WEBVTT

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.320
Mesh shaders, ray tracing, and space black finish?

00:00:02.840 --> 00:00:05.720
No, believe it or not, you didn't just travel back to 2019.

00:00:06.300 --> 00:00:12.620
You watched Apple's scary fast event announcing, among other things, their latest M3 chip lineup.

00:00:13.000 --> 00:00:15.600
But, while some of what they talked about felt a little...

00:00:16.500 --> 00:00:19.680
yesterday's news, but magical this time, typical Apple,

00:00:19.960 --> 00:00:24.280
the rest of it was full of some pretty big dunks on the rest of the computer industry,

00:00:24.420 --> 00:00:27.860
which is also becoming kinda typical Apple.

00:00:27.860 --> 00:00:32.840
I mean, here, think about all the variety in the world of PC laptops.

00:00:33.520 --> 00:00:36.500
Apple's, by contrast, are downright boring.

00:00:36.660 --> 00:00:38.960
They don't even have touchscreens, for crying out loud.

00:00:39.340 --> 00:00:43.560
And yet, they deliver time and again on what matters,

00:00:43.760 --> 00:00:47.960
so effectively that I can't even blame folks for flocking to them.

00:00:48.480 --> 00:00:55.320
Say it with me, PC industry, nothing else matters until you get these things right.

00:00:55.320 --> 00:00:57.560
Power efficiency, performance,

00:00:57.860 --> 00:00:59.460
and portability.

00:00:59.460 --> 00:01:04.420
Come to think of it, now that they've got a new process node, the number three is everywhere here.

00:01:04.700 --> 00:01:09.700
Three nanometer on the M3 chip with three main M3 SKUs.

00:01:09.700 --> 00:01:16.660
The announcement video is 30 minutes 31 seconds long, held on October the 30th in 2023.

00:01:16.920 --> 00:01:21.380
What is next? Are they gonna make me write three segues to today's sponsor?

00:01:21.780 --> 00:01:27.040
Hetzner. Hetzner has recently launched their new high-performance cloud servers that now have dedicated

00:01:27.040 --> 00:01:30.860
vCPUs, which provide a fantastic price-to-performance ratio.

00:01:30.860 --> 00:01:35.600
Check them out at the link below and use code LTT23 for 20 euros off.

00:01:36.080 --> 00:01:44.480
Apple's main focus today was showing off, once again, the most powerful laptops we've ever created, which is kind of a no-doy moment.

00:01:44.480 --> 00:01:46.480
I mean, why would you make a new one that isn't better?

00:01:46.540 --> 00:01:53.360
But after all those years of Intel missing their tick-tock development cycle and rehashing the same 14 nanometer chips,

00:01:53.360 --> 00:01:56.840
it kind of makes sense that Apple feels the need to rub some salt in their teeth.

00:01:57.040 --> 00:02:02.480
Or rub some salt in their exes' wounds and clarify that, yes, generational improvements are actually a thing.

00:02:02.880 --> 00:02:04.360
Let's start with the GPU.

00:02:04.360 --> 00:02:12.060
They're claiming that their new three nanometer hotness is the biggest leap forward in graphics architecture ever for Apple Silicon.

00:02:12.600 --> 00:02:15.360
And considering what they had before, they're probably right.

00:02:16.020 --> 00:02:21.360
Hardware-accelerated ray tracing and mesh shaders, while nothing new to PC gamers, are

00:02:21.920 --> 00:02:27.000
certainly going to be a key part of their path toward making games look incredible on the Mac.

00:02:27.320 --> 00:02:33.640
Alan Wake 2, for example, just came out to rave reviews over their implementations of these key technologies.

00:02:33.780 --> 00:02:40.000
But while the game looks amazing, older 10 series NVIDIA cards struggle with it due to Alan Wake 2's

00:02:40.640 --> 00:02:45.120
requirement for mesh shaders having dropped support for vertex shaders altogether.

00:02:45.440 --> 00:02:51.040
So, while Apple's announcements might not sound impressive if you've been hearing these words for almost half a decade,

00:02:51.360 --> 00:02:56.520
in typical Apple fashion, they're showing up to the party just in time for their implementation to

00:02:57.040 --> 00:02:58.360
actually be useful.

00:02:58.360 --> 00:02:59.860
Kind of smart, really.

00:02:59.860 --> 00:03:03.960
But they've also got some outright new stuff, like dynamic caching.

00:03:03.960 --> 00:03:10.500
In a nutshell, mSilicon Macs use unified memory that is shared between the CPU and the GPU, and

00:03:11.040 --> 00:03:16.020
normally, some portion of that memory would be reserved for the GPU by looking at the

00:03:16.660 --> 00:03:23.460
maximum amount it could possibly need for the most intense parts of a game or a video editing workload, and then

00:03:23.580 --> 00:03:25.580
holding that all the time.

