gotham Racing from Xbox 360

00:05:30.720 --> 00:05:37.120
era. Like I like, what is this? Why did Why does it look like this? I thought it

00:05:34.720 --> 00:05:42.560
was a tech demo. Anyways, the updates are one, neural radiance caching, which

00:05:40.320 --> 00:05:46.160
learns how light bounces within a scene to try and predict ray intersections

00:05:44.479 --> 00:05:49.840
before they happen. Two, ray regeneration, which is NVIDIA's ray

00:05:47.759 --> 00:05:53.680
reconstruction, but more AMD earer. Three, super resolution, which is super

00:05:51.919 --> 00:05:58.479
resolution. And four, frame gen, which is frame gen. Sounds

00:05:56.120 --> 00:06:04.560
cool. What would be cooler is having more games supporting the tech. Oh. Uh,

00:06:01.440 --> 00:06:06.720
okay. What next? We got AI. AI. Oh,

00:06:04.560 --> 00:06:12.639
right. Uh, new Threadripper. The king is back, baby. And the new Threadripper

00:06:08.880 --> 00:06:14.880
9000 lineup looks wild. While AMD isn't

00:06:12.639 --> 00:06:19.520
packing any more cores than last year, Shimata Peak seems to squeeze a lot of

00:06:17.440 --> 00:06:26.000
juice out of the move to AMD's more efficient Zen 5 architecture. Starting

00:06:21.840 --> 00:06:28.240
with a 300 MHz higher boost clock, which

00:06:26.000 --> 00:06:33.680
doesn't sound like much, but when it's across this many cores, it adds up to a

00:06:31.280 --> 00:06:37.759
lot. Now, if you were hoping for 3D Vcash on these models though, and let's

00:06:35.759 --> 00:06:42.080
be real, we were all hoping for 3D Vcash, you're going to have to keep

00:06:39.440 --> 00:06:47.360
waiting. But despite the minor changes to the on paper specs, AMD showed off a

00:06:45.199 --> 00:06:52.080
pretty decent performance uplift over their last gen Inbench before they

00:06:49.600 --> 00:06:56.960
pivoted to shaming Intel for a while. You know what? Fair enough AMD. Enjoy

00:06:54.720 --> 00:07:01.759
your victory lap. Now, naturally, given that these are workstation chips, AMD is

00:06:59.199 --> 00:07:05.599
also emphasizing how improved CPU performance will allow for improved AI

00:07:04.240 --> 00:07:10.479
performance when you're working with large models that require multiple GPUs,

00:07:08.000 --> 00:07:14.960
which is becoming more and more relevant as larger local models are gaining

00:07:12.680 --> 00:07:19.680
popularity. The best part, though, is these new chips are dropping compatible

00:07:17.120 --> 00:07:25.280
with existing 7000 series motherboards with just a BIOS update. Good guy AMD

00:07:23.440 --> 00:07:29.759
finally delivering on a Threadripper upgrade path just like we delivered

00:07:27.759 --> 00:07:33.479
these great cargo pants available in two inseam lengths for shorter and for

00:07:32.000 --> 00:07:38.000
taller kings ltstore.com. There is bad news though.

00:07:36.000 --> 00:07:41.759
If you want to get your fingers on a 96 core Threadripper Pro when they arrive

00:07:39.440 --> 00:07:45.599
in July, they will only be available through partners like Lenovo, meaning

00:07:43.599 --> 00:07:50.960
that enthusiasts are going to be stuck with the nonpro lineup that caps out at

00:07:48.000 --> 00:07:56.080
just 64 cores with fewer PCIe lanes, half the number of memory channels, and

00:07:52.880 --> 00:07:58.479
far less supported memory capacity. AMD

00:07:56.080 --> 00:08:03.919
has well and truly forgotten the Threadripper enthusiasts who supported them in

00:08:00.400 --> 00:08:06.240
the early days of Ryzen. Cool. Also,

00:08:03.919 --> 00:08:11.000
there's no pricing information today. It really is amazing how much AMD acts like

