WEBVTT

00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:05.160
I jumped on the 8K gaming hype train as

00:00:03.199 --> 00:00:11.599
hard as anyone especially with that early look at NVIDIA's RTX 3090 the

00:00:08.080 --> 00:00:13.599
world's first 8K GPU but have you ever

00:00:11.599 --> 00:00:21.359
realized you're riding a bandwagon that just doesn't make any sense I mean even

00:00:16.880 --> 00:00:25.240
now the second I saw this liquid cooled

00:00:21.359 --> 00:00:28.880
RTX 490 from MSI who sponsored this

00:00:25.240 --> 00:00:31.000
video I thought wow with up to two times

00:00:28.880 --> 00:00:36.280
the performance maybe we could do it even better this

00:00:33.399 --> 00:00:41.480
time except I couldn't help noticing that while 8K gaming is still a

00:00:39.559 --> 00:00:48.120
highlighted feature on NVIDIA's product page it's all the way hidden down at the

00:00:45.160 --> 00:00:53.800
bottom here what's the deal with that is it that the 4090 is somehow worse for 8K

00:00:51.559 --> 00:01:00.079
than the last gen is it that they simply couldn't find an 8K monitor to validate

00:00:55.960 --> 00:01:02.800
it on or is it that 8K gaming is just

00:01:00.079 --> 00:01:09.240
really really pointless no matter how powerful your GPU is the only way to

00:01:05.400 --> 00:01:09.240
know is to try

00:01:16.320 --> 00:01:23.320
it to get our 8K groove on the first thing we're going to need is a tricked

00:01:20.680 --> 00:01:31.200
out gaming PC and this one courtesy of MSI is an absolute doozy at its gooey

00:01:27.479 --> 00:01:33.200
Center is their RTX 490 Supreme Liquid X

00:01:31.200 --> 00:01:39.200
it is an absolute Beast with integrated liquid cooling 24 gigs of GDDR 6X memory

00:01:36.240 --> 00:01:45.000
over 16,000 Kuda cores and much much more expensive yes but you've got an 8K

00:01:43.159 --> 00:01:48.960
display you're not exactly hurting for cash are you for our testing we'll be

00:01:46.880 --> 00:01:54.840
using the exact same unit that LG provided for our last 8K gaming video

00:01:51.640 --> 00:01:57.200
their signature ZX 88 in OLED that lives

00:01:54.840 --> 00:02:02.000
here in our employee lounge for after hours Smash Bros tournaments we're going

00:01:59.399 --> 00:02:06.680
to start by recreating our 8K gaming experience from last time man look at

00:02:04.240 --> 00:02:12.040
all those KS there's eight of them got our HD there's eight got our raid

00:02:09.560 --> 00:02:17.440
tracing dlss pretty much everything set to ultra Nightmare and we're running on

00:02:14.239 --> 00:02:19.800
our RTX 3090 so we can get a baseline

00:02:17.440 --> 00:02:25.640
just wait it'll hang like this but it'll go it will yep oh here it goes here it

00:02:22.760 --> 00:02:30.400
goes hey look at that oh yes pretty smooth eh uh actually yeah we're only

00:02:28.599 --> 00:02:35.280
getting like 55 FPS but it's Ultra nightmare for the most

00:02:32.239 --> 00:02:38.239
part yeah okay oh that was not smooth it

00:02:35.280 --> 00:02:43.480
hitches o yeah when I when I do like a quick 180 that

00:02:40.599 --> 00:02:47.840
is not a lot of frames in between there can I chainsaw this nope you should be

00:02:45.239 --> 00:02:51.239
able to well oh okay whatever I died see you later cool so that's pretty close to

00:02:50.159 --> 00:02:55.760
the experience you guys were getting last time yeah we wanted to retest the

00:02:53.360 --> 00:03:01.840
390 because since then we've gotten new CPUs new drivers and we wanted to see

00:02:58.959 --> 00:03:07.080
well hey is the 90 an even more viable 8K gaming card than it was before turns

00:03:04.480 --> 00:03:11.440
out not really about the same as before yeah it's pretty pretty close across the

00:03:08.440 --> 00:03:15.360
board actually time to upgrade all right

00:03:11.440 --> 00:03:20.080
and see you later 3090

00:03:15.360 --> 00:03:22.200
Supreme nice knowing you hello 4090

00:03:20.080 --> 00:03:30.959
Supreme I got to say when it comes to these like 250 350 400 watt cards liquid