00:03:25.580 --> 00:03:26.480
But now,

00:03:26.480 --> 00:03:29.840
M3 can dynamically determine exactly

00:03:29.840 --> 00:03:31.000
UND EXACTLY

00:03:31.000 --> 00:03:36.240
how much memory it actually needs in any given moment and allocate that to the GPU.

00:03:36.360 --> 00:03:38.440
It's on all three of the new chips,

00:03:38.760 --> 00:03:41.140
there's that number again, and it supposedly

00:03:41.780 --> 00:03:44.660
dramatically increases the average utilization of the GPU.

00:03:45.100 --> 00:03:47.420
We're gonna have to wait and test it for ourselves, of course,

00:03:47.420 --> 00:03:51.920
but if it's done well, this is a major benefit of a tightly integrated system.

00:03:52.180 --> 00:03:56.320
Though you'll be paying a major premium for it, especially if you shell out

00:03:56.480 --> 00:04:01.600
for the 40-core GPU version of the M3 Macs rather than the 30-core base one.

00:04:02.440 --> 00:04:06.260
Cutting-edge costs though, and if they're vague and nebulous slides are to be believed,

00:04:06.520 --> 00:04:13.940
M3's performance per watt is about to put even more pressure on the likes of Intel, who recently resorted to rehashing old CPUs

00:04:14.220 --> 00:04:17.520
again with their 14th gen desktop processors.

00:04:18.360 --> 00:04:20.360
14 is really not Intel's number, hey?

00:04:20.940 --> 00:04:26.040
Speaking of Intel and CPUs, this whole event had major jilted ex-lover vibes.

00:04:26.040 --> 00:04:29.280
Am I right? Like, how many times did they mention Team Blue?

00:04:29.500 --> 00:04:35.700
Intel, Intel, Intel, Intel, but be that as it may, the CPUs on these new chips look very, uh,

00:04:36.220 --> 00:04:39.480
so long, see you later, don't need you, impressive.

00:04:39.860 --> 00:04:46.800
First, not only are the P-cores and the E-cores 30 and 50% faster than the M1 respectively,

00:04:46.900 --> 00:04:49.720
but they've improved the branch prediction on both and

00:04:50.480 --> 00:04:55.440
strategically juiced up core counts, so the regular M3 in the now entry-level

00:04:55.440 --> 00:05:02.360
14-inch MacBook, buh-bye 13-inch model, is an 8-core CPU with a 10-core GPU and support for up to

00:05:02.680 --> 00:05:08.120
24 gigs of unified memory. The M3 Pro sports 12 CPU cores,

00:05:08.580 --> 00:05:12.620
18 cores for graphics, and up to 36 gigs of unified memory.

00:05:12.620 --> 00:05:18.080
That is a pretty good amount of memory for a laptop, and it's not even close to the Max,

00:05:18.400 --> 00:05:25.000
the M3 Max that is, that offers up to a whopping 16 CPU cores, up to 40 GPU cores,

00:05:25.440 --> 00:05:32.560
and up to 128 gigabytes of unified memory, a feature that previously was only seen on desktop Macs.

00:05:32.920 --> 00:05:40.760
The only thing I don't like about all of this is Apple's de-emphasis on what kind of CPU cores we're looking at.

00:05:41.120 --> 00:05:47.640
See, this generation, it's not a problem yet, because only the Max SKU deviated from their previous

00:05:48.020 --> 00:05:54.240
one-to-one ratio of performance to efficiency cores, and it did so in a positive way, with a three

00:05:54.240 --> 00:05:55.240
three-to-one ratio of performance to efficiency cores, and it did so in a positive way, with a three

00:05:55.240 --> 00:05:55.440
three-to-one ratio of performance to efficiency cores, and it did so in a positive way, with a three

00:05:55.600 --> 00:05:56.560
three-to-one split.

00:05:56.560 --> 00:06:04.220
But, I also kind of feel like we're being primed to not think about what kind of cores we're getting, so that maybe they could go

00:06:04.380 --> 00:06:06.380
the other way in the future.

00:06:06.520 --> 00:06:12.760
But that's for future Linus to complain about. For now, the M3 lineup has more going for it than just a new chip.

00:06:12.980 --> 00:06:18.200
Apple continues to lead the way on laptop displays, with their Liquid Retina XDR display peaking at up to

00:06:19.380 --> 00:06:24.700
sixteen hundred nits in HDR, and six hundred nits in SDR, all while running at

00:06:24.700 --> 00:06:32.040
120 hertz. That is astonishing for a machine that runs on battery. And speaking of, they couldn't

00:06:32.040 --> 00:06:37.480
resist taking some shots at Intel over their crummy battery life, boasting that an M3 machine

00:06:37.480 --> 00:06:44.980
will give Intel Mac owners up to an additional 11 hours of battery life alongside the up to 11x

00:06:44.980 --> 00:06:50.700
performance uplift. An uplift that is consistent whether you're plugged into the wall or running

00:06:50.700 --> 00:06:56.280
on the aforementioned battery. That's really cool because now if you feel the need to step outside

00:06:56.280 --> 00:07:01.720
for some fresh air or just to change the scenery, you don't have to worry about a worse digital

00:07:01.720 --> 00:07:07.660
experience because of it. Just unplug, pop your M3 MacBook into an LTT backpack, which has lots

00:07:07.660 --> 00:07:12.120
of space for even the 16-inch in there, and an air tag in the hidden pocket, and walk away.

