WEBVTT

00:00:02.290 --> 00:00:06.730
The Apple Studio Display brings out lots of emotions

00:00:06.730 --> 00:00:07.670
for people.

00:00:07.670 --> 00:00:10.250
It's either the screen we've all been waiting for

00:00:10.250 --> 00:00:12.990
or the biggest disappointment in technology

00:00:12.990 --> 00:00:14.270
in the past decade.

00:00:14.270 --> 00:00:16.730
The Studio Display, the Apple Studio Display.

00:00:16.730 --> 00:00:19.010
Biggest disappointment of the last 10 years.

00:00:19.010 --> 00:00:20.130
Yeah.

00:00:20.130 --> 00:00:22.610
But like many devices we've seen come from Apple

00:00:22.610 --> 00:00:23.830
over the past many years,

00:00:23.830 --> 00:00:26.290
the story is a little deeper and more annoying

00:00:26.290 --> 00:00:28.770
because those buggers in the glass circle

00:00:28.770 --> 00:00:30.670
are masters of getting you to pay more

00:00:30.670 --> 00:00:32.470
than you otherwise would want to.

00:00:32.470 --> 00:00:33.970
And damn it, you're gonna like it

00:00:33.970 --> 00:00:36.730
because it's the best monitor there is.

00:00:36.730 --> 00:00:37.610
Right.

00:00:37.610 --> 00:00:40.890
So the expectation is that this monitor is perfect,

00:00:40.890 --> 00:00:42.410
but it's not.

00:00:42.410 --> 00:00:43.790
And that's the tension.

00:00:43.790 --> 00:00:46.650
So I'm gonna show you my nitpicks about the Studio Display

00:00:46.650 --> 00:00:51.260
and a very suitable alternative not from Apple.

00:00:51.260 --> 00:00:53.020
It's like the cable's already attached.

00:00:53.020 --> 00:00:53.860
Oh, right.

00:00:53.860 --> 00:01:10.440
And then there's that.

00:01:10.440 --> 00:01:14.500
Allow me to at least briefly explain why everyone is so mad.

00:01:14.500 --> 00:01:15.920
Apple has a pretty long

00:01:15.920 --> 00:01:18.260
and storied history of making very nice,

00:01:18.260 --> 00:01:20.920
quite expensive monitors for their desktops.

00:01:20.920 --> 00:01:24.540
There's the portrait Macintosh display from the late 80s,

00:01:24.540 --> 00:01:26.960
and then the larger than you ever thought possible

00:01:26.960 --> 00:01:29.520
Apple Cinema displays through the aughts,

00:01:29.520 --> 00:01:32.760
all the way to the Pro Display XDR.

00:01:32.760 --> 00:01:36.720
32 inches, 6K resolution, mini LED contrast ratio,

00:01:36.720 --> 00:01:38.040
HDR brightness.

00:01:38.040 --> 00:01:42.260
It's five plus thousand dollar price tag was defensible,

00:01:42.260 --> 00:01:43.780
but still quite dear.

00:01:43.780 --> 00:01:45.860
Everyone else who wanted an Apple display,

00:01:45.860 --> 00:01:48.920
had to either get the 5K display built into the iMac

00:01:48.920 --> 00:01:51.020
or settle at the Apple store checkout

00:01:51.020 --> 00:01:55.100
for a $1,300 LG 5K ultra-fine display.

00:01:55.100 --> 00:01:57.520
And the display shaped hole in the Apple lineup

00:01:57.520 --> 00:01:59.900
felt like a major oversight.

00:01:59.900 --> 00:02:02.460
I already lamented about this last fall

00:02:02.460 --> 00:02:05.260
when I pitched some admittedly strange alternatives,

00:02:05.260 --> 00:02:06.960
which I will still defend,

00:02:06.960 --> 00:02:08.660
but don't worry because Apple

00:02:08.660 --> 00:02:10.840
have finally given us their answer.

00:02:10.840 --> 00:02:14.660
The $1,600 Apple Studio Display.

00:02:14.660 --> 00:02:15.760
On paper, it's what Apple has to offer.

