WEBVTT

00:00:00.040 --> 00:00:07.279
so Intel just launched their brand new code name Broadwell EP based zons I mean

00:00:04.920 --> 00:00:14.719
these things are bananas the top ofth line one has 22 cores 45 Megs of cash a

00:00:11.840 --> 00:00:20.840
quad Channel ddr4 memory controller and best of all did I mention that we've

00:00:17.000 --> 00:00:22.199
already got one no I didn't because that

00:00:20.840 --> 00:00:25.640
would be a lie we have

00:00:28.960 --> 00:00:34.800
two

00:00:34.800 --> 00:00:40.760
tunnel bear is the easy to use VPN service that lets you use the web as

00:00:38.960 --> 00:00:46.520
though you're in one of 20 different countries learn more and try tunnel bear

00:00:43.280 --> 00:00:49.879
for free at the link in the video

00:00:46.520 --> 00:00:54.440
description now as impressive as the E5

00:00:49.879 --> 00:00:56.320
2699 V4 might be under the hood CPUs are

00:00:54.440 --> 00:00:59.960
never really much to look at physically but that won't stop us from

00:00:58.280 --> 00:01:05.680
investigating some of the differences between this and the older haswell-based

00:01:02.800 --> 00:01:09.439
V3 processors so first of all they've redesigned the heat spreader I don't

00:01:07.520 --> 00:01:13.000
know exactly what the engineering reason for these little flanges that come out

00:01:11.240 --> 00:01:17.200
into the corners are but if I had to guess I would say it would be to

00:01:14.799 --> 00:01:22.240
transfer the compact pressure of the CPU heat sink onto the pads and the pins in

00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:27.200
the socket below more evenly and then the other thing that they've changed is

00:01:23.960 --> 00:01:30.000
it no longer overhangs the socket and

00:01:27.200 --> 00:01:35.680
it's actually closer to the size of a desktop chip than the previous Zeon were

00:01:32.759 --> 00:01:39.159
with these like Ultra super mega wide heat spreaders on them now there are

00:01:37.439 --> 00:01:44.280
some similarities here and this will be good news for high-end desktop

00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:48.200
Enthusiast users or workstation users who are not necessarily going to drop I

00:01:46.439 --> 00:01:54.320
think this one's like $4500 on a 22 core model but might be

00:01:51.560 --> 00:01:59.360
interested in a high core count model and that is that it uses the same 2011

00:01:57.439 --> 00:02:04.119
contact pads on the bottom and is therefore socket compatible with LGA

00:02:02.079 --> 00:02:09.399
20113 meaning that as long as your motherboard maker provides a BIOS update

00:02:06.640 --> 00:02:14.040
this will be a dropin replacement for the older v3s and even desktop

00:02:12.400 --> 00:02:18.800
processors assuming you've got a board that will support it so naturally then

00:02:16.599 --> 00:02:25.959
the first thing I'm going to do is throw it on my gaming desktop test bench and

00:02:22.920 --> 00:02:28.239
see how it goes but before we do that I

00:02:25.959 --> 00:02:33.800
want to get some oh did I just die that was quick and anyway before we do that I

00:02:31.760 --> 00:02:39.519
want to get some baseline numbers on a 5960x extreme Edition desktop processor

00:02:36.800 --> 00:02:45.319
so we have something to compare this brand new top-of-the-line 22 core

00:02:42.640 --> 00:02:50.080
against Benchmark wise I'll be doing a very very limited set so we'll be

00:02:47.560 --> 00:02:55.200
running Crisis 3 to represent gaming we'll be running cinebench as well as W

00:02:52.640 --> 00:03:00.640
Prime so with our Baseline numbers run all that's left to do is find out if our

00:02:57.159 --> 00:03:02.760
motherboard has a BIOS update we can't

00:03:00.640 --> 00:03:07.519
tell because ASUS and for everyone for that matters BIOS update release notes

00:03:04.879 --> 00:03:13.480
are notoriously terrible so all we can do now is update to the latest one tear

00:03:10.680 --> 00:03:18.400
the system apart and give it a shot all right moment of

00:03:23.640 --> 00:03:30.319
truth yeah uh this is not looking like it is

00:03:27.920 --> 00:03:37.239
going to work we're getting a post code 53 maybe it will

00:03:33.239 --> 00:03:40.840
change and no but that's okay because

00:03:37.239 --> 00:03:43.720
this is just a minor setback Broadwell e

00:03:40.840 --> 00:03:49.680
the Enthusiast desktop equivalent for Broadwell EP is not set to land for