00:07:12.620 --> 00:07:18.000
LTTstore.com. But hey, maybe you like having a stationary computer. Where's the love for you?

00:07:18.740 --> 00:07:20.520
Well, the good news is the new iMovie.

00:07:20.700 --> 00:07:26.980
iMac, which comes with a 4.5K display now, is getting the regular M3 chip. The bad news is

00:07:26.980 --> 00:07:32.480
that's all the love you get. Apple, where the heck are the Pro and Max models, guys?

00:07:34.360 --> 00:07:40.700
Oh wait, I get it. They probably could have done that, but launching three dyes across three

00:07:40.700 --> 00:07:47.240
chassis, that seems like it was the right number today. But more will almost certainly follow if

00:07:47.240 --> 00:07:51.820
Apple's to keep hold of their efficiency crown. The just-announced Snapdragon X,

00:07:51.920 --> 00:07:57.440
Elite looks poised to make the competition a lot more interesting, and Microsoft's decade-plus

00:07:57.440 --> 00:08:03.240
long slog to make Windows on ARM a reality feels like it's finally on the cusp of bearing fruit.

00:08:03.960 --> 00:08:12.560
Of course, most of the comparisons I saw Qualcomm making were to M2, and you can't actually buy any

00:08:12.560 --> 00:08:16.520
of that stuff today. So if you're looking for something to compete with a MacBook,

00:08:16.920 --> 00:08:21.130
you'll have to check the links below where we'll have, um, MacBooks.

00:08:21.950 --> 00:08:30.310
Don't expect them to be cheap. The 14-inch M3 MacBook is $400 less than the old 14-inch MacBook,

00:08:30.790 --> 00:08:37.130
so that's cool, but it's also $300 more expensive than the previous entry-level model

00:08:37.130 --> 00:08:43.770
now that the 13 option doesn't exist anymore, and you'll be paying that price for just 8GB

00:08:43.770 --> 00:08:51.510
of unified memory and a wimpy 512GB SSD. Once you start specking out the 16-inch versions with the

00:08:51.950 --> 00:08:58.530
M3 Pro and the M3 Max, well, it doesn't take long to start hitting $3, $4, or even $7,000,

00:08:58.990 --> 00:09:03.230
and that's nothing compared to what they've done with the iMac. Sure, it starts at $1,300,

00:09:03.750 --> 00:09:10.690
but that is with a 256GB SSD. By the time you put a terabyte of storage in it, you've spent

00:09:10.690 --> 00:09:19.940
$1,700 on a machine that just has the most basic M3 silicon in it. Man, do these guys ever charge

00:09:19.940 --> 00:09:21.960
a premium for that sweet, sweet, sweet, sweet, sweet, sweet, sweet, sweet, sweet, sweet, sweet,

00:09:21.980 --> 00:09:26.660
memory and storage? Just like I'm about to charge a premium to our sponsor.

00:09:27.220 --> 00:09:31.640
Backblaze. Backblaze is an affordable and easy-to-use cloud backup solution that starts

00:09:31.640 --> 00:09:38.240
at just $9 a month. They make it so simple. You can backup almost anything from your Mac or your PC

00:09:38.240 --> 00:09:43.380
and access it from anywhere with their web and mobile apps, so you're always ready to show off

00:09:43.380 --> 00:09:49.240
your monk cosplay. Or you can easily protect your business data through a centrally managed admin.

00:09:49.240 --> 00:09:51.740
You can even restore your data by mail.

00:09:51.980 --> 00:09:57.020
Backblaze will ship a hard drive with your data on it right to your door, and then you can return

00:09:57.020 --> 00:10:01.500
the hard drive after for a refund when you're done. And if you're worried about accidentally

00:10:01.500 --> 00:10:08.980
deleting files, you can increase your retention history to one year for free. With over 55 billion

00:10:08.980 --> 00:10:14.000
files restored and two exabytes of data under their management, Backblaze has got you covered.

00:10:14.100 --> 00:10:19.760
They even have us covered. We backup our servers to Backblaze nightly. So sign up and get a 15-day

00:10:19.760 --> 00:10:21.840
free trial with no credit card required.

00:10:21.980 --> 00:10:24.940
Today at Backblaze.com slash LTT.

00:10:25.480 --> 00:10:29.300
Thanks for watching. If you guys like this video, make sure to check out our iPhone 15

00:10:29.300 --> 00:10:33.920
coverage from earlier this year. That A15 Pro chip is something else.