00:03:28.200 --> 00:03:37.840
cooling just kind of starts to Mak sense doesn't it like that is a much

00:03:34.120 --> 00:03:41.640
more reasonable sized GPU well this is

00:03:37.840 --> 00:03:43.680
big but that's not the point the point

00:03:41.640 --> 00:03:50.200
is it doesn't look quite as ridiculous here and the 490 air cooled version of

00:03:46.599 --> 00:03:53.799
the Supreme is even bigger than the old

00:03:50.200 --> 00:03:56.400
3090 can't build a ratchet 4090 gaming

00:03:53.799 --> 00:04:01.840
system without a ratcheting screwdriver LTT Store. hey buddy hey there we go

00:04:00.720 --> 00:04:07.200
check out settings make sure nothing changed blah blah blah yep exact same

00:04:04.280 --> 00:04:12.560
settings cool oh it says connecting this time it still froze still froze it still

00:04:10.040 --> 00:04:18.199
froze okay hold on but we're getting 300 FPS right now in the loading screen wow

00:04:14.959 --> 00:04:22.560
it feels a lot more responsive right is

00:04:18.199 --> 00:04:25.280
that a solid 90 FPS yeah this high is 97

00:04:22.560 --> 00:04:31.199
but our lows are 1% lows down to like 80 85 wow at 50 so I think it's it might

00:04:28.479 --> 00:04:35.360
stutter still but like it's much more rare like you stuttered like three times

00:04:33.000 --> 00:04:40.360
with the 390 right oh stutter wait I need ammo that wasn't a bad stutter

00:04:37.240 --> 00:04:43.120
though no it wasn't as bad but like it

00:04:40.360 --> 00:04:48.039
would bug me oh this is totally playable though yeah 100% 100% playable man if we

00:04:46.720 --> 00:04:52.160
were willing to sell for what we had last time which is more like 60 FPS you

00:04:50.320 --> 00:04:57.120
think we could render it 8K native maybe yeah try it we had a lot of

00:04:55.160 --> 00:05:02.160
criticism last time like yeah you're gaming at 8K but you're using DLS s

00:05:00.039 --> 00:05:08.120
which is essentially just gaming at a lower resolution and then upscaling it

00:05:05.320 --> 00:05:10.759
but maybe we don't need to upscale D LSS isn't actually doing as much as I

00:05:09.240 --> 00:05:17.639
thought it would you're getting a solid like 60 65 yeah holy crap you can

00:05:14.680 --> 00:05:25.639
actually game natively at what you could do with dlss before that's pretty wild

00:05:23.080 --> 00:05:31.759
it's gorgeous this is what this freaking R tracing you guys cannot emphasize that

00:05:29.199 --> 00:05:37.199
enough all right let's try some other games at this point you're probably

00:05:33.600 --> 00:05:40.120
wondering why we're using a 12900 K CPU

00:05:37.199 --> 00:05:46.520
rather than the latest ryzen 7000 or Intel 13th gen and the answer is that we

00:05:43.440 --> 00:05:48.960
actually wanted to use the latest CPUs

00:05:46.520 --> 00:05:53.000
but the ryzen 7950 X ended up being so unstable that we wasted an entire day

00:05:51.160 --> 00:05:57.360
trying to get it to work and the lab still has all of our 13th gen core chips

00:05:55.639 --> 00:06:02.199
so 12 900k uh oh shoot I didn't check the

00:05:59.440 --> 00:06:06.039
settings sets are they probably right I can check them from in game they're

00:06:03.440 --> 00:06:14.120
probably right 200 FPS I'm like kind of excited now last time around we got 27

00:06:09.840 --> 00:06:16.479
FPS average with r tracing and dlss

00:06:14.120 --> 00:06:22.120
which is like console playable but not exactly a a PC gaming experience well

00:06:19.319 --> 00:06:27.759
holy crap is this right I don't know you settings 97 FPS check the settings that

00:06:25.120 --> 00:06:32.960
can't be right holy crap that quality RTX on set to high instead of very high

00:06:30.360 --> 00:06:43.280
go to preset very high I think that's the big difference highest yeah my 99

00:06:35.960 --> 00:06:45.960
lows are still 75 FPS this is 100%

00:06:43.280 --> 00:06:51.400
playable dude it's like a 5-year-old game now yeah but it's still a pretty

00:06:48.840 --> 00:06:56.759
game I know like people ask why we test it because it's a super pretty game and

00:06:54.120 --> 00:07:01.520
it's still demanding I mean to o whoops um that's not what I meant to do oh my