00:03:47.400 --> 00:03:53.040
however long I actually have no idea so it makes sense I guess that some of the

00:03:51.239 --> 00:03:57.560
more desktop oriented boards would not have Broadwell EP support but that's

00:03:54.599 --> 00:04:04.840
okay because we have a system that definitely does

00:04:00.280 --> 00:04:08.200
this is eight Gamers 1 CPU the Michael

00:04:04.840 --> 00:04:11.040
Bay style sequel to seven Gamers 1 CPU

00:04:08.200 --> 00:04:16.239
it's bigger it's better it's better and it's also deceptively named because in

00:04:13.560 --> 00:04:21.040
addition to actually running two CPUs because come on quite frankly if you've

00:04:18.160 --> 00:04:25.960
got a workload that can benefit from 22 cores and 44 threads did I mention that

00:04:23.800 --> 00:04:31.800
CP hyperthreading then you've probably got a workload that can benefit from 44

00:04:28.840 --> 00:04:38.199
cores and 88 thread so we're going to be using this bad boy to deceptively put

00:04:34.440 --> 00:04:41.759
two CPUs in and also deceptively run up

00:04:38.199 --> 00:04:43.320
to 10 gaming VMS but it's going to be a

00:04:41.759 --> 00:04:47.919
little bit different because this chassis supports and you'll see here

00:04:49.880 --> 00:04:57.039
hopefully there we go

00:04:53.800 --> 00:04:59.520
supports eight video cards in it sort of

00:04:57.039 --> 00:05:07.080
advertised configuration but thanks to to its 11 PCI e6x slots on board 10 GB

00:05:04.680 --> 00:05:12.840
networking dual 10 gbit networking I am planning to put an additional two cards

00:05:09.560 --> 00:05:15.800
in here to hopefully get 10 gaming VMS

00:05:12.840 --> 00:05:20.680
running and streaming using steam in home streaming to 10 different clients

00:05:18.600 --> 00:05:25.160
all over the building instead of having everyone Tethered to the system this

00:05:22.759 --> 00:05:30.520
time so all we've got to do then is apply the latest BIOS update and throw

00:05:27.720 --> 00:05:35.319
the CPUs in here for our testing but before we put the 22 cores

00:05:33.199 --> 00:05:43.199
in that machine I actually had to pull out the 8 Zotac gtx980 TI amps and

00:05:40.319 --> 00:05:47.800
replace them with just one Titan X so I could get an Apples to Apples comparison

00:05:45.120 --> 00:05:53.759
against my top-of-the-line desktop 5960x the cool thing here is that this

00:05:51.000 --> 00:05:57.720
is 218 course the previous Flagship before that the flagship E5 was a 12

00:05:56.319 --> 00:06:00.600
core we actually have one of those in Ed's machine maybe let me know in the

00:05:59.319 --> 00:06:05.800
com comments if you'd like to see a generation by generation comparison

00:06:02.720 --> 00:06:08.800
there and so we've gone from 12 to 18 to

00:06:05.800 --> 00:06:12.240
now 22 cores but and this is really

00:06:08.800 --> 00:06:14.680
interesting the 2699 V4 that we have

00:06:12.240 --> 00:06:18.840
actually has 24 physical cores on it meaning that if they were to create an

00:06:16.759 --> 00:06:23.479
additional 24 core skew and yields improve or whatever they potentially

00:06:21.360 --> 00:06:26.680
could which is pretty cool so we ran through the same benchmarks chis of 3

00:06:24.840 --> 00:06:30.440
Center bench and W Prime but it should be noted at this time that W Prime no

00:06:29.000 --> 00:06:34.120
matter how many threads I set it to isn't really scaling so I might just

00:06:32.199 --> 00:06:41.599
leave that out so with that out of the way then all right let's put some 22

00:06:36.840 --> 00:06:41.599
core CPUs in here let's Lock and

00:06:45.560 --> 00:06:54.919
Load Here We Go 44

00:06:51.120 --> 00:06:57.639
oh dang it doesn't matter how

00:06:54.919 --> 00:07:02.879
experienced I get at this stuff I still forget to plug in the

00:06:59.960 --> 00:07:02.879
power supply

00:07:03.479 --> 00:07:13.360
sometimes okay try that

00:07:08.199 --> 00:07:13.360
again Lock and Load 44

00:07:15.400 --> 00:07:22.680
cores hilariously that's not nearly as loud as it was when we had the default

00:07:19.840 --> 00:07:27.960
fans in here I actually posted a uh a periscope stream of me turning it on for