00:02:15.760 --> 00:02:17.260
It's what I've been asking for.

00:02:17.260 --> 00:02:21.140
A new Thunderbolt display with the lauded 5K resolution

00:02:21.140 --> 00:02:24.080
in a well-built, attractive enclosure.

00:02:24.080 --> 00:02:25.880
It's certainly much more attractive

00:02:25.880 --> 00:02:28.220
than the old LG 5K ultra-fine display,

00:02:28.220 --> 00:02:30.500
which LG still sells though,

00:02:30.500 --> 00:02:32.580
no longer through the Apple store.

00:02:32.580 --> 00:02:36.220
Despite the new Studio Display being an all new product

00:02:36.220 --> 00:02:39.020
from Apple, it essentially uses the same LG panel

00:02:39.020 --> 00:02:41.460
that is found in the ultra-fine and the iMac.

00:02:41.460 --> 00:02:44.140
Though in here, it's about 100 nits brighter.

00:02:44.140 --> 00:02:44.820
That paired with the ultra-fine display,

00:02:44.820 --> 00:02:47.280
and paired with the anti-reflective coating

00:02:47.280 --> 00:02:49.280
that Apple puts on their glossy screens,

00:02:49.280 --> 00:02:51.820
means that you can place it opposite a window

00:02:51.820 --> 00:02:53.220
and never notice.

00:02:53.220 --> 00:02:56.880
It also means that nanotexture is really not worth it

00:02:56.880 --> 00:02:59.800
unless you absolutely know you need it.

00:02:59.800 --> 00:03:03.440
The 200 plus pixels per inch look nice, crisp,

00:03:03.440 --> 00:03:06.880
and is perfect for macOS, but accuracy,

00:03:07.980 --> 00:03:09.820
I still have to figure that out in another video,

00:03:09.820 --> 00:03:11.360
so subscribe if you wanna find out

00:03:11.360 --> 00:03:13.440
how to calibrate an Apple monitor.

00:03:13.440 --> 00:03:14.520
Even if it turns out to be

00:03:14.520 --> 00:03:18.140
Perfectly accurate, that should be a given at this price

00:03:18.140 --> 00:03:19.860
and not really enough to justify

00:03:19.860 --> 00:03:22.320
the $300 price increase alone.

00:03:22.320 --> 00:03:28.500
So what else is there?

00:03:28.500 --> 00:03:30.740
The new studio display has all the latest technologies

00:03:30.740 --> 00:03:33.680
fitted within a very thin package.

00:03:33.680 --> 00:03:36.280
There are the best speakers you'll ever hear

00:03:36.280 --> 00:03:37.500
built into a monitor.

00:03:37.500 --> 00:03:39.580
They're good enough that I don't think you'll need

00:03:39.580 --> 00:03:41.260
to buy another pair.

00:03:41.260 --> 00:03:43.300
Next, the webcam gets center stage,

00:03:43.300 --> 00:03:45.640
which is probably the best place for it.

00:03:45.640 --> 00:03:47.540
This is the webcam and microphone

00:03:47.540 --> 00:03:49.100
of the Apple Studio display.

00:03:49.100 --> 00:03:52.200
There is lots of commotion going on behind me,

00:03:52.200 --> 00:03:55.800
as you can see, and the center stage camera is pretty nifty.

00:03:55.800 --> 00:03:57.580
When I tested it in a Zoom call,

00:03:57.580 --> 00:04:00.180
I found that it works as good or better

00:04:00.180 --> 00:04:02.520
than any of the other webcams I tried,

00:04:02.520 --> 00:04:04.920
and that's with harsh window light.

00:04:04.920 --> 00:04:07.800
Others have not found the webcams as compelling

00:04:07.800 --> 00:04:10.640
and their screenshots do show some stark differences.

00:04:10.640 --> 00:04:12.780
There's room for improvement for sure,

00:04:12.780 --> 00:04:14.840
but after some Zoom compression,

00:04:14.840 --> 00:04:15.600
it's not really that bad.

00:04:15.600 --> 00:04:18.900
Same goes for the microphone.

