1
00:00:01,120 --> 00:00:06,640
what where the crap are they ah here we go

2
00:00:05,200 --> 00:00:09,840
okay this should be fine so i'm gonna go through this door backwards

3
00:00:08,400 --> 00:00:13,120
wait shoot he's behind me but where

4
00:00:12,000 --> 00:00:16,960
come on i mean like i can tell he's like behind

5
00:00:15,040 --> 00:00:21,600
me but i can't tell exactly where he is this sucks

6
00:00:18,800 --> 00:00:26,160
oh what's this surround sound and a headset heck yeah

7
00:00:23,760 --> 00:00:31,760
i can get into that hold on a minute you've still only got

8
00:00:28,640 --> 00:00:34,079
two speakers i mean is it even any good

9
00:00:31,760 --> 00:00:40,000
like surely you'd need oh so this is is full true 7.1 surround

10
00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:44,559
sound in a headset look at it look at all this there's so many drivers in here

11
00:00:42,480 --> 00:00:53,960
what is the best way to get surround sound out of a headset there's only one way to

12
00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:53,960
find out by comparing them all

13
00:00:58,399 --> 00:01:05,680
surround sound is nothing new i mean we've had quadrophonic records since the

14
00:01:02,879 --> 00:01:10,840
70s and i mean it's nothing special right just add more speakers and boom

15
00:01:08,400 --> 00:01:15,119
the sound is all around you easy

16
00:01:12,560 --> 00:01:19,840
except not really unless the audio was recorded binaurally with dual

17
00:01:17,280 --> 00:01:24,560
microphones positioned like human ears there's special processing required in

18
00:01:21,920 --> 00:01:28,080
the studio to convert the mono audio that's typically recorded in sound

19
00:01:26,159 --> 00:01:33,360
booths and movie sets or in youtube videos into stereo or

20
00:01:30,880 --> 00:01:39,520
surround and traditionally this conversion has been a highly manual and

21
00:01:36,320 --> 00:01:41,119
artistic process that locks down the

22
00:01:39,520 --> 00:01:45,439
number of audio channels that are available but

23
00:01:43,119 --> 00:01:52,159
current gen surround sound technologies like dolby atmos and dtsx get around

24
00:01:49,040 --> 00:01:55,759
this channel hard lock limitation by

25
00:01:52,159 --> 00:01:58,960
actually processing where a sound should

26
00:01:55,759 --> 00:02:01,520
be in 3d space at the studio allowing

27
00:01:58,960 --> 00:02:06,880
your receiver to take this information and then approximate that location as

28
00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:12,000
best it can using whatever speakers it has available this technology is called

29
00:02:09,759 --> 00:02:16,480
object-based surround and i'm bringing it up because it just so happens to be

30
00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:20,959
very similar to how many games have processed their audio for years so what

31
00:02:19,280 --> 00:02:26,080
nearly all of our surround sound headsets are doing is taking our game

32
00:02:23,200 --> 00:02:30,319
audio or at minimum a surround audio stream with this positional data and

33
00:02:28,640 --> 00:02:36,400
using what's called a head related transfer function or hrtf for short to

34
00:02:33,519 --> 00:02:40,800
process it in such a way as to mimic the way that your ears perceive the

35
00:02:38,480 --> 00:02:45,360
directionality of sound which is super complicated by the way and has to do

36
00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:48,480
with like the curvatures of the growths on the side of your head and like all

37
00:02:46,879 --> 00:02:54,319
that kind of stuff that's not the only way to do it though

38
00:02:51,360 --> 00:03:01,360
that's right this here is the brute force method so this headset has five

39
00:02:57,840 --> 00:03:05,200
drivers per ear to actually provide the

40
00:03:01,360 --> 00:03:07,280
front rear side center and subwoofer

41
00:03:05,200 --> 00:03:11,599
channels that you'd expect in a straight surround sound system firing directly

42
00:03:09,599 --> 00:03:17,360
into your ear balls now the question here is

43
00:03:13,760 --> 00:03:20,080
which one of these solutions is better

44
00:03:17,360 --> 00:03:25,280
hrtf based surround makes a lot of sense that is as long as your head is roughly

45
00:03:22,640 --> 00:03:32,959
the same size as the head that it was coded for and meanwhile true 7.1 methods

46
00:03:29,200 --> 00:03:35,840
like razer's tmat 7.1 are potentially

47
00:03:32,959 --> 00:03:40,400
agnostic to the shape of your head but all those extra speakers limit the

48
00:03:37,920 --> 00:03:44,080
maximum size of the individual drivers and they add weight and complexity to

49
00:03:42,879 --> 00:03:49,760
our setup besides we don't know yet if either of

50
00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:51,440
these methods actually work so without

51
00:03:49,760 --> 00:03:56,000
further ado then it's time for some science

52
00:03:54,000 --> 00:03:59,680
in order to test these headsets we're going to use overwatch thanks to its

53
00:03:57,760 --> 00:04:04,080
excellent surround mix the setup is simple load up the shooting range then grab