00:07:25.000 --> 00:07:27.960
the first time it was

00:07:28.319 --> 00:07:35.479
deafening please turn

00:07:35.479 --> 00:07:40.639
on oh

00:07:40.639 --> 00:07:46.840
hello hey hey wow that was the longest

00:07:43.840 --> 00:07:49.240
post I've ever seen in my

00:07:46.840 --> 00:07:55.400
life okay then let's uh get into the BIOS here what the hell was

00:07:53.039 --> 00:08:02.759
that it's like they want me to have a freaking heart

00:07:57.639 --> 00:08:02.759
attack 44 core machine not turning

00:08:03.440 --> 00:08:11.360
on jeez why is it that my stress is your

00:08:07.440 --> 00:08:13.919
entertainment Hey where's my bio

00:08:11.360 --> 00:08:23.560
screen okay so that's it video

00:08:17.240 --> 00:08:23.560
card is still detected all good in the

00:08:23.720 --> 00:08:35.680
hood wow that my friends is what 40 4 cores

00:08:31.440 --> 00:08:39.599
88 threads looks

00:08:35.680 --> 00:08:41.839
like just like that stock speed of this

00:08:39.599 --> 00:08:46.200
puppy actually not much higher than the previous one in fact I think it's a

00:08:43.599 --> 00:08:51.279
touch lower but you do get architectural improvements from going from Haswell to

00:08:49.040 --> 00:08:55.839
Broadwell for the microarchitecture of the CPU

00:08:52.640 --> 00:08:58.880
itself um and let's see what that

00:08:55.839 --> 00:09:01.839
translates to so we'll fire up uh let's

00:08:58.880 --> 00:09:08.120
do C bench is our first run here cuz I guarantee

00:09:03.200 --> 00:09:10.320
you none if or almost none if any of you

00:09:08.120 --> 00:09:13.680
have ever seen a cine bench run that looks like

00:09:20.600 --> 00:09:26.760
this and

00:09:23.880 --> 00:09:32.360
done over 5,000 points 50

00:09:30.320 --> 00:09:37.839
24 unfreaking

00:09:35.040 --> 00:09:42.839
real I certainly have never seen anything like it let's run it again just

00:09:39.480 --> 00:09:42.839
cuz Hey it doesn't take very long

00:09:42.959 --> 00:09:51.839
right so CPU usage 100% across 44 cores

00:09:49.399 --> 00:10:00.160
88 threads yeah whatever no big

00:09:55.880 --> 00:10:02.560
deal but can it run crisis only one way

00:10:00.160 --> 00:10:08.640
to find out okay so while I haven't run the Benchmark yet I think I can say with

00:10:05.760 --> 00:10:14.680
a fair degree of certainty that yes yes it can because all tabbing out reveals

00:10:11.040 --> 00:10:16.640
that Crisis 3 is utilizing

00:10:14.680 --> 00:10:22.320
5.6% of this CPU six C oh sorry 6 point 6.4 is what

00:10:20.440 --> 00:10:28.200
we peaked at there well whoa how is that even

00:10:26.079 --> 00:10:32.360
possible okay it's actually using a reasonable amount of it you can see most

00:10:30.360 --> 00:10:38.839
of it's on this one random core right here but uh there are some other other

00:10:36.399 --> 00:10:45.680
cor oh and it fell back down again all right so let's do this let's run the

00:10:42.040 --> 00:10:45.680
bench can it run

00:10:55.480 --> 00:11:03.279
crisis I don't know what crisis 3's music sounds like die you can die too

00:11:00.480 --> 00:11:08.120
you can die too just jump over this thing I kind of screwed up my jump there

00:11:04.800 --> 00:11:10.760
that's okay boom so all that's left now

00:11:08.120 --> 00:11:15.480
is a bit of a wrap up yes it can play crisis it's a silly question of course

00:11:12.560 --> 00:11:20.800
it can it's got about the power of multiples of our highest end desktop

00:11:18.320 --> 00:11:25.560
processor in it but it's only really truly utilized in more multi-threaded

00:11:23.399 --> 00:11:30.360
workloads like for example cin bench that is highend 3D rendering or in a

00:11:28.360 --> 00:11:36.120
heavily virtualized environment like what I have planned for it in terms of

00:11:33.240 --> 00:11:40.680
power consumption and temperatures once again I'm impressed in spite of the 22

00:11:38.240 --> 00:11:45.000
cores under the hood our total system power consumption at idle is around 200

00:11:42.839 --> 00:11:49.800
Watts remember that includes those beefy fans over there and our load power