00:04:18.900 --> 00:04:21.320
All of these fancy new features are enabled

00:04:21.320 --> 00:04:24.720
by an A13 powered logic board running iOS.

00:04:24.720 --> 00:04:26.180
And if that goes wrong,

00:04:26.180 --> 00:04:29.480
you can only reboot the monitor by pulling the power cord

00:04:29.480 --> 00:04:33.240
as there's no off button.

00:04:33.240 --> 00:04:35.620
And that's my thing about this monitor.

00:04:35.620 --> 00:04:38.200
Apple might think they put lots of thought into the features,

00:04:38.200 --> 00:04:40.380
but when you start zooming in on the design details,

00:04:40.380 --> 00:04:43.360
you'll find that they've received little attention.

00:04:43.360 --> 00:04:46.100
It's not actually all that innovative where it matters.

00:04:48.060 --> 00:04:51.020
The fact they were able to fit the power supply they did

00:04:51.020 --> 00:04:53.680
behind this panel is mighty impressive.

00:04:53.680 --> 00:04:55.880
It's nice too, as you don't have to deal

00:04:55.880 --> 00:04:58.040
with the giant power brick dangling somewhere.

00:04:58.040 --> 00:05:00.280
But that convenience is compromised by the fact

00:05:00.280 --> 00:05:03.880
that Apple attached a knot for you to remove cable

00:05:03.880 --> 00:05:05.580
to power the display.

00:05:05.580 --> 00:05:07.720
This was a problem they already fixed

00:05:07.720 --> 00:05:09.180
with the LED cinema display,

00:05:09.180 --> 00:05:14.210
but somehow we've regressed back to this hassle.

00:05:14.210 --> 00:05:15.350
Here's a free idea.

00:05:15.350 --> 00:05:17.910
What about powering the monitor through Thunderbolt

00:05:17.910 --> 00:05:19.450
from the Mac Studio?

00:05:19.450 --> 00:05:21.970
The USB-C standard supports enough

00:05:21.970 --> 00:05:23.850
to power a display like this.

00:05:23.850 --> 00:05:26.290
So could you imagine a single port solution

00:05:26.290 --> 00:05:28.710
like the old ADC connector?

00:05:28.710 --> 00:05:30.210
And then for laptop users,

00:05:30.210 --> 00:05:31.690
Apple could flip the script,

00:05:31.690 --> 00:05:34.150
offering an external power supply with Ethernet

00:05:34.150 --> 00:05:35.090
like the iMac,

00:05:35.090 --> 00:05:39.150
and then make the studio display the perfect hub.

00:05:39.150 --> 00:05:40.150
Speaking of hubs,

00:05:40.150 --> 00:05:42.710
while the USB hub on the back of the display

00:05:42.710 --> 00:05:45.130
now supports up to 10 gig speeds,

00:05:45.130 --> 00:05:49.130
the Thunderbolt input is in completely the wrong spot.

00:05:49.450 --> 00:05:51.990
Is it over here?

00:05:51.990 --> 00:05:53.370
With the downstream ports,

00:05:53.370 --> 00:05:56.830
it should be tucked in behind the stand with the power cord.

00:05:56.830 --> 00:06:02.180
Everything going into the monitor should go through here.

00:06:02.180 --> 00:06:06.370
Look how much better this immediately looks.

00:06:06.370 --> 00:06:09.450
The included Thunderbolt cable is also annoyingly short.

00:06:09.450 --> 00:06:11.630
That means you can't really put the Mac Studio

00:06:11.630 --> 00:06:14.790
or a MacBook on the left side of your screen.

00:06:14.790 --> 00:06:16.030
And if you have two screens,

00:06:16.030 --> 00:06:18.250
you're gonna have to put the computer

00:06:18.250 --> 00:06:19.430
in the center between them.

00:06:19.430 --> 00:06:21.110
And if you want three screens,

00:06:21.110 --> 00:06:22.590
you're gonna need to buy a longer cable,

00:06:22.590 --> 00:06:28.290
which Apple will sell to you for $130.

00:06:28.290 --> 00:06:31.760
Then there's the whole stand situation.