00:06:59.199 --> 00:07:01.520
God that

00:07:02.400 --> 00:07:11.759
the water girlly the rag doll was just like nope I want more 10K no no I mean I want

00:07:09.919 --> 00:07:17.680
I want to run it natively okay sure I don't want a dlss maybe you don't have

00:07:13.639 --> 00:07:19.440
to it's already dropped o okay oh yeah

00:07:17.680 --> 00:07:24.120
this is way harder 50 is not bad well hold on I

00:07:22.360 --> 00:07:28.199
wonder if HDR isn't on I wonder if that's changed things oh no it's off

00:07:26.080 --> 00:07:31.479
yeah yeah yeah so so that so that's probably part of some of our perform

00:07:29.520 --> 00:07:35.039
performance while we're getting like 100 let's try it we're going to try it it

00:07:33.160 --> 00:07:38.919
looks like between game runs our Windows HDR got disabled so it is running in HDR

00:07:37.840 --> 00:07:45.800
now and rendering natively at 8K with HDR it

00:07:43.160 --> 00:07:49.680
feels a little sloppier on the inputs that

00:07:46.639 --> 00:07:53.000
did cost us a little yeah it's a little

00:07:49.680 --> 00:07:54.639
blurry however it's still like 4550

00:07:53.000 --> 00:07:58.400
average you're being a hater it's a pretty damn goodlooking game I'd like to

00:07:56.840 --> 00:08:02.039
see you develop a better game I saw the game you developed and it actually gears

00:08:00.319 --> 00:08:06.639
5 looks amazing I'm not talking about gears 5

00:08:03.360 --> 00:08:09.080
you okay In fairness though these are

00:08:06.639 --> 00:08:12.800
older games that we've looked at so far what if we were to look at something a

00:08:10.800 --> 00:08:17.280
little bit newer what were you getting with the 3090 in this game while I

00:08:14.680 --> 00:08:24.479
wasn't in multiplayer I was in campaign but we're getting about 30 FPS really

00:08:21.560 --> 00:08:29.960
cuz I've got 60 FPS right now and I'm just getting all these

00:08:26.120 --> 00:08:34.560
kills I'm rendering natively

00:08:29.960 --> 00:08:37.240
in a current demanding game this is

00:08:34.560 --> 00:08:40.599
sick it tears those kills it tears a little too much though hey it does hey

00:08:39.279 --> 00:08:45.519
is that stopping me from getting a killing spree ladies and gentlemen no

00:08:42.560 --> 00:08:49.120
what's my halo kill ratio infinite killing

00:08:46.640 --> 00:08:52.680
friendy does this game even have dlss I thought it did I don't care whatever

00:08:51.040 --> 00:08:57.600
okay that was clear it's clearly playable I think we've made our Point AK

00:08:55.279 --> 00:09:03.519
gaming totally a thing so we were sucking back 43 30 Watts with this bad

00:09:00.720 --> 00:09:08.720
boy but never saw higher than about 63° freaking impressive not to mention

00:09:06.600 --> 00:09:12.880
that compared to an aircooled card this thing is actually reasonable when it

00:09:10.279 --> 00:09:18.480
comes to size and weight in the slot in CSO on the highest presets with no

00:09:15.040 --> 00:09:22.279
antialising no dlss we were getting 160

00:09:18.480 --> 00:09:24.120
FPS average with a 3090 with our 490

00:09:22.279 --> 00:09:29.760
wait this doesn't seem right we're only getting 100 oh A8 time msaa that's why 8

00:09:26.959 --> 00:09:33.240
times an we're still getting 100 FPS yeah and the game Crash it'll crash for

00:09:32.240 --> 00:09:39.320
that yeah holy crap we are running at 8K

00:09:37.399 --> 00:09:47.040
native with dual Berettas and over 200 frames per second

00:09:43.160 --> 00:09:49.200
hitting 330 sometimes what and it feels

00:09:47.040 --> 00:09:56.040
like it that's that's super responsive like this is not a problem

00:09:52.880 --> 00:10:00.040
wow Berettas are a problem though well

00:09:56.040 --> 00:10:02.760
yeah for sure but hey hey

00:10:00.040 --> 00:10:09.959
hey did you reload you 21 bullets left little while to

00:10:04.600 --> 00:10:13.200
reload got him whoa 1% lows are like 180

00:10:09.959 --> 00:10:15.560
200 FPS totally totally this is not just

00:10:13.200 --> 00:10:22.079
playable like this is competitive playable which raises the question with