00:08:08.479 --> 00:08:16.080
Intel and NVIDIA when they are the top dog. Also coming to the workstation is

00:08:13.680 --> 00:08:20.240
some new AMD GPU tech. Earlier this week, we did a video on Intel's B60 GPU,

00:08:18.639 --> 00:08:24.560
and we talked about why it was their most important GPU yet, offering an

00:08:22.960 --> 00:08:29.280
affordable option for entry-level workstations that required certified

00:08:26.720 --> 00:08:34.000
drivers and creating a lowcost platform for running pretty large AI models

00:08:31.360 --> 00:08:39.200
locally. Meanwhile, AMD is hoping to wrigle their way into the ProGPU market

00:08:36.159 --> 00:08:43.039
by throwing a whopping 32 GB of VRAM on

00:08:39.200 --> 00:08:44.880
their new Radeon AI Pro R9700, a GPU

00:08:43.039 --> 00:08:48.000
name optimized for shareholder value. AMD is also making big strides to

00:08:46.640 --> 00:08:52.399
improve their software, bringing improved RockM support to Windows and

00:08:50.480 --> 00:08:56.880
Linux alike, which enables developers to bring their AI and HPC applications to

00:08:54.560 --> 00:09:00.160
Radeon. Get it away from CUDA is what they say. They say, "Please, please, no

00:08:58.399 --> 00:09:03.760
CUDA, sir." They didn't say how much this GPU would cost, but they did spend

00:09:02.160 --> 00:09:09.440
a fair amount of time comparing it to the 5080. So, a a thousand probably not.

00:09:08.399 --> 00:09:13.519
It's probably not It's probably not going to be a thousand. AMD's

00:09:11.440 --> 00:09:18.959
announcements this year then were a mixed bag of exciting and also

00:09:16.560 --> 00:09:22.480
underwhelming. I mean, compared to the NVIDIA keynote, at least there was

00:09:20.640 --> 00:09:30.240
something worth talking about. And we took this incredible GPU and we shrunk

00:09:26.240 --> 00:09:32.880
it in here. Does that make any sense?

00:09:30.240 --> 00:09:37.040
And AMD is clearly busting their buns to catch up to NVIDIA in the workstation

00:09:34.640 --> 00:09:40.480
and data center spheres. But like the rest of the industry, they seem to have

00:09:38.720 --> 00:09:46.000
forgotten about their customers who don't have six, seven, or eight figure

00:09:43.519 --> 00:09:51.839
annual budgets. I guess we're all just chopped liver. You know what isn't

00:09:47.920 --> 00:09:53.680
chopped liver though? Our sponsor. L is

00:09:51.839 --> 00:09:57.839
getting older and older. He really need to retire. That's why I use our sponsor

00:09:55.760 --> 00:10:02.080
Odu to help him reboot Lannis's cat tips. Odo has over 50 apps for business.

00:10:00.320 --> 00:10:06.160
So while using a project app to track our progress, Lance told me to try this

00:10:04.000 --> 00:10:10.480
method to lure the cats out. An hour later, only Noodle shake my hand to work

00:10:08.480 --> 00:10:14.640
together. In our brainstorm session, Missy and Brownie remain missing, but

00:10:12.399 --> 00:10:18.000
Noodle is one hardworking cat. We listed the ideas out and structure our

00:10:16.320 --> 00:10:22.000
workflow. Noodle agreed to letting me cook the cat. Cook with the cat. We

00:10:20.560 --> 00:10:25.760
scheduled the shoot within a couple of clicks, keeping things organized.

00:10:23.839 --> 00:10:29.519
Filming with him has been a blast, but this sneaky cat better not think I will

00:10:27.680 --> 00:10:33.279
work for free. Luckily, I can easily lock my time sheet along with the

00:10:31.200 --> 00:10:37.360
project or to keep test organized. But to be honest, Noodle didn't contribute

00:10:35.120 --> 00:10:40.720
much. Lance better not retired. If you guys enjoyed this video, maybe check out

00:10:39.040 --> 00:10:46.480
the one we did on Intel's most disruptive GPU yet, the Ark Pro B60.