00:06:31.760 --> 00:06:34.340
Apple's hardware designers moved the mounting point

00:06:34.340 --> 00:06:36.260
for their modern monitor stands

00:06:36.260 --> 00:06:40.340
from here in the center down to here on the new iMac,

00:06:40.340 --> 00:06:42.400
and now this.

00:06:42.400 --> 00:06:46.240
The benefit is a smaller footprint on your desk.

00:06:46.240 --> 00:06:48.580
That's great if you're using a yellow iMac at home,

00:06:48.580 --> 00:06:51.420
but it's not great if you need more flexibility.

00:06:51.420 --> 00:06:52.120
But it's not great if you need more flexibility.

00:06:52.120 --> 00:06:54.880
The standard stand is a little low

00:06:54.880 --> 00:06:56.940
for a tall person like me.

00:06:56.940 --> 00:07:00.100
So Apple offers a height adjustable stand option,

00:07:00.100 --> 00:07:02.300
which uses the same nifty hinge design

00:07:02.300 --> 00:07:05.400
as found in the $1,000 Pro display stand.

00:07:05.400 --> 00:07:08.600
And on here, it's $400,

00:07:08.600 --> 00:07:10.300
which is a little dear when you note

00:07:10.300 --> 00:07:12.800
that the stand doesn't support rotation.

00:07:12.800 --> 00:07:16.560
Even more annoying is that thanks to all that A13 power

00:07:16.560 --> 00:07:20.280
on board, the monitor does in fact support auto rotation,

00:07:20.280 --> 00:07:21.280
which is awesome.

00:07:22.120 --> 00:07:26.470
But for that, you have to opt for the VESA mount.

00:07:26.470 --> 00:07:29.130
Generally, I wish that VESA mounts and arms

00:07:29.130 --> 00:07:30.810
would look better from behind.

00:07:30.810 --> 00:07:33.650
Here though, Apple isn't really helping things.

00:07:33.650 --> 00:07:35.650
Again, because of the mount placement,

00:07:35.650 --> 00:07:38.030
Apple had to create this stretched H pattern

00:07:38.030 --> 00:07:40.430
to move the mount point to the center.

00:07:40.430 --> 00:07:43.590
But that means now the Apple logo gets blocked.

00:07:43.590 --> 00:07:45.410
A charitable way of putting it is that

00:07:45.410 --> 00:07:47.250
it's peeking above the plate.

00:07:47.250 --> 00:07:48.740
How cute.

00:07:48.740 --> 00:07:49.580
Oh, right.

00:07:49.580 --> 00:07:52.040
And I almost forgot the worst part.

00:07:52.040 --> 00:07:53.560
You have to choose what style of monitor you want,

00:07:53.560 --> 00:07:56.000
what stand you want at the time of purchase.

00:07:56.000 --> 00:07:57.700
Because unlike previous Apple displays,

00:07:57.700 --> 00:08:00.760
this one has a non-user removable stand.

00:08:00.760 --> 00:08:03.320
Rumors exist that you can take the monitor

00:08:03.320 --> 00:08:05.420
to the Apple store and have them swap the stand,

00:08:05.420 --> 00:08:09.940
but I called and at the time of writing, you can't.

00:08:09.940 --> 00:08:13.540
Look, all I'm doing is holding the studio display

00:08:13.540 --> 00:08:16.720
up to the precedence set by its predecessors.

00:08:16.720 --> 00:08:18.900
Those had great cable management.

00:08:18.900 --> 00:08:21.720
Those had a user-friendly way to swap the stand

00:08:21.720 --> 00:08:22.700
for a VESA mount.

00:08:22.700 --> 00:08:24.300
So considering that the price

00:08:24.300 --> 00:08:29.300
has gone up well then so would the expectation and scrutiny.

00:08:29.300 --> 00:08:32.500
If this 5K monitor came out in black

00:08:32.500 --> 00:08:36.440
with the cylindrical Mac Pro in 2013 for $1,600,

00:08:36.440 --> 00:08:39.180
our collective heads would have exploded with glee.