00:10:18.720 --> 00:10:25.240
8K gaming then seemingly alive and well

00:10:22.079 --> 00:10:28.399
why would I call it a stupid bandwagon

00:10:25.240 --> 00:10:31.360
because math let's turn our game down to

00:10:28.399 --> 00:10:35.519
4K and see if we can tell the difference okay I'm checking like these power lines

00:10:33.120 --> 00:10:38.839
for stair stepping and stuff cuz we're not we're not rolling anti-aliasing if

00:10:37.440 --> 00:10:44.000
there's anywhere we're going to notice it it's here yeah this really does not

00:10:42.120 --> 00:10:47.959
look very different this looks not bad at all this looks totally fine maybe

00:10:46.040 --> 00:10:51.880
it's just me though why don't we gather up some Rubes I mean test subjects sorry

00:10:50.760 --> 00:10:55.839
I mean uh colleagues and see if we can have a bit

00:10:54.000 --> 00:11:01.639
of fun with them we're going to tell them they're gaming at 8K and watch them

00:10:58.920 --> 00:11:05.880
Mar at the clarity and sharpness and then we'll reveal that actually it's

00:11:03.399 --> 00:11:11.560
just running at 4k on an 8K display so we're using a 4090 uh-huh and we're

00:11:08.360 --> 00:11:12.600
gaming at 8K and it's on an 88 in TV how

00:11:11.560 --> 00:11:18.320
do you think it looks I feel really far away even though

00:11:16.399 --> 00:11:23.279
the screen this big yes what do you think about the clarity

00:11:20.560 --> 00:11:28.240
and stuff and like oh it is very clear I'm going to tell you a secret mhm it's

00:11:25.680 --> 00:11:34.440
set to 4K right now it's not really something I'd really really be able to

00:11:31.000 --> 00:11:37.320
notice especially like for these assets

00:11:34.440 --> 00:11:40.920
I don't think they're even in 4k them themselves so if you walk up to it it's

00:11:38.880 --> 00:11:45.800
not like you're going to notice anyways right so I think it's really a question

00:11:43.880 --> 00:11:51.600
of whether or not a lot of these things are intended to be played at 4K or even

00:11:49.279 --> 00:11:55.959
more so 8K right okay I'm going to restart it put it in 8k okay see if you

00:11:54.000 --> 00:12:02.920
can even notice a difference at all so now we're definitely in

00:11:57.519 --> 00:12:04.760
8k uh it looks the exact same right yeah

00:12:02.920 --> 00:12:10.600
okay sure this is amazing the texture details

00:12:08.639 --> 00:12:15.519
incredible looks pretty good is he on my team yeah he is okay okay I got a secret

00:12:12.959 --> 00:12:22.600
for you yeah you're playing in 4k right now on an 8K display that diminishing

00:12:19.440 --> 00:12:25.639
returns my friend right yeah I could not

00:12:22.600 --> 00:12:28.079
tell I also have not played this game in

00:12:25.639 --> 00:12:32.399
a very long time that's fine take take some time to like take a really close

00:12:29.480 --> 00:12:36.399
look at some stuff we'll swap to 8K and we'll see if you can even tell the

00:12:33.880 --> 00:12:42.800
difference once it's in proper 8K you're getting a lower FPS we went from like

00:12:38.680 --> 00:12:46.199
350 like you know 256 270 no it looks

00:12:42.800 --> 00:12:48.639
like oh man I can't tell the difference

00:12:46.199 --> 00:12:55.680
maybe the blood no but even that texture just doesn't look it doesn't make give

00:12:52.839 --> 00:13:00.199
you any benefit there's nothing nice shot thank you it's pretty sharp looking

00:12:57.959 --> 00:13:05.720
yeah Halo guys look pretty good yeah those effects looked pretty sick yeah so

00:13:02.519 --> 00:13:07.959
here's the trick it's 4K right now okay

00:13:05.720 --> 00:13:12.639
and it's upscaling to 8K hey look I got an achievement do you notice at all no

00:13:10.800 --> 00:13:17.360
it's pretty sharp and This TV has a nice upscaler in it anyway so okay so now

00:13:15.279 --> 00:13:21.839
let's change it to 8K feels about the same it certainly doesn't feel as fluid

00:13:20.040 --> 00:13:26.720
but that's just feeling how does it look does it look sharper no at all not

00:13:24.680 --> 00:13:30.399
really looks about the same textures look just as sharp should I be noticing