00:11:47.639 --> 00:11:55.279
consumption is around 500 watts with ID to 64 running Full Tilt in the

00:11:53.680 --> 00:11:59.720
background let's go ahead and pull that up and our load temperatures even with

00:11:57.560 --> 00:12:05.920
these goofy coolers I mean they're good coolers but they're not amazing is under

00:12:02.680 --> 00:12:07.399
50 degrees it does help to be able to

00:12:05.920 --> 00:12:11.279
spread out the cores when you've got lots and lots of cores you have a larger

00:12:09.360 --> 00:12:15.480
heat source so it's a little bit easier for the heat to

00:12:12.920 --> 00:12:20.040
transfer so I think that pretty much wraps it up what was the point of this

00:12:17.360 --> 00:12:24.600
video Well Point number one is holy [ __ ] that's cool Point number two is that

00:12:22.440 --> 00:12:29.880
while this is not something you're going to be running in your desktop you know

00:12:27.279 --> 00:12:35.120
now the thing to not about these kinds of Technology showcases is that all this

00:12:32.519 --> 00:12:39.760
stuff eventually does trickle down I mean remember 12 core like two and a

00:12:37.720 --> 00:12:45.440
half years ago was the topof the line for servers and now the rumor is that

00:12:43.360 --> 00:12:50.680
Broadwell e the desktop version of this is going to have a 10 Core Extreme

00:12:46.920 --> 00:12:55.000
Edition so uh there you go it's a sight

00:12:50.680 --> 00:12:57.639
of what's to come if nothing else Ting

00:12:55.000 --> 00:13:01.800
is an unusual mobile carrier one that's focused on customer service service and

00:12:59.480 --> 00:13:09.680
customer satisfaction first when you call them I'm about to blow your

00:13:05.480 --> 00:13:11.519
mind you do not speak to a robot it was

00:13:09.680 --> 00:13:15.320
pretty disconcerting the first time I did it I called and someone was like

00:13:13.160 --> 00:13:20.560
hello and I was like what Wizardry is this you actually

00:13:18.880 --> 00:13:25.600
get put through directly to a person who asks you what you want and takes care of

00:13:22.680 --> 00:13:31.079
you and you don't actually have to pay a whack ton of extra monthly fees for that

00:13:28.839 --> 00:13:36.279
service in fact the average Ting bill is only $24 per month per device well hold

00:13:34.920 --> 00:13:40.120
on a second lonus why would it be like an average bill why wouldn't they just

00:13:38.160 --> 00:13:45.240
have like contract rates because that's not the way Ting works it's all about

00:13:42.480 --> 00:13:49.800
using what you use and paying for exactly what to use so in order to find

00:13:47.680 --> 00:13:54.120
out if Ting would be better for you all you got to do is head over to lin.com

00:13:51.959 --> 00:13:58.000
LinkedIn the video description and try out their savings calculator you enter

00:13:56.199 --> 00:14:03.759
your last three bills and how much you paid for them and then your actual usage

00:14:00.759 --> 00:14:06.120
and boom Ting shows you how much you

00:14:03.759 --> 00:14:09.639
would be saving if you're stuck in a contract and you switch to Ting they'll

00:14:07.519 --> 00:14:14.800
cover 25% of your cancellation fee up to 75 bucks and if you sign up using our

00:14:12.120 --> 00:14:19.399
link you'll also get $25 in service credit or towards a new device so thanks

00:14:17.680 --> 00:14:22.000
for watching guys if you dislike this video hit the dislike button but if you

00:14:20.800 --> 00:14:26.160
liked it hit the like button get subscribed maybe consider getting a cool

00:14:24.120 --> 00:14:29.320
shirt like this one using our Amazon affiliate code to shop at Amazon if you

00:14:28.079 --> 00:14:33.680
happen to be doing anyway we got instructions up here or even contributing directly through our

00:14:31.959 --> 00:14:37.639
community Forum by answering people's questions asking your own questions or

00:14:35.720 --> 00:14:41.000
even becoming a contributor member where you get a little cool badge and all that

00:14:39.399 --> 00:14:45.639
stuff now that you're done doing all that you're probably wondering hm gee what should I watch next well maybe you

00:14:43.920 --> 00:14:50.320
should check out our Channel Super Fun video which we've got a link to up here

00:14:47.959 --> 00:14:53.079
we've got a lot of stuff that we've done recently that's awesome and a lot of

00:14:51.759 --> 00:14:59.000
stuff coming down the pipe for that channel so don't miss any of it by

00:14:55.079 --> 00:14:59.000
getting subscribed over there