00:08:39.180 --> 00:08:41.580
But unfortunately, the technology to transmit

00:08:41.580 --> 00:08:44.260
this amount of pixels didn't exist yet.

00:08:44.260 --> 00:08:47.840
If in 2016, this monitor had come out in space gray

00:08:47.840 --> 00:08:50.160
alongside the Touch Bar MacBook Pro

00:08:50.160 --> 00:08:53.760
instead of the LG Ultra Fine at $1,600,

00:08:53.760 --> 00:08:56.880
we would have all loved and praised it.

00:08:56.880 --> 00:09:00.080
But it's 2022 and we've already had five years

00:09:00.080 --> 00:09:03.520
of a $1,300 LG Ultra Fine display

00:09:03.520 --> 00:09:07.660
and six plus years of the $1,800 5K iMac.

00:09:07.660 --> 00:09:10.140
This is old display technology

00:09:10.140 --> 00:09:12.780
and some fancier speakers and center stage camera

00:09:12.780 --> 00:09:14.500
isn't going to make up for that

00:09:14.500 --> 00:09:18.140
or the poorly placed mounting point and Thunderbolt input.

00:09:18.140 --> 00:09:21.820
So what have other monitor makers been doing in the meantime?

00:09:21.820 --> 00:09:23.660
Well, I'll show you one of my favorites,

00:09:23.660 --> 00:09:27.700
after a word from this video's sponsor, Squarespace.

00:09:27.700 --> 00:09:30.260
These days, if you're running a business, you need a website.

00:09:30.260 --> 00:09:34.340
And by the way, I hate making websites, CSS, HTML, ugh.

00:09:34.340 --> 00:09:36.580
So Squarespace's all-in-one platform

00:09:36.580 --> 00:09:38.920
for building your business's online presence

00:09:38.920 --> 00:09:40.140
is quite appealing.

00:09:40.140 --> 00:09:42.460
You can monetize member areas,

00:09:42.460 --> 00:09:45.100
market with email campaigns and SEO tools,

00:09:45.100 --> 00:09:47.360
and track insights and analytics.

00:09:47.360 --> 00:09:48.780
Squarespace is so good,

00:09:48.780 --> 00:09:51.800
we use it here at Linus Media Group for our webpages.

00:09:51.800 --> 00:09:54.480
So head to squarespace.com slash macaddress

00:09:54.480 --> 00:10:00.210
and get 10% off today.

00:10:00.210 --> 00:10:05.340
My favorite monitor available at the moment is this,

00:10:05.340 --> 00:10:06.920
the Huawei MateView.

00:10:06.920 --> 00:10:11.140
This is a screen that is unlike any other screen you can buy.

00:10:11.140 --> 00:10:13.640
It has a three by two aspect ratio.

00:10:13.640 --> 00:10:16.380
It has truly next level industrial design

00:10:16.380 --> 00:10:18.300
that's just as height adjustable

00:10:18.300 --> 00:10:21.200
as the expensive stand option from Apple,

00:10:21.200 --> 00:10:23.480
while being just as attractive.

00:10:23.480 --> 00:10:25.500
Many people here actually mistook it.

00:10:25.500 --> 00:10:28.280
For the Apple Studio Display.

00:10:28.280 --> 00:10:30.060
It's more color accurate

00:10:30.060 --> 00:10:32.400
and almost as bright as the Studio Display

00:10:32.400 --> 00:10:35.460
while costing less than half the price.

00:10:35.460 --> 00:10:37.000
As far as value is concerned,

00:10:37.000 --> 00:10:40.180
this is a truly great monitor.

00:10:40.180 --> 00:10:42.620
But there are flaws here too.

00:10:42.620 --> 00:10:46.020
Unlike Apple, Huawei put no effort in the garnish.

00:10:46.020 --> 00:10:50.740
The speaker sounds like it came from a 2005 laptop.

00:10:50.740 --> 00:10:52.320
The built-in microphone is awful too,

00:10:52.320 --> 00:10:54.600
though there's no webcam anyway.