00:13:28.839 --> 00:13:35.720
a differ difference Mr bloof no you shouldn't be would you pay more for an

00:13:32.320 --> 00:13:39.040
8K TV uh no but there are lunatics out

00:13:35.720 --> 00:13:41.519
there who do o AK is a higher number

00:13:39.040 --> 00:13:45.920
than 4K so it's better wow you heard it here first folks this just did how much

00:13:44.519 --> 00:13:50.560
would it cost me to get this experience at home oh my God 4 everything the card

00:13:48.680 --> 00:13:56.880
alone is like $1,800 the TV was about $3,000 when LG

00:13:54.440 --> 00:14:00.480
sent it over I think so either I could send my kid to college or I could buy

00:13:58.480 --> 00:14:03.639
the setup yeah obviously you should buy the setup so it looks really good I

00:14:02.360 --> 00:14:12.880
don't have anything to compare it to obviously sitting from here I don't have like a 4K thing to look at but solid it

00:14:08.040 --> 00:14:17.360
is 4K what it's an ak8 TV with a 4090

00:14:12.880 --> 00:14:19.880
and we've set Halo to 4K right now oh

00:14:17.360 --> 00:14:23.480
you were messing with me yeah was that on purpose yeah oh okay I thought I just

00:14:21.880 --> 00:14:27.279
wasn't paying attention now you get the true 8K

00:14:24.920 --> 00:14:32.040
experience wa obviously it's going to sound biased now but it looks clear you

00:14:29.440 --> 00:14:37.320
think so I think so no I'm so bad with this stuff looks good this looks great

00:14:35.079 --> 00:14:41.240
looks amazing I don't know like I I can tell when things are stuttery yeah but

00:14:39.160 --> 00:14:47.759
I'm I'm not great at telling like the textures on here are so crisp like I I

00:14:44.800 --> 00:14:54.279
just want fluidity in my game this looks in many ways completely identical to

00:14:51.040 --> 00:14:56.440
what I would expect it to be on a 4K

00:14:54.279 --> 00:15:02.440
television right if you told me that this was 4K I would say yes yes it is

00:14:59.800 --> 00:15:07.000
that's exactly what it is you guessed it there you go change it to 8K now though

00:15:05.000 --> 00:15:11.480
and let's see if we can notice like much of a difference I was really surprised

00:15:09.079 --> 00:15:16.920
at the FPS I was like there's no way it's getting that many

00:15:13.000 --> 00:15:19.480
FPS this is uh exactly the same

00:15:16.920 --> 00:15:24.120
experience you got some dlss going on here for sure there's no way I'm getting

00:15:21.519 --> 00:15:30.160
200 FPS right now it's a 4090 water cooled with dlss right maybe maybe is

00:15:27.959 --> 00:15:33.440
that the challenge tell definitely how does 8 look how forget about the frames

00:15:32.120 --> 00:15:38.440
for second I'm So Far Away what do you mean it looks great it's nice and sharp

00:15:36.079 --> 00:15:41.440
but I'm really far away so I don't know we're in

00:15:39.279 --> 00:15:45.480
4k that's why we're getting like 200 frames per second okay so I I knew I was

00:15:43.279 --> 00:15:48.519
being Bamboozled in some Capac yeah hit cancel no hit cancel you got to change

00:15:46.920 --> 00:15:53.920
it to 8K now cuz now you got to really try 8K wow the

00:15:51.399 --> 00:15:58.160
detail in those like look at the trees man that's a lot of pixels brother okay

00:15:56.079 --> 00:16:03.040
I'm going to switch it to 4K I'm not going to lie

00:16:00.199 --> 00:16:07.519
doesn't look as different as I was expecting can we can we go back one more

00:16:05.519 --> 00:16:13.720
time okay there's definitely a lot more detail sure but man it's 8K is stupid

00:16:11.360 --> 00:16:19.560
you can really see the pores in the stone concrete I feel like my series X

00:16:17.000 --> 00:16:28.480
looks like this dang like it doesn't look that that good this could

00:16:22.600 --> 00:16:31.000
be four I guess it is oh my wow see I'm

00:16:28.480 --> 00:16:35.680
a gamer I know my halo I when I saw my master chief I knew this ain't no this

00:16:33.680 --> 00:16:40.920
Ain my master chief now let's change it to 4K or 28k and see if you can even

00:16:38.440 --> 00:16:44.920
like see any kind of improvement okay look at those bullets those look awful