54
00:04:02,080 --> 00:04:07,599
soldier 76 and sprint over next to these bots that shoot periodically

55
00:04:05,840 --> 00:04:12,159
once here we'll blindfold our participant spin the viewport around

56
00:04:09,840 --> 00:04:15,200
choose a headset at random and then have the test subject point out where they

57
00:04:13,519 --> 00:04:19,759
think the shooting is coming from once that's done we'll have them take

58
00:04:17,280 --> 00:04:23,120
the mouse and blindly aim at the bots since we only care about the horizontal

59
00:04:21,440 --> 00:04:27,120
accuracy i'll adjust the vertical axis so we can measure how far away they are

60
00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:31,040
from hitting the bots rinse and repeat then it's on to the

61
00:04:29,040 --> 00:04:36,479
next victim so after tallying the results it seemed relatively random

62
00:04:34,320 --> 00:04:41,520
whether or not most of the participants picked the right direction when it came

63
00:04:38,240 --> 00:04:43,919
time to actually aim but there are at

64
00:04:41,520 --> 00:04:49,199
least a few takeaways here starting with that dolby atmos for headphones which is

65
00:04:46,479 --> 00:04:54,320
a software solution ended up with more direct hits than any other combination

66
00:04:52,639 --> 00:05:02,000
while the razer man of war came in second also the clear loser here is the razer

67
00:04:58,320 --> 00:05:04,240
tmat 7.1 where more often than not the

68
00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:09,840
target was actually completely off screen maybe there is really nothing to

69
00:05:07,039 --> 00:05:13,840
the true 7.1 thing after all now when it comes to pointing out the source of a

70
00:05:11,600 --> 00:05:20,400
sound though the best results came from the logitech g933 and the ASUS rog strix

71
00:05:17,840 --> 00:05:25,120
fusion 700 with an average variation of only six percent across all of our tests

72
00:05:23,199 --> 00:05:29,600
which is less than half of the overall average our control stereo headset sat

73
00:05:27,840 --> 00:05:33,759
at just under 12 with every other contender except for

74
00:05:31,520 --> 00:05:39,600
dolby atmos for headphones ending up being actually worse

75
00:05:36,560 --> 00:05:41,840
poor razor interestingly even with our

76
00:05:39,600 --> 00:05:45,440
admittedly small sample size it quickly became clear that the people who were

77
00:05:43,440 --> 00:05:48,880
more accustomed to headphone gaming tended to be the best at zeroing in on

78
00:05:47,520 --> 00:05:53,039
where they thought a sound was coming from which makes sense given the

79
00:05:50,880 --> 00:05:57,759
sweeping pattern they employ while ironically enough everybody else seemed

80
00:05:55,600 --> 00:06:01,360
to have better results when pointing out the initial direction perhaps as a

81
00:05:59,919 --> 00:06:05,680
result of the gamers being very accustomed to their own setups

82
00:06:03,600 --> 00:06:11,360
it's hard to say for certain for now though let's get back to the question at

83
00:06:07,520 --> 00:06:15,039
hand are surround gaming headphones bs

84
00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:16,160
according to our testing the answer is

85
00:06:15,039 --> 00:06:20,479
mostly with the exception of ASUS proprietary

86
00:06:18,400 --> 00:06:25,120
solution the most successful things we tried were all either dolby or dts based

87
00:06:24,240 --> 00:06:30,639
so done in software which tells me that

88
00:06:27,759 --> 00:06:36,319
there really is no such thing as a good surround gaming headset i mean ASUS

89
00:06:33,759 --> 00:06:40,639
comes with rog motherboards and you can even buy dolby atmos for headphones on

90
00:06:38,720 --> 00:06:45,759
the Windows store with a dts option coming soon and those can be applied to

91
00:06:43,520 --> 00:06:50,720
any stereo headphones which means that the real answer is something that

92
00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:54,639
many of you probably already knew if you want the best gaming audio then you just

93
00:06:53,840 --> 00:07:00,000
get good audio there's no such thing as

94
00:06:57,039 --> 00:07:04,000
gaming headphones just good headphones paired with the processing solution that

95
00:07:02,000 --> 00:07:07,919
works best for you and the good news about that is that these software

96
00:07:05,840 --> 00:07:12,560
solutions actually tend to have free trials or in razer's case are even

97
00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:16,960
actually free outright so then with audio being such a subjective experience

98
00:07:15,039 --> 00:07:20,960
it's on you guys to try it out with your own headphones and your own ears and

99
00:07:19,199 --> 00:07:24,560
find your sweet spot so thanks for watching guys if you disliked this video

100
00:07:23,199 --> 00:07:28,960
you can hit that button but if you liked it hit like get subscribed or maybe consider checking out where to buy the

101
00:07:27,280 --> 00:07:32,400
stuff we featured at the link in the video description also down there is our

102
00:07:30,880 --> 00:07:38,080
merch store which has cool shirts like this one and our community forum which

103
00:07:34,479 --> 00:07:38,080
you should totally join