00:10:54.600 --> 00:10:55.600
The matte display,

00:10:55.600 --> 00:10:58.220
they finish shows way more glare

00:10:58.220 --> 00:11:00.600
than Apple's glossy screens.

00:11:00.600 --> 00:11:02.140
But perhaps the biggest flaw

00:11:02.140 --> 00:11:05.160
is the placement of the USB-C input.

00:11:05.160 --> 00:11:11.410
It's right here on the side of the stand.

00:11:11.410 --> 00:11:12.590
Why?

00:11:12.590 --> 00:11:14.290
That means it's always visible

00:11:14.290 --> 00:11:16.310
contributing to the cable clutter.

00:11:16.310 --> 00:11:20.210
And if you wanna be able to use these built-in USB-A ports,

00:11:20.210 --> 00:11:21.430
which is handy,

00:11:21.430 --> 00:11:24.910
you have to use this plug.

00:11:24.910 --> 00:11:28.330
Oh, and the last issue is that for geopolitical reasons,

00:11:28.330 --> 00:11:31.370
it's not available in the US.

00:11:31.370 --> 00:11:41.200
My fellow Canadians, it's about $900 here, which is sweet.

00:11:41.220 --> 00:11:44.580
Apple's external displays have always been quite expensive,

00:11:44.580 --> 00:11:48.400
but we accepted that for cohesive industrial design,

00:11:48.400 --> 00:11:51.520
great build quality, and advanced technology.

00:11:51.520 --> 00:11:54.420
But as the display technology got older,

00:11:54.420 --> 00:11:56.980
the prices at least became more manageable.

00:11:56.980 --> 00:12:01.040
The glorious 30-inch cinema display launched at $3,500,

00:12:01.040 --> 00:12:02.820
but was only $1,700 when it was discontinued.

00:12:02.820 --> 00:12:04.640
This continued six years later.

00:12:04.640 --> 00:12:07.780
The last Thunderbolt display, which was great, by the way,

00:12:07.780 --> 00:12:10.280
was priced at $1,000.

00:12:10.280 --> 00:12:13.360
I think the Apple Studio display costs too much.

00:12:13.360 --> 00:12:16.340
It should be 1,300 tops,

00:12:16.340 --> 00:12:18.800
especially when you consider that before,

00:12:18.800 --> 00:12:23.120
you could get an iMac with this panel for $1,800,

00:12:23.120 --> 00:12:26.040
with a whole computer for only $200 more

00:12:26.040 --> 00:12:28.190
than this monitor costs.

00:12:28.190 --> 00:12:31.350
Apple's hardware engineering has been on a righteous roll

00:12:31.350 --> 00:12:32.970
these past few years, amazing us,

00:12:32.970 --> 00:12:36.250
with fast, efficient chips we never thought possible.

00:12:36.250 --> 00:12:37.970
This has been great for their computers,

00:12:37.970 --> 00:12:40.090
but what's happened with the Studio display

00:12:40.090 --> 00:12:44.310
is that that philosophy has been applied here too,

00:12:44.310 --> 00:12:46.430
at the detriment to everything else.

00:12:46.430 --> 00:12:48.670
This is an electrically engineered product

00:12:48.670 --> 00:12:51.210
as opposed to a holistically designed product,

00:12:51.210 --> 00:12:54.630
and that really is too bad.

00:12:54.630 --> 00:12:57.050
Thanks for displaying this Mac Address.

00:12:57.050 --> 00:12:59.910
If you like my alternative pick for the Studio display,

00:12:59.910 --> 00:13:01.110
give this video a like,

00:13:01.110 --> 00:13:02.970
and if you just wanna get a Studio display,

00:13:02.970 --> 00:13:05.090
display yourself, well, you might as well subscribe.

00:13:05.090 --> 00:13:06.330
Now, I'm curious, in the comments,

00:13:06.330 --> 00:13:08.050
how important are displays to you?

00:13:08.050 --> 00:13:10.950
I think they are a monument of computing on your desk,

00:13:10.950 --> 00:13:13.130
so they should look and be nice.

00:13:13.130 --> 00:13:13.970
Do you agree?