00:16:43.120 --> 00:16:48.720
but do you think this looks like better than the 4K image you were just looking

00:16:46.480 --> 00:16:53.759
at absolutely not I feel like I'm being pranked and it's still 4K like it does

00:16:50.519 --> 00:16:56.839
not look it's it's a little more Terry I

00:16:53.759 --> 00:16:59.519
guess CU we're lower FPS yeah but no the

00:16:56.839 --> 00:17:05.160
issue is that from a natural comfortable viewing distance 8K is not necessarily

00:17:03.000 --> 00:17:09.319
going to increase the perceived Clarity or resolution of the image there's

00:17:07.720 --> 00:17:13.760
actually a pretty simple formula for when the individual pixels on a display

00:17:11.640 --> 00:17:22.199
become indiscernible from each other and at 88 diagonal inches here we would have

00:17:17.079 --> 00:17:24.000
to be closer than 69 in Nice in order to

00:17:22.199 --> 00:17:29.960
make out the individual pixels and that assumes that we have perfect vision but

00:17:26.959 --> 00:17:32.520
lonus you might say it's a little more

00:17:29.960 --> 00:17:37.320
complicated than that and 8K is a forward-looking technology it's intended

00:17:34.919 --> 00:17:41.799
for much larger TVs and projectors and those are good points

00:17:40.160 --> 00:17:45.679
there are times when we can see a little bit of texture Shimmer or a little bit

00:17:43.440 --> 00:17:50.200
of stair stepping in something like a a power line traveling across the blue sky

00:17:48.280 --> 00:17:53.919
but that could easily be solved with a little bit of multi- sample

00:17:51.400 --> 00:17:59.080
anti-aliasing for a much smaller performance Hit And as far as larger

00:17:56.360 --> 00:18:04.360
displays go the thing is is that as they get larger you're going to want to sit

00:18:01.080 --> 00:18:07.400
even farther away from them we did a

00:18:04.360 --> 00:18:09.880
full video on this a while back but TX

00:18:07.400 --> 00:18:14.600
actually publishes guidelines for how much of your field of view should be

00:18:12.039 --> 00:18:20.200
optimally occupied by an image before you begin to experience uh eye fatigue

00:18:17.159 --> 00:18:23.559
or motion sickness and it's about

00:18:20.200 --> 00:18:25.200
40° maximum meaning that no matter what

00:18:23.559 --> 00:18:31.159
screen size you plug into their calculator 4K and 8K are going to spit

00:18:28.360 --> 00:18:40.080
out the exact same recommended viewing distance which is well outside of

00:18:35.640 --> 00:18:43.840
retina so the good news is that 8K

00:18:40.080 --> 00:18:46.320
gaming is four reals here with the 490

00:18:43.840 --> 00:18:50.919
and who knows may even be affordable in another generation or two but the other

00:18:48.880 --> 00:18:56.120
good news is that you don't need to care about that at all which might explain

00:18:53.640 --> 00:19:02.799
why MSI actually sent over their Optics MPG 321 ur- QD

00:18:59.240 --> 00:19:05.760
144 HZ 4k monitor when we pitched them

00:19:02.799 --> 00:19:10.880
doing an 8K demo video to uh show off their RTX 490 uh that particular monitor

00:19:08.919 --> 00:19:15.159
is designed for gaming and content creation uh it's quantum dot to enhance

00:19:13.120 --> 00:19:20.159
color accuracy color saturation and contrast and of course is 144 HZ with a

00:19:18.200 --> 00:19:23.919
1 millisecond response time and NVIDIA gsync for faster smoother frames it

00:19:22.080 --> 00:19:27.960
works for both PC and console gaming and to learn more about MSI monitors and of

00:19:25.799 --> 00:19:32.720
course gpus you can follow the link in the video description

00:19:29.640 --> 00:19:36.080
now one use case for this kind of gaming

00:19:32.720 --> 00:19:40.600
horsepower at higher than 4K resolutions

00:19:36.080 --> 00:19:42.440
is VR but whatever the Zuck might think

00:19:40.600 --> 00:19:46.760
those headsets aren't going mainstream anytime soon so it's not something that

00:19:45.240 --> 00:19:50.720
we have to worry about thanks for watching if you like

00:19:48.799 --> 00:19:55.880
this video or maybe if you hated it take a look at the last time we did this with

00:19:52.320 --> 00:19:58.480
an RTX 390 to see just how far we've

00:19:55.880 --> 00:19:58.480
